AzTrials
AzTrials

Superficial Colorectal TumorsRECNCT03470883

Predictive Factors for Failure or Success of Endoscopic Treatment of Superficial Colorectal Tumors

An observational study of Superficial Colorectal Tumors, run by Institut Paoli-Calmettes at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the long-term complete remission rate (> 12 months) after endoscopic treatment of early neoplastic colorectal lesions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Superficial Colorectal Tumors
What is being tested?
Evaluation of the long-term complete remission rate (> 12 months)
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Jan 2012to 2 Nov 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patient having undergone endoscopic resection of a colorectal lesion stage 4 or 5 of the modified Vienna classification

Who may be able to join

  • Patient having undergone endoscopic resection of a colorectal lesion stage 4 or 5 of the modified Vienna classification during the last 5 years at the institute.

Who cannot join

  • Adenomas with low grade dysplasia
  • Endoscopic control not available

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Institut Paoli Calmettes

    Marseille, Bouches Du Rhone, 13009

Other trials in France

About this study

To evaluate the long-term complete remission rate (> 12 months) after endoscopic treatment of early neoplastic colorectal lesions.

Read the detailed description

Intra-mucous colorectal neoplasia lesions (or even with minimal mucosal infiltration), formerly treated surgically, are increasingly treated endoscopically.

The IPC as a center for interventional endoscopy has been taking care of these lesions for several years.

Resection techniques have diversified since the 2000s (polypectomy, monobloc or piecemeal mucosectomy, submucosal dissection ... etc) and the endoscopy team has developed its various techniques within the institute ; Practice has evolved and has not been studied or evaluated in recent years. The purpose of this study is to evaluate practices and to compare results with the literature, and to identify predictive factors for the failure or success of endoscopic treatment of these early neoplastic lesions.

Being tested
Evaluation of the long-term complete remission rate (> 12 months)
Keywords
endoscopic resection, colorectal adenomas, Colorectal adenocarcinomas

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Evaluation of the long-term complete remission rate (> 12 months)Other

    Evaluation of the long-term complete remission rate (> 12 months)

Study groups in NCT03470883
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
endoscopic resection of a colorectal lesionPatient having undergone endoscopic resection of a colorectal lesion stage 4 or 5 of the modified Vienna classification during the last 5 years at the institute.
Receives: Other: Evaluation of the long-term complete remission rate (> 12 months)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Complete long-term remission (> 12 months)

    Evaluation of the long-term complete remission rate (> 12 months)

    Measured: 13 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Absence of residual lesion on early control (3 to 6 months)

    Medium-term response rate (3 to 6 months)

    Measured: 3 to 6 months

  2. Rates of medium and long-term recurrence

    Recurrence rate in the medium and long term

    Measured: 13 months

  3. Management of medium and long-term recurrence

    Management of recurrence (endoscopic revision or surgery)

    Measured: 13 months

  4. Morbidity and mortality rates

    Morbidity and mortality rate of endoscopic resection

    Measured: 13 months

  5. Lymph node or visceral metastatic evolution rate

    Rate of pejorative lymph node or metastatic evolution (especially for lesions with microinfiltration of the submucosa)

    Measured: 13 months

  6. Endoscopic description and anatomopathological results

    Endoscopic and / or anatomopathological predictive factors of success (complete long-term remission)

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Mar 2018
  2. Study start1 Jan 2012
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2016
  4. Study completion2 Nov 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03470883
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC-IPC 2017-035
Acronym
REC
Status last verified
Mar 2018
First submitted
13 Mar 2018
Last updated
24 May 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Dixon MF. Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited. Gut. 2002 Jul;51(1):130-1. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.1.130.

    PubMed 12077106
  • Repici A, Pellicano R, Strangio G, Danese S, Fagoonee S, Malesci A. Endoscopic mucosal resection for early colorectal neoplasia: pathologic basis, procedures, and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Aug;52(8):1502-15. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a74d9b.

    PubMed 19617768
  • Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Tam W, Singh R, Zanati S, Burgess NG, Sonson R, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut. 2015 Jan;64(1):57-65. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305516. Epub 2014 Jul 1.

    PubMed 24986245
  • Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Dumonceau JM, Paspatis G, Jover R, Langner C, Bronzwaer M, Nalankilli K, Fockens P, Hazzan R, Gralnek IM, Gschwantler M, Waldmann E, Jeschek P, Penz D, Heresbach D, Moons L, Lemmers A, Paraskeva K, Pohl J, Ponchon T, Regula J, Repici A, Rutter MD, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):270-297. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102569. Epub 2017 Feb 17.

    PubMed 28212588
  • Belderbos TD, Leenders M, Moons LM, Siersema PD. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2014 May;46(5):388-402. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1364970. Epub 2014 Mar 26.

    PubMed 24671869

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Superficial Colorectal Tumors, run by Institut Paoli-Calmettes at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Complete long-term remission (> 12 months) (time frame: 13 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03470883, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in