AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT03486782

Dual Site-dual Channel Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Language and Cognitive Function in Stroke Patients

A study testing IFG stimulation, DLPFC stimulation and aphasia therapy in people with Stroke and Aphasia, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of dual site-dual channel non-invasive brain stimulation for recovery of language and cognitive function in post stroke patients. Simultaneous dual site-dual channel stimulation was applied by using two sets of transcranial direct current stimulation devices. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stroke, Aphasia, Cognitive Impairment
What is being tested?
IFG stimulation, DLPFC stimulation and aphasia therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
29 May 2018to 17 Mar 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • left hemisphere involved stroke patients
  • patients diagnoses as post stroke aphasia

Who cannot join

  • history of psychiatric disease
  • patients with metal implants
  • history of epilepsy
  • pregnancy
  • skin defect at the site of electrode attachment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Effect of Dual Site-dual Channel Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Recovery of Language and Cognitive Function in Stroke Patients

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of dual site-dual channel non-invasive brain stimulation for recovery of language and cognitive function in post stroke patients. Simultaneous dual site-dual channel stimulation was applied by using two sets of transcranial direct current stimulation devices. All subjects will go through four conditions of transcranial direct current stimulation with for 30 minutes. Four conditions are 1) Dual stimulation: i) anodal stimulation on ipsilesional inferior frontal cortex, ii) anodal stimulation on ipsilesional dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. 2) Single stimulation 1: anodal stimulation on ipsilesional inferior frontal cortex and cathodal stimulation on contralesional inferior frontal cortex; 3) Single stimulation 2: anodal stimulation on ipsilesional inferior frontal cortex and cathodal stimulation on contralesional supraorbital area.

Being tested
IFG stimulation, DLPFC stimulation, aphasia therapy
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, dual stimulation
Medical subject headings
Stroke, Aphasia, Cognitive Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IFG stimulationDevice

    stimulating inferior frontal cortex with transcranial direct current stimulation for 30 minutes

  • DLPFC stimulationDevice

    stimulating dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with transcranial direct current stimulation for 30 minutes

  • aphasia therapyBehavioural

    aphasia therapy for 30 minutes during transcranial direct current stimulation

Study groups in NCT03486782
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dual stimulationActive comparatori) anodal stimulation of ipsilesional inferior frontal cortex and cathodal stimulation of contralesional supraorbital area ii) anodal stimulation on ipsilesional dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and cathodal stimulation of contralesional supraorbital area
Receives: Device: IFG stimulation; Device: DLPFC stimulation; Behavioral: aphasia therapy
Single stimulation 1Active comparatori) anodal stimulation of ipsilesional inferior frontal cortex and cathodal stimulation of contralesional inferior frontal cortex
Receives: Device: IFG stimulation; Behavioral: aphasia therapy
Single stimulation 2Active comparatori) anodal stimulation of ipsilesional inferior frontal cortex and cathodal stimulation of contralesional supraorbital area
Receives: Device: IFG stimulation; Behavioral: aphasia therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in Korean Boston naming test

    measures naming ability thorough picture naming test

    Measured: Baseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

  2. Changes in Korean Western Aphasia Battery

    assessment of language function and provide aphasia quotients

    Measured: Baseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Digit span test

    measures memory span

    Measured: Baseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

  2. Korea Montreal Cognitive Assessment

    measure cognitive function

    Measured: Baseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

  3. Korean Color Word Stroop test

    measures selective attention and executive function

    Measured: Baseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

  4. Controlled Oral Word Association Test

    measure verbal fluency

    Measured: Baseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

  5. Changes of Cortical activation

    Cortical activation is measured by functional Near-Infrared-Spectroscopy (fNIRS) (NIRScout, NIRx, Germany)

    Measured: Baseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

  6. Changes in brain activation of resting-state and task functional MRI

    Neuroplasticity measure

    Measured: Baseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Apr 2018
  2. Study start29 May 2018
  3. Primary completion17 Mar 2020
  4. Study completion17 Mar 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03486782
Sponsor's protocol ID
2017-08-124-B
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
22 Mar 2018
Last updated
27 May 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing IFG stimulation, DLPFC stimulation and aphasia therapy in people with Stroke and Aphasia, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in Korean Boston naming test (time frame: Baseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 May 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in