AzTrials
AzTrials

Femtosecond Laser in Comparison to Moria Microkeratome in Creating Corneal FlapsNCT03484468

Femtosecond Laser Versus Microkeratome in Creating Corneal Flaps in LASIK

An observational study of Femtosecond Laser in Comparison to Moria Microkeratome in Creating Corneal Flaps, run by Assiut University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Since the cornea is the main responsible for the refraction of the eye, as its refractive power is greater than 70% of the total refraction of the eye, so modification of its refractive properties are used to change the optical system of the eye. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
anterior segment Ocular Coherence Tomography
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
50 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Apr 2018to Apr 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: population attending specialized eye centers

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-40 year
  • Preoperative spherical refraction of -2.00 to -10.00D.
  • Refractive cylinder of less than -3.00D.
  • A stable refractive state for 2 years.
  • An intraocular pressure (IOP) of <22 mm Hg.

Who cannot join

  • A history of any systemic autoimmune disease.
  • A history of diabetes.
  • Other ophthalmic disorders.
  • A history of ocular trauma and surgical history.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

HANY O. EL-SEDAFE, PHD contact

+201005263681

helsedfy@aun.edu.eg

About this study

Official title: Predictability of Corneal Flap Thickness in Lasik Using Femtosecod Laser in Comparison to Moria Microkeratome

Since the cornea is the main responsible for the refraction of the eye, as its refractive power is greater than 70% of the total refraction of the eye, so modification of its refractive properties are used to change the optical system of the eye. Hence, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis has become the most commonly procedure used to correct the refractive errors of the eye. The most important step in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis is the creation of the corneal flap, which its thickness may judge the whole outcome of the surgery . So trying to minimize the variation in the thickness of the resultant flap in comparison to what planned flap thickness preoperatively become our target.

Read the detailed description

As laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis procedure started to use automated microkeratomes in creating corneal flaps since 1989, and science go on until United states Food and Drug Administration approved the IntraLase laser for flap creation in January 2000 femtosecond lasers work by emitting light pulses of short duration (10-15 s) at 1053 nm wavelength that cause photodisruption of the tissue with minimum collateral damage . This enables no blade incisions to be performed within the tissue at various patterns and depth with high precision.

Aim of the work To evaluate and compare the variation in corneal flap thickness created from use of a femtosecond laser and a MORIA microkeratome when making a 110-µm- and 90- µm thick corneal flap and to identify the potential factors that affect corneal flap thickness.

Being tested
anterior segment Ocular Coherence Tomography
Keywords
lasik, flap_thickness, femtosecond, laser, moria, microkeratome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • anterior segment Ocular Coherence TomographyDevice

    anterior segment OCT (Ocular Coherence Tomography) a device shows imaging of anterior segment of the eye and able to show corneal layers and measures its thickness.

Study groups in NCT03484468
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
femtosecond_laserparticipants had there lasik corneal flap creation using femtosecond laser
Receives: Device: anterior segment Ocular Coherence Tomography
moria_microkeratomeparticipants had there lasik corneal flap creation using moria microkeratome
Receives: Device: anterior segment Ocular Coherence Tomography

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. corneal flap thickness

    measuring the corneal flap thickness in nanometers postoperatively by anterior segment OCT

    Measured: 7 days

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. uncorrected visual acuity

    identifying uncorrected visual acuity postoperatively

    Measured: 7 days

  2. best corrected visual acuity

    identifying best corrected visual acuity postoperatively

    Measured: 7 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Mar 2018
  2. Study startApr 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionAug 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03484468
Sponsor's protocol ID
femtosecond_vs_microkeratome
Status last verified
Mar 2018
First submitted
24 Mar 2018
Last updated
30 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Zhang J, Zhang SS, Yu Q, Wu JX, Lian JC. Comparison of corneal flap thickness using a FS200 femtosecond laser and a moria SBK microkeratome. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 18;7(2):273-7. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.14. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 24790869
  • F.A.Guarnieri(ed.), Introduction, Corneal Biomechanics and Refractive Surgery, © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 ; 1: 1

  • Solomon KD, Fernandez de Castro LE, Sandoval HP, Biber JM, Groat B, Neff KD, Ying MS, French JW, Donnenfeld ED, Lindstrom RL; Joint LASIK Study Task Force. LASIK world literature review: quality of life and patient satisfaction. Ophthalmology. 2009 Apr;116(4):691-701. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.037.

    PubMed 19344821
  • Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, Huang D, Varley GA, Agapitos PJ, de Luise VP, Koch DD. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2002 Jan;109(1):175-87. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00966-6.

    PubMed 11772601
  • Hsu SY, Chen HY, Chung CP. Analysis of actual corneal flap thickness and confounding factors between first and second operated eyes. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2009 Sep-Oct;40(5):448-52. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20090901-02.

    PubMed 19772267
  • Ortiz D, Alio JL, Pinero D. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.023.

    PubMed 18242446
  • Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. The history of LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2012 Apr;28(4):291-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120229-01.

    PubMed 22496438
  • Soong HK, Malta JB. Femtosecond lasers in ophthalmology. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Feb;147(2):189-197.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.026. Epub 2008 Oct 18.

    PubMed 18930447
  • Marino GK, Santhiago MR, Wilson SE. Femtosecond Lasers and Corneal Surgical Procedures. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017 Sep-Oct;6(5):456-464. doi: 10.22608/APO.2017163. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

    PubMed 28780779
  • Ratkay-Traub I, Ferincz IE, Juhasz T, Kurtz RM, Krueger RR. First clinical results with the femtosecond neodynium-glass laser in refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2003 Mar-Apr;19(2):94-103. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20030301-03.

    PubMed 12701713

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Femtosecond Laser in Comparison to Moria Microkeratome in Creating Corneal Flaps, run by Assiut University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact SAMIR Y. SALIH, PHD (+201003304320, samir.abouelail@med.au.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

corneal flap thickness (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03484468, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in