Chronic Low Back PainNCT03483168
Culturally Sensitive Pain Education Program for Turkish Patients
A study testing Culturally sensitive pain education and Standard pain education program in people with Chronic Low Back Pain, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
In last decade, the awareness has grown regarding the pain neuroscience education (PNE). In the literature, it has been found that there is strong evidence that the educational strategy of pain neuroscience education (PNE) can have positive effects on pain, disability, catastrophization, and physical performance in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Culturally sensitive pain education and Standard pain education program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2018to 1 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 40 Turkish patients between the age of 18 and 65 years, with a diagnosis of non-specific chronic LBP (have pain at least 3 months and mean pain frequency is 3 or more days per week), who are diagnosed by a physician and not starting new treatments,medication or continuing usual care 6 weeks prior and during study participation will be included to the present study. First generation Turkish migrants who are born in turkey, being Turkish as a first language, and being of Turkish nationality will be eligible for inclusion in this study.
Who cannot join
- Patients with uncontrolled mental health condition (eg, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder) that prevents the successful participation, specific pathologies, trauma, or pregnancy will be excluded. Study participants will be instructed to refrain from analgesics 48 hours prior to assessments.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effects of Culturally Sensitive Pain Education Program in Turkish Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
In last decade, the awareness has grown regarding the pain neuroscience education (PNE). In the literature, it has been found that there is strong evidence that the educational strategy of pain neuroscience education (PNE) can have positive effects on pain, disability, catastrophization, and physical performance in chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Nowadays, many physiotherapists integrate the PNE into the treatment of chronic pain. However, the importance of culturally sensitive approaches for the treatment of chronic pain has been proposed depending on the cultural differences of pain beliefs, pain cognitions, pain experiences and pain coping strategies in different ethnic populations. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the effects of a culturally sensitive PNE with a standard translated PNE on pain intensity, disability status, pain pressure thresholds and psychosocial factors (conceptualization of pain, pain beliefs, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and illness perception) in Turkish patients with chronic low back pain (LBP).
The effects of culturally sensitive PNE format will be compared with the standard translated PNE in a pilot trial. 40 Turkish patients (first generation migrant living around Ghent) with chronic LBP, between the age of 18 and 65 years, will be randomized to the culturally sensitive PNE or standard translated PNE. The content of 2 sessions PNE include the explanation about differences of acute and chronic pain, purpose of acute pain, production of acute pain and chronic pain, and potential sustaining factors for central sensitization, but presented in different ways. They will be subjected to an individual education session and they will receive a home education program. In session 2 (after 1 week), they will come back to ascertain that everything is understood.
Read the detailed description
In last decade, the awareness has grown regarding the pain neuroscience education (PNE). In the literature, it has been found that there is strong evidence that the educational strategy of pain neuroscience education (PNE) can have positive effects on pain, disability, catastrophization, and physical performance in chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Nowadays, many physiotherapists integrate the PNE into the treatment of chronic pain. However, the importance of culturally sensitive approaches for the treatment of chronic pain has been proposed depending on the cultural differences of pain beliefs, pain cognitions, pain experiences and pain coping strategies in different ethnic populations. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the effects of a culturally sensitive PNE with a standard translated PNE on pain intensity, disability status, pain pressure thresholds and psychosocial factors (conceptualization of pain, pain beliefs, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and illness perception) in Turkish patients with chronic low back pain (LBP).
The effects of culturally sensitive PNE format will be compared with the standard translated PNE in a pilot trial. 40 Turkish patients (first generation migrant living around Ghent) with chronic LBP, between the age of 18 and 65 years, will be randomized to the culturally sensitive PNE or standard translated PNE. The content of 2 sessions PNE include the explanation about differences of acute and chronic pain, purpose of acute pain, production of acute pain and chronic pain, and potential sustaining factors for central sensitization, but presented in different ways. They will be subjected to an individual education session and they will receive a home education program. In session 2 (after 1 week), they will come back to ascertain that everything is understood.
The primary outcomes include pain intensity and disability status. Secondary outcome measures are pain pressure thresholds and psychosocial factors such as conceptualization of pain, pain Beliefs, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and illness perceptions. Pain thresholds will be assessed with the pressure algometer. Pressure will be applied bilaterally at 3 pressure points: one on the mass of erector spinae muscle, one on the quadriceps muscle, and one on the trapezius muscle. All outcomes will be evaluated at baseline, day 7 (immediately after session 2) and after 1 month follow-up.
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Culturally sensitive pain education, Standard pain education program
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Culturally sensitive pain educationBehavioural
The content of the PNE program include the characteristics of acute and chronic pain, purpose of acute pain, formation process of acute pain from the nervous system, the formation process of chronic pain, and potential sustaining factors for central sensitization.
Standard pain education programBehavioural
For the standard translated PNE, The English translation of "Pain Neuroscience Education: slides for supporting and illustrating your explanation" at the Pain in Motion Group web page (http://www.paininmotion.be/education/tools-for-clinical-practice) and English translation of the Patient Information Leaflet will be used. The education materials will be translated using the forward/backward translation process. The English version of PNE presentation and information leaflet will be translated to Turkish by two independent translators.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Culturally sensitive pain education | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Culturally sensitive pain education |
| Standard pain education | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Standard pain education program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain intensity
"0-10" Numerical Pain Scale
Measured: change from baseline pain intensity at 4 week
Disability status
Disability status will be assessed by using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire ranging from 0 to 24; higher scores represent higher levels of pain-related disability.
Measured: Change from baseline disability status at 4 week
Secondary outcomes (6)
Pain Pressure Thresholds
Pain pressure thresholds will be assessed with a hand held pressure algometer (Wagner Force 50) with a circular probe of one cm diameter. Perpendicular pressure will be applied at a constant rate (1kg/s) to the tissue surface. 3 pressure-points will be evaluated bilaterally: One pressure points are on the Erector spinae muscle mass at 5 cm laterally of the processus spinosus vertebrae of L3, one pressure pain is on the middle of the quadriceps muscle (between the anterior superior iliac spine and base of the patella), one pressure point is on the middle of the trapezius muscle (between acromion and processus spinosus of C7). Two measurements will be taken with a 30 second interval and the mean of the measurements will be recorded.
Measured: change from baseline pain pressure thresholds at 4 weeks
Knowledge of pain
Knowledge of pain will be assessed by using the Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire ranging from 0 to 13; higher scores represent higher levels of pain knowledge.
Measured: change from baseline pain knowledge at 4 weeks
Pain related beliefs
Pain related beliefs will be assessed by using the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire consisting of two subscales: Organic Beliefs and Psychological Beliefs. Scores for each subscale ranges from 1 to 6; higher scores represent that having more negative pain beliefs.
Measured: change from baseline pain beliefs at 4 weeks
Pain catastrophization
Catastrophization of pain will be evaluated by using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale ranging from 0 to 52; higher scores represent higher levels of catastrophizing.
Measured: change from baseline pain catastrophization at 4 weeks
Fear avoidance beliefs related to pain
Fear avoidance will be evaluated by using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia ranging from 17 to 68; higher scores represent higher levels of kinesiophobia.
Measured: change from baseline kinesiophobia at 4 weeks
Illness perceptions
Illness perceptions will be evaluated by using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire; ranges from 0 to 80; higher scores represent a more threatening view of the illness.
Measured: change from baseline illness perceptions at 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Mar 2018
- Study start1 Apr 2018
- Primary completion1 Oct 2018
- Study completion1 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hacettepe University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ceren Gürşen, Hacettepe University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03483168
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EC UZG 2018/0228
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 16 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Louw A, Puentedura EJ, Zimney K, Schmidt S. Know Pain, Know Gain? A Perspective on Pain Neuroscience Education in Physical Therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Mar;46(3):131-4. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.0602.
PubMed 26928735Sleptsova M, Woessmer B, Grossman P, Langewitz W. Culturally sensitive group therapy for Turkish patients suffering from chronic pain: a randomised controlled intervention trial. Swiss Med Wkly. 2013 Nov 12;143:w13875. doi: 10.4414/smw.2013.13875. eCollection 2013.
PubMed 24222526Holzel LP, Ries Z, Kriston L, Dirmaier J, Zill JM, Rummel-Kluge C, Niebling W, Bermejo I, Harter M. Effects of culture-sensitive adaptation of patient information material on usefulness in migrants: a multicentre, blinded randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 23;6(11):e012008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012008.
PubMed 27881523
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effects of Culturally Sensitive Pain Education Program in Turkish Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03483168
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EC UZG 2018/0228
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hacettepe UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In last decade, the awareness has grown regarding the pain neuroscience education (PNE). In the literature, it has been found that there is strong evidence that the educational strategy of pain neuroscience education (PNE) can have positive effects on pain, disability, catastrophization, and physical performance in chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Nowadays, many physiotherapists integrate the PNE into the treatment of chronic pain. However, the importance of culturally sensitive approaches for the treatment of chronic pain has been proposed depending on the cultural differences of pain beliefs, pain cognitions, pain experiences and pain coping strategies in different ethnic populations. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the effects of a culturally sensitive PNE with a standard translated PNE on pain intensity, disability status, pain pressure thresholds and psychosocial factors (conceptualization of pain, pain beliefs, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and illness perception) in Turkish patients with chronic low back pain (LBP).
The effects of culturally sensitive PNE format will be compared with the standard translated PNE in a pilot trial. 40 Turkish patients (first generation migrant living around Ghent) with chronic LBP, between the age of 18 and 65 years, will be randomized to the culturally sensitive PNE or standard translated PNE. The content of 2 sessions PNE include the explanation about differences of acute and chronic pain, purpose of acute pain, production of acute pain and chronic pain, and potential sustaining factors for central sensitization, but presented in different ways. They will be subjected to an individual education session and they will receive a home education program. In session 2 (after 1 week), they will come back to ascertain that everything is understood.
Detailed description
In last decade, the awareness has grown regarding the pain neuroscience education (PNE). In the literature, it has been found that there is strong evidence that the educational strategy of pain neuroscience education (PNE) can have positive effects on pain, disability, catastrophization, and physical performance in chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Nowadays, many physiotherapists integrate the PNE into the treatment of chronic pain. However, the importance of culturally sensitive approaches for the treatment of chronic pain has been proposed depending on the cultural differences of pain beliefs, pain cognitions, pain experiences and pain coping strategies in different ethnic populations. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the effects of a culturally sensitive PNE with a standard translated PNE on pain intensity, disability status, pain pressure thresholds and psychosocial factors (conceptualization of pain, pain beliefs, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and illness perception) in Turkish patients with chronic low back pain (LBP).
The effects of culturally sensitive PNE format will be compared with the standard translated PNE in a pilot trial. 40 Turkish patients (first generation migrant living around Ghent) with chronic LBP, between the age of 18 and 65 years, will be randomized to the culturally sensitive PNE or standard translated PNE. The content of 2 sessions PNE include the explanation about differences of acute and chronic pain, purpose of acute pain, production of acute pain and chronic pain, and potential sustaining factors for central sensitization, but presented in different ways. They will be subjected to an individual education session and they will receive a home education program. In session 2 (after 1 week), they will come back to ascertain that everything is understood.
The primary outcomes include pain intensity and disability status. Secondary outcome measures are pain pressure thresholds and psychosocial factors such as conceptualization of pain, pain Beliefs, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and illness perceptions. Pain thresholds will be assessed with the pressure algometer. Pressure will be applied bilaterally at 3 pressure points: one on the mass of erector spinae muscle, one on the quadriceps muscle, and one on the trapezius muscle. All outcomes will be evaluated at baseline, day 7 (immediately after session 2) and after 1 month follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Culturally sensitive pain education | Experimental | Behavioral: Culturally sensitive pain education |
| Standard pain education | Active comparator | Behavioral: Standard pain education program |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 40 Turkish patients between the age of 18 and 65 years, with a diagnosis of non-specific chronic LBP (have pain at least 3 months and mean pain frequency is 3 or more days per week), who are diagnosed by a physician and not starting new treatments,medication or continuing usual care 6 weeks prior and during study participation will be included to the present study. First generation Turkish migrants who are born in turkey, being Turkish as a first language, and being of Turkish nationality will be eligible for inclusion in this study.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with uncontrolled mental health condition (eg, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder) that prevents the successful participation, specific pathologies, trauma, or pregnancy will be excluded. Study participants will be instructed to refrain from analgesics 48 hours prior to assessments.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Culturally sensitive pain educationThe content of the PNE program include the characteristics of acute and chronic pain, purpose of acute pain, formation process of acute pain from the nervous system, the formation process of chronic pain, and potential sustaining factors for central sensitization. | Behavioural | Culturally sensitive pain education |
| Standard pain education programFor the standard translated PNE, The English translation of "Pain Neuroscience Education: slides for supporting and illustrating your explanation" at the Pain in Motion Group web page (http://www.paininmotion.be/education/tools-for-clinical-practice) and English translation of the Patient Information Leaflet will be used. The education materials will be translated using the forward/backward translation process. The English version of PNE presentation and information leaflet will be translated to Turkish by two independent translators. | Behavioural | Standard pain education |
Primary outcome
Pain intensity
Time frame: change from baseline pain intensity at 4 week
"0-10" Numerical Pain Scale
Disability status
Time frame: Change from baseline disability status at 4 week
Disability status will be assessed by using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire ranging from 0 to 24; higher scores represent higher levels of pain-related disability.
6 secondary outcomes
Pain Pressure Thresholds
Time frame: change from baseline pain pressure thresholds at 4 weeks
Knowledge of pain
Time frame: change from baseline pain knowledge at 4 weeks
Pain related beliefs
Time frame: change from baseline pain beliefs at 4 weeks
Pain catastrophization
Time frame: change from baseline pain catastrophization at 4 weeks
Fear avoidance beliefs related to pain
Time frame: change from baseline kinesiophobia at 4 weeks
Illness perceptions
Time frame: change from baseline illness perceptions at 4 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Oct 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 26928735Louw A, Puentedura EJ, Zimney K, Schmidt S. Know Pain, Know Gain? A Perspective on Pain Neuroscience Education in Physical Therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Mar;46(3):131-4. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.0602.
- Results publication: PubMed 24222526Sleptsova M, Woessmer B, Grossman P, Langewitz W. Culturally sensitive group therapy for Turkish patients suffering from chronic pain: a randomised controlled intervention trial. Swiss Med Wkly. 2013 Nov 12;143:w13875. doi: 10.4414/smw.2013.13875. eCollection 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 27881523Holzel LP, Ries Z, Kriston L, Dirmaier J, Zill JM, Rummel-Kluge C, Niebling W, Bermejo I, Harter M. Effects of culture-sensitive adaptation of patient information material on usefulness in migrants: a multicentre, blinded randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 23;6(11):e012008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012008.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Chronic Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Hybrid mHealth for Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), Non-specific Low Back Pain (NSLBP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Dead Bug Exercises With and Without Diaphragmatic Breathing in Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
McGill Stabilization Exercises Versus Pilates for Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Recruiting
The Intervention Effect of Exercise on Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Injuries
Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain, Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Injury
Not yet recruiting
Erector Spinae Plane Block With or Without Thoracolumbar Fascia Injection for Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Culturally sensitive pain education and Standard pain education program in people with Chronic Low Back Pain, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain intensity (time frame: change from baseline pain intensity at 4 week). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03483168, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.