AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostate CancerNCT03489057

Efficacy of a Couple-Focused mHealth Symptom Self-management Program

A study testing Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC) in people with Prostate Cancer, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study, the investigators propose to test the efficacy of a couple-focused, web-based tailored prostate cancer symptom management program, Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC) in a randomized clinical trial. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Prostate Cancer
What is being tested?
Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
560 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
30 May 2018to 31 Jul 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The eligible patients must
  • be 40 to 75 years of age
  • be within 16 weeks (4 months) after completing initial treatment for localized prostate cancer as confirmed by patient and biopsy pathology report) with curative intent, i.e., surgery or radiotherapy +/- hormonal treatment;
  • have no previous cancer history within the past 2 years and not currently in treatment for cancer, or have a concurrent cancer (excluding non-melanomatous skin cancer);
  • experience prostate cancer-specific and/or general symptoms;
  • have a partner who is willing to participate.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • The eligible partners must
  • be 18 years or older
  • be identified as the partner by the patient
  • not have been diagnosed with cancer or receiving treatment for cancer within the past 12 months (non-melanomatous skin cancer diagnosis/treatment is acceptable) so that couples can focus their efforts on managing prostate cancer.

Who cannot join

  • Patients and their partners will be excluded from the study if they:
  • Do not read and speak English (evidenced by their understanding and responses to screening questions and self-reported ability to read English);
  • Have cognitive impairment (assessed by the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27559

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Testing the Efficacy of a Couple-Focused, Tailored mHealth Intervention for Symptom Self-Management Among Men With Prostate Cancer and Their Partners

In this study, the investigators propose to test the efficacy of a couple-focused, web-based tailored prostate cancer symptom management program, Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC) in a randomized clinical trial. A two-group (PERC versus National Cancer Institute (NCI) website plus treatment as usual) randomized controlled design will be used, and data will be collected at baseline (T1), 4 (T2), 8 (T3), and 12 months (T4) among 300 patients completing initial treatment for localized prostate cancer and their intimate partners (i.e., 600 participants in total).

Read the detailed description

This randomized clinical trial aims to test the efficacy of a couple-focused, web-based tailored prostate cancer symptom management program, Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC). The study participants will include 300 patients completing initial treatment for localized prostate cancer and their intimate partners (i.e., 300 dyads and 600 individuals). After informed consent, we will conduct baseline assessment (T1), randomly assign eligible participants to either PERC or the National Cancer Institute (NCI) website, and then collect data at 4 (T2), 8 (T3), and 12 months (T4) post-T1.

Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Being tested
Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC), usual care plus NCI website
Keywords
symptom, family research, self-management, caregiving, social support, mHealth, healthy behavior, self-efficacy, quality of life, care transition
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC)Behavioural

    PERC uses mHealth technologies to dramatically increase couples' accessibility to posttreatment supportive care whenever and wherever they feel comfortable accessing it. PERC aims to improve QOL for both patients and partners by enhancing positive appraisals of illness and boosting self-efficacy, social support from multiple sources, and healthy behaviors for symptom self-management at home.

  • usual care plus NCI websiteBehavioural

    The usual care plus NCI website provides generic information about prostate cancer treatment options, research, causes, and statistics; coping resources that are not prostate cancer-specific; support from non-providers via a toll free phone and LiveHelp Online Chat about cancer-related questions, clinical trials, and quitting smoking.

Study groups in NCT03489057
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PERC ProgramExperimentalProstate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC) program. Participants assigned to experimental condition will receive access to the PERC website.
Receives: Behavioral: Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC)
usual care plus NCI websiteActive comparatorParticipants in this usual care plus NCI website group will be automatically directed to the NCI prostate cancer website after logging in to the study website homepage.
Receives: Behavioral: usual care plus NCI website

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment (FACT-G) Scores

    The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is used to measure change in quality of life of patient and partner from baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1). Change from baseline is the post-Baseline values minus the Baseline value. Functional assessment of Cancer Therapy-General is a 27-item survey which assesses physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating "not at all" and 4 indicating "very much" in response to item questions. The total FACT-G score is calculated as the sum of four sub scores including physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Total scores range between 0-108. Higher scores indicated better well-being. It has also demonstrated sensitivity to change over time.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8 and 12

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Change in Pain From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores

    PROMIS Pain Interference - Short Form 6b is used to measure change in Pain Interference among patients and their partners from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8-mon post-T1), and T4 (12-mon post-T1). Required by PROMIS scoring instrument, for all PROMS measurements, total raw scores are translated into T scores for each participant, where the T score rescales the raw score into a standardized T score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. The pain measures the extent to which patients experience problems with pain over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores reflect greater Pain Interference. The score value ranges between 41-78.3.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  2. Change in Fatigue From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Scores

    FACT-G is used to measure the change in the quality of life of patients and partners from baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). Change from baseline is the post-baseline values minus the Baseline value. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General is a 27-item survey that assesses physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating "not at all" and 4 indicating "very much" in response to item questions. The total FACT-G score is calculated as the sum of four sub-scores including physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Total scores range between 0-108. Higher scores indicated better well-being. It has also demonstrated sensitivity to change over time.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  3. Change in Sleep Disturbance From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by PROMIS Scores

    PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b is used to examine change in sleep quality of patients and their partners from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1). Required by the PROMIS scoring instrument, for all PROMS measurements, total raw scores are translated into T scores for each participant, where the T score rescales the raw score into a standardized T score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. The sleep disturbance sub-scale measured the extent to which participants experienced sleep disturbance over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores reflect greater sleep disturbance. Score value ranges between 28.9-76.5.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  4. Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Anxiety Short Form

    PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Anxiety Short Form 7a is used to examine change in anxiety among patients and their partners from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1). For all PROMS measurements, total raw scores are translated into T scores for each participant, where the T score rescales the raw score into a standardized T score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. The anxiety sub-scale of the PROMIS item bank measures the extent to which participants experience anxiety symptoms over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with the total scores range from 36.3 to 82.7 with higher scores reflect higher anxiety.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  5. Change in Depression From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Depression

    PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Depression Short From 8b is used to measure the change in depression scores among patients from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1). Required by the PROMIS scoring instrument, for all PROMIS measurements, total raw scores are translated into T scores for each participant, where the T score rescales the raw score into a standardized T score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. The depression sub-scale of the PROMIS item bank measures the extent to which participants experience depressive symptoms in the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with the total scores range from 24.7 to 63.5 with higher scores indicate greater depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  6. Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Urinary Symptom Score (Patient Only)

    Urinary symptom scores change by time were measured using patients' self-assessed urinary symptoms subscale of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) which is designed to evaluate patient urinary function and bother after prostate cancer treatment. EPIC26 was used at Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). EPIC26 evaluates patients' functional and symptom-specific issues, including urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms and bother. The patient self-report contains 26 items, and the score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer prostate cancer symptoms and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  7. Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Bowel Symptom Score (Patient Only)

    Bowel symptom scores change by time and were measured using patients' self-assessed bowel symptoms subscale of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) which is designed to evaluate patient function and bother after prostate cancer treatment. EPIC was used at Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). EPIC26 evaluates patients' functional and symptom-specific issues, including urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms and bother. The patient self-report contains 26 items, and the score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer prostate cancer symptoms and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  8. Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Sexual Symptom Score (Patients Only)

    Sexual symptom scores change by time were measured using patients' self-assessed sexual symptoms subscale of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) which is designed to evaluate patient function and bother after prostate cancer treatment. EPIC was used at Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1). EPIC26 evaluates patients' functional and symptom-specific issues, including urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms and bother. The patient self-report contains 26 items, and the score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer prostate cancer symptoms and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  9. Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Hormonal Symptom Score (Patient Only)

    Hormonal symptom scores change by time were measured using patients' self-assessed hormonal subscale of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) which is designed to evaluate patient function and bother after prostate cancer treatment. EPIC was used at Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). EPIC26 evaluates patients' functional and symptom-specific issues, including urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms and bother. The patient self-report contains 26 items, and the score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer prostate cancer symptoms and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  10. Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Urine Symptom Score (Partners Only)

    Urinary symptom scores change by time were measured using caregiver assessed urinary symptoms subscale of the 4-item caregiver version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form which is designed to assess how much of a bother/burden patients' prostate cancer symptoms were for the partners themselves. EPIC-caregiver was used Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). The partner reported how patients' urinary and bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms bothered the caregivers. The score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer bother partners reported and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  11. Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Bowel Symptom (Partners Only)

    Bowel symptom scores change by time were measured using caregiver-assessed bowel symptoms subscale of the 4-item caregiver version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form which is designed to assess how much of a bother/burden patients' prostate cancer symptoms were for the partners themselves. EPIC-caregiver was used Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). The partner reported how patients' urinary and bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms bothered the caregivers. The score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer bother partners reported and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  12. Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Hormonal Symptom Score Partners Only)

    Hormonal symptom scores change by time were measured using caregiver-assessed hormonal subscale of the 4-item caregiver version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form which is designed to assess how much of a bother/burden patients' prostate cancer symptoms were for the partners themselves. EPIC-caregiver was used Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). The partner reported how patients' urinary and bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms bothered the caregivers. The score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer bother partners reported and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  13. Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Sexual Symptom Score Partners Only)

    Sexual symptom scores change by time were measured using caregiver assessed sexual symptoms subscale of the 4-item caregiver version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form which is designed to assess how much of a bother/burden patients' prostate cancer symptoms were for the partners themselves. EPIC-caregiver was used Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). The partner reported how patients' urinary and bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms bothered the caregivers. The score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer bother partners reported and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  14. Change in Self-efficacy Scores From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by the Lewis Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale

    The Lewis Cancer Self-Efficacy will be used to measure change in patient and partner feelings of self-efficacy in dealing with the patient's cancer diagnosis and treatment from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1). Change from baseline is the post-Baseline values minus the Baseline value. Patients will rate statements about how confident they feel on a scale from 1 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  15. Change in Informational Support Scores From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by PROMIS-Informational Support Short Form

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 8a is a National Institute of Health-funded initiative to develop and validate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for clinical research and practice. PROMISE is a set of measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health. It uses a 5-point Likert scale. The scoring process involved collecting PROMIS data from participants and calculating the PROMIS score as the sum of responses to each question. Then Health Measures Scoring Service was used to calculate the PROMIS T-score - the standardized score. Specifically, PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population (T-scores have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10). On the T-score metric: A score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population; A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  16. Change in Instrumental Support Scores From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Measured by PROMIS Instrumental Support-Short Form 8a

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 8a is a National Institute of Health-funded initiative to develop and validate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for clinical research and practice. PROMISE is a set of measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health. It uses a 5-point Likert scale. The scoring process involved collecting PROMIS data from participants and calculating the PROMIS score as the sum of responses to each question. Then Health Measures Scoring Service was used to calculate the PROMIS T-score - the standardized score. Specifically, PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population (T-scores have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10). On the T-score metric: A score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population; A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

  17. Change in Appraisal of Illness Scores From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Measured by Appraisal of Illness Scale

    The appraisal of Illness scale is used to measure changes in perception of prostate cancer and related issues among patients and their partners. The Appraisal of Illness scale is a 20-item measure that uses Likert Scales ranging from 1 to 5 (very false to very true). The score range is 1-5. The higher score indicated a better cognitive appraisal of the illness the patient or partner had. The score is calculated by the Prorated mean scale scores. The formula is prorated scale score =[SUM OF ITEM SCORES]x[N OF ITEMS IN SCALE]/[N OF ITEMS ANSWERED]. Measurements were performed at baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1). Change from baseline is the post-baseline values minus the baseline value. Higher scores indicate better support.

    Measured: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Apr 2018
  2. Study start30 May 2018
  3. Primary completion6 Jul 2022
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
560 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03489057
Sponsor's protocol ID
LCCC 1713
Other IDs
1R01NR016990-01A1
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
13 Mar 2018
Last updated
3 Oct 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Ma C, Adler RH, Neidre DB, Chen RC, Northouse LL, Rini C, Tan X, Song L. Challenges and Approaches to Recruitment for and Retention in a Dyad-Focused eHealth Intervention During COVID-19: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 3;26:e51877. doi: 10.2196/51877.

    PubMed 39625741
  • Song L, Nielsen ME, Chen RC, Rini C, Keyserling TC, Idiagbonya E, Fuller GP, Northouse L, Palmer MH, Tan X. Testing the efficacy of a couple-focused, tailored eHealth intervention for symptom self-management among men with prostate cancer and their partners: the study protocol. Trials. 2022 Jan 4;23(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05948-5.

    PubMed 34983621

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC) in people with Prostate Cancer, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment (FACT-G) Scores (time frame: Baseline, month 4, 8 and 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03489057, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in