AzTrials
AzTrials

Prurigo NodularisPhase 2/3PRISMNCT03497975

PRISM Study-Pruritus Relief Through Itch Scratch Modulation

A Phase 2/3 study testing Nalbuphine ER Tablets in people with Prurigo Nodularis, run by Trevi Therapeutics at 70 sites in 5 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To investigate the anti-pruritic efficacy and safety of Nalbuphine Extended Release (ER) (NAL ER) tablets in Prurigo Nodularis. Participants were randomized to NAL ER (or matching placebo) with the primary endpoint evaluation at Week 14. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Prurigo Nodularis
What is being tested?
Nalbuphine ER Tablets
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
353 participants
Where
70 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
7 Aug 2018to 24 Feb 2023
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Individuals diagnosed with generalized nodular PN, covering 2 separate body parts, and 10 or more pruriginous nodules
  • Severe itch due to PN
  • Age 18 years and older at the time of consent, and a life expectancy of at least 18 months.
  • Individuals using antidepressants must be on a stable dose for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to screening.
  • Participants with a history of acute secondary dermatoses within the preceding 6 months may enroll only if the dermatosis has resolved completely as follows per medical history or participant self-report and current clinical assessment: (a) Localized contact dermatitis, environmental exposures, superficial burns, or viral exanthems must have been resolved for at least 4 weeks prior to screening. (b) Skin or environmental infestations, such as scabies, lice, or bed bugs, must have been resolved for at least 8 weeks prior to screening.
  • Any identified systemic, non-dermatologic disease that could be a potential cause of concomitant pruritus (e.g., thyroid disease, celiac disease, hepatitis C virus [HCV]) must either have resolved, been successfully treated [i.e., HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) negative], or must be successfully managed with stable, optimized treatment (e.g., thyroid replacement, dietary management with resolution of symptoms, respectively) for at least 3 months prior to screening.
  • Participants who are human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive may enroll if they meet the following criteria: (a) currently on a stable (> 6 months stable use) and well tolerated highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen; (b) cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count > 500 cells/mL; and (c) HIV ribonucleic acid (RNA) < 50 copies/mL documented for at least 6 months prior to enrollment.

Who cannot join

  • Pruritus due to localized PN (only one body part affected), or less than 10 nodules
  • Active, uncontrolled, pruritic dermatoses in need of treatment (such as atopic dermatitis or bullous pemphigoid for example).
  • History of a major psychiatric disorder such as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. History of active substance abuse in the last 3 years.
  • Known intolerance [gastrointestinal (GI), central nervous system (CNS) symptoms] or hypersensitivity/drug allergy to opioids.
  • Use of certain concomitant medications and treatments within a period prior to the study, or requirement for these medications during the study:
  • Potential participants taking opiates, gabapentin, pregabalin, calcineurin inhibitors, cannabinoid agonists, capsaicin, cryosurgery, topical doxepin, thalidomide or methotrexate, topical antihistamines or topical corticosteroids require a 14-day washout.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Within 4 weeks prior to screening: ultraviolet (UV)-therapy, exposure to any investigational medication, including placebo
  • Within 3 months prior to screening: Non-insulin biologics (including monoclonal antibodies) that modify the immune system,
  • Individuals taking monoamine oxidase inhibitors are excluded, as concomitant opiate use may increase the risk for serotonin syndrome.
  • Myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome within the previous 3 months, as reported by the participant.
  • Individuals with prolonged QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF).
  • Note: Other Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

70 sites in 5 countries.

70 sites in 5 countries

United States36 sites
  • Study Site 143

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48103

  • Study Site 137

    Austin, Texas, 78705

  • Study Site 138

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33433

  • Study Site 136

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Study Site 153

    Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135

  • Study Site 147

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29407

  • Study Site 107

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425-8908

  • Study Site 140

    Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37421

  • Study Site 122

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219

  • Study Site 120

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • Study Site 121

    Fremont, California, 94538

  • Study Site 159

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • Study Site 144

    Henderson, Nevada, 89052

  • Study Site 132

    Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033

  • Study Site 131

    Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919

  • Study Site 145

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37917

  • Study Site 157

    Laguna Niguel, California, 92677

  • Study Site 146

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119

  • Study Site 148

    Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505

  • Study Site 141

    North Hollywood, California, 91606

  • Study Site 158

    Orlando, Florida, 32819

  • Study Site 106

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103

  • Study Site 151

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85006

  • Study Site 109

    Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801

  • Study Site 102

    Rockville, Maryland, 20850

  • Study Site 118

    Saint Joseph, Missouri, 64506

  • Study Site 130

    San Francisco, California, 94115

  • Study Site 108

    South Miami, Florida, 33143

  • Study Site 135

    Spokane, Washington, 99202

  • Study Site 134

    Stony Brook, New York, 11794

  • Study Site 142

    Tampa, Florida, 33615

  • Study Site 139

    Troy, Michigan, 48084

  • Study Site 128

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037

  • Study Site 103

    Webster, Texas, 77598

  • Study Site 150

    West Jordan, Utah, 84088

  • Study Site 101

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28411

Other trials in United States

Germany16 sites
  • Study Site 205

    Bad Bentheim, 48455

  • Study Site 216

    Berlin, 10117

  • Study Site 209

    Berlin, 10247

  • Study Site 208

    Berlin, 10789

  • Study Site 219

    Cologne, 50937

  • Study Site 213

    Dresden, Saxony, 01307

  • Study Site 221

    Düsseldorf, 40225

  • Study Site 204

    Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590

  • Study Site 215

    Hamburg, 20246

  • Study Site 222

    Hamburg, 22391

  • Study Site 212

    Heidelberg, 69115

  • Study Site 214

    Kiel, 24105

  • Study Site 201

    Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131

  • Study Site 220

    München, 80802

  • Study Site 202

    Münster, North Rhine-Westphal, 48149

  • Study Site 206

    Stuttgart, 70178

Other trials in Germany

Poland14 sites
  • Study Site 304

    Bialystok, 15-453

  • Study Site 306

    Katowice, 40-648

  • Study Site 308

    Krakow, 31-302

  • Study Site 316

    Krakow, 31-559

  • Study Site 309

    Lodz, 90-265

  • Study Site 314

    Lublin, 20-406

  • Study Site 305

    Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, 27-400

  • Study Site 313

    Poznan, 60-529

  • Study Site 315

    Poznan, 60-848

  • Study Site 303

    Rzeszów, 35055

  • Study Site 310

    Warsaw, 01-142

  • Study Site 301

    Warsaw, 01-817

  • Study Site 312

    Warsaw, 02-962

  • Study Site 302

    Wroclaw, 50566

Other trials in Poland

Austria2 sites
  • Study Site 401

    Graz, 8036

  • Study Site 402

    Linz, 4020

Other trials in Austria

France2 sites
  • Study Site 501

    Brest, 29609

  • Study Site 502

    Paris, 75010

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2b/3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 2-Arm, Efficacy and Safety Study in Prurigo Nodularis (PN) With Nalbuphine ER Tablets for Pruritus Relief Through Itch Scratch Modulation (PRISM Study)

To investigate the anti-pruritic efficacy and safety of Nalbuphine Extended Release (ER) (NAL ER) tablets in Prurigo Nodularis. Participants were randomized to NAL ER (or matching placebo) with the primary endpoint evaluation at Week 14. During the open label extension, participants who received NAL ER were continued on NAL ER and participants who received placebo would then shift to NALER.

Being tested
Nalbuphine ER Tablets, Placebo Tablets

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nalbuphine ER TabletsDrug

    Also called NAL ER Tablets

    Active Nalbuphine ER Tablets

  • Placebo TabletsDrug

    Placebo matching NAL ER with no active substance

Study groups in NCT03497975
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NAL ERExperimentalDuring the double-blind (DB) period, participants were titrated over 2 weeks to NAL ER 162 mg, orally, twice daily (BID), followed by 162 mg, orally, BID, for 12 weeks. During the open label extension (OLE) period, participants perceived a titration period of 2 weeks, and continued to receive NAL ER 162 mg, orally, BID, for 38 weeks in total.
Receives: Drug: Nalbuphine ER Tablets
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorDuring the DB period, participants perceived a titration period of 2 weeks during which they received placebo to match the active titration period, followed by placebo, orally, BID, for 12 weeks. During the OLE period, participants were titrated over 2 weeks to NAL ER 162 mg, orally, BID, which they received for 38 weeks (including titration).
Receives: Drug: Nalbuphine ER Tablets; Drug: Placebo Tablets

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With ≥ 4- Point Decrease in 7-day Average Worst Itch - Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) up to Week 14

    The NRS is a patient related outcome (PRO) instrument, designed to quantify the intensity of worst itching experienced during a 24-hour period, and can be applied and validated either with reference to the average itch or to the absolute worst itch (WI-NRS) over that 24-hour period. WI-NRS is a set of boxes, one for each number, from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst possible itching). Higher scores indicate worst itching experience. Responder was defined as a participant with a ≥4-point decrease in the 7-day average WI-NRS from baseline to Week 14.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 14

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Change From Baseline in Itch-related Quality of Life (ItchyQoL) Total Score at Week 14

    The ItchyQoL consists of 22 pruritus-specific items measuring how pruritus affects participant's QoL in the area of symptoms related to the itch condition (6 questions), functional limitations (7 questions), and emotions (9 questions). The participant scored each question never = 1, rarely = 2, sometimes = 3, often = 4, all the time = 5. The ItchyQoL total score were obtained as the sum of the 22 items ranging from 22 to 110, with higher score indicating worsening of pruritus. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement in the pruritus-related difficulties.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 14

  2. Change From Baseline in Prurigo Activity Score (PAS) Assessed by the Percentage of Participants With 1-Category Improvement in the Percentage of Pruriginous Lesions With Excoriations/Crusts (Item 5a) at Week 14

    PAS consists of 5 quantitative/qualitative measurements related to examination of skin: Type; number;distribution;quantitative number of lesions in a body part;activity. Prurigo lesion activity is recorded as a stage (0 to 4), based on percentage of overall lesions with relevant characteristic. Three types of PAS responders defined one for each of the following items: Pruriginous lesions with excoriations/crusts (item 5a);Healed lesions (item 5b);Number of lesions (item 2). Pruriginous lesions with excoriations/crusts (item 5a) was recorded from 0 to 4;where 0 = 0-25%1 = 26-50%,2 = 51-75%,3 = 76-90%,4 = 91-100%. Higher score=a greater number of pruriginous lesions with excoriations/crusts. A responder was defined as a participant who has at least 1-category improvement in the relevant item from baseline to Week 14. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing evaluation (including repeated and unscheduled assessments) taken prior to or on the date of first dose of study medication.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 14

  3. Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8a at Week 14

    PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8a questionnaire is a tool for assessing sleep. It has 8 questions which measures sleep in the past 7 days.There is 1 broad sleep quality question with options:"very poor","poor","fair","good",and "very good".Remaining 7 questions are answered with:"not at all","a little bit","somewhat","quite a bit",and "very much".Lowest possible raw score=8; highest possible raw score=40. The T-score rescales raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and an standard deviation of 10 derived from general population.Lowest possible T-score=28.9;highest possible T-score=76.6.Higher T-score shows more of the concept measured,higher the T-Score worse the sleep disturbance.Scores <55=normal limits, 55-60=mild, 61-70=moderate,and >70=severe sleep disturbance.Baseline=last non-missing evaluation (including repeated and unscheduled assessments) taken prior to or on the date of first dose of study medication.Negative change from baseline indicated better sleep.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 14

  4. Change From Baseline in 7-Day Average WI-NRS to Week 14

    The NRS is a PRO instrument, designed to quantify the intensity of worst itching experienced during a 24-hour period, and can be applied and validated either with reference to the average itch or to the absolute worst itch (WI-NRS) over that 24-hour period. WI-NRS is a set of boxes, one for each number, from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst possible itching). Higher scores indicate worst itching experience. Baseline WI-NRS value was calculated as the arithmetic mean of the WI-NRS values (minimum of 5 required) taken for eligibility review by site at the time of randomization. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 14

  5. Change From Baseline in PAS Assessed by the Percentage of Participants With 1-Category Improvement in the Percentage of Healed Lesions (Item 5b) at Week 14

    PAS consists of 5 quantitative/qualitative measurements related to skin-Type; number; distribution; quantitative number of lesions in body part; activity. Prurigo lesion activity is recorded as stage (0 to 4), based on percentage of overall lesions with relevant characteristic. Three types of PAS responders are defined: Pruriginous lesions with excoriations/crusts (item 5a); Healed lesions (item 5b); Number of lesions (item 2). Prurigo lesions (item 5b), where 0 = 100%,1 = 75-99%,2 = 50-74%,3 = 25-49%,4 = 0-24% healed pruriginous lesions. Lower score=more number of healed pruriginous lesions. A responder was defined as a participant who has at least 1-category improvement in the relevant item from baseline to Week 14. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing evaluation (including repeated and unscheduled assessments) taken prior to or on the date of first dose of treatment. A negative change from baseline would indicate higher number of healed lesions.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 14

  6. Change From Baseline in PAS Assessed by the Percentage of Participants With 1-Category Improvement in the Percentage of Lesions (Item 2) at Week 14

    PAS consists of 5 quantitative/qualitative measurements of skin- Type; number; distribution; quantitative number of lesions in body part; activity. Prurigo lesion activity is recorded as stage (0 to 4) based on percentage of overall lesions with relevant characteristic. Three types of PAS responders are defined: Pruriginous lesions with excoriations/crusts (item 5a); Healed lesions (item 5b); Number of lesions (item 2). Prurigo lesion activity is recorded as a stage (0 to 4), based on the percentage of overall lesions with the relevant characteristic. A lower score indicates less number of pruriginous lesions. A responder was defined as a participant who has at least 1-category improvement in the relevant item from baseline to Week 14. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing evaluation (including repeated and unscheduled assessments) taken prior to or on the date of first dose of study medication. A negative change from baseline would indicate lower number of lesions.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 14

  7. Change From Baseline in Investigator Global Assessment-Prurigo Nodularis (IGA-PN) Assessed by the Percentage of Participants With 1-Category Improvement in Activity at Week 14

    The IGA-PN collects an investigator global assessment of status of PN skin lesions. The IGA-PN uses a 5-category scale (scoring 0 to 4) to describe the status of 2 aspects of disease: The Activity (amount of excoriation and crusting associated with the prurigo lesions), and the Stage (the quantitative presence and proportion of flattening of the lesions). The excoriation/crusting activity on the surface (PN-Activity) where it considers number of PN lesion with excoriations and crusts on the top, 0=clear (No nodules), 1 =small number, 2=minority of nodules, 3=most nodules, 4=severe (vast majority of nodules). A higher number indicates severe status of PN skin lesions. An IGA-PN responder for activity was defined as participants who has at a least 1-category improvement in the respective score from baseline to Week 14. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing evaluation (including repeated and unscheduled assessments) taken prior to or on the date of first dose of study medication.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 14

  8. Change From Baseline in IGA-PN Assessed by the Percentage of Participants With 1-Category Improvement in Stage at Week 14

    The IGA-PN collects an investigator global assessment of status of PN skin lesions. The IGA-PN uses a 5-category scale(scoring 0 to 4) to describe 2 aspects of disease. The Activity(amount of excoriation and crusting of prurigo lesions) and the Stage(the quantitative presence and proportion of flattening of lesions),where 0=clear(No nodules),1=Rare, flattened lesions, with no more than single dome-shaped palpable nodules(1-5 nodules), 2=Few,mostly flattened lesions, with small number of dome-shaped palpable nodules(6-19 nodules,3=Many lesions, partially flattened and dome-shaped palpable nodules (20-100 nodules),4=Abundant lesions, majority are dome-shaped palpable nodules (over 100 nodules).Higher number= presence of abundant lesions.Responder as defined as participants who has at a least 1-category improvement from baseline to Week 14.Baseline was defined as the last non-missing evaluation(repeated and unscheduled assessments)taken prior to or on the date of first dose of treatment.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 14

  9. Percentage of Participants Having a Patient Benefit Index, Pruritus Version (PBI-P) Score of ≥1 at Week 14

    PBI-P is an instrument that measures participant-defined treatment objectives and benefits acquired during the course of treatment.During and after therapy, the participant completes a matched "on-treatment" Treatment Benefits questionnaire and rates the extent to which the treatment objectives have been achieved.It consists of 27 multiple choice questions that can be answered "not at all","somewhat","moderately","quite","very".PBI-P global score is computed according to the score obtained for patient needs questionnaire (PNQ) and patient benefit questionnaire (PBQ).Score may only be computed if the participant has provided valid data on importance (PNQ) and benefit (PBQ) for at least 75% of the respective treatment goals,i.e., for at least 21 of the 27 items. Total score ranges from 0-135. Higher scores=more benefit received from the study to the participant.Responses "does/did not apply","question answered" are considered valid values when counting number of non-missing responses.

    Measured: At Week 14

  10. Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and Discontinued From Study Drug Due to TEAEs in DB Period

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who administered a pharmaceutical product, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. An AE can, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. DB period TEAEs are defined as AEs that either start or worsen in severity on or after the first DB dose and prior to the first extension titration dose of study medication in the OLE period. TEAEs included both serious \& non-serious TEAEs.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 14

  11. Number of Participants Who Experienced TEAEs, Serious TEAEs, and Discontinued From Study Drug Due to TEAEs in OLE Period

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. An AE can, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. OLE period TEAEs are defined as AEs that either start or worsen in severity on or after the first extension titration dose of study medication. TEAEs included both serious \& non-serious TEAEs.

    Measured: From Week 14 up to Week 56

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Apr 2018
  2. Study start7 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion10 May 2022
  4. Study completion24 Feb 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
353 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03497975
Sponsor's protocol ID
TR11
Other IDs
2018-001219-53, 2018
Acronym
PRISM
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
22 Mar 2018
Last updated
24 Jun 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Nalbuphine ER Tablets in people with Prurigo Nodularis, run by Trevi Therapeutics at 70 sites in 5 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 70 sites in United States, Germany, Poland, Austria, France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 4- Point Decrease in 7-day Average Worst Itch - Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) up to Week 14 (time frame: Baseline up to Week 14). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in