Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2NCT03473262
Empagliflozin-based Quadruple Combination vs Insulin Glarine-based Combination Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Chungbuk National University Hospital.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of the empagliflozin as add-on thearpy compared to insulin glargine-based antidiabetic agents (OADs) combination thearpy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on triple OADs in a real clinical practice. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2017to 18 Jul 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The targeted population consists of adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated in outpatient setting by specialists.
Who may be able to join
- Are inadequately controlled with triple OADs (metformin, sulfonylurea, dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitor) as evidenced by HbA1c >7.5% and <12.0%
Who cannot join
- Type 1 diabetes
- Gestional diabetes
- Diabetes due to secondary causes
- Receiving anticancer treatment
- Receiving glucocorticoids or immune-suppressants
- Have been treated with sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors for more than 7 consecutive days within 3 months before entering the study
- Have been treated with any type of insulin for more than 7 consecutive days within 3 months before entering the study
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Empagliflozin vs. Insulin Glargine add-on Therapy in Patients With Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Under Triple Combination Therapy
This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of the empagliflozin as add-on thearpy compared to insulin glargine-based antidiabetic agents (OADs) combination thearpy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on triple OADs in a real clinical practice.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Keywords
- Type 2 diabetes, Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, Empagliflozin, Insulin glargine
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EMPA | Empagliflozin 25 mg/day | |
| INS | Insulin Glargine dose-titrated |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Secondary outcomes (13)
Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Glycemic Target of HbA1c ≤7.0% at Week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 12
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Changes in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 12
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in Weight Between Baseline and Week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in Body Mass Index Between Baseline and Week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in Total Cholesterol Between Baseline and Week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in HDL Cholesterol Between Baseline and Week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in LDL Cholesterol Between Baseline and Week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in Triglycerides Between Baseline and Week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure Between Baseline and Week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in Dystolic Blood Pressure Between Baseline and Week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Patients With Hypoglycemia Episodes Between Baseline and Week 24
All episodes consistent with hypoglycemia with or without a confirmatory blood glucose reading were collected.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Patients With At Least 1 Episode of Genitourinary Tract Infections Between Baseline and Week 24
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Mar 2018
- Study start1 Jan 2017
- Primary completion18 Jul 2018
- Study completion18 Jul 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chungbuk National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eu Jeong Ku, Chungbuk National University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03473262
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017-03-011
- Other IDs
- eujeongku
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 15 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Empagliflozin vs. Insulin Glargine add-on Therapy in Patients With Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Under Triple Combination Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03473262
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2017-03-011
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Keywords
- Type 2 diabetes, Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, Empagliflozin, Insulin glargine
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chungbuk National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of the empagliflozin as add-on thearpy compared to insulin glargine-based antidiabetic agents (OADs) combination thearpy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on triple OADs in a real clinical practice.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EMPA | – | –Empagliflozin 25 mg/day |
| INS | – | –Insulin Glargine dose-titrated |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The targeted population consists of adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated in outpatient setting by specialists.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Are inadequately controlled with triple OADs (metformin, sulfonylurea, dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitor) as evidenced by HbA1c >7.5% and <12.0%
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Type 1 diabetes
- Gestional diabetes
- Diabetes due to secondary causes
- Receiving anticancer treatment
- Receiving glucocorticoids or immune-suppressants
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Changes in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
13 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Glycemic Target of HbA1c ≤7.0% at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Changes in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in Weight Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in Body Mass Index Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in Total Cholesterol Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in HDL Cholesterol Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in LDL Cholesterol Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in Triglycerides Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Changes in Dystolic Blood Pressure Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Patients With Hypoglycemia Episodes Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Patients With At Least 1 Episode of Genitourinary Tract Infections Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
RecruitingObservational study
Genetics of Type 2 Diabetes in West Africans
Hypertension, Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study Comparing SHR-3167 With Insulin Degludec in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Currently Treated With Basal Insulin
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Active, not recruiting
Chrono Nutrition and Insulin Resistance in Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Research Trial to Study Insulin Sensitivity Using Automated Glucose Clamp Technology
Obesity Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Obese Adults
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Eloralintide (LY3841136) in Participants With Obesity or Overweight, Type 2 Diabetes, and Increased Cardiovascular Risk
Obesity, Overweight
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Chungbuk National University Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24 (time frame: Baseline, Week 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2018.