Sickle Cell CrisisPERFIDNCT03477552
Transillumination Device for Peripheral Intravenous Placement in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease (PERFID)
A study testing Accuvein V400 device and Routine procedure in people with Sickle Cell Crisis, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
The primary goal of this randomized, controlled, open-label study is to determine the efficacy of AccuveinV400 (a transillumination veins device) to facilitate peripheral intravenous (IVP) catheter placement during a vaso-oclusive crisis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sickle Cell Crisis
- What is being tested?
- Accuvein V400 device and Routine procedure
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 126 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 30 Mar 2018to 30 May 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Sickle cell patients (all genotypes)
- Patients hospitalized for uncomplicated vaso-occlusive crisis (CVO) in Internal/general Medicine department
- Patients requiring the placement or replacement of a peripheral intra-venous catheter in the Department of Internal/general Medicine
- Patients arrived in the internal/general medicine department of the hospital between 9h and 18h and except weekends
- Signed informed consent.
- Affiliated to the French health care insurance.
Who cannot join
- Signs of shock
- Acute chest Syndrome
- Central venous catheter already present
- Indication to have a central venous catheter from the ourset
- Patient who has already participated to the PERFID study during the current hospitalization
- Refusal of the patient's participation
- Pregnant or lactating woman
- Patient under guardianship or curatorship
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
France2 sites
CHU H. Mondor
Créteil
AP-HP - Hopital Europeen Georges-Pompidou Paris, France
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75908
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of AccuVein V400 to Facilitate Peripheral Intravenous Placement in Sickle Cell Disease Adults With Vaso-occlusive Crisis : a Randomized Clinical Trial
The primary goal of this randomized, controlled, open-label study is to determine the efficacy of AccuveinV400 (a transillumination veins device) to facilitate peripheral intravenous (IVP) catheter placement during a vaso-oclusive crisis. The investigators hypothesized that the number of attempts to a successful placement of a peripheral IV, our primary outcome, would be shorter with the assistance of the Accuvein V400. It is also expected that AccuveinV400 will reduce the time of the procedure, the rate of failure, the technique-related pain.
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Crisis
- Being tested
- Accuvein V400 device, Routine procedure
- Keywords
- Sickle Cell Crisis, intravenous catheter, transillumination
- Medical subject headings
- Vaso-Occlusive Crises
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Accuvein V400 deviceDevice
Sickle cell patients who need a new vein puncture in order to infuse them will benefit of AccuveinV400 device to illuminate their venous network
Routine procedureOther
In the control group, the nurse proceeds as usual to infuse the patient (visual identification in the light of the chamber and palpation)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Accuvein V400 device | Experimental | In the Accuvein group, the nurse uses the Accuvein device to identify the veins before any puncture to infuse the patient and then proceeds as usual, under illumination of the device. Receives: Device: Accuvein V400 device |
| Routine procedure | Active comparator | In the control group, the nurse proceeds as usual to infuse the patient (visual identification in the light of the chamber and palpation) Receives: Other: Routine procedure |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of venipunctures
Number of venipunctures until the peripheral IV placement (with a retrograde blood sample) or before failure (discontinuation after at least 3 attempts by 2 nurses and a maximum of 9 attempts in total).
Measured: Time of the infusion procedure
Secondary outcomes (11)
Time of the procedure
Time from the tourniquet inflation to the insertion of the catheter with a retrograde blood sample was recorded with a chronometer
Measured: Time of the infusion procedure
Procedure failure
Percentage of the procedure failure
Measured: Time of the infusion procedure
The need of a central venous catheter
Percentage of use of a central venous catheter due to failure of peripheral perfusion.
Measured: Time of the infusion procedure
Patient bone pain before and after the procedure
Patient bone pain will be evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (between 0=no pain to10=intolerable pain) before and after the infusion procedure
Measured: Before and within 1 hour after a successful peripheral IV placement
Anxiety before and after the procedure
Patient and nurse anxiety will be evaluated by a visual 5 points-Likert scale (between 1=not at all anxiety to 5=extremely anxious) of anxiety before and after the procedure
Measured: Just before and within 1 hour after a successful peripheral IV placement
Patient satisfaction (pain)
Patient pain related to the procedure will be evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (between 0=no pain to10=intolerable pain)
Measured: Within 1 hour after a successful peripheral IV placement
Patient satisfaction (procedure)
Patient satisfaction of the procedure will be evaluated by a visual 5-points Likert scale (between 1=not at all anxiety to 5=extremely anxious) of satisfaction of the procedure
Measured: Within 1 hour after a successful peripheral IV placement
Nurse satisfaction (procedure)
Nurse global satisfaction of the procedure will be evaluated by Likert scale (between 1=not at all anxiety to 5=extremely anxious)
Measured: Within 1 hour after a successful peripheral IV placement
Nurse satisfaction (quality of placement)
Nurse satisfaction of the quality of the peripheral intravenous placement will be evaluated by Likert scale (between 1=not at all anxiety to 5=extremely anxious)
Measured: Within 1 hour after a successful peripheral IV placement
Qualitative interview of the Accuvein use
Verbatim of a semi-structured interview by a psychologist of 10 to 15 patients (and their nurse) often hospitalized, in the Accuvein Arm
Measured: An average of one week after the procedure
Side effects of the procedure
Complication rate of the peripheral venous catheter procedure (hematoma, bleeding, malaise).
Measured: Time of the infusion procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Mar 2018
- Study start30 Mar 2018
- Primary completion30 Apr 2022
- Study completion30 May 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sickle Cell CrisisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Adult sickle cell patients who need of a new peripheral intravenous catheter placement (for fluid or porphine therapy) will be randomized between two arms : usual technique or use of the AccuveinV400® device). The randomization list (ratio 1: 1) will be made by the statistician of the study using the SAS software and balanced by random blocks of small size (2, 4, 6) to make it unpredictable. The randomization will be stratified on the center and the number of hospitalizations in the previous year (\>3, \<3).
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 126 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jean-Benoit Arlet, MD,PhD, Principal investigator, Medicine interne department, Europeen Georges Pompidou Hopital, Paris, FranceEric Fischer, Principal investigator, Medicine interne department, Europeen Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, FranceFrançois Lionnet, MD, Principal investigator, Medicine interne department, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03477552
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- K160919J
- Other IDs
- 2017-AO2746-47, PHRIP-16-0139
- Acronym
- PERFID
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 7 Feb 2018
- Last updated
- 13 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Corbasson A, Fischer E, Vilfaillot A, Da Costa AB, Charmettan M, Ferreira M, Barthelemy C, Namaoui W, Khimoud D, Beaudoin A, Berkani L, Guillaud C, Khellaf M, Flamarion E, Michon A, Lafont E, Cheminet G, Chatellier G, Pouchot J, Ranque B, Arlet JB. Efficacy of a vein visualisation device for facilitating peripheral venous line placement in adult patients with sickle cell disease: A randomised clinical trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2025 Mar;163:104988. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104988. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
PubMed 39787687
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of AccuVein V400 to Facilitate Peripheral Intravenous Placement in Sickle Cell Disease Adults With Vaso-occlusive Crisis : a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03477552
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PERFID / K160919J
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Crisis
- Keywords
- Sickle Cell Crisis, intravenous catheter, transillumination
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 126 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France
- Study start
- 30 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary goal of this randomized, controlled, open-label study is to determine the efficacy of AccuveinV400 (a transillumination veins device) to facilitate peripheral intravenous (IVP) catheter placement during a vaso-oclusive crisis. The investigators hypothesized that the number of attempts to a successful placement of a peripheral IV, our primary outcome, would be shorter with the assistance of the Accuvein V400. It is also expected that AccuveinV400 will reduce the time of the procedure, the rate of failure, the technique-related pain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Adult sickle cell patients who need of a new peripheral intravenous catheter placement (for fluid or porphine therapy) will be randomized between two arms : usual technique or use of the AccuveinV400® device). The randomization list (ratio 1: 1) will be made by the statistician of the study using the SAS software and balanced by random blocks of small size (2, 4, 6) to make it unpredictable. The randomization will be stratified on the center and the number of hospitalizations in the previous year (>3, <3).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Accuvein V400 device | Experimental | Device: Accuvein V400 deviceIn the Accuvein group, the nurse uses the Accuvein device to identify the veins before any puncture to infuse the patient and then proceeds as usual, under illumination of the device. |
| Routine procedure | Active comparator | Other: Routine procedureIn the control group, the nurse proceeds as usual to infuse the patient (visual identification in the light of the chamber and palpation) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Sickle cell patients (all genotypes)
- Patients hospitalized for uncomplicated vaso-occlusive crisis (CVO) in Internal/general Medicine department
- Patients requiring the placement or replacement of a peripheral intra-venous catheter in the Department of Internal/general Medicine
- Patients arrived in the internal/general medicine department of the hospital between 9h and 18h and except weekends
- Signed informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Signs of shock
- Acute chest Syndrome
- Central venous catheter already present
- Indication to have a central venous catheter from the ourset
- Patient who has already participated to the PERFID study during the current hospitalization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Accuvein V400 deviceSickle cell patients who need a new vein puncture in order to infuse them will benefit of AccuveinV400 device to illuminate their venous network | Device | Accuvein V400 device |
| Routine procedureIn the control group, the nurse proceeds as usual to infuse the patient (visual identification in the light of the chamber and palpation) | Other | Routine procedure |
Primary outcome
Number of venipunctures
Time frame: Time of the infusion procedure
Number of venipunctures until the peripheral IV placement (with a retrograde blood sample) or before failure (discontinuation after at least 3 attempts by 2 nurses and a maximum of 9 attempts in total).
11 secondary outcomes
Time of the procedure
Time frame: Time of the infusion procedure
Procedure failure
Time frame: Time of the infusion procedure
The need of a central venous catheter
Time frame: Time of the infusion procedure
Patient bone pain before and after the procedure
Time frame: Before and within 1 hour after a successful peripheral IV placement
Anxiety before and after the procedure
Time frame: Just before and within 1 hour after a successful peripheral IV placement
Patient satisfaction (pain)
Time frame: Within 1 hour after a successful peripheral IV placement
Patient satisfaction (procedure)
Time frame: Within 1 hour after a successful peripheral IV placement
Nurse satisfaction (procedure)
Time frame: Within 1 hour after a successful peripheral IV placement
Nurse satisfaction (quality of placement)
Time frame: Within 1 hour after a successful peripheral IV placement
Qualitative interview of the Accuvein use
Time frame: An average of one week after the procedure
Side effects of the procedure
Time frame: Time of the infusion procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jan 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39787687Corbasson A, Fischer E, Vilfaillot A, Da Costa AB, Charmettan M, Ferreira M, Barthelemy C, Namaoui W, Khimoud D, Beaudoin A, Berkani L, Guillaud C, Khellaf M, Flamarion E, Michon A, Lafont E, Cheminet G, Chatellier G, Pouchot J, Ranque B, Arlet JB. Efficacy of a vein visualisation device for facilitating peripheral venous line placement in adult patients with sickle cell disease: A randomised clinical trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2025 Mar;163:104988. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104988. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sickle Cell Crisis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Buprenorphine for the Management of Pain in Children With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis
Not yet recruiting
Hypoxic Red Blood Cells in Sickle Cell Anemia
Sickle Cell Anaemia, Sickle Cell Anemia Crisis
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of CSL889 in Adults and Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease During Vaso-Occlusive Crisis
Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Adaptive Platform Trial for Pain Management in Sickle Cell Vaso-Occlusive Crisis
Sickle Cell Disease, Vaso-occlusive Crisis
Recruiting
Effect of Virtual Reality Technology for Pain Management of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease, Vaso-occlusive Crisis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean-Benoit Arlet, MD,PhD principal investigator
Medicine interne department, Europeen Georges Pompidou Hopital, Paris, France
Eric Fischer principal investigator
Medicine interne department, Europeen Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France
François Lionnet, MD principal investigator
Medicine interne department, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Accuvein V400 device and Routine procedure in people with Sickle Cell Crisis, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of venipunctures (time frame: Time of the infusion procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03477552, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.