Critically Ill PatientsNCT03469882
High Protein Intake and Early Exercise in Adult Intensive Care Patients
A study testing High protein nutrition and Cycle ergometry exercise in people with Critically Ill Patients, run by Hospital Sao Domingos at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
This study analyse the impact of high protein intake associated to early programed exercise on functional outcomes of adult intensive care patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Critically Ill Patients
- What is being tested?
- High protein nutrition and Cycle ergometry exercise
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2018to 31 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- We will include 180 consecutive patients admitted to one of the study ICUs
- Aged 18 years or above.
- Non-pregnant.
- Requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours.
- Expected ICU stay higher than 3 days.
Who cannot join
- Inability to walk without assistance before the acute illness that led to ICU admission (use of gait aid is not an exclusion criterion).
- Cognitive impairment prior to hospitalization described by relatives and evaluated by the ICU psychology team.
- Neuromuscular diseases that compromise weaning from mechanical ventilation.
- Acute pelvic fracture.
- Unstable spinal cord trauma.
- Patients considered moribund.
Show all 13Show fewer
- In some situations patients will not be included in the resistive exercise program for as long as a temporary limiting factor remains:
- Patients undergoing neuromuscular blocking drugs.
- Patients under high-dose vasoactive drug use.
- Mechanical ventilation with FIO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) ≥ 60% and / or PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure)> 12 cm H2O.
- Intracranial hypertension.
- . Open abdomen.
- Status epilepticus.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: High Protein Intake and Early Exercise in Adult Intensive Care Patients: Impact on Functional Outcomes. A Randomized Controlled Phase II Trial.
This study analyse the impact of high protein intake associated to early programed exercise on functional outcomes of adult intensive care patients.
Read the detailed description
The muscle weakness associated to intensive care, one of the components of Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) has a significant impact on the short-term and long-term outcomes in the critically ill patient (1, 2). Puthucheary et al. (3) analyzed 63 septic patients with imaging examination and established a clear relationship between the number of organ failures and muscle loss in the first 10 days of ICU. Although a study involving 244 critically ill patients has shown an alarming relationship between reduced muscle mass at admission and mortality (4), evidences that nutritional interventions can attenuate muscle loss and result in improvement in outcome are unclear. Recent studies evaluating the impact of nutritional therapy on clinical outcomes have surprisingly demonstrated that patients who received full nutritional intake did not differ in outcomes when compared to those receiving reduced nutritional intake, the so-called permissive underfeeding (5, 6, 7). Careful analysis of these studies, however, reveals that the authors define hyponutrition as synonymous with reduced calorie intake, without mentioning the protein intake offered to the patients. The study with the greatest scientific repercussion (8) used reduced caloric intake in the study group, but the protein intake did not differ between groups. Observational studies comparing high protein intake with conventional intake have shown improvement in outcome indicators in patients receiving more than 1.6 and even more than 2.0 g / kg / day of protein (9, 10). Recently the intensive care medicine research agenda published in the journal of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the top priority of the nutrition research in the critically ill patients was to compare normal and hyperproteic nutrition ideally associated with physical activity (11). Several recent studies have shown benefits of early physical rehabilitation in the critically ill patient (12, 13).
The optimal integration between adequate protein intake and exercise in the critically ill patient may have an impact on short- and long-term outcomes, but this hypothesis has not yet been tested by studies with a good methodology. The hypothesis of this prospective randomized phase II study is that the association of high protein intake with early physical rehabilitation improves physical function after hospital discharge with a significant impact on quality of life.
- Conditions
- Critically Ill Patients
- Being tested
- High protein nutrition, Cycle ergometry exercise, Usual care group
- Keywords
- Protein, exercise, critical illness, outcome,
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity, Critical Illness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High protein nutritionDietary supplement
Patients in the HPE group will be submitted to nutritional support preferably through the enteral route. Energy expenditure will be determined by indirect calorimetry. They will receive 2.0 to 2.2 grams/kg/day of protein.
Cycle ergometry exerciseDevice
Patients will be submitted to two daily sessions of exercise (cycle ergometry) 15 minutes duration each, during the 7 days of the week. The intervention will be maintained exclusively duting the patient's stay in the ICU. The cycle ergometer will be the MotoMed Letto II (Reck Technik, Germany).
Usual care groupOther
Also called No intervention
Participants randomized to the usual care group will receive usual care protein and exercise.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High protein and exercise (HPE) group | Experimental | Begining within 48 hours of ICU admission participants will receive nutrition support with energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry, 2.0 to 2.2 g/kg/day of protein and in-bed cycle ergometry exercise. Receives: Dietary Supplement: High protein nutrition; Device: Cycle ergometry exercise |
| Usual care group | Other | Participants randomized to the usual care group will receive usual care protein and exercise Receives: Other: Usual care group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Physical component summary (PCS) 3 months after randomization
Blind assessment of PCS after 3 months after randomization
Measured: 3 months after randomization
Physical component summary (PCS) 6 months after randomization
Blind assessment of PCS after 6 months after randomization
Measured: 6 months after randomization
Secondary outcomes (4)
handgrip strength
handgrip strength measured at ICU discharge,
Measured: 20 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Length of time under mechanical ventilation
Measured: 20 days
Length of ICU stay
Length of ICU stay
Measured: 20 days
Hospital mortality
Hospital mortality
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Mar 2018
- Study start1 Jun 2018
- Primary completion31 Dec 2019
- Study completion31 Jul 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Critically Ill PatientsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Sao Domingos
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, José Raimundo Araujo de Azevedo, Hospital Sao Domingos
- Investigators
- WIDLANI s MONTENEGRO, RN, Ms, Study director, Hospital Sao Domingos
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03469882
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ICUHSD 03/18
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kress JP, Hall JB. ICU-acquired weakness and recovery from critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 24;370(17):1626-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1209390. No abstract available.
PubMed 24758618Fan E, Dowdy DW, Colantuoni E, Mendez-Tellez PA, Sevransky JE, Shanholtz C, Himmelfarb CR, Desai SV, Ciesla N, Herridge MS, Pronovost PJ, Needham DM. Physical complications in acute lung injury survivors: a two-year longitudinal prospective study. Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):849-59. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000040.
PubMed 24247473Puthucheary ZA, Rawal J, McPhail M, Connolly B, Ratnayake G, Chan P, Hopkinson NS, Phadke R, Dew T, Sidhu PS, Velloso C, Seymour J, Agley CC, Selby A, Limb M, Edwards LM, Smith K, Rowlerson A, Rennie MJ, Moxham J, Harridge SD, Hart N, Montgomery HE. Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness. JAMA. 2013 Oct 16;310(15):1591-600. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278481.
PubMed 24108501Hermans G, Van Mechelen H, Clerckx B, Vanhullebusch T, Mesotten D, Wilmer A, Casaer MP, Meersseman P, Debaveye Y, Van Cromphaut S, Wouters PJ, Gosselink R, Van den Berghe G. Acute outcomes and 1-year mortality of intensive care unit-acquired weakness. A cohort study and propensity-matched analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 15;190(4):410-20. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201312-2257OC.
PubMed 24825371National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network; Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, Steingrub J, Hite RD, Moss M, Morris A, Dong N, Rock P. Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial. JAMA. 2012 Feb 22;307(8):795-803. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.137. Epub 2012 Feb 5.
PubMed 22307571Doig GS, Simpson F, Sweetman EA, Finfer SR, Cooper DJ, Heighes PT, Davies AR, O'Leary M, Solano T, Peake S; Early PN Investigators of the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Early parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2013 May 22;309(20):2130-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.5124.
PubMed 23689848Harvey SE, Parrott F, Harrison DA, Bear DE, Segaran E, Beale R, Bellingan G, Leonard R, Mythen MG, Rowan KM; CALORIES Trial Investigators. Trial of the route of early nutritional support in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 30;371(18):1673-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409860. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
PubMed 25271389Arabi YM, Aldawood AS, Haddad SH, Al-Dorzi HM, Tamim HM, Jones G, Mehta S, McIntyre L, Solaiman O, Sakkijha MH, Sadat M, Afesh L; PermiT Trial Group. Permissive Underfeeding or Standard Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 18;372(25):2398-408. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1502826. Epub 2015 May 20.
PubMed 25992505Allingstrup MJ, Esmailzadeh N, Wilkens Knudsen A, Espersen K, Hartvig Jensen T, Wiis J, Perner A, Kondrup J. Provision of protein and energy in relation to measured requirements in intensive care patients. Clin Nutr. 2012 Aug;31(4):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.12.006. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
PubMed 22209678Nicolo M, Heyland DK, Chittams J, Sammarco T, Compher C. Clinical Outcomes Related to Protein Delivery in a Critically Ill Population: A Multicenter, Multinational Observation Study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Jan;40(1):45-51. doi: 10.1177/0148607115583675. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
PubMed 25900319Arabi YM, Casaer MP, Chapman M, Heyland DK, Ichai C, Marik PE, Martindale RG, McClave SA, Preiser JC, Reignier J, Rice TW, Van den Berghe G, van Zanten ARH, Weijs PJM. The intensive care medicine research agenda in nutrition and metabolism. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Sep;43(9):1239-1256. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4711-6. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
PubMed 28374096Burtin C, Clerckx B, Robbeets C, Ferdinande P, Langer D, Troosters T, Hermans G, Decramer M, Gosselink R. Early exercise in critically ill patients enhances short-term functional recovery. Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2499-505. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a38937.
PubMed 19623052Gruther W, Pieber K, Steiner I, Hein C, Hiesmayr JM, Paternostro-Sluga T. Can Early Rehabilitation on the General Ward After an Intensive Care Unit Stay Reduce Hospital Length of Stay in Survivors of Critical Illness?: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Sep;96(9):607-615. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000718.
PubMed 28181920Chrispin PS, Scotton H, Rogers J, Lloyd D, Ridley SA. Short Form 36 in the intensive care unit: assessment of acceptability, reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Anaesthesia. 1997 Jan;52(1):15-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.015-az014.x.
PubMed 9014540Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meirão 1, Quaresma MR. Brazilian-portuguese version of the SF-36. A reliable and valid quality of life outcome measure. Rev Bras Reumatologia. 1999; 39 (3): 143-50.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- High Protein Intake and Early Exercise in Adult Intensive Care Patients: Impact on Functional Outcomes. A Randomized Controlled Phase II Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03469882
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ICUHSD 03/18
- Conditions
- Critically Ill Patients
- Keywords
- Protein, exercise, critical illness, outcome,
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Sao DomingosUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study analyse the impact of high protein intake associated to early programed exercise on functional outcomes of adult intensive care patients.
Detailed description
The muscle weakness associated to intensive care, one of the components of Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) has a significant impact on the short-term and long-term outcomes in the critically ill patient (1, 2). Puthucheary et al. (3) analyzed 63 septic patients with imaging examination and established a clear relationship between the number of organ failures and muscle loss in the first 10 days of ICU. Although a study involving 244 critically ill patients has shown an alarming relationship between reduced muscle mass at admission and mortality (4), evidences that nutritional interventions can attenuate muscle loss and result in improvement in outcome are unclear. Recent studies evaluating the impact of nutritional therapy on clinical outcomes have surprisingly demonstrated that patients who received full nutritional intake did not differ in outcomes when compared to those receiving reduced nutritional intake, the so-called permissive underfeeding (5, 6, 7). Careful analysis of these studies, however, reveals that the authors define hyponutrition as synonymous with reduced calorie intake, without mentioning the protein intake offered to the patients. The study with the greatest scientific repercussion (8) used reduced caloric intake in the study group, but the protein intake did not differ between groups. Observational studies comparing high protein intake with conventional intake have shown improvement in outcome indicators in patients receiving more than 1.6 and even more than 2.0 g / kg / day of protein (9, 10). Recently the intensive care medicine research agenda published in the journal of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the top priority of the nutrition research in the critically ill patients was to compare normal and hyperproteic nutrition ideally associated with physical activity (11). Several recent studies have shown benefits of early physical rehabilitation in the critically ill patient (12, 13).
The optimal integration between adequate protein intake and exercise in the critically ill patient may have an impact on short- and long-term outcomes, but this hypothesis has not yet been tested by studies with a good methodology. The hypothesis of this prospective randomized phase II study is that the association of high protein intake with early physical rehabilitation improves physical function after hospital discharge with a significant impact on quality of life.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High protein and exercise (HPE) group | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: High protein nutrition, Device: Cycle ergometry exerciseBegining within 48 hours of ICU admission participants will receive nutrition support with energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry, 2.0 to 2.2 g/kg/day of protein and in-bed cycle ergometry exercise. |
| Usual care group | Other | Other: Usual care groupParticipants randomized to the usual care group will receive usual care protein and exercise |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- We will include 180 consecutive patients admitted to one of the study ICUs
- Aged 18 years or above.
- Non-pregnant.
- Requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours.
- Expected ICU stay higher than 3 days.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Inability to walk without assistance before the acute illness that led to ICU admission (use of gait aid is not an exclusion criterion).
- Cognitive impairment prior to hospitalization described by relatives and evaluated by the ICU psychology team.
- Neuromuscular diseases that compromise weaning from mechanical ventilation.
- Acute pelvic fracture.
- Unstable spinal cord trauma.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High protein nutritionPatients in the HPE group will be submitted to nutritional support preferably through the enteral route. Energy expenditure will be determined by indirect calorimetry. They will receive 2.0 to 2.2 grams/kg/day of protein. | Dietary supplement | High protein and exercise (HPE) group |
| Cycle ergometry exercisePatients will be submitted to two daily sessions of exercise (cycle ergometry) 15 minutes duration each, during the 7 days of the week. The intervention will be maintained exclusively duting the patient's stay in the ICU. The cycle ergometer will be the MotoMed Letto II (Reck Technik, Germany). | Device | High protein and exercise (HPE) group |
| Usual care groupAlso: No interventionParticipants randomized to the usual care group will receive usual care protein and exercise. | Other | Usual care group |
Primary outcome
Physical component summary (PCS) 3 months after randomization
Time frame: 3 months after randomization
Blind assessment of PCS after 3 months after randomization
Physical component summary (PCS) 6 months after randomization
Time frame: 6 months after randomization
Blind assessment of PCS after 6 months after randomization
4 secondary outcomes
handgrip strength
Time frame: 20 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 20 days
Length of ICU stay
Time frame: 20 days
Hospital mortality
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2021.
- Background: PubMed 24758618Kress JP, Hall JB. ICU-acquired weakness and recovery from critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 24;370(17):1626-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1209390. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24247473Fan E, Dowdy DW, Colantuoni E, Mendez-Tellez PA, Sevransky JE, Shanholtz C, Himmelfarb CR, Desai SV, Ciesla N, Herridge MS, Pronovost PJ, Needham DM. Physical complications in acute lung injury survivors: a two-year longitudinal prospective study. Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):849-59. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000040.
- Background: PubMed 24108501Puthucheary ZA, Rawal J, McPhail M, Connolly B, Ratnayake G, Chan P, Hopkinson NS, Phadke R, Dew T, Sidhu PS, Velloso C, Seymour J, Agley CC, Selby A, Limb M, Edwards LM, Smith K, Rowlerson A, Rennie MJ, Moxham J, Harridge SD, Hart N, Montgomery HE. Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness. JAMA. 2013 Oct 16;310(15):1591-600. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278481.
- Background: PubMed 24825371Hermans G, Van Mechelen H, Clerckx B, Vanhullebusch T, Mesotten D, Wilmer A, Casaer MP, Meersseman P, Debaveye Y, Van Cromphaut S, Wouters PJ, Gosselink R, Van den Berghe G. Acute outcomes and 1-year mortality of intensive care unit-acquired weakness. A cohort study and propensity-matched analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 15;190(4):410-20. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201312-2257OC.
- Background: PubMed 22307571National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network; Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, Steingrub J, Hite RD, Moss M, Morris A, Dong N, Rock P. Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial. JAMA. 2012 Feb 22;307(8):795-803. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.137. Epub 2012 Feb 5.
- Background: PubMed 23689848Doig GS, Simpson F, Sweetman EA, Finfer SR, Cooper DJ, Heighes PT, Davies AR, O'Leary M, Solano T, Peake S; Early PN Investigators of the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Early parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2013 May 22;309(20):2130-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.5124.
- Background: PubMed 25271389Harvey SE, Parrott F, Harrison DA, Bear DE, Segaran E, Beale R, Bellingan G, Leonard R, Mythen MG, Rowan KM; CALORIES Trial Investigators. Trial of the route of early nutritional support in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 30;371(18):1673-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409860. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
- Background: PubMed 25992505Arabi YM, Aldawood AS, Haddad SH, Al-Dorzi HM, Tamim HM, Jones G, Mehta S, McIntyre L, Solaiman O, Sakkijha MH, Sadat M, Afesh L; PermiT Trial Group. Permissive Underfeeding or Standard Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 18;372(25):2398-408. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1502826. Epub 2015 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 22209678Allingstrup MJ, Esmailzadeh N, Wilkens Knudsen A, Espersen K, Hartvig Jensen T, Wiis J, Perner A, Kondrup J. Provision of protein and energy in relation to measured requirements in intensive care patients. Clin Nutr. 2012 Aug;31(4):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.12.006. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
- Background: PubMed 25900319Nicolo M, Heyland DK, Chittams J, Sammarco T, Compher C. Clinical Outcomes Related to Protein Delivery in a Critically Ill Population: A Multicenter, Multinational Observation Study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Jan;40(1):45-51. doi: 10.1177/0148607115583675. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
- Background: PubMed 28374096Arabi YM, Casaer MP, Chapman M, Heyland DK, Ichai C, Marik PE, Martindale RG, McClave SA, Preiser JC, Reignier J, Rice TW, Van den Berghe G, van Zanten ARH, Weijs PJM. The intensive care medicine research agenda in nutrition and metabolism. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Sep;43(9):1239-1256. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4711-6. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
- Background: PubMed 19623052Burtin C, Clerckx B, Robbeets C, Ferdinande P, Langer D, Troosters T, Hermans G, Decramer M, Gosselink R. Early exercise in critically ill patients enhances short-term functional recovery. Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2499-505. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a38937.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Critically Ill Patients
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Extended and Intermittent Infusion of Beta-lactams in Critically Ill Paediatric Patients
Infection, Sepsis
Recruiting
Development and Preliminary Validation of Intelligent Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Use
Critically Ill Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
Active, not recruiting
Weighted Blankets for Agitation in Adults in the Intensive Care Unit
Psychomotor Agitation, Critical Illness
RecruitingObservational study
Predicting Extubation Failure Using Machine Learning
Extubation Failure, Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound-Calibrated Pulse Contour Cardiac Output Monitoring: Value and Accuracy in Hemodynamic Care
Sepsis, Circulatory Instability
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
WIDLANI s MONTENEGRO, RN, Ms study director
Hospital Sao Domingos
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High protein nutrition and Cycle ergometry exercise in people with Critically Ill Patients, run by Hospital Sao Domingos at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Physical component summary (PCS) 3 months after randomization (time frame: 3 months after randomization). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03469882, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2021.