InjuriesNCT03468569
Functional Movement Analysis of Handball Players
A study testing Functional Movement Screen in people with Injuries and Sports Physical Therapy, run by Medipol University.
Trial summary
RELATIONSHIP OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS WITH INJURY HISTORY AND ATHLETIC PARAMETERS IN HANDBALL ATHLETES Abstract Objectives: Handball is a popular sport in many countries. There is lack of knowledge about handball athlete's functional movement capacity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Injuries, Sports Physical Therapy
- What is being tested?
- Functional Movement Screen
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 51 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2016to 18 May 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 35 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Become a team licensed handball athlete between ages 16-35
- Have not had a surgical operation involving the musculoskeletal system in the last six months
- Not having an obstacle to the realization of the tests to be carried out in the study
- Volunteering to participate in the work
Who cannot join
- If feeling any discomfort during the tests
- Do not want to go on study
About this study
Official title: Relationship of Functional Movement Analysis With Injury History and Athletic Parameters In Handball Athletes
RELATIONSHIP OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS WITH INJURY HISTORY AND ATHLETIC PARAMETERS IN HANDBALL ATHLETES
Abstract Objectives: Handball is a popular sport in many countries. There is lack of knowledge about handball athlete's functional movement capacity. The aim of this study is to investigate the Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) scores, to evaluate the injury risks of handball athletes and to determine its relationship with athletic performance.
Design: Observational study. Methods: A total of 51 professional handball players in Turkey were included in this study. The sport-specific features and demographic data were recorded. The functional movement analysis was performed and agility and balance and force were evaluated.
Read the detailed description
In august 2018, same evaluations will be done for same individuals.
- Conditions
- Injuries, Sports Physical Therapy
- Being tested
- Functional Movement Screen
- Keywords
- Athletic Performance, Functional Movement Screen, Handball Athletes, Injury Prevention, Injury History
- Medical subject headings
- Wounds and Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Functional Movement ScreenOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Movement Screen | Experimental | Movement Analysis for injury risk Receives: Other: Functional Movement Screen |
| Vertical Jump Test | Experimental | Jump test Height Measurement, Functional Movement Screen Receives: Other: Functional Movement Screen |
| Y Balance Test | Experimental | Functional lower extremity reach with balance, Functional Movement Screen Receives: Other: Functional Movement Screen |
| Illinois Agility Test | Experimental | Agility measurement, Functional Movement Screen Receives: Other: Functional Movement Screen |
| Injury History | No intervention | Athletes injury history for last year was recorded as injury count. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Functional Movement Screen Assessment (FMS)
0-21 (It has 7 subtests, and minimum 0 and maximum 3 is given for scoring.) Higher scores are better. For bilateral subtests, scoring is performed for both sides, and scoring is given according to lower side. ( Example; Right 2, Left 1 so 1 point score is given for that parameter. At last, all 7 scores summed for total score(0/21).
Measured: 20 minutes
Secondary outcomes (3)
Vertical Jump Test
Inches, Higher scores are better.
Measured: 5 minutes
Y Balance Test
Functional Reach Measurement, higher scores are better.
Measured: 10 minutes
Illinois Agility Test
Agility Measurement, Lower scores are better.
Measured: 2 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Mar 2018
- Study start1 Aug 2016
- Primary completion18 May 2017
- Study completion18 May 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medipol University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Emre Serdar Vayvay, Medipol University
- Investigators
- Devrim Tarakcı, PhD, Principal investigator, Medipol UniversityEmre Serdar Vayvay, PhD, Study director, Medipol UniversityCandan Algun, PhD,Prof, Study chair, Medipol University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03468569
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10840098-604.01.01-E.13036
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006 May;1(2):62-72.
PubMed 21522216Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 2. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Aug;1(3):132-9.
PubMed 21522225Plisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Elkins B. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;4(2):92-9.
PubMed 21509114Hachana Y, Chaabene H, Nabli MA, Attia A, Moualhi J, Farhat N, Elloumi M. Test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and minimal detectable change of the Illinois agility test in male team sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Oct;27(10):2752-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182890ac3.
PubMed 23439329Raya MA, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, Jayne DM, Campbell SM, Gagne E, Manrique PG, Muller DG, Tucker C. Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(7):951-60. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.05.0096.
PubMed 24301432Carlock JM, Smith SL, Hartman MJ, Morris RT, Ciroslan DA, Pierce KC, Newton RU, Harman EA, Sands WA, Stone MH. The relationship between vertical jump power estimates and weightlifting ability: a field-test approach. J Strength Cond Res. 2004 Aug;18(3):534-9. doi: 10.1519/R-13213.1.
PubMed 15320676Atalay ES, Tarakci D, Algun C. Are the functional movement analysis scores of handball players related to athletic parameters? J Exerc Rehabil. 2018 Dec 27;14(6):954-959. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836372.186. eCollection 2018 Dec.
PubMed 30656154
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Relationship of Functional Movement Analysis With Injury History and Athletic Parameters In Handball Athletes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03468569
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 10840098-604.01.01-E.13036
- Conditions
- Injuries, Sports Physical Therapy
- Keywords
- Athletic Performance, Functional Movement Screen, Handball Athletes, Injury Prevention, Injury History
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medipol UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RELATIONSHIP OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS WITH INJURY HISTORY AND ATHLETIC PARAMETERS IN HANDBALL ATHLETES
Abstract Objectives: Handball is a popular sport in many countries. There is lack of knowledge about handball athlete's functional movement capacity. The aim of this study is to investigate the Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) scores, to evaluate the injury risks of handball athletes and to determine its relationship with athletic performance.
Design: Observational study. Methods: A total of 51 professional handball players in Turkey were included in this study. The sport-specific features and demographic data were recorded. The functional movement analysis was performed and agility and balance and force were evaluated.
Detailed description
In august 2018, same evaluations will be done for same individuals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Movement Screen | Experimental | Other: Functional Movement ScreenMovement Analysis for injury risk |
| Vertical Jump Test | Experimental | Other: Functional Movement ScreenJump test Height Measurement, Functional Movement Screen |
| Y Balance Test | Experimental | Other: Functional Movement ScreenFunctional lower extremity reach with balance, Functional Movement Screen |
| Illinois Agility Test | Experimental | Other: Functional Movement ScreenAgility measurement, Functional Movement Screen |
| Injury History | No intervention | –Athletes injury history for last year was recorded as injury count. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Become a team licensed handball athlete between ages 16-35
- Have not had a surgical operation involving the musculoskeletal system in the last six months
- Not having an obstacle to the realization of the tests to be carried out in the study
- Volunteering to participate in the work
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- If feeling any discomfort during the tests
- Do not want to go on study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Movement Screen | Other | Functional Movement Screen, Illinois Agility Test, Vertical Jump Test, Y Balance Test |
Primary outcome
Functional Movement Screen Assessment (FMS)
Time frame: 20 minutes
0-21 (It has 7 subtests, and minimum 0 and maximum 3 is given for scoring.) Higher scores are better. For bilateral subtests, scoring is performed for both sides, and scoring is given according to lower side. ( Example; Right 2, Left 1 so 1 point score is given for that parameter. At last, all 7 scores summed for total score(0/21).
3 secondary outcomes
Vertical Jump Test
Time frame: 5 minutes
Y Balance Test
Time frame: 10 minutes
Illinois Agility Test
Time frame: 2 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2018.
- Background: PubMed 21522216Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006 May;1(2):62-72.
- Background: PubMed 21522225Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 2. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Aug;1(3):132-9.
- Background: PubMed 21509114Plisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Elkins B. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;4(2):92-9.
- Background: PubMed 23439329Hachana Y, Chaabene H, Nabli MA, Attia A, Moualhi J, Farhat N, Elloumi M. Test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and minimal detectable change of the Illinois agility test in male team sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Oct;27(10):2752-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182890ac3.
- Background: PubMed 24301432Raya MA, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, Jayne DM, Campbell SM, Gagne E, Manrique PG, Muller DG, Tucker C. Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(7):951-60. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.05.0096.
- Background: PubMed 15320676Carlock JM, Smith SL, Hartman MJ, Morris RT, Ciroslan DA, Pierce KC, Newton RU, Harman EA, Sands WA, Stone MH. The relationship between vertical jump power estimates and weightlifting ability: a field-test approach. J Strength Cond Res. 2004 Aug;18(3):534-9. doi: 10.1519/R-13213.1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30656154Atalay ES, Tarakci D, Algun C. Are the functional movement analysis scores of handball players related to athletic parameters? J Exerc Rehabil. 2018 Dec 27;14(6):954-959. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836372.186. eCollection 2018 Dec.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Injuries
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Arterial Stiffness During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Abdominal Wall Wounds
Postoperative Abdominal Wall Wound Complications, Surgical Wound Infection
RecruitingPhase 4
Effect of a Furosemide Stress Test-Guided Strategy on Liberation From Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury
Acute Kidney Injury
Recruiting
Implant for Walking After Incomplete SCI
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Gait
Recruiting
Lateral Ankle Treatment
Avulsion Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Alloy Scaffold With Controlled Degradation for Periarticular Bone Defects
Periarticular Bone Defect, Proximal Humerus Fracture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Devrim Tarakcı, PhD principal investigator
Medipol University
Emre Serdar Vayvay, PhD study director
Medipol University
Candan Algun, PhD,Prof study chair
Medipol University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Functional Movement Screen in people with Injuries and Sports Physical Therapy, run by Medipol University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Functional Movement Screen Assessment (FMS) (time frame: 20 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03468569, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2018.