AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT03468946

Investigation of the Relationship Between Taste Perception and Caries Activity in School Children

A study testing salty taste perception, bitter taste perception and sour taste perception in people with Healthy, run by University of Beykent.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Four basic taste perceptions and relationship with caries are poorly investigated in children as compared to adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate salty, sweet, bitter and sour taste perceptions of school children and compare them with demographic, clinical, microbiologic and biochemical caries-risk factors. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 13 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
salty taste perception, bitter taste perception and sour taste perception
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
2 May 2013to Dec 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 13 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • without any chronic disease such as diabetes and being ASA I or ASA II. We only included patients who had no antibiotics and drug intake within the last month.

Who cannot join

  • chronic disease ASA III, IV antibiotic and drug intake within the last month

About this study

Four basic taste perceptions and relationship with caries are poorly investigated in children as compared to adults.

The aim of this study was to evaluate salty, sweet, bitter and sour taste perceptions of school children and compare them with demographic, clinical, microbiologic and biochemical caries-risk factors.

Read the detailed description

Study design

  1. Caries risk assessment The investigators developed a questionnaire to understand the patient's overall health status, to collect demographic and socio-economic information, to assess their oral health habits. The questionnaire consists of 3 parts; first part includes questions about general health such as chronic diseases, drugs and allergies, second part includes questions about income and education level of parents, and last part includes questions about oral health knowledge, habits, diet contents and frequency, fluoride exposure. the investigators allowed the parents to fill the questionnaire. After the questionnaire was filled, the investigators performed the oral examination using DMFT, DMFS, dft and dfs indices according to WHO. Then, the investigators determined the oral hygiene status with Sillness\&Löe Index (Silness ve Loe, 1964). the investigators estimated paraffin-stimulated salivary flow rate, buffer capacity, mutans streptococci and lactobacilli counts using CRT chairside kits (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). In addition to initial questionnaire and oral examination, the investigators asked the patients to record their nutritional takings of 2 weekdays and 1 weekend day. the investigators estimated the caries risk profiles of all children using the Cariogram which is a computer-based program. Cariogram identifies three risk groups low, medium and high caries risk according the scores.
  2. Taste evaluation the investigators prepared aqueous basic taste solutions of sucrose (Merck, Germany, purity >99.5%), sodium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich, USA, purity >99%), caffeine (Merck, Germany, purity >99.5%), citric acid monohydrate (Sigma-Aldrich, USA, purity >99%), at two levels (1.0 ISO, 2.0 ISO) (ISO 3972:1991, 8586-1:1993) (Table 1). the investigators formulated all the solutions by using spring water in the same day of measurement at room temperature (25 ± 2°C). Each solution was coded randomly.
Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
salty taste perception, bitter taste perception, sour taste perception, sweet taste perception
Keywords
taste perception, caries risk, cariogram, children

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • salty taste perceptionOther

    Also called sodium chloride, Sigma-Aldrich, USA, RIEDEL SK.S.314

    salty taste perception in high caries risk, medium caries risk, low caries risk.

    The aim of this study was to evaluate salty taste perceptions of school children and compare them with demographic, clinical, microbiologic and biochemical caries-risk factors(high caries risk, medium caries risk, low risk ).

  • bitter taste perceptionOther

    Also called caffeine, Merck, Germany, MERCK 102584

    bitter taste perception in high caries risk, medium caries risk, low caries risk.

    The aim of this study was to evaluate bitter taste perceptions of school children and compare them with demographic, clinical, microbiologic and biochemical caries-risk factors (high caries risk, medium caries risk, low risk ).

  • sour taste perceptionOther

    Also called citric acid, Sigma-Aldrich, USA, RIEDEL SK.R.2 7102

    sour taste perception in high caries risk, medium caries risk, low caries risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate sour taste perceptions of school children and compare them with demographic, clinical, microbiologic and biochemical caries-risk factors (high caries risk, medium caries risk, low risk ).

  • sweet taste perceptionOther

    Also called sucrose, Merck, Germany, MERCK 1.07651.1 000

    sweet taste perception in high caries risk, medium caries risk, low caries risk.

    The aim of this study was to evaluate sweet taste perceptions of school children and compare them with demographic, clinical, microbiologic and biochemical caries-risk factors (high caries risk, medium caries risk, low risk ).

Study groups in NCT03468946
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
high caries riskOtherchildren with high caries -identified by cariogram to evaluate sweet taste perception, salty taste perception, sour taste perception and bitter taste perception of school children and compare them with demographic, clinical, microbiologic and biochemical caries-risk factors.
Receives: Other: salty taste perception; Other: bitter taste perception; Other: sour taste perception; Other: sweet taste perception
medium caries riskOtherchildren with medium caries- identified by cariogram to evaluate sweet taste perception, salty taste perception, sour taste perception and bitter taste perception of school children and compare them with demographic, clinical, microbiologic and biochemical caries-risk factors.
Receives: Other: salty taste perception; Other: bitter taste perception; Other: sour taste perception; Other: sweet taste perception
low riskOtherno caries or low risk- identified by cariogram to evaluate sweet taste perception, salty taste perception, sour taste perception and bitter taste perception of school children and compare them with demographic, clinical, microbiologic and biochemical caries-risk factors.
Receives: Other: salty taste perception; Other: bitter taste perception; Other: sour taste perception; Other: sweet taste perception

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. DMFT, DMFS, dft and dfs indices

    DMFT, DMFS, dft and dfs indices are total counts of decayed, missing, filled teeth / DMFT, Plaque index, Salivary flow rate, buffer capacity, mutans streptococci and lactobacilli counts are combined to report caries risk in high/medium/low caries risk

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Sillness&Löe Index

    Sillness\&Löe index in total amount of dental plaque on the teeth. /DMFT, Plaque index, Salivary flow rate, buffer capacity, mutans streptococci and lactobacilli counts are combined to report caries risk in high/medium/low caries risk

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Salivary flow rate

    Salivary flow rate in ml/minute

    Measured: 1 year

  3. buffer capacity

    buffer capacity in pH / DMFT, Plaque index, Salivary flow rate, buffer capacity, mutans streptococci

    Measured: 1 year

  4. mutans streptococci and lactobacilli counts

    mutans streptococci and lactobacilli counts in cfu/ml / DMFT, Plaque index, Salivary flow

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Mar 2018
  2. Study start2 May 2013
  3. Primary completionMay 2014
  4. Study completionDec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03468946
Sponsor's protocol ID
SAG-C-DRP-090414-0077
Status last verified
Mar 2018
First submitted
19 Feb 2018
Last updated
19 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing salty taste perception, bitter taste perception and sour taste perception in people with Healthy, run by University of Beykent.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

DMFT, DMFS, dft and dfs indices (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in