Autism Spectrum DisorderNCT03469986
A Multi-site Comparison of Social Visual Engagement to Clinical Diagnosis for Autism Spectrum Disorder
An observational study of Autism Spectrum Disorder, run by EarliTec Diagnostics, Inc at 6 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is an outpatient, multicenter, prospective, pivotal, double-blind, within-subject comparison trial of the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device (MAC-ID) diagnostic procedure relative to the gold-standard (reference standard), current best practice expert clinician diagnosis (ECD) of Autism Spectrum Disorder… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 30 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Autism Spectrum Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 505 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Apr 2018to 31 May 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 30 months
- All sexes
- Child
Study population: Subjects will be recruited on the basis of concern for ASD, including children who a parent, caregiver, or clinician suspects may have ASD as well as children who are not suspected to have an ASD.
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to participate in this study:
- Boys and girls between 16 and 30 months of age
- Generally healthy with no acute illnesses by physical examination
- Normal or corrected-to-normal vision, in terms of visual acuity and oculomotor function, sufficient to watch short videos. Adequate hearing to hear material presented in videos
- Subject and parent can communicate meaningfully in English with the principal investigator and the clinical study site staff
- Subject's parent or guardian is able to read and understand the informed consent form
- Parent voluntarily provides written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Any subject who meets any of the exclusion criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- Known genetic disorders (e.g., Fragile X, Williams Syndrome, Tuberous Sclerosis, Muscular Dystrophy, Neurofibromatosis, Down Syndrome)
- Severe hearing or visual impairment as determined on physical examination (e.g., congenital nystagmus, congenital cataracts, previous diagnosis of severe hearing deficits by otoacoustic emissions or auditory brainstem response)
- Acute illnesses likely to prevent successful or valid data collection, i.e., conjunctivitis, fever, uncontrolled allergy symptoms, etc.
- Uncontrolled epilepsy or seizure disorder
- History or presence of a clinically significant medical disease, or a mental state that might confound the study or be detrimental to the subject as determined by the investigator
Show all 11Show fewer
- Acute exacerbations of chronic illnesses likely to prevent successful or valid data collection
- Receiving therapies that may affect vision, i.e., currently receiving or have received the following therapies within 2 weeks of screening: topiramate, chlorpromazine, thioridazine, prednisone, prednisolone (including ophthalmic solutions and ointments), diphenhydramine, or hydroxyzine; or have received ophthalmic antibiotics within 3 days of screening: tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and ofloxacin solutions and/or bacitracin ointment
- Receiving therapies that may affect the ability to focus attention on the videos, i.e., if on central nervous system (CNS) stimulants, CNS depressants, or anticonvulsants, dose must be stable (same dose for at least 2 weeks).
- Known allergies or sensitivity to the plastic, leather, or metal components used in the materials of the Social Developmental Testing Device seat
- Unable or unwilling to sit in a car seat, e.g., child has tantrums on nearly all occasions when placed in a car seat and tantrums do not subside within 5 minutes
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
United States6 sites
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Cincinnati Children's Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229
Southwest Autism Research and Resource Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143
Seattle Children's Hospital
Seattle, Washington, 98105
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Pivotal, Double-Blinded Within-subject Comparison of the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device and Current Best Practice Clinical Diagnosis For Autism Spectrum Disorder in Pediatric Subjects 16-30 Months of Age
This is an outpatient, multicenter, prospective, pivotal, double-blind, within-subject comparison trial of the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device (MAC-ID) diagnostic procedure relative to the gold-standard (reference standard), current best practice expert clinician diagnosis (ECD) of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in children 16-30 months of age.
Consecutive pediatric patients from the intended population (i.e. children 16-30 months of age) recruited from pediatric referrals and general advertisements will be the subjects of this trial. All subjects will undergo the MAC-ID diagnostic procedure (test). All subjects will also undergo the current best practice clinical diagnostic procedure, using standardized ASD diagnostic instruments and standardized developmental assessments, to produce the ECD of each child's ASD status (reference/gold standard).
Read more
The study consists of a screening phase and diagnostic evaluation phase to assess the validity (sensitivity and specificity), safety, and effectiveness of the MAC-ID when used to diagnose ASD.
Subjects will be enrolled in the trial for a period of 1 day. The trial will be completed in approximately 12 months.
The overall study objective is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the MAC-ID to accurately diagnose ASD (primary analysis), as well as to accurately assess severity of ASD (secondary analysis) in very young pediatric subjects.
The primary endpoints of this study are the diagnostic result from the MAC-ID and the diagnostic results from the ECD evaluation, both of which are either positive or negative for ASD. Each subject will undergo the Social Developmental Testing Device procedure and an examination by a clinical expert in the field of ASD diagnosis; all study center site personnel (including the expert clinicians responsible for the ECD evaluation) will be blinded to MAC-ID results.
- Conditions
- Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Being tested
- Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device
- Medical subject headings
- Autism Spectrum Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Marcus Autism Center Investigational DeviceDevice
This trial will ascertain whether the binary results of autism or not-autism as determined by the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device match expert clinical diagnostic opinion. The investigational device is designed to measure visual attention to social information in the environment relative to normative, age-specific benchmarks; these measurements assess presence (primary efficacy outcome) and severity (secondary outcomes) of autism spectrum disorder in 16- to 30-month-old children.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Autism Spectrum Disorder | Children who meet criteria based on expert clinical diagnosis for autism spectrum disorder will be tested with the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device and expert clinical assessment. Receives: Device: Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device | |
| Non-autism Spectrum Disorder | Children who do not meet criteria for autism spectrum disorder based on expert clinical diagnosis will be tested with the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device and expert clinical assessment. Receives: Device: Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Presence of Autism Spectrum Disorder
In a sample of 400, 200 ASD and 200 non-ASD, the investigational device binary determination of ASD versus non-ASD will match the clinician best estimate diagnosis with 70/70 sensitivity and specificity
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (3)
Social disability index
Using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, 2nd Edition, does the degree of deviation of visual engagement indicate the severity of autism symptomatology
Measured: 1 day
Verbal Ability Index
Using the verbal domains of the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, does the degree of does the degree of deviation of visual engagement indicate the level of verbal abilities
Measured: 1 day
Nonverbal Ability Index
Using the nonverbal domain of the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, does the degree of does the degree of deviation of visual engagement indicate the level of nonverbal abilities
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Mar 2018
- Study start7 Apr 2018
- Primary completion31 May 2019
- Study completion31 May 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Autism Spectrum DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 505 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- EarliTec Diagnostics, Inc
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Cheryl Klaiman, PhD, Principal investigator, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03469986
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S-DTD-2014-301
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 12 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 8 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Jones W, Klaiman C, Richardson S, Lambha M, Reid M, Hamner T, Beacham C, Lewis P, Paredes J, Edwards L, Marrus N, Constantino JN, Shultz S, Klin A. Development and Replication of Objective Measurements of Social Visual Engagement to Aid in Early Diagnosis and Assessment of Autism. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2330145. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30145.
PubMed 37669054Jones W, Klaiman C, Richardson S, Aoki C, Smith C, Minjarez M, Bernier R, Pedapati E, Bishop S, Ence W, Wainer A, Moriuchi J, Tay SW, Klin A. Eye-Tracking-Based Measurement of Social Visual Engagement Compared With Expert Clinical Diagnosis of Autism. JAMA. 2023 Sep 5;330(9):854-865. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.13295.
PubMed 37668621
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Pivotal, Double-Blinded Within-subject Comparison of the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device and Current Best Practice Clinical Diagnosis For Autism Spectrum Disorder in Pediatric Subjects 16-30 Months of Age
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03469986
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- S-DTD-2014-301
- Conditions
- Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 505 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- EarliTec Diagnostics, IncIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 7 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an outpatient, multicenter, prospective, pivotal, double-blind, within-subject comparison trial of the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device (MAC-ID) diagnostic procedure relative to the gold-standard (reference standard), current best practice expert clinician diagnosis (ECD) of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in children 16-30 months of age.
Consecutive pediatric patients from the intended population (i.e. children 16-30 months of age) recruited from pediatric referrals and general advertisements will be the subjects of this trial. All subjects will undergo the MAC-ID diagnostic procedure (test). All subjects will also undergo the current best practice clinical diagnostic procedure, using standardized ASD diagnostic instruments and standardized developmental assessments, to produce the ECD of each child's ASD status (reference/gold standard).
The study consists of a screening phase and diagnostic evaluation phase to assess the validity (sensitivity and specificity), safety, and effectiveness of the MAC-ID when used to diagnose ASD.
Subjects will be enrolled in the trial for a period of 1 day. The trial will be completed in approximately 12 months.
The overall study objective is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the MAC-ID to accurately diagnose ASD (primary analysis), as well as to accurately assess severity of ASD (secondary analysis) in very young pediatric subjects.
The primary endpoints of this study are the diagnostic result from the MAC-ID and the diagnostic results from the ECD evaluation, both of which are either positive or negative for ASD. Each subject will undergo the Social Developmental Testing Device procedure and an examination by a clinical expert in the field of ASD diagnosis; all study center site personnel (including the expert clinicians responsible for the ECD evaluation) will be blinded to MAC-ID results.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Autism Spectrum Disorder | – | Device: Marcus Autism Center Investigational DeviceChildren who meet criteria based on expert clinical diagnosis for autism spectrum disorder will be tested with the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device and expert clinical assessment. |
| Non-autism Spectrum Disorder | – | Device: Marcus Autism Center Investigational DeviceChildren who do not meet criteria for autism spectrum disorder based on expert clinical diagnosis will be tested with the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device and expert clinical assessment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 30 months
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Subjects will be recruited on the basis of concern for ASD, including children who a parent, caregiver, or clinician suspects may have ASD as well as children who are not suspected to have an ASD.
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Boys and girls between 16 and 30 months of age
- Generally healthy with no acute illnesses by physical examination
- Normal or corrected-to-normal vision, in terms of visual acuity and oculomotor function, sufficient to watch short videos. Adequate hearing to hear material presented in videos
- Subject and parent can communicate meaningfully in English with the principal investigator and the clinical study site staff
- Subject's parent or guardian is able to read and understand the informed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Any subject who meets any of the exclusion criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- Known genetic disorders (e.g., Fragile X, Williams Syndrome, Tuberous Sclerosis, Muscular Dystrophy, Neurofibromatosis, Down Syndrome)
- Severe hearing or visual impairment as determined on physical examination (e.g., congenital nystagmus, congenital cataracts, previous diagnosis of severe hearing deficits by otoacoustic emissions or auditory brainstem response)
- Acute illnesses likely to prevent successful or valid data collection, i.e., conjunctivitis, fever, uncontrolled allergy symptoms, etc.
- Uncontrolled epilepsy or seizure disorder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Marcus Autism Center Investigational DeviceThis trial will ascertain whether the binary results of autism or not-autism as determined by the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device match expert clinical diagnostic opinion. The investigational device is designed to measure visual attention to social information in the environment relative to normative, age-specific benchmarks; these measurements assess presence (primary efficacy outcome) and severity (secondary outcomes) of autism spectrum disorder in 16- to 30-month-old children. | Device | Autism Spectrum Disorder, Non-autism Spectrum Disorder |
Primary outcome
Presence of Autism Spectrum Disorder
Time frame: 1 day
In a sample of 400, 200 ASD and 200 non-ASD, the investigational device binary determination of ASD versus non-ASD will match the clinician best estimate diagnosis with 70/70 sensitivity and specificity
3 secondary outcomes
Social disability index
Time frame: 1 day
Verbal Ability Index
Time frame: 1 day
Nonverbal Ability Index
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Nov 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 37669054Jones W, Klaiman C, Richardson S, Lambha M, Reid M, Hamner T, Beacham C, Lewis P, Paredes J, Edwards L, Marrus N, Constantino JN, Shultz S, Klin A. Development and Replication of Objective Measurements of Social Visual Engagement to Aid in Early Diagnosis and Assessment of Autism. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2330145. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30145.
- Results publication: PubMed 37668621Jones W, Klaiman C, Richardson S, Aoki C, Smith C, Minjarez M, Bernier R, Pedapati E, Bishop S, Ence W, Wainer A, Moriuchi J, Tay SW, Klin A. Eye-Tracking-Based Measurement of Social Visual Engagement Compared With Expert Clinical Diagnosis of Autism. JAMA. 2023 Sep 5;330(9):854-865. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.13295.
- EarliPoint Evaluation for Autism Spectrum DisorderLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Autism Spectrum Disorder
RecruitingPhase 1
Cannabidiol (CBD) in Adults With ASD
Autism Spectrum Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Schizophrenia, Autism-Related Irritability
Not yet recruiting
Sensory-integration Therapy Verses Augumented Reality-based Training in ASD
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Recruiting
Cumulative and Booster Effects of Multisession Prefrontal tDCS in ASD Adolescents
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Autistic Spectrum Disorder
Not yet recruiting
"Family Resilience And Mind-body Enhancement" (FRAME): A Randomised Controlled Trial
Autism
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cheryl Klaiman, PhD principal investigator
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Autism Spectrum Disorder, run by EarliTec Diagnostics, Inc at 6 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Presence of Autism Spectrum Disorder (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03469986, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2023.