Cervical Cancer Stage IIIBNCT03477240
Feasibility Study Of A Telephonic Questionnaire For Follow-Up Of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients
An observational study of Cervical Cancer Stage IIIB and Treatment Outcome, run by Tata Memorial Hospital.
Trial summary
Cross-sectional Feasibility study on all consecutive patients of locally advanced cancer of the cervix or vault treated entirely at Tata Memorial Centre with curative intent radiation or chemoradiation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Cancer Stage IIIB, Treatment Outcome, Follow up
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 May 2018to 1 Aug 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: All consecutive patients of locally advanced cancer of the cervix or vault treated entirely at Tata Memorial Centre with curative intent radiation or chemoradiation.
Who may be able to join
- Cervical Cancer Stage Ib2, II and III (Squamous carcinoma or adenocarcinoma)
- Cancer of the vault
- Cancer of the cervix which inadvertently underwent hysterectomy (inadequate surgery)
- Treated with curative intent with radical radio(chemo)therapy or NACT followed by radical radio(chemo)therapy and completed all curative treatment.
- Within 2 years post completion of treatment
- Has complete clinical response at 3 months post treatment
- Informed consent
- Contactable by telephone
Who cannot join
- Patients with Stage III disease treated with palliative intent with once monthly radiotherapy
- Early stage cervical cancer patients who underwent Wertheims hysterectomy and who have completed adjuvant radiochemotherapy due to high-risk factors
- Metastatic cervical cancers
- Patients who are unable to comprehend the questions or dialogue over telephone by medical staff.
- Patients who seem unreliable for follow up
About this study
Official title: A Cross-Sectional Feasibility Study of a Telephonic Questionnaire By Research Nurses For Follow-Up Of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients With Complete Response To Treatment.
Cross-sectional Feasibility study on all consecutive patients of locally advanced cancer of the cervix or vault treated entirely at Tata Memorial Centre with curative intent radiation or chemoradiation.
Read the detailed description
Our institution registers on an average 670 cases of cancer cervix in a year and almost 75% are treated with curative intent, therefore around 500 patients a year would be treated with curative intent. Assuming that 75% of patients registered in a year would be receiving treatment at our institute, 375 patients a year would be completing treatment, of whom the investigator expect 80-85% ,i.e 300 patients to have a complete response. The list of patients who have completed radio(chemotherapy) in 2015 \&2016 can be obtained from the Radiation Oncology Department records. Patients identified for a follow up visit will be telephonically contacted between one and two weeks before the planned clinic visit and verbal telephonic consent taken prior to the nurse-led interview. This study should be able to accrue 300 patients in 6 months.
Patients of locally advanced cervical cancer or vault cancer who have been treated with radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy and have a clinical complete response at 3 months post treatment and are within the first 2 years post treatment completion will be eligible to participate in this study.
Screening: Patients will be screened from the list of patients treated in the radiotherapy department over the last 2 years (2015-2016), available from the Radiation Oncology Information System (ROIS). All patients with a diagnosis of cervical cancer or vault cancer will be screened using the hospital Electronic Medical Record (EMR) to check stage of disease, schedule of treatment received, response at 3 months post treatment and expected date of next follow up.
If patient fulfils all inclusion criteria, she will be called by the research nurse, approximately 1-2 weeks prior to her expected date of follow up, for a preliminary conversation and invited to participate in the study.
After verbal telephonic consent is obtained, she will be interviewed by the clinical research nurse using the format of the prepared proforma (Form A) regarding symptoms suggestive of disease recurrence as well as treatment induced toxicity. At the end of the interview, the research nurse records her impression of whether the patient has worrisome symptoms of disease or not and has symptoms of treatment toxicity or not for which she should visit the hospital.
When the patient reports to the OPD the next week for scheduled physical follow up, the nurse completes the consenting process by taking a short written informed consent. The examining physician then takes a complete history and in addition, performs a physical examination and any investigations he/she deems necessary. Following this he/she notes down final impression of disease status and toxicity which are taken as the gold standard (Form B). Each patient will be interviewed only once during their follow up schedule.
In addition at the physical visit, information regarding the acceptability of nurse-led telephonic follow-up to the patient and the financial impact of physical follow- up will be collected using a structured format (Form C).
Study participant drop-out/ Lost-to-follow up: Patients may withdraw their consent at any point during the telephonic interview or the subsequent follow up visit.
- A patient who does not attend the scheduled follow up visit within 1-2 weeks of the telephonic interview will be called a second time to remind her of the follow up appointment and enquire about reasons for non-attendance in the clinic, which will be recorded. If patient does not report to the clinic within the next 2 weeks, she will be considered to have dropped out from the study.
- Those patients in whom the interval between telephonic interview and the physician's assessment is more than 4 weeks, will be considered drop outs and follow up telephone call will go out to enquire about reasons for non-attendance in the clinic, which will be recorded.
- Keywords
- Cervical Cancer, TELEPHONIC QUESTIONNAIRE, Follow up
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Accuracy of nurse-led telephonic interview for disease recurrence
To estimate the accuracy of nurse-led telephonic interview in identifying patients with symptoms suggestive of disease recurrence, in terms of sensitivity and specificity values
Measured: 1 YEAR
Secondary outcomes (2)
Accuracy of nurse-led telephonic interview for late toxicity of treatment
To estimate the accuracy of nurse-led telephonic interview in identifying patients with symptoms suggestive of late toxicity of treatment
Measured: 1 YEAR
Acceptability of a nurse-led telephonic surveillance program using structured format (Form C).
To assess patients' acceptability of a nurse-led telephonic surveillance program (if found to be concordant with physical clinic visits)
Measured: 1 YEAR
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Mar 2018
- Study start1 May 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion28 Feb 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Aug 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cervical Cancer Stage IIIBStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tata Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Umesh Mahantshetty, Tata Memorial Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03477240
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TMH-1950
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 26 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No IPD will be shared
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Cross-Sectional Feasibility Study of a Telephonic Questionnaire By Research Nurses For Follow-Up Of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients With Complete Response To Treatment.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03477240
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TMH-1950
- Keywords
- Cervical Cancer, TELEPHONIC QUESTIONNAIRE, Follow up
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tata Memorial HospitalOther government
- Study start
- 1 May 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cross-sectional Feasibility study on all consecutive patients of locally advanced cancer of the cervix or vault treated entirely at Tata Memorial Centre with curative intent radiation or chemoradiation.
Detailed description
Our institution registers on an average 670 cases of cancer cervix in a year and almost 75% are treated with curative intent, therefore around 500 patients a year would be treated with curative intent. Assuming that 75% of patients registered in a year would be receiving treatment at our institute, 375 patients a year would be completing treatment, of whom the investigator expect 80-85% ,i.e 300 patients to have a complete response. The list of patients who have completed radio(chemotherapy) in 2015 \&2016 can be obtained from the Radiation Oncology Department records. Patients identified for a follow up visit will be telephonically contacted between one and two weeks before the planned clinic visit and verbal telephonic consent taken prior to the nurse-led interview. This study should be able to accrue 300 patients in 6 months.
Patients of locally advanced cervical cancer or vault cancer who have been treated with radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy and have a clinical complete response at 3 months post treatment and are within the first 2 years post treatment completion will be eligible to participate in this study.
Screening: Patients will be screened from the list of patients treated in the radiotherapy department over the last 2 years (2015-2016), available from the Radiation Oncology Information System (ROIS). All patients with a diagnosis of cervical cancer or vault cancer will be screened using the hospital Electronic Medical Record (EMR) to check stage of disease, schedule of treatment received, response at 3 months post treatment and expected date of next follow up.
If patient fulfils all inclusion criteria, she will be called by the research nurse, approximately 1-2 weeks prior to her expected date of follow up, for a preliminary conversation and invited to participate in the study.
After verbal telephonic consent is obtained, she will be interviewed by the clinical research nurse using the format of the prepared proforma (Form A) regarding symptoms suggestive of disease recurrence as well as treatment induced toxicity. At the end of the interview, the research nurse records her impression of whether the patient has worrisome symptoms of disease or not and has symptoms of treatment toxicity or not for which she should visit the hospital.
When the patient reports to the OPD the next week for scheduled physical follow up, the nurse completes the consenting process by taking a short written informed consent. The examining physician then takes a complete history and in addition, performs a physical examination and any investigations he/she deems necessary. Following this he/she notes down final impression of disease status and toxicity which are taken as the gold standard (Form B). Each patient will be interviewed only once during their follow up schedule.
In addition at the physical visit, information regarding the acceptability of nurse-led telephonic follow-up to the patient and the financial impact of physical follow- up will be collected using a structured format (Form C).
Study participant drop-out/ Lost-to-follow up: Patients may withdraw their consent at any point during the telephonic interview or the subsequent follow up visit.
- A patient who does not attend the scheduled follow up visit within 1-2 weeks of the telephonic interview will be called a second time to remind her of the follow up appointment and enquire about reasons for non-attendance in the clinic, which will be recorded. If patient does not report to the clinic within the next 2 weeks, she will be considered to have dropped out from the study.
- Those patients in whom the interval between telephonic interview and the physician's assessment is more than 4 weeks, will be considered drop outs and follow up telephone call will go out to enquire about reasons for non-attendance in the clinic, which will be recorded.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All consecutive patients of locally advanced cancer of the cervix or vault treated entirely at Tata Memorial Centre with curative intent radiation or chemoradiation.
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Cervical Cancer Stage Ib2, II and III (Squamous carcinoma or adenocarcinoma)
- Cancer of the vault
- Cancer of the cervix which inadvertently underwent hysterectomy (inadequate surgery)
- Treated with curative intent with radical radio(chemo)therapy or NACT followed by radical radio(chemo)therapy and completed all curative treatment.
- Within 2 years post completion of treatment
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with Stage III disease treated with palliative intent with once monthly radiotherapy
- Early stage cervical cancer patients who underwent Wertheims hysterectomy and who have completed adjuvant radiochemotherapy due to high-risk factors
- Metastatic cervical cancers
- Patients who are unable to comprehend the questions or dialogue over telephone by medical staff.
- Patients who seem unreliable for follow up
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Accuracy of nurse-led telephonic interview for disease recurrence
Time frame: 1 YEAR
To estimate the accuracy of nurse-led telephonic interview in identifying patients with symptoms suggestive of disease recurrence, in terms of sensitivity and specificity values
2 secondary outcomes
Accuracy of nurse-led telephonic interview for late toxicity of treatment
Time frame: 1 YEAR
Acceptability of a nurse-led telephonic surveillance program using structured format (Form C).
Time frame: 1 YEAR
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Mar 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No IPD will be shared
Related trials for Cervical Cancer Stage IIIB
RecruitingPhase 3
Induction Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab Before Chemoradiation and Pembrolizumab Maintenance Compared to Standard Chemoradiation With Pembrolizumab Followed by Pembrolizumab Maintenance in High-Risk Cervical Cancer
Locally Advanced Cervical Adenocarcinoma, Locally Advanced Cervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Triapine With Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With IB2-IVA Cervical or Vaginal Cancer
Advanced Cervical Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Cervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Testing the Addition of a New Anti-Cancer Drug, Triapine, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Cisplatin) During Radiation Therapy for Advanced-stage Cervical and Vaginal Cancers
Advanced Vaginal Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Vaginal Adenosquamous Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Time-Restricted Eating Versus Nutritional Counseling for the Reduction of Radiation or Chemoradiation Tx Side Effects in Patients With Prostate, Cervical, or Rectal Cancers
Localized Prostate Carcinoma, Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
NBTXR3, Chemotherapy, and Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer
Cervical Esophagus Adenocarcinoma, Clinical Stage II Esophageal Adenocarcinoma AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cervical Cancer Stage IIIB and Treatment Outcome, run by Tata Memorial Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Accuracy of nurse-led telephonic interview for disease recurrence (time frame: 1 YEAR). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2018.