AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteotomyCALCOTNCT03487497

Gait Analysis During Level and Uphill Walking After Lengthening Osteotomy of the Lateral Column

An observational study of Osteotomy and Lengthening; Leg, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A common surgical treatment for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (and the resulting flat foot) is the correction through a calcaneal lengthening osteotomy of the lateral column (LLC). Clinical studies showed pain relief and functional improvements through different scores. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Osteotomy, Lengthening; Leg
What is being tested?
Lateral column lengthening osteotomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
32 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
20 Nov 2017to 31 Dec 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 20 patients who had undergone lengthening osteotomy of the lateral column of the foot 2 to 10 years prior and 20 age and sex matched healthy subjects

Who may be able to join

  • age > 18 years
  • age < 70 years
  • Patients:
  • Unilateral surgery for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction by flexor digitorum longus transfer and lateral lengthening osteotomy of the calcaneus
  • Minimum of 2 years postoperatively

Who cannot join

  • Neuromuscular disorders affecting gait
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Diabetes
  • Pregnancy (if unknown, a pregnancy test (urine test) will be performed)
  • Body mass index > 35 kg/m2
  • Patients:
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Additional pathologies that influence the mobility of the ankle joint
  • Bilateral surgery
  • Use of walking aids
  • Healthy control group:
  • Lower extremity surgery
  • Pain in the lower extremities within the last 6 months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • University Hospital Basel

    Basel, Canton of Basel-City, 4031

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

A common surgical treatment for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (and the resulting flat foot) is the correction through a calcaneal lengthening osteotomy of the lateral column (LLC). Clinical studies showed pain relief and functional improvements through different scores. However, according to clinical experience, some patients complain about a limited ankle dorsiflexion after LLC surgery. Several joints of the foot (talocrural, subtalar, talonavicular, calcaneocuboid) contribute to the overall range of motion in foot plantarflexion/dorsiflexion and pronation/supination. Changes in the range of motion in one joint can affect all the other joints. For instance, it was shown that a fusion of the talonavicular joint removes most of the residual hindfoot motion in plantarflexion/dorsiflexion and pronation/supination. Because the lengthening of the lateral column presumably decreases the mobility of the medial column and thus of the talonavicular joint, this surgery can influence the range of motion of the other joints, and hence contribute to the reported decreased ankle dorsiflexion motion.

Patients after LLC have less plantarflexion of the first metatarsal throughout stance of level walking and less inversion of the hindfoot during push-off compared to healthy subjects. Uphill walking requires more ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion than level walking. A limitation of the ankle joint mobility especially in dorsiflexion could therefore lead to additional or greater changes in gait patterns (hindfoot and forefoot kinematics) during uphill walking.

Read more

The primary objective is:

  • To compare differences in hindfoot and forefoot kinematics between level and uphill treadmill walking in relation to passive range of motion

The secondary objectives are:

  • To compare lower leg muscle activation during level and uphill treadmill walking between patients after LLC and healthy subjects
  • To test the association between muscle strength, muscle activation patterns and hindfoot and forefoot kinematics during level and uphill walking and heel rise
  • To relate clinical outcome of LLC surgery by functional scores to passive range of motion
Read the detailed description

At the initial assessment, written informed consent will be obtained before participants will undergo a clinical exam (inspection and palpation of the foot, measurement of bilateral passive ankle range of motion). All participants will complete the Short Form (SF)36 and the Foot Function Index20 to obtain pain and functional scores (approximate duration: 30 minutes). Participants will be able to familiarize with treadmill walking at their preferred walking speed. Surface electrodes will be placed bilaterally over the tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius medialis and lateralis, soleus, and peroneus brevis. Isokinetic muscle strength in ankle plantarflexion/ dorsiflexion and inversion/eversion will be tested using the Biodex system 4 Pro (approximate duration: 45 minutes). Reflective surface markers will be placed bilaterally on anatomic landmarks according to the Plug In Gait model and a specific foot model. These markers are seen by 6 Vicon MX cameras. Participants will be asked to stand on the treadmill (h/p cosmos, Zebris), and data for a standing reference trial will be collected. Single-limb heel rise performance with each leg will be tested on the treadmill while kinematic, electromyography (EMG), and pressure data will be measured. Participants will then walk barefoot for 2 minutes at 0% slope while kinematic, EMG, and pressure data will be recorded. Subsequently, the treadmill incline will be increased to 15%, and data for 2 minutes walking at this slope will be recorded followed by three heel rises (approximate duration: 45 minutes). The estimated total time for each participant is 120 minutes.

Being tested
Lateral column lengthening osteotomy
Keywords
gait analysis, electromyography, strength test, walking

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lateral column lengthening osteotomyProcedure or surgery

    Lengthening osteotomy of the lateral column of the foot

Study groups in NCT03487497
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PatientsPatients who underwent lateral column lengthening osteotomy
Receives: Procedure: Lateral column lengthening osteotomy
Healthy subjectsHealthy subjects without intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Passive plantarflexion and dorsiflexion range of motion

    measured using a Biodex

    Measured: 0 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. 3D hindfoot and forefoot range of motion during level and uphill walking

    assessed as max plantarflexion to max dorsiflexion of the ankle using marker and camera based motion capture

    Measured: 0 months

  2. Isokinetic strength in plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, inversion, and eversion

    Max moment assessed using a Biodex

    Measured: 0 months

  3. Lower leg muscle activation

    Max electromyographic signal intensity

    Measured: 0 months

  4. Clinical outcome

    assessed by American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Hindfoot Score (questionnaires) (best score: 100 - no limitations)

    Measured: 0 months

  5. Functional outcome

    assessed by Foot Function Index (questionnaire) (best score: 0; worst score 100)

    Measured: 0 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Apr 2018
  2. Study start20 Nov 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2018
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
32 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03487497
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015-00254
Other IDs
2015
Acronym
CALCOT
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
28 Feb 2018
Last updated
2 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Osteotomy and Lengthening; Leg, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Passive plantarflexion and dorsiflexion range of motion (time frame: 0 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in