Arthritis, RheumatoidNCT03470740
Effects of a Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-management Program
A study testing rheumatoid arthritis self-management program in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a persistent systemic disease. WHO (World Health Organization) commented that a crucial goal of heath care for RA is prevention of loss of daily function by patients' self-management (SM) skills; however, a comprehensive rheumatoid arthritis self-management (RASm) for RA patients'… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- What is being tested?
- rheumatoid arthritis self-management program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 224 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2016to 31 Jul 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with RA
- Age of 20 years or over
- Disease considered have been stable for at least 3 months
- Able to understand and comply with the study treatment
Who cannot join
- Suffering from other terminal illnesses, severe dementia or another debilitating psychiatric disorder
- Living in a long-term care facility
- Participation in another research protocol
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of a Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-management program-a Randomized Controlled Trial
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a persistent systemic disease. WHO (World Health Organization) commented that a crucial goal of heath care for RA is prevention of loss of daily function by patients' self-management (SM) skills; however, a comprehensive rheumatoid arthritis self-management (RASm) for RA patients' day-to-day self-managing is limited in Taiwan.
Aims: The aims of the study are: (1) to implement the RASm program, (2) to determine the effectiveness of the program with 6 months follow-up, and (3) to understand participants' experiences when receiving the RASm program for the experimental group.
Read the detailed description
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a persistent systemic disease. WHO (World Health Organization) commented that a crucial goal of heath care for RA is prevention of loss of daily function by patients' self-management (SM) skills; however, a comprehensive rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for RA patients' day-to-day self-managing is limited in Taiwan. The aims of the study are: (1) to implement the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program, and (2) to determine the effectiveness of the program with 6 months follow-up. The project will design to implement and evaluate the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for RA patients using two groups experimental design. A medical center in northern Taiwan will be selected and patients who visited the RA departments will be eligible for the study if they are: (1) diagnosed with RA, (2) age of 20 years or over, (3) disease considered have been stable for at least 3 months, and (4) able to understand and comply with the study treatment. After completion of baseline data, patients will be randomly allocated to the intervention or control group using a computerized allocation procedure and follow the CONSORT flow diagram. Control patients received usual care, and the intervention group will receive the 6-week rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which based on self-efficacy theory. The independent variable of the program will be the four information include mastery experience, social modeling, social persuasion and physical and emotional states, and the strategies involve education, goal setting and attainment, self-monitoring, and phone calls. All participants will follow up for 6 months, and the data will be collected at the baseline, and 2, 3, and 6 months. The statistics with the GEE (generalized estimating equation) analysis will be used to evaluate the outcomes such as the disease activity (DAS-28), arthritis self-efficacy (ASE), physical functioning (MHAQ), quality of life (SF-36), and self-management behaviors. Through enhance the capacity of self-management program for the RA cases to reduce the health care utilization and patients' and caregivers' burden.
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Being tested
- rheumatoid arthritis self-management program
- Keywords
- rheumatoid arthritis, self-management, self-efficacy
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rheumatoid arthritis self-management programBehavioural
The intervention group received the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which was based on Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and proposes that self-efficacy is influenced by four information sources: mastery of experience, social modeling, social persuasion and one's physical and emotional states. To enhance participants' self-management skill, the following strategies were employed: peer story-telling, assessment, family involvement, goal setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and phone calls consultation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| intervention group | Other | An individualized rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for managing RA patients' physical behavioral problems was applied for the intervention group. The program was based on the self-efficacy theory and the four resources were incorporated to emphasize patients' knowledge, skill, and responsibility in managing their RA situations. Receives: Behavioral: rheumatoid arthritis self-management program |
| control group | No intervention | The control group received general information on rheumatoid arthritis care and follow-up. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease Activity
Disease activity was measured using the DAS-28 (Disease Activity Score-28) which evaluated 28 tender and swollen joint counts of rheumatoid arthritis patients. This scale was used to calculate the 28 tender and swollen joint counts. Scores can range from 0 to 9.4. The lower score represent a better RA outcome.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Arthritis Self-efficacy- Pain
We used the arthritis self-efficacy-pain (ASE-pain) to measure RA patients' pain self-efficacy. The ASE-pain used visual analogue scales (0-10), in which 0 means 'very uncertain' and 10 means 'very certain'; a higher score refers to higher self-efficacy. This scale have 5 items, therefore, the score range will be 0-50.
Measured: 6 months
Arthritis Self-efficacy- Other
We used the arthritis self-efficacy-other (ASE-OS) to measure RA patients' other symptoms self-efficacy. The ASE-OS used visual analogue scales (0-10), in which 0 means 'very uncertain' and 10 means 'very certain'; a higher score refers to higher self-efficacy. This scale have 6 items, therefore, the score range will be 0-60.
Measured: 6 months
SF-36 Quality of life_Physical Component Scores
The Short-form 36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses 8 dimensions of health: physical functioning (PF), social functioning (SF), role limitations because of physical health problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), general mental health (psychological distress and well-being; MH), limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems (RE), vitality (energy and fatigue; VT), and general health perceptions (GH), was used to assess the quality of life in this study. The original scale using the Likert scoring method, the score is from 1-3 or 1-5. Before the scores are added, we follow the SF-36 manual, adjust each item scored from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating extreme problems and 100 indicating no problems. The physical component scores (PCS) included GH, PF, RP, and BP, then the scores of each sub-question under the Physical Component Scores are summed together, and the range after adjustment from 0 (extreme problems) to 400 (no problems) for the Physical Component Scores.
Measured: 6 months
Physical Functioning
The 8-item Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire was used to measure the physical functioning for this study. The MHAQ measures eight activities such as dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach grip, and common daily activities. Items are rated from 1 = without difficulty, to 4 = unable to do; a lower score indicates a greater ability to conduct daily activities. The range of the score will be 8-32.
Measured: 6 months
Self-management Behaviors
To assess self-management behaviors the researchers developed a joint activity and protection self-management behaviors scale. The scale consists of eight items and ranges from zero for 'never' to four for 'always'. Higher scores indicate a higher level of use of each of the self-management behavior. The range of the score will be 0-32.
Measured: 6 months
SF-36 Quality of Life_Mental Component Scores (MCS)
The Short-form 36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses 8 dimensions of health: physical functioning (PF), social functioning (SF), role limitations because of physical health problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), general mental health (psychological distress and well-being; MH), limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems (RE), vitality (energy and fatigue; VT), and general health perceptions (GH), was used to assess the quality of life in this study. The original scale using the Likert scoring method, the score is from 1-3 or 1-5. Before the scores are added, we follow the SF-36 manual, adjust each item scored from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating extreme problems and 100 indicating no problems. The mental component scores (MCS) included RE, SF, VT, and MH, then the scores of each sub-question under the Mental Component Scores are summed together, and the range after adjustment from 0 (extreme problems) to 400 (no problems) for the Mental Component Scores.
Measured: 6 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2018
- Study start1 Sep 2016
- Primary completion31 Jul 2018
- Study completion31 Jul 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Arthritis, RheumatoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants were randomly assigned to experimental group who received a rheumatoid arthritis self-management intervention based on self-efficacy theory for 6 weeks, and a control group receiving standard rheumatology care only.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 224 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Su-Hui Chen, PhD, Principal investigator, Professor, School of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03470740
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ChangGungMHRA
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 8 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 22 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of a Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-management program-a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03470740
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ChangGungMHRA
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Keywords
- rheumatoid arthritis, self-management, self-efficacy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 224 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 28 Aug 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a persistent systemic disease. WHO (World Health Organization) commented that a crucial goal of heath care for RA is prevention of loss of daily function by patients' self-management (SM) skills; however, a comprehensive rheumatoid arthritis self-management (RASm) for RA patients' day-to-day self-managing is limited in Taiwan.
Aims: The aims of the study are: (1) to implement the RASm program, (2) to determine the effectiveness of the program with 6 months follow-up, and (3) to understand participants' experiences when receiving the RASm program for the experimental group.
Detailed description
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a persistent systemic disease. WHO (World Health Organization) commented that a crucial goal of heath care for RA is prevention of loss of daily function by patients' self-management (SM) skills; however, a comprehensive rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for RA patients' day-to-day self-managing is limited in Taiwan. The aims of the study are: (1) to implement the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program, and (2) to determine the effectiveness of the program with 6 months follow-up. The project will design to implement and evaluate the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for RA patients using two groups experimental design. A medical center in northern Taiwan will be selected and patients who visited the RA departments will be eligible for the study if they are: (1) diagnosed with RA, (2) age of 20 years or over, (3) disease considered have been stable for at least 3 months, and (4) able to understand and comply with the study treatment. After completion of baseline data, patients will be randomly allocated to the intervention or control group using a computerized allocation procedure and follow the CONSORT flow diagram. Control patients received usual care, and the intervention group will receive the 6-week rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which based on self-efficacy theory. The independent variable of the program will be the four information include mastery experience, social modeling, social persuasion and physical and emotional states, and the strategies involve education, goal setting and attainment, self-monitoring, and phone calls. All participants will follow up for 6 months, and the data will be collected at the baseline, and 2, 3, and 6 months. The statistics with the GEE (generalized estimating equation) analysis will be used to evaluate the outcomes such as the disease activity (DAS-28), arthritis self-efficacy (ASE), physical functioning (MHAQ), quality of life (SF-36), and self-management behaviors. Through enhance the capacity of self-management program for the RA cases to reduce the health care utilization and patients' and caregivers' burden.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants were randomly assigned to experimental group who received a rheumatoid arthritis self-management intervention based on self-efficacy theory for 6 weeks, and a control group receiving standard rheumatology care only.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| intervention group | Other | Behavioral: rheumatoid arthritis self-management programAn individualized rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for managing RA patients' physical behavioral problems was applied for the intervention group. The program was based on the self-efficacy theory and the four resources were incorporated to emphasize patients' knowledge, skill, and responsibility in managing their RA situations. |
| control group | No intervention | –The control group received general information on rheumatoid arthritis care and follow-up. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosed with RA
- Age of 20 years or over
- Disease considered have been stable for at least 3 months
- Able to understand and comply with the study treatment
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Suffering from other terminal illnesses, severe dementia or another debilitating psychiatric disorder
- Living in a long-term care facility
- Participation in another research protocol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rheumatoid arthritis self-management programThe intervention group received the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which was based on Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and proposes that self-efficacy is influenced by four information sources: mastery of experience, social modeling, social persuasion and one's physical and emotional states. To enhance participants' self-management skill, the following strategies were employed: peer story-telling, assessment, family involvement, goal setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and phone calls consultation. | Behavioural | intervention group |
Primary outcome
Disease Activity
Time frame: 6 months
Disease activity was measured using the DAS-28 (Disease Activity Score-28) which evaluated 28 tender and swollen joint counts of rheumatoid arthritis patients. This scale was used to calculate the 28 tender and swollen joint counts. Scores can range from 0 to 9.4. The lower score represent a better RA outcome.
6 secondary outcomes
Arthritis Self-efficacy- Pain
Time frame: 6 months
Arthritis Self-efficacy- Other
Time frame: 6 months
SF-36 Quality of life_Physical Component Scores
Time frame: 6 months
Physical Functioning
Time frame: 6 months
Self-management Behaviors
Time frame: 6 months
SF-36 Quality of Life_Mental Component Scores (MCS)
Time frame: 6 Months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Aug 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Pharmacokinetics of LPX-TI641 in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase 1/2 Study of NKX019 in Subjects With Immune-Mediated Diseases (Ntrust-2)
Systemic Sclerosis, Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of QLS2416 Injection in Participants With Autoimmune Diseases
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Platform Study of Targeted Therapies for Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Su-Hui Chen, PhD principal investigator
Professor, School of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing rheumatoid arthritis self-management program in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Aug 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease Activity (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.