AzTrials
AzTrials

MelasmaNCT03472235

Microneedle and Trichloroaceticacid in Treatment of Melasma

A study testing Microneedle in people with Melasma, run by Assiut University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Melasma is an acquired disorder of hyperpigmentation characterised by blotchy, light-to-dark brown macules distributed symmetrically on the sun-exposed parts of the body. Although many factors have been proposed to have a role in pathogenesis, the exact ethology is yet to be understood. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years
Conditions the study is for
Melasma
What is being tested?
Microneedle
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
5 Apr 2018to 5 Apr 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Both sex will be included Age range from 18- 50 yrs.' old Patients with realistic expectations.

Who cannot join

  • patients taking oral contraceptive pills. patients with history of polycystic ovary. pregnant and lactating females. patients with active infection. patients on isotretinoin. patients with history of keloids,or hypertrophic scars.

About this study

Official title: Combined Trichlotoaceticacid and Microneedle Versus Trichlroacetic Acid Alone in the Treatment of Melasma

Melasma is an acquired disorder of hyperpigmentation characterised by blotchy, light-to-dark brown macules distributed symmetrically on the sun-exposed parts of the body.

Although many factors have been proposed to have a role in pathogenesis, the exact ethology is yet to be understood. The most commonly identifiable risk factors include ultraviolet radiation, genetic predisposition, pregnancy, oral contraceptives, thyroid disease and drugs like antiepileptic. The excessive pigmentation has been attributed to both melanocytosis (increased number of melanocytes) as well as melano genesis (excess production of melanin) as confirmed in a histopathological study on Asian patients.] Furthermore, a vascular component has also been proposed to play a role in the pathogenesis of melisma. Kim et al. have found that lesion melasma skin had greater expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor in keratinocytes compared to nearby nonlesional skin.

Read the detailed description

As regards management, the therapeutic options range from photoprotection, topical hypopigmenting agents, chemical peels and lasers. There are variety of less-tried systemic agents like fish oil, green tea and . Although no single agent has proved to be effective for all patients, a combination of two or three agents is often tried to achieve optimum results.

Chemical peeling is the application of a chemical agent to the skin, which causes the controlled destruction of a part or of the entire epidermis, with or without the dermis, leading to exfoliation and removal of superficial lesions, followed by the regeneration of new epidermal and dermal tissues.

Chemical peels are a well-known modality of treatment for melasma. The basic mechanism of the action of chemical peels in melasma is the removal of unwanted melanin by causing a controlled chemical burn to the skin.

Trichlroacetic acid peeling has been the gold standard in chemical peeling for many decades.

For superficial peels Trichlroacetic acid 10% to 25% are used. some authors consider up to 35% Trichlroacetic acid as also a superficial.

Skin microneedling is a technique predominantly used to improve the appearance of cutaneous scarring and photo damage.

Fine needles puncture the skin, resulting in increased dermal elastin and collagen, collagen remodelling, and thickening of the epidermis and dermis. Additionally, skin needling creates small channels, which increase the absorption of topically applied preparations A property which has been used in various dermatological treatments.

Conditions
Melasma
Being tested
Microneedle
Medical subject headings
Melanosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MicroneedleDevice

    TCA peeling session: Facial skin will be cleansed with tap water and degreased by rubbing with an alcohol sponge .

    Then TCA 25% will be applied to the whole face by cotton tipped applicator or gauze pad. The entire face will be treated until complete frosting occur.

    The patients will be instructed to wash their faces to decrease the burning sensation.

    Combined session: starts with microneedle using microneedle device (Derma pen) The skin of each patient is cleaned with anti septic solution and anesthetic cream may be applied to lessen discomfort.

    (Dermapen) will be applied on the lesional skin in four direction, vertical, horizontal and in the two diagonal until pin point bleeding occur which will be gently massaged .

    After 10 minutes TCA peeling will be applied TCA peeling will be done for 8 session with 2 weeks interval between each session.

    Microneedle will be done for 4session with 4 weeks interval between each session.

Study groups in NCT03472235
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AActive comparatorinclude 20 patients will be treated with TCA25% +microneedle 8 sessions for TCA 25 peel and 4 sessions for microneedle (derma pen).
Receives: Device: Microneedle
BActive comparatorinclude 20 patient will be treated with TCA 25% only ( 8 sessions)
Receives: Device: Microneedle

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Scoring of the patients according to modified melasma are abd severity index [mMASI] Scoring before and After last session will be done by 1 month

    Efficacy of the treatment =(mMASIscorebefor -mMASIscoreafter)/mMASIscore before x100.

    Clinical efficacy was categorized into :

    Excellent response: if morethan 75%fall in [mMASI] score. Very good response:if 50-75%fall in ]mMASI[score . Good respone: if 25-50%fall in ]mMASI[score. Poor response: if less25%fall in mMASIscore. No response: when there was no change in [mMASI] score at the end of the therapy.

    Efficacy of the treatment =(mMASIscorebefor -mMASIscoreafter)/mMASIscore before x100.

    Clinical efficacy was categorized into :

    Excellent response: if morethan 75%fall in [mMASI] score. Very goodresponse:if 50-75%fall in ]mMASI[score . Good respone: if 25-50%fall in ]mMASI[score. Poor response: if less25%fall in mMASIscore. No response: when there was no change in [mMASI] score at the end of the therapy.

    Measured: 1 month after last session

  2. [mMASI] Scoring before and After last session will be done by 3 months

    before x100.

    Clinical efficacy was categorized into :

    Excellent response: if morethan 75%fall in [mMASI] score. Very good response:if 50-75%fall in ]mMASI[score . Good respone: if 25-50%fall in ]mMASI[score. Poor response: if less25%fall in mMASIscore. No response: when there was no change in [mMASI] score at the end of the therapy.

    Efficacy of the treatment =(mMASIscorebefor -mMASIscoreafter)/mMASIscore before x100.

    Clinical efficacy was categorized into :

    Excellent response: if morethan 75%fall in [mMASI] score. Very goodresponse:if 50-75%fall in ]mMASI[score . Good respone: if 25-50%fall in ]mMASI[score. Poor response: if less25%fall in mMASIscore. No response: when there was no c

    Measured: 3 months after last session

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Mar 2018
  2. Study start5 Apr 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion5 Apr 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion5 Apr 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
TCA peeling session: Facial skin will be cleansed with tap water and degreased by rubbing with an alcohol sponge . Then TCA 25% will be applied to the whole face by cotton tipped applicator or gauze pad. The entire face will be treated until complete frosting occur. The patients will be instructed to wash their faces to decrease the burning sensation. Combined session: starts with microneedling using microneedling device (Dermapen) The skin of each patient is cleaned with anti septic solution and anesthetic cream may be applied to lessen discomfort. (Dermapen) will be applied on the lesional skin in four direction, vertical, horizontal and in the two diagonal until pin point bleeding occur which will be gently massaged . After 10 minutes TCA peeling will be applied TCA peeling will be done for 8 session with 2 weeks interval between each session. Microneedling will be done for 4session with 4 weeks interval between each session.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03472235
Sponsor's protocol ID
MTTM
Status last verified
Feb 2018
First submitted
7 Feb 2018
Last updated
21 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sheth VM, Pandya AG. Melasma: a comprehensive update: part II. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Oct;65(4):699-714. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.06.001.

    PubMed 21920242

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Microneedle in people with Melasma, run by Assiut University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Scoring of the patients according to modified melasma are abd severity index [mMASI] Scoring before and After last session will be done by 1 month (time frame: 1 month after last session). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03472235, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in