PruritusPhase 2NCT03483870
Effect of Granisetron on Morphine Induced Pruritus in Cesarean Section
A Phase 2 study testing Morphine Sulfate and Granisetron in people with Pruritus, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Neuraxial anesthesia, which includes epidural anesthesia and intrathecal anesthesia, is a frequent anesthetic approach for caesarean delivery and other lower abdominal and lower limb anesthetic procedures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pruritus
- What is being tested?
- Morphine Sulfate and Granisetron
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2018to 30 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 40 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Parturients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II physical status.
- Age: 20-40 years.
- At term gestation (≥ 37 weeks) with a singleton uncomplicated pregnancy.
- Elective cesarean delivery under intrathecal anesthesia.
Who cannot join
- Parturient refusal.
- Significant organ dysfunctions (e.g., cardiac, respiratory, renal, or liver disorders).
- Morbid obesity (BMI >35).
- Parturients with known hypersensitivity to granisetron, morphine or amide local anesthetics.
- Parturients with pruritogenic systemic disease.
- A coexisting skin disorder or preexisting pregnancy induced pruritus.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Parturients with any contraindication for intrathecal anesthesia, e.g. coagulopathy.
- Emergency cesarean section.
- Psychiatric disorders.
- Fetal abnormalities.
- Failed or unsatisfactory intrathecal block.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Intravenous Granisetron on Incidence and Severity of Intrathecal Morphine Induced Pruritus in Elective Cesarean Section
Neuraxial anesthesia, which includes epidural anesthesia and intrathecal anesthesia, is a frequent anesthetic approach for caesarean delivery and other lower abdominal and lower limb anesthetic procedures. The addition of neuraxial morphine to local anesthetics provides an effective and prolonged postoperative analgesia. Neuraxial administration of morphine which is considered as a gold standard for analgesia has been associated with a frequent incidence of pruritus and postoperative nausea and vomiting.
The incidence of neuraxial opioid induced pruritus varies widely from 30% - 60% after orthopedic surgery with intrathecal morphine injection and from 60% - 100% in pregnant women after neuraxial opioid administration. Parturients appear to be the most susceptible to neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus which probably might be due to the interaction of estrogens with opioid receptors.
Read more
Although the exact mechanism of neuraxial opioid induced pruritus is unclear, the postulated mechanisms include the presence of an "itch center" in the central nervous system (CNS), medullary dorsal horn activation, antagonism of inhibitory transmitters, modulation of 5-hydroxytryptamine subtype 3 (5-HT3) or serotonergic pathways and the involvement of prostaglandins.
There is dense concentration of opioid receptors and 5-HT3 receptors in the dorsal part of the spinal cord and the nucleus of the spinal tract of the trigeminal nerve in the medulla. Activation of these receptors by neuraxial opioid administration or by circulating estrogen in parturients results in neuraxial opioid induced pruritus which is usually localized to the face, neck, or upper thorax. Nalbuphine, propofol and ondansetron have been used effectively in the treatment of pruritus associated with neuraxial morphine in surgical patients.
Granisetron is a potent and highly selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist that has little or no affinity for other 5-HT receptors, or dopaminergic, adrenergic, benzodiazepine, histaminic, or opioid receptors. Its onset of action is 1-3 min, peak plasma level 30 min, plasma half-life is 4-6 h and duration of action up to 24 h. Its longer duration of action than that of ondansetron may coincide with the peak incidence of pruritus after intrathecal morphine (6-9 h). In contrast, other 5-HT3-receptor antagonists have affinities for various receptor-binding sites. For example, ondansetron has detectable binding to 5-HT1B, 5-HT1C, α1-adrenergic, and μ-opioid receptor sites. Although not proven, the binding of these agents to additional receptor subtypes other than their target receptor may underlie the inferior adverse event profile seen with ondansetron compared with granisetron.
Read the detailed description
The study will be carried on 40 parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section (CS) under intrathecal anesthesia. They will be randomly allocated into two equal groups of 20 parturients each:
Group A: (placebo group) will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally \& 2 mL of normal saline 0.9%.
Group B: (treatment group) will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally \& 2 mL of 2 mg granisetron IV injection.
Preoperative assessment:
The day prior to surgery, all patients will undergo preanesthetic checkup including detailed history, thorough general, physical, systemic examination and weight of the patient. They will be kept NOP (nil per mouth) 6-8 hours for solids and 2 hours for water and clear fluids.
Preparation of the patients:
Written consent, coagulation profile, emergency resuscitation equipments including airway devices, advanced cardiac life support drugs. Parturients will be educated regarding the visual analogue scale (VAS).
Parturients in the holding area:
The patients will be positioned in the supine position, with uterine displacement to the left lateral side.
- Baseline monitoring readings of the maternal vital signs including Heart rate (HR), noninvasive systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) and respiratory rate (RR).
- Then IV cannula 18 G will be inserted into forearm vein and normal saline 0.9% solution 15 ml/kg will be infused for all women participating in the study over 20-30 minutes as a preload.
- The study drugs will be given 30 min before administration of intrathecal anesthesia.
- All patients will be premedicated with ranitidine 50 mg IV and then they will be transferred to the operating room.
Parturient in the operating room:
The previous monitoring data will be recorded again for the second time. Then subarachnoid block will be carried out under complete aseptic condition in the sitting position with the table in the horizontal level using 25 G pencil point spinal needle. Intrathecal block will be performed at the level of L 3-4 or L 4-5 vertebral interspaces; 12.5 mg (2.5 ml) of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and 200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally at a rate of 1 ml/15 second after obtaining free flow of CSF. Immediately after end of injection of the drugs intrathecally, the parturient will be placed in the supine position with left lateral uterine displacement by putting a wedge under right hip (15ﹾ left-tilted supine position). All patients will receive supplemental oxygen 4 L/min via facemask until delivery of the baby. Sensory block will be assessed using loss of sensation in response to cold sensation (using ice cube). Surgery will start when the maximum height of sensory block reaches T6 or higher. Motor blockade will be assessed by modified Bromage scale (1 = unable to move feet or knees; 2 = able to move feet only; 3 = just able to move knees; 4 = full flexion of knees; 5 = no detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine; 6 = able to perform partial knee bend).
A third monitoring reading of the vital data will be taken immediately, 5 min and 10 min after spinal block and before the surgical operation (CS) starts.
Intraoperative assessment:
- After subarachnoid block parturients will be monitored for HR, NIBP, SpO2 and RR every 5 min till the end of the surgery. All parturients will be continuously monitored intraoperatively for any episodes of hypotension or bradycardia. Hypotension: defined as more than 20% decrease in maternal systolic blood pressure from the baseline. It will be treated with IV crystalloid fluid bolus and/or 3 mg IV ephedrine boluses when needed. Bradycardia defined as maternal heart rate < 60 beats/min. If occurred, it will be treated with IV atropine sulphate 0.5mg.
- After delivery of the baby, IV oxytocin 5 U will be administered slowly followed by an oxytocin infusion 0.03 U/mL at a rate of 200 mL/hr.
Study outcomes:
Primary outcome:
Incidence of pruritus during the first postoperative 24 hours.
Secondary outcomes:
- Onset time of pruritus
- Duration, location of pruritus and severity of pruritus according to the pruritus grading score The pruritus grading system (PGS) score for each patient is based on: distribution, frequency, severity of itch and quality of sleep. Pruritus Grading System Each patient's itch grade is calculated as the sum of the individual scores as:
- Distribution:Solitary site 1, Multiple sites 2, Generalized 3
- Frequency: Episodic 1, Frequent 3, Continuous 5
- Severity: Rubbing 1, Scratching 1, Localized excoriations 3, Generalized excoriations 5
- Sleep disturbance: Rare 0, Occasional 2, Frequent 4,Totally restless 6 Mild grade: if total score is between 0 and 5. Moderate grade: if total score is between 6 and 11. Severe grade: if total score is between 12 and 19. The onset of pruritus will be assessed and recorded every 15 min for 4 hours along with the complaint by the patient. Pruritus scores will then be evaluated at 4, 8 and 24 hours post-surgery. For patients with pruritus who request treatment, antihistamines such as pheniramine maleate and μ-opioid receptor antagonists such as naloxone will be used depending upon the severity assessed by the clinician, if required.
- Postoperative pain assessment, by a blinded Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) nurse using VAS at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after intrathecal morphine injection. Visual analog scale (Fig. 1) is a validated approach to pain measurement (Wood, 2004). The most common VAS consists of a 10-cm line with one end labeled "no pain" and the other end labeled "worst pain imaginable." The patient marks the line at the point that best describes the pain intensity. The length of the line to the patient's mark is measured and recorded in millimeters. The main theoretical advantage of the VAS is that it does not limit pain to 10 discrete levels of intensity, permitting a more detailed rating of pain. Rescue analgesia will be given in the form of perfalgan (paracetamol) 1 gm/ 6 h (max 4 gm per day) IV infusion and/or pethidine (meperidine) 1 mg/ kg IM when VAS is greater than 4.
- Perioperative adverse events will be recorded, including nausea, vomiting (treated with 10 mg IV metoclopramide), intraoperative shortness of breath and respiratory depression (RR < 8 breaths/ min), and postoperative headache in the first 24 hours postoperatively.
- Participants' satisfaction after end of the delivery: 1) not satisfied or 2) satisfied and willing to take the same medication and procedure in the future when indicated.
Serum serotonin measurment:
Two blood samples (2 mL each) will be withdrawn from each parturient. One sample will be withdrawn in the holding area before preload infusion and granisetron injection (basal reading for serum serotonin) and the other one will be withdrawn 6 hours after intrathecal morphine injection in both groups. Repeated freezing and thawing of the samples should be avoided. Hemolytic and especially lipemic serum samples should not be used with this assay. Storage: up to 6 hours at 2 - 8ºC; for longer periods (up to 6 months) at - 20 ºC.
Intended use and principle of the test: Enzyme Immunoassay for the quantitative determination of serotonin in serum. In the first step, serotonin is quantitatively acylated. The subsequent competitive ELISA kit uses the microtiter plate format. The antigen is bound to the solid phase of the microtiter plate. The acylated standards, controls and samples and the solid phase bound analyte compete for a fixed number of antiserum binding sites. After the system is in equilibrium, free antigen and free antigen-antiserum complexes are removed by washing. The antibody bound to the solid phase is detected by an anti-rabbit IgG-peroxidase conjugate using TMB as a substrate. The reaction is monitored at 450 nm.
Quantification of unknown samples is achieved by comparing their absorbance with a reference curve prepared with known standard concentrations. Expected reference values in serum: Males: 80 - 450 ng/ml and females: 40 - 400 ng/ml
- Conditions
- Pruritus
- Being tested
- Morphine Sulfate, Placebo, Granisetron
- Keywords
- Granisetron, Serum Serotonin, Morphine
- Medical subject headings
- Pruritus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Morphine SulfateDrug
200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally
PlaceboDrug
Also called Normal saline 0.9%
2 mL of normal saline 0.9% IV injection
GranisetronDrug
Also called Kytril, Sancuso
2 mL of 2 mg granisetron IV injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Morphine sulphate & Placebo | Placebo comparator | 20 parturients under intrathecal anesthesia will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate intrathecally and 2 mL of normal saline 0.9% (placebo) IV injection preoperative. Receives: Drug: Morphine Sulfate; Drug: Placebo |
| Morphine sulphate & Granisetron | Active comparator | 20 parturients under intrathecal anesthesia will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate intrathecally and 2 mL of 2 mg granisetron IV injection preoperative. Receives: Drug: Morphine Sulfate; Drug: Granisetron |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of pruritus during the first postoperative 24 hours.
The effect of prophylactic intravenous (IV) administration of granisetron on incidence and severity of pruritus that occurs after intrathecal morphine in parturients undergoing cesarean section (CS).
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (5)
Onset time of pruritus
Recording the time when itching began
Measured: 24 hours
The pruritus grading system (PGS)
The pruritus grading system (PGS) score (Firas et al, 2012) for each patient is based on: distribution, frequency, severity of itch and quality of sleep.
Each patient's itch grade is calculated as the sum of the individual scores as:
Distribution:Solitary site 1, Multiple sites 2, Generalized 3
Frequency: Episodic 1, Frequent 3, Continuous 5
Severity: Rubbing 1, Scratching 1, Localized excoriations 3, Generalized excoriations 5
Sleep disturbance: Rare 0, Occasional 2, Frequent 4,Totally restless 6
Mild grade: if total score is between 0 and 5.
Moderate grade: if total score is between 6 and 11.
Severe grade: if total score is between 12 and 19.
Measured: 24 hours
Postoperative pain assessment
Postoperative pain assessment, by a blinded Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) nurse using VAS at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after intrathecal morphine injection. Visual analog scale is a validated approach to pain measurement (Wood, 2004). The most common VAS consists of a 10-cm line with one end labeled "no pain" and the other end labeled "worst pain imaginable." The patient marks the line at the point that best describes the pain intensity. The length of the line to the patient's mark is measured and recorded in millimeters. The main theoretical advantage of the VAS is that it does not limit pain to 10 discrete levels of intensity, permitting a more detailed rating of pain.
Rescue analgesia will be given in the form of perfalgan (paracetamol) 1 gm/ 6 h (max 4 gm per day) IV infusion and/or pethidine (meperidine) 1 mg/ kg IM when VAS is greater than 4.
Measured: 24 hours
Perioperative adverse events
Nausea, vomiting, intraoperative shortness of breath and respiratory depression (RR < 8 breaths/ min), and postoperative headache in the first 24 hours postoperatively.
Measured: 24 hours
Participants' satisfaction after end of the delivery
- not satisfied or 2) satisfied and willing to take the same medication and procedure in the future when indicated.
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Mar 2018
- Study start1 Jun 2018
- Primary completion1 Oct 2020
- Study completion30 Oct 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PruritusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- comparison of the effect of intravenous granisetron with the effect of using placebo on morphine induced pruritus in parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rabab Ahmed Samy Anwer, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03483870
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Granisetron in C.S
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 9 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kumar K, Singh SI. Neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus: An update. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;29(3):303-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.117045.
PubMed 24106351Dimitriou V, Voyagis GS. Opioid-induced pruritus: repeated vs single dose ondansetron administration in preventing pruritus after intrathecal morphine. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Nov;83(5):822-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.5.822. No abstract available.
PubMed 10690153Koju RB, Gurung BS, Dongol Y. Prophylactic administration of ondansetron in prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus and post-operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing caesarean section. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Feb 17;15:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-15-18.
PubMed 25971957Szarvas S, Harmon D, Murphy D. Neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus: a review. J Clin Anesth. 2003 May;15(3):234-9. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00501-9.
PubMed 12770663Blower P. A pharmacologic profile of oral granisetron (Kytril tablets). Semin Oncol. 1995 Aug;22(4 Suppl 10):3-5. No abstract available.
PubMed 7570052Breen TW, Shapiro T, Glass B, Foster-Payne D, Oriol NE. Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient. Anesth Analg. 1993 Nov;77(5):919-24. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199311000-00008.
PubMed 8214727Reich A, Szepietowski JC. Opioid-induced pruritus: an update. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010 Jan;35(1):2-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03463.x. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
PubMed 19663845Charuluxananan S, Kyokong O, Somboonviboon W, Narasethakamol A, Promlok P. Nalbuphine versus ondansetron for prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2003 Jun;96(6):1789-1793. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000066015.21364.7D.
PubMed 12761013Wood S. Factors influencing the selection of appropriate pain assessment tools. Nurs Times. 2004 Aug 31-Sep 6;100(35):42-7.
PubMed 15471273van Wijngaarden I, Tulp MT, Soudijn W. The concept of selectivity in 5-HT receptor research. Eur J Pharmacol. 1990 Jun 12;188(6):301-12. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(90)90190-9.
PubMed 2164935Perez EA, Hesketh P, Sandbach J, Reeves J, Chawla S, Markman M, Hainsworth J, Bushnell W, Friedman C. Comparison of single-dose oral granisetron versus intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized parallel study. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Feb;16(2):754-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.2.754.
PubMed 9469367Slappendel R, Weber EW, Benraad B, van Limbeek J, Dirksen R. Itching after intrathecal morphine. Incidence and treatment. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2000 Oct;17(10):616-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.2000.00727.x.
PubMed 11050519
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Intravenous Granisetron on Incidence and Severity of Intrathecal Morphine Induced Pruritus in Elective Cesarean Section
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03483870
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Granisetron in C.S
- Conditions
- Pruritus
- Keywords
- Granisetron, Serum Serotonin, Morphine
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Neuraxial anesthesia, which includes epidural anesthesia and intrathecal anesthesia, is a frequent anesthetic approach for caesarean delivery and other lower abdominal and lower limb anesthetic procedures. The addition of neuraxial morphine to local anesthetics provides an effective and prolonged postoperative analgesia. Neuraxial administration of morphine which is considered as a gold standard for analgesia has been associated with a frequent incidence of pruritus and postoperative nausea and vomiting.
The incidence of neuraxial opioid induced pruritus varies widely from 30% - 60% after orthopedic surgery with intrathecal morphine injection and from 60% - 100% in pregnant women after neuraxial opioid administration. Parturients appear to be the most susceptible to neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus which probably might be due to the interaction of estrogens with opioid receptors.
Although the exact mechanism of neuraxial opioid induced pruritus is unclear, the postulated mechanisms include the presence of an "itch center" in the central nervous system (CNS), medullary dorsal horn activation, antagonism of inhibitory transmitters, modulation of 5-hydroxytryptamine subtype 3 (5-HT3) or serotonergic pathways and the involvement of prostaglandins.
There is dense concentration of opioid receptors and 5-HT3 receptors in the dorsal part of the spinal cord and the nucleus of the spinal tract of the trigeminal nerve in the medulla. Activation of these receptors by neuraxial opioid administration or by circulating estrogen in parturients results in neuraxial opioid induced pruritus which is usually localized to the face, neck, or upper thorax. Nalbuphine, propofol and ondansetron have been used effectively in the treatment of pruritus associated with neuraxial morphine in surgical patients.
Granisetron is a potent and highly selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist that has little or no affinity for other 5-HT receptors, or dopaminergic, adrenergic, benzodiazepine, histaminic, or opioid receptors. Its onset of action is 1-3 min, peak plasma level 30 min, plasma half-life is 4-6 h and duration of action up to 24 h. Its longer duration of action than that of ondansetron may coincide with the peak incidence of pruritus after intrathecal morphine (6-9 h). In contrast, other 5-HT3-receptor antagonists have affinities for various receptor-binding sites. For example, ondansetron has detectable binding to 5-HT1B, 5-HT1C, α1-adrenergic, and μ-opioid receptor sites. Although not proven, the binding of these agents to additional receptor subtypes other than their target receptor may underlie the inferior adverse event profile seen with ondansetron compared with granisetron.
Detailed description
The study will be carried on 40 parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section (CS) under intrathecal anesthesia. They will be randomly allocated into two equal groups of 20 parturients each:
Group A: (placebo group) will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally \& 2 mL of normal saline 0.9%.
Group B: (treatment group) will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally \& 2 mL of 2 mg granisetron IV injection.
Preoperative assessment:
The day prior to surgery, all patients will undergo preanesthetic checkup including detailed history, thorough general, physical, systemic examination and weight of the patient. They will be kept NOP (nil per mouth) 6-8 hours for solids and 2 hours for water and clear fluids.
Preparation of the patients:
Written consent, coagulation profile, emergency resuscitation equipments including airway devices, advanced cardiac life support drugs. Parturients will be educated regarding the visual analogue scale (VAS).
Parturients in the holding area:
The patients will be positioned in the supine position, with uterine displacement to the left lateral side.
- Baseline monitoring readings of the maternal vital signs including Heart rate (HR), noninvasive systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) and respiratory rate (RR).
- Then IV cannula 18 G will be inserted into forearm vein and normal saline 0.9% solution 15 ml/kg will be infused for all women participating in the study over 20-30 minutes as a preload.
- The study drugs will be given 30 min before administration of intrathecal anesthesia.
- All patients will be premedicated with ranitidine 50 mg IV and then they will be transferred to the operating room.
Parturient in the operating room:
The previous monitoring data will be recorded again for the second time. Then subarachnoid block will be carried out under complete aseptic condition in the sitting position with the table in the horizontal level using 25 G pencil point spinal needle. Intrathecal block will be performed at the level of L 3-4 or L 4-5 vertebral interspaces; 12.5 mg (2.5 ml) of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and 200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally at a rate of 1 ml/15 second after obtaining free flow of CSF. Immediately after end of injection of the drugs intrathecally, the parturient will be placed in the supine position with left lateral uterine displacement by putting a wedge under right hip (15ﹾ left-tilted supine position). All patients will receive supplemental oxygen 4 L/min via facemask until delivery of the baby. Sensory block will be assessed using loss of sensation in response to cold sensation (using ice cube). Surgery will start when the maximum height of sensory block reaches T6 or higher. Motor blockade will be assessed by modified Bromage scale (1 = unable to move feet or knees; 2 = able to move feet only; 3 = just able to move knees; 4 = full flexion of knees; 5 = no detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine; 6 = able to perform partial knee bend).
A third monitoring reading of the vital data will be taken immediately, 5 min and 10 min after spinal block and before the surgical operation (CS) starts.
Intraoperative assessment:
- After subarachnoid block parturients will be monitored for HR, NIBP, SpO2 and RR every 5 min till the end of the surgery. All parturients will be continuously monitored intraoperatively for any episodes of hypotension or bradycardia. Hypotension: defined as more than 20% decrease in maternal systolic blood pressure from the baseline. It will be treated with IV crystalloid fluid bolus and/or 3 mg IV ephedrine boluses when needed. Bradycardia defined as maternal heart rate < 60 beats/min. If occurred, it will be treated with IV atropine sulphate 0.5mg.
- After delivery of the baby, IV oxytocin 5 U will be administered slowly followed by an oxytocin infusion 0.03 U/mL at a rate of 200 mL/hr.
Study outcomes:
Primary outcome:
Incidence of pruritus during the first postoperative 24 hours.
Secondary outcomes:
- Onset time of pruritus
- Duration, location of pruritus and severity of pruritus according to the pruritus grading score The pruritus grading system (PGS) score for each patient is based on: distribution, frequency, severity of itch and quality of sleep. Pruritus Grading System Each patient's itch grade is calculated as the sum of the individual scores as:
- Distribution:Solitary site 1, Multiple sites 2, Generalized 3
- Frequency: Episodic 1, Frequent 3, Continuous 5
- Severity: Rubbing 1, Scratching 1, Localized excoriations 3, Generalized excoriations 5
- Sleep disturbance: Rare 0, Occasional 2, Frequent 4,Totally restless 6 Mild grade: if total score is between 0 and 5. Moderate grade: if total score is between 6 and 11. Severe grade: if total score is between 12 and 19. The onset of pruritus will be assessed and recorded every 15 min for 4 hours along with the complaint by the patient. Pruritus scores will then be evaluated at 4, 8 and 24 hours post-surgery. For patients with pruritus who request treatment, antihistamines such as pheniramine maleate and μ-opioid receptor antagonists such as naloxone will be used depending upon the severity assessed by the clinician, if required.
- Postoperative pain assessment, by a blinded Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) nurse using VAS at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after intrathecal morphine injection. Visual analog scale (Fig. 1) is a validated approach to pain measurement (Wood, 2004). The most common VAS consists of a 10-cm line with one end labeled "no pain" and the other end labeled "worst pain imaginable." The patient marks the line at the point that best describes the pain intensity. The length of the line to the patient's mark is measured and recorded in millimeters. The main theoretical advantage of the VAS is that it does not limit pain to 10 discrete levels of intensity, permitting a more detailed rating of pain. Rescue analgesia will be given in the form of perfalgan (paracetamol) 1 gm/ 6 h (max 4 gm per day) IV infusion and/or pethidine (meperidine) 1 mg/ kg IM when VAS is greater than 4.
- Perioperative adverse events will be recorded, including nausea, vomiting (treated with 10 mg IV metoclopramide), intraoperative shortness of breath and respiratory depression (RR < 8 breaths/ min), and postoperative headache in the first 24 hours postoperatively.
- Participants' satisfaction after end of the delivery: 1) not satisfied or 2) satisfied and willing to take the same medication and procedure in the future when indicated.
Serum serotonin measurment:
Two blood samples (2 mL each) will be withdrawn from each parturient. One sample will be withdrawn in the holding area before preload infusion and granisetron injection (basal reading for serum serotonin) and the other one will be withdrawn 6 hours after intrathecal morphine injection in both groups. Repeated freezing and thawing of the samples should be avoided. Hemolytic and especially lipemic serum samples should not be used with this assay. Storage: up to 6 hours at 2 - 8ºC; for longer periods (up to 6 months) at - 20 ºC.
Intended use and principle of the test: Enzyme Immunoassay for the quantitative determination of serotonin in serum. In the first step, serotonin is quantitatively acylated. The subsequent competitive ELISA kit uses the microtiter plate format. The antigen is bound to the solid phase of the microtiter plate. The acylated standards, controls and samples and the solid phase bound analyte compete for a fixed number of antiserum binding sites. After the system is in equilibrium, free antigen and free antigen-antiserum complexes are removed by washing. The antibody bound to the solid phase is detected by an anti-rabbit IgG-peroxidase conjugate using TMB as a substrate. The reaction is monitored at 450 nm.
Quantification of unknown samples is achieved by comparing their absorbance with a reference curve prepared with known standard concentrations. Expected reference values in serum: Males: 80 - 450 ng/ml and females: 40 - 400 ng/ml
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- comparison of the effect of intravenous granisetron with the effect of using placebo on morphine induced pruritus in parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Morphine sulphate & Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Morphine Sulfate, Drug: Placebo20 parturients under intrathecal anesthesia will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate intrathecally and 2 mL of normal saline 0.9% (placebo) IV injection preoperative. |
| Morphine sulphate & Granisetron | Active comparator | Drug: Morphine Sulfate, Drug: Granisetron20 parturients under intrathecal anesthesia will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate intrathecally and 2 mL of 2 mg granisetron IV injection preoperative. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Parturients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II physical status.
- Age: 20-40 years.
- At term gestation (≥ 37 weeks) with a singleton uncomplicated pregnancy.
- Elective cesarean delivery under intrathecal anesthesia.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Parturient refusal.
- Significant organ dysfunctions (e.g., cardiac, respiratory, renal, or liver disorders).
- Morbid obesity (BMI >35).
- Parturients with known hypersensitivity to granisetron, morphine or amide local anesthetics.
- Parturients with pruritogenic systemic disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Morphine Sulfate200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally | Drug | Morphine sulphate & Granisetron, Morphine sulphate & Placebo |
| PlaceboAlso: Normal saline 0.9%2 mL of normal saline 0.9% IV injection | Drug | Morphine sulphate & Placebo |
| GranisetronAlso: Kytril, Sancuso2 mL of 2 mg granisetron IV injection | Drug | Morphine sulphate & Granisetron |
Primary outcome
Incidence of pruritus during the first postoperative 24 hours.
Time frame: 24 hours
The effect of prophylactic intravenous (IV) administration of granisetron on incidence and severity of pruritus that occurs after intrathecal morphine in parturients undergoing cesarean section (CS).
5 secondary outcomes
Onset time of pruritus
Time frame: 24 hours
The pruritus grading system (PGS)
Time frame: 24 hours
Postoperative pain assessment
Time frame: 24 hours
Perioperative adverse events
Time frame: 24 hours
Participants' satisfaction after end of the delivery
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Sep 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 24106351Kumar K, Singh SI. Neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus: An update. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;29(3):303-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.117045.
- Results publication: PubMed 10690153Dimitriou V, Voyagis GS. Opioid-induced pruritus: repeated vs single dose ondansetron administration in preventing pruritus after intrathecal morphine. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Nov;83(5):822-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.5.822. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 25971957Koju RB, Gurung BS, Dongol Y. Prophylactic administration of ondansetron in prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus and post-operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing caesarean section. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Feb 17;15:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-15-18.
- Results publication: PubMed 12770663Szarvas S, Harmon D, Murphy D. Neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus: a review. J Clin Anesth. 2003 May;15(3):234-9. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00501-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 7570052Blower P. A pharmacologic profile of oral granisetron (Kytril tablets). Semin Oncol. 1995 Aug;22(4 Suppl 10):3-5. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 8214727Breen TW, Shapiro T, Glass B, Foster-Payne D, Oriol NE. Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient. Anesth Analg. 1993 Nov;77(5):919-24. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199311000-00008.
- Results publication: PubMed 19663845Reich A, Szepietowski JC. Opioid-induced pruritus: an update. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010 Jan;35(1):2-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03463.x. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
- Results publication: PubMed 12761013Charuluxananan S, Kyokong O, Somboonviboon W, Narasethakamol A, Promlok P. Nalbuphine versus ondansetron for prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2003 Jun;96(6):1789-1793. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000066015.21364.7D.
- Results publication: PubMed 15471273Wood S. Factors influencing the selection of appropriate pain assessment tools. Nurs Times. 2004 Aug 31-Sep 6;100(35):42-7.
- Results publication: PubMed 2164935van Wijngaarden I, Tulp MT, Soudijn W. The concept of selectivity in 5-HT receptor research. Eur J Pharmacol. 1990 Jun 12;188(6):301-12. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(90)90190-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 9469367Perez EA, Hesketh P, Sandbach J, Reeves J, Chawla S, Markman M, Hainsworth J, Bushnell W, Friedman C. Comparison of single-dose oral granisetron versus intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized parallel study. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Feb;16(2):754-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.2.754.
- Results publication: PubMed 11050519Slappendel R, Weber EW, Benraad B, van Limbeek J, Dirksen R. Itching after intrathecal morphine. Incidence and treatment. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2000 Oct;17(10):616-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.2000.00727.x.
- Using Pruritus Grading System for Measurement of Pruritus in Patients with Diseases Associated with ItchLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pruritus
Recruiting
Investigation of the Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Itch and Pain Sensitivity
Histamine, Cowhage
Active, not recruiting
Identification of the Mechanism of Non-histaminergic Itch Inducing Epigenetic Changes
Itch
Recruiting
Investigate the Relationship Between Catastrophizing and the Perception of Itch Intensity in Healthy Individuals
Histamine, Cowhage
RecruitingPhase 3
Roflumilast Cream 0.3% for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis, Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Recruiting
Topographical Distribution of Itch and Pain Receptors
Pain, Itch
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Morphine Sulfate and Granisetron in people with Pruritus, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of pruritus during the first postoperative 24 hours. (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03483870, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2021.