AzTrials
AzTrials

Family ConflictNCT03495440

Families of Youth with Developmental Disabilities: a Theory-Based Intervention

A study testing Center Sessions and At-home in people with Family Conflict and Marital Conflict, run by University of Notre Dame at 2 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is designed to evaluate a preventive intervention program designed to support families (parents and typically developing adolescent siblings) that include a child with an intellectual and/or developmental disability. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Family Conflict, Marital Conflict, Communication
What is being tested?
Center Sessions and At-home
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
4 Aug 2017to 31 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants in all conditions will include mothers, fathers, TD siblings between 11 and 17 years old, and individuals with IDD of any age.
  • Participants must be able to understand and respond to survey questions in English
  • Parents must be cohabitating, with both participating children living in their home.
  • Individual with IDD falls into one or more of the following categories: 1) meets criteria for an intellectual disability, which would mean a measured IQ of 70-75 or lower and a measured Adaptive Functioning score of 70-75 or lower, 2) meets criteria for an Autism Spectrum Disorder based on an evaluation using the ADOS-2, SCQ, and expert clinical judgment based on DSM-5 ASD criteria, or 3) has a medically verified genetic condition (e.g., Down syndrome, Fragile X syndrome, Williams syndrome, Angelman syndrome, others) that is generally considered to be a developmental disability, and shows cognitive or adaptive functioning deficits (70-75 or below) although not necessarily deficits in both categories as would be needed for an Intellectual Disability diagnosis.

Who cannot join

  • Siblings identified as typically developing will be excluded 1) with a score of 10 or higher on the SCQ-L, if a subsequent ADOS suggests that they have an ASD diagnosis, or 2) with a WASI-II score of 75 or lower.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Edward M Cummings, PhD contact

574-631-4947

ecumming@nd.edu

Kathleen N Bergman, PhD contact

574-631-0956

kbergman@nd.edu

United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Wm. J. Shaw Center for Children and Families

    Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46814

    Kathleen N Bergman, PhD, 574-631-0956, kbergman@nd.edu

    Not yet recruiting
  • Wm. J. Shaw Center for Children and Families

    South Bend, Indiana, 46814

    Kathleen N Bergman, PhD, 574-631-0956, kbergman@nd.edu

    E. M Cummings, PhD, 574-631-4947, ecumming@nd.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study is designed to evaluate a preventive intervention program designed to support families (parents and typically developing adolescent siblings) that include a child with an intellectual and/or developmental disability. Participant families will be randomly assigned to either the treatment condition, in which they will receive psychoeducation and communication coaching over a four-week period, or the control condition, in which they will receive self-study materials. All subjects will participate in a pre-test assessment and three post-test assessments over the course of the year.

Read the detailed description

A critical need exists for an evidence-based program to ameliorate the impact of family stress and conflict on the overall well-being of parents and TD siblings, as well as individuals with IDD. Our objective in this study is to test the efficacy for parents, TD siblings, and children with IDD of an adaptation of the psycho-educational and communication training approach used in a previously validated prevention/intervention program for community families, and to examine the mechanisms associated with change processes that occur as a result of the 4-week program. Our long-term goal is to increase the availability and affordability of empirically-supported family-systems approaches to reduce family stress and conflict in families of individuals with IDD. Our central hypothesis is that participation in the program will support the identified needs of families with a child with IDD, improve the well-being and adjustment of parents, increase emotional security and adjustment for TD siblings, and be associated with improvements in adaptive functioning for individuals with IDD. This central hypothesis is supported by promising qualitative evidence and preliminary analyses from an ongoing pilot study using the adapted curriculum included in the present proposal. Our rationale is that providing a family-systems approach to improving the family environment will support the well-being of each family member, including the child with IDD. The specific aims are: (1) determining the efficacy of the program for parents, (2a) determining the efficacy of the program for typically developing siblings, (2b) testing process models, guided by the Emotional Security Theory (EST; Davies \& Cummings, 1994), to explain how and why and for whom and when changes occur as a result of the program, and (3) examining the impact of the program on individuals with IDD. Families (n=150) that include a child with IDD and a TD sibling between 11 and 17 years of age, will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) parent and typically developing sibling intervention, or (2) resource only control. Multi-method assessments of all family members will be obtained at pre- and post-intervention visits, and 6-month and 1-year follow-ups. The approach is innovative because it addresses multiple family members' needs, tests theory about explanatory models for program impact, and utilizes a brief, psycho-educational format and a RCT design to evaluate its efficacy. This research is significant because it will create an inexpensive model program for family-system-level interventions for families of children with IDD, benefiting parents, siblings and the child with IDD, including evaluations of program effectiveness in standing community centers.

Being tested
Center Sessions, At-home
Keywords
Emotional Security, Intellectual Disability, Developmental Disability
Medical subject headings
Communication, Intellectual Disability, Developmental Disabilities

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Center SessionsBehavioural

    Program to support relationships and communication between parents and typically developing adolescent siblings of individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities.

  • At-homeBehavioural

    Self-study resources paired with regular contact with study personnel.

Study groups in NCT03495440
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Center SessionsExperimentalTreatment condition in which participants receive psychoeducation and communication coaching.
Receives: Behavioral: Center Sessions
At-homeActive comparatorActive, self-study control condition in which participants receive regular communication with study personnel and self-study materials to review on their own.
Receives: Behavioral: At-home

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in marital satisfaction -- Short Marital Adjustment Scale (SMAT)

    15-item parent self-report questionnaire measuring indices of marital satisfaction, including matters of disagreement, relationship dynamics, and happiness.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Change in hostile interparental conflict -- O'Leary Porter Scales (OPS)

    10-item parent self-report questionnaire designed to measure overt marital hostility exhibited in front of the children.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Change in family functioning -- Family Environment Scale (FES)

    27-item self-report measure that assesses dimensions of family functioning, specifically, the social domain of family relationships (cohesion, expressiveness, and conflict) to be completed by parents and typically developing siblings.

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Change in typically developing siblings' perception of interparental conflict -- Children's Perception of Inter-parental Conflict (CPIC)

    19-item self-report questionnaire that captures three dimensions of marital conflict (frequency, intensity, and resolution) perceived by children.

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Change in typically developing siblings' levels of attachment to parents -- Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA)

    25-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess adolescents' perceptions of the positive and negative affective dimension of relationships with their parents and peers. Typically developing siblings complete two forms (father and mother) on three scales: trust, communication, and alienation.

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Change in typically developing siblings' emotional security -- Security in the Subsystem (SIS) and Security in the Family System (SIFS)

    The SIS is a child-report of the feelings and behaviors experienced when witnessing marital conflict. The SIFS is a self-report measure of adolescents' security in the family as a whole. Scores will be used in latent variables as a broad indicator of typically developing siblings' emotional security.

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Change in typically developing siblings' adjustment -- Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

    25-item parent-report measure of prosocial behavior and psychopathology in their children.

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Change in typically developing siblings' behavior -- Youth Self-Report (YSR)

    Adolescent self-report measure of perceived externalizing and internalizing behaviors.

    Measured: 1 year

  9. Change in typically developing siblings' depressive symptomatology -- Child Depression Inventory (CDI)

    27-item self-report questionnaire measuring the extent of depression symptoms in children.

    Measured: 1 year

  10. Change on parents' depressive symptomatology - Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)

    Parent self-report measure used to assess the severity of depression symptoms.

    Measured: 1 year

  11. Change in parents' problem drinking behaviors -- Parental Alcohol Experiences scale (PAE)

    Parent self-report measure that provides a continuous measure of parental problem drinking.

    Measured: 1 year

  12. Change in the quality of family conflict interactions -- Family Interactions Coding System (FICS)

    Video recorded quadratic (parent, TD sibling, child with IDD) interactions during which families discuss a topic of conflict are coded using an observational coding system to assess overall levels of constructiveness, destructiveness and resolution.

    Measured: 1 year

  13. Change in the quality of couples' conflict interactions -- Family Interactions Coding System (FICS)

    Video recorded dyadic (interparental) interactions during which couples discuss a topic of conflict are coded using an observational coding system to assess overall levels of constructiveness, destructiveness and resolution.

    Measured: 1 year

  14. Change in family interactions in the home -- Daily Diaries

    Parents complete 15 daily diaries following the 6-month and 12-month follow up assessments comprising of self-reports on the occurrence and quality of daily interparental and parent-child interactions.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change in adaptive functioning for individuals with IDD - Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales II

    Parent report measure describing skills and skill development in individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities. Subscales focus on four domains: (1) Communication, (b) Daily Living Skills, (c) Socialization, and (d) Motor Skills. The domain composite scores make up the overall Adaptive Behavior Composite. The Internalizing and Externalizing subscales, and one subset of items labeled "Other" make up the optional Maladaptive Behavior Index. This index provides a measure of undesirable behaviors that may interfere with an individual's adaptive behavior.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Apr 2018
  2. Study start4 Aug 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03495440
Sponsor's protocol ID
16-1246
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
24 May 2017
Last updated
15 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Center Sessions and At-home in people with Family Conflict and Marital Conflict, run by University of Notre Dame at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Edward M Cummings, PhD (574-631-4947, ecumming@nd.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in marital satisfaction -- Short Marital Adjustment Scale (SMAT) (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 14 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in