Chronic Low Back PainModulate-LBPNCT03470766
Sham-Controlled RCT on 10kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Low Back Pain (Modulate-LBP)
A study testing Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy) in people with Chronic Low Back Pain and Neuropathic Pain, run by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial with parallel economic evaluation. Patients will be allocated 1:1 to activated 10kHz SCS plus usual care (intervention) or sham 10kHz SCS plus usual care (control) and followed up to 6 months. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Low Back Pain, Neuropathic Pain, Refractory Pain
- What is being tested?
- Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 41 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 14 Aug 2018to 20 Oct 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults over the age of 18
- Onset of low back pain > 12 months
- Low back pain intensity > 60 out of 100mm on pain visual analogue scale (VAS)
- Presence of clear component of neuropathic pain based on a PainDETECT Questionnaire score of >19 (we will monitor this inclusion criteria in the early stage of the trial and revise if necessary)
- Degenerative disc disease confirmed by imaging or internal disc disruption as confirmed by discography
- On stable pain medications, as determined by the Investigator, for at least 28 days prior to enrolling in this study and not change medication dosage without consulting Investigator
- Legally able to provide informed consent
- Able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures and visits
Who cannot join
- Had previous spinal surgery
- Chronic widespread pain
- Subject has an active implanted device, whether turned on or off (e.g. pacemaker, intrathecal pump, deep brain stimulator etc.)
- A current diagnosis of a progressive neurological disease such as multiple sclerosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, rapidly progressive arachnoiditis, rapidly progressive diabetic peripheral neuropathy, brain or spinal cord tumour, or severe/critical central or foraminal spinal stenosis
- Mechanical spine instability detected by a clinician (validation by flexion/extension films of lumbar spine within the past 6 months showing 4 mm or more translational movement or excessive angular movement manifested by >5 degrees segmental angular movement) e.g. any forms of spondylolisthesis
- A medical condition or pain in other area(s), not intended to be treated with SCS, that could interfere with study procedures, accurate pain reporting, and/or confound evaluation of study endpoints, as determined by the Investigator
Show all 14Show fewer
- Bleeding diathesis such as coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia
- Immunocompromised and at an increased risk for infection
- Systemic infection or local infection that would contraindicate SCS placement
- Metastatic malignant disease or active local malignant disease
- Pregnant (if female and sexually active, subject must be using a reliable form of contraception, be surgically sterile or be at least 2 years post-menopausal)
- Active alcohol, marijuana, recreational or prescription drug abuse or dependence or unwilling to stop/reduce excessive inappropriate medication.
- Evidence of an active disruptive psychological or psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance of intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by the Investigator
- Concomitant participation in another clinical trial (surgery, device or drug)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites
Guy's and St Thomas Hospital
London, SE1 7EH
South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW
About this study
Official title: Multicentre, Double Blind, Randomised Sham-Controlled Trial of 10kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Low Back Pain (Modulate-LBP)
Multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial with parallel economic evaluation. Patients will be allocated 1:1 to activated 10kHz SCS plus usual care (intervention) or sham 10kHz SCS plus usual care (control) and followed up to 6 months.
Read the detailed description
The prevalence of chronic low back pain in the population is estimated to range between at 12% and 28% (1-4). Within this group an estimated 12-15% of adults suffer from chronic neuropathic lower back pain (CNLBP), have relatively greater pain severity, and account for more of the costs of this condition (5,6). This subgroup of people with CNLBP are the focus of the proposed trial.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends SCS for refractory neuropathic pain (TA159) (7). It is routinely used for people with predominant, neuropathic, radicular pain typically resulting from, or persisting after, spinal surgery (so-called failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) (8-10). SCS has been shown to be cost effective for this indication (11).
Conventional SCS consists of the insertion of a medical wire (lead) introduced into the epidural space through a needle puncture. The lead is then positioned to target the pain by passing current into the lead from an external power source to generate a pins and needles sensation (paraesthesias) over the painful area. Analgesia occurs when the paraesthesia overlaps and therefore masks the painful area. Once pain reduction is demonstrated, the battery is implanted under the skin of the abdomen, flank or buttock. SCS is most commonly used in the treatment of leg pain of FBSS. However, due to lack of existing evidence and the difficulty of obtaining paraesthesia over the low back, SCS has traditionally not been recommended for treating patients with back pain without previous back surgery (10, 12).
High frequency 10kHz-SCS is a recent major advance in SCS technology. The current is delivered at 10kHz frequency as opposed to the 40 to 60Hz generated by the conventional SCS (13). The key advantages of a higher frequency current are:
10kHz-SCS has been shown to be superior (14) to conventional SCS in targeting residual low back pain following back surgery. Moreover, it does not generate any stimulation related sensations or paraesthesia so is preferred by patients as they are saved from needing to experience these distracting and occasional shocking sensations of conventional SCS. Therefore, 10kHz-SCS allows to smoothly conduct sham controlled or double blind studies in the field of SCS without the need for device modifications.
The lead applicant conducted an uncontrolled, multicentre, single arm study with 83 people with significant low back pain with or without leg pain, implanted with a 10kHz-SCS. At 24 months, the mean reported VAS score for back pain was 3.3 (SD 0.3), compared with 8.4 (SD 0.1) at baseline (pre-implant) and 2.7 (SD 0.3) at 6 months with 60% of subjects reporting >50% back pain relief. Similar improvements were observed in leg pain, disability, sleep and marked reductions in medication intake (15).
In a more recent multicentre RCT, 10kHz-SCS therapy demonstrated superiority to conventional low-frequency SCS in the treatment of post-surgical neuropathic pain. A total of 198 subjects with both back and leg pain were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to a 10 KHz-SCS or conventional SCS. 10kHz-SCS decreased back pain intensity by 67% compared to 44% in the conventional SCS arm (16). This decrease was sustained at 24 months (17).
The above mentioned studies focused on neuropathic back pain in the context of patients with previous spinal surgery. However, a small subset of patients without prior spine surgery that received 10kHz-SCS therapy in both these studies have shown good pain relief and functional improvements in both studies comparable to those with FBSS (14,16).
The investigators hypothesised that patients with CNLBP with no prior spine surgery would benefit from 10kHz-SCS. To evaluate this hypothesis, the investigators initially designed and conducted an open label uncontrolled pilot study in 21 patients with CNLBP and no prior spine surgery. 10kHz-SCS therapy significantly reduced back pain intensity by an average of 5.59 (SD 1.80) (-72.6% vs baseline) at 12 months in medically refractory low back pain patients with no past history of spine surgery. 90% of the implanted patients were classified as responders (i.e. VAS back pain reduction >50%) at 12 months. The investigators also observed a significant increase in physical function scores and health-related quality of life at one year post 10kHz-SCS implant. Mean pain intensity was reduced by 73% and disability measured by the Oswestry Disability Index was reduced by 48%. Opioid medication intake decreased by 64% and mean EQ-5D quality of life scores improved from 0.16 to 0.47. More importantly 75% of patients were able to return to employment(18). This improvement was sustained at 3 years follow up (19).
Following these promising results, the investigators now intend to undertake a fully powered RCT to confirm our hypothesis that 10kHz-SCS is beneficial for CNLBP patients with no prior back surgery.
To date 10kHz-SCS has not been formally tested against a sham control condition in order to isolate the therapeutic effects from those induced by placebo. It is very possible that some of the benefit reported may be due to a placebo effect (enhanced by a surgical procedure) or reporting bias in either the patient or assessor. The investigators have therefore specifically designed this fully powered double blind randomised sham controlled trial of 10kHz-SCS to address this major methodological limitation of previous studies.
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain, Neuropathic Pain, Refractory Pain
- Being tested
- Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy)
- Keywords
- Neuromodulation, HF10, HF-10, Nevro, High-frequency, 10kHz, Spinal Cord Stimulation, CNLBP, Chronic Neuropathic Low Back Pain, Double blind randomised sham-controlled, PANARC, SCS
- Medical subject headings
- Neuralgia, Pain, Intractable
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy)Device
Also called Neuromodulation, High-frequency stimulation, Nevro, HF-10
Nevro 10kHz High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active Lead (AL) | Active comparator | One octad lead placed where contacts 4 and 5 span the T9-T10 disc space. Receives: Device: Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy) |
| Sham Lead (SL) | Sham comparator | One octad lead implanted subcutaneously behind the IPG and will serve to dissipate the current from the battery Receives: Device: Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean VAS Back Pain (7 Day Subject VAS Pain Diary)
Changes in mean VAS back pain between intervention and control at 6 months post-randomisation
Measured: 6 months post randomisation
Secondary outcomes (9)
Oswestry disability index (v2.1a)
To compare disability between intervention and control at 1, 3, and 6 months post-randomisation.
Measured: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation
PHQ-9 Questionnaire
To compare depression between intervention and control at 1, 3, and 6 months post-randomisation.
Measured: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation
PSQI Questionnaire
To compare sleep quality between intervention and control at 1, 3, and 6 months post-randomisation.
Measured: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation
PGIC Questionnaire
To compare patients' global impression of change between intervention and control at 1, 3, and 6 months post-randomisation.
Measured: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation
EQ-5D Questionnaire
To compare health-related quality of life between intervention and control at 1, 3, and 6 months post-randomisation.
Measured: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation
Medication Usage
To compare medication usage between intervention and control at 1, 3, and 6 months post-randomisation.
Measured: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation
Sensation Map
To compare sensation maps between intervention and control at 1, 3, and 6 months post-randomisation.
Measured: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation
Healthcare utilisation, work status, work absence, and out of pocket expenses
To compare the cost-effectiveness of 10kHz-SCS between intervention and control at six months post-randomisation.
Measured: 6 months post randomisation
Safety/Adverse Events
To compare complications and adverse events at 6-months post-randomisation between intervention and control.
Measured: 6 months post randomisation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2018
- Study start14 Aug 2018
- Primary completion20 Oct 2022
- Study completion20 Oct 2022
Why it stopped: Study terminated early at the request of Sponsors.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial with parallel economic evaluation. Patients will be allocated 1:1 to activated 10kHz SCS plus usual care (intervention) or sham 10kHz SCS plus usual care (control) and followed up to 6 months.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pain And Neuromodulation Academic Research Centre (PANARC), University of Exeter, National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom, King's College London, University of Oxford, University of Liverpool, James Cook University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03470766
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Modulate-LBP
- Acronym
- Modulate-LBP
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 13 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2.
PubMed 34854473Al-Kaisy A, Royds J, Palmisani S, Pang D, Wesley S, Taylor RS, Cook A, Eldabe S, McCracken L, Duarte R, Fairbank J. Multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial of 10 khz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic neuropathic low back pain (MODULATE-LBP): a trial protocol. Trials. 2020 Jan 28;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3831-4.
PubMed 31992344
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicentre, Double Blind, Randomised Sham-Controlled Trial of 10kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Low Back Pain (Modulate-LBP)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03470766
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Modulate-LBP / Modulate-LBP
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain, Neuropathic Pain, Refractory Pain
- Keywords
- Neuromodulation, HF10, HF-10, Nevro, High-frequency, 10kHz, Spinal Cord Stimulation, CNLBP
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Study terminated early at the request of Sponsors.
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pain And Neuromodulation Academic Research Centre (PANARC), University of Exeter, National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom, King's College London, University of Oxford, University of Liverpool, James Cook University Hospital
- Study start
- 14 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Oct 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial with parallel economic evaluation. Patients will be allocated 1:1 to activated 10kHz SCS plus usual care (intervention) or sham 10kHz SCS plus usual care (control) and followed up to 6 months.
Detailed description
The prevalence of chronic low back pain in the population is estimated to range between at 12% and 28% (1-4). Within this group an estimated 12-15% of adults suffer from chronic neuropathic lower back pain (CNLBP), have relatively greater pain severity, and account for more of the costs of this condition (5,6). This subgroup of people with CNLBP are the focus of the proposed trial.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends SCS for refractory neuropathic pain (TA159) (7). It is routinely used for people with predominant, neuropathic, radicular pain typically resulting from, or persisting after, spinal surgery (so-called failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) (8-10). SCS has been shown to be cost effective for this indication (11).
Conventional SCS consists of the insertion of a medical wire (lead) introduced into the epidural space through a needle puncture. The lead is then positioned to target the pain by passing current into the lead from an external power source to generate a pins and needles sensation (paraesthesias) over the painful area. Analgesia occurs when the paraesthesia overlaps and therefore masks the painful area. Once pain reduction is demonstrated, the battery is implanted under the skin of the abdomen, flank or buttock. SCS is most commonly used in the treatment of leg pain of FBSS. However, due to lack of existing evidence and the difficulty of obtaining paraesthesia over the low back, SCS has traditionally not been recommended for treating patients with back pain without previous back surgery (10, 12).
High frequency 10kHz-SCS is a recent major advance in SCS technology. The current is delivered at 10kHz frequency as opposed to the 40 to 60Hz generated by the conventional SCS (13). The key advantages of a higher frequency current are:
10kHz-SCS has been shown to be superior (14) to conventional SCS in targeting residual low back pain following back surgery. Moreover, it does not generate any stimulation related sensations or paraesthesia so is preferred by patients as they are saved from needing to experience these distracting and occasional shocking sensations of conventional SCS. Therefore, 10kHz-SCS allows to smoothly conduct sham controlled or double blind studies in the field of SCS without the need for device modifications.
The lead applicant conducted an uncontrolled, multicentre, single arm study with 83 people with significant low back pain with or without leg pain, implanted with a 10kHz-SCS. At 24 months, the mean reported VAS score for back pain was 3.3 (SD 0.3), compared with 8.4 (SD 0.1) at baseline (pre-implant) and 2.7 (SD 0.3) at 6 months with 60% of subjects reporting >50% back pain relief. Similar improvements were observed in leg pain, disability, sleep and marked reductions in medication intake (15).
In a more recent multicentre RCT, 10kHz-SCS therapy demonstrated superiority to conventional low-frequency SCS in the treatment of post-surgical neuropathic pain. A total of 198 subjects with both back and leg pain were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to a 10 KHz-SCS or conventional SCS. 10kHz-SCS decreased back pain intensity by 67% compared to 44% in the conventional SCS arm (16). This decrease was sustained at 24 months (17).
The above mentioned studies focused on neuropathic back pain in the context of patients with previous spinal surgery. However, a small subset of patients without prior spine surgery that received 10kHz-SCS therapy in both these studies have shown good pain relief and functional improvements in both studies comparable to those with FBSS (14,16).
The investigators hypothesised that patients with CNLBP with no prior spine surgery would benefit from 10kHz-SCS. To evaluate this hypothesis, the investigators initially designed and conducted an open label uncontrolled pilot study in 21 patients with CNLBP and no prior spine surgery. 10kHz-SCS therapy significantly reduced back pain intensity by an average of 5.59 (SD 1.80) (-72.6% vs baseline) at 12 months in medically refractory low back pain patients with no past history of spine surgery. 90% of the implanted patients were classified as responders (i.e. VAS back pain reduction >50%) at 12 months. The investigators also observed a significant increase in physical function scores and health-related quality of life at one year post 10kHz-SCS implant. Mean pain intensity was reduced by 73% and disability measured by the Oswestry Disability Index was reduced by 48%. Opioid medication intake decreased by 64% and mean EQ-5D quality of life scores improved from 0.16 to 0.47. More importantly 75% of patients were able to return to employment(18). This improvement was sustained at 3 years follow up (19).
Following these promising results, the investigators now intend to undertake a fully powered RCT to confirm our hypothesis that 10kHz-SCS is beneficial for CNLBP patients with no prior back surgery.
To date 10kHz-SCS has not been formally tested against a sham control condition in order to isolate the therapeutic effects from those induced by placebo. It is very possible that some of the benefit reported may be due to a placebo effect (enhanced by a surgical procedure) or reporting bias in either the patient or assessor. The investigators have therefore specifically designed this fully powered double blind randomised sham controlled trial of 10kHz-SCS to address this major methodological limitation of previous studies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial with parallel economic evaluation. Patients will be allocated 1:1 to activated 10kHz SCS plus usual care (intervention) or sham 10kHz SCS plus usual care (control) and followed up to 6 months.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active Lead (AL) | Active comparator | Device: Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy)One octad lead placed where contacts 4 and 5 span the T9-T10 disc space. |
| Sham Lead (SL) | Sham comparator | Device: Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy)One octad lead implanted subcutaneously behind the IPG and will serve to dissipate the current from the battery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Adults over the age of 18
- Onset of low back pain > 12 months
- Low back pain intensity > 60 out of 100mm on pain visual analogue scale (VAS)
- Presence of clear component of neuropathic pain based on a PainDETECT Questionnaire score of >19 (we will monitor this inclusion criteria in the early stage of the trial and revise if necessary)
- Degenerative disc disease confirmed by imaging or internal disc disruption as confirmed by discography
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Had previous spinal surgery
- Chronic widespread pain
- Subject has an active implanted device, whether turned on or off (e.g. pacemaker, intrathecal pump, deep brain stimulator etc.)
- A current diagnosis of a progressive neurological disease such as multiple sclerosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, rapidly progressive arachnoiditis, rapidly progressive diabetic peripheral neuropathy, brain or spinal cord tumour, or severe/critical central or foraminal spinal stenosis
- Mechanical spine instability detected by a clinician (validation by flexion/extension films of lumbar spine within the past 6 months showing 4 mm or more translational movement or excessive angular movement manifested by >5 degrees segmental angular movement) e.g. any forms of spondylolisthesis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy)Also: Neuromodulation, High-frequency stimulation, Nevro, HF-10Nevro 10kHz High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation | Device | Active Lead (AL), Sham Lead (SL) |
Primary outcome
Mean VAS Back Pain (7 Day Subject VAS Pain Diary)
Time frame: 6 months post randomisation
Changes in mean VAS back pain between intervention and control at 6 months post-randomisation
9 secondary outcomes
Oswestry disability index (v2.1a)
Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation
PHQ-9 Questionnaire
Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation
PSQI Questionnaire
Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation
PGIC Questionnaire
Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation
EQ-5D Questionnaire
Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation
Medication Usage
Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation
Sensation Map
Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation
Healthcare utilisation, work status, work absence, and out of pocket expenses
Time frame: 6 months post randomisation
Safety/Adverse Events
Time frame: 6 months post randomisation
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Study terminated early at the request of Sponsors.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34854473O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31992344Al-Kaisy A, Royds J, Palmisani S, Pang D, Wesley S, Taylor RS, Cook A, Eldabe S, McCracken L, Duarte R, Fairbank J. Multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial of 10 khz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic neuropathic low back pain (MODULATE-LBP): a trial protocol. Trials. 2020 Jan 28;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3831-4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Low Back Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Two Patient Education Methods in Women With Chronic Low Back Pain: Online Pain Education vs. AI-Driven Patient Education on Pain Beliefs, Catastrophizing, and Self-Efficacy
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Myofascial Techniques on Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Chronic Pain Master Protocol (CPMP): A Study of LY4065967 in Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic Pain, Low Back Pain
Recruiting
SENECA - Smart Therapies for Chronic Pain
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy) in people with Chronic Low Back Pain and Neuropathic Pain, run by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Study terminated early at the request of Sponsors.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean VAS Back Pain (7 Day Subject VAS Pain Diary) (time frame: 6 months post randomisation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03470766, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2024.