Adolescent BehavioriRAPNCT03502226
Evaluation of an Inpatient Sexual Risk Behavior Assessment Program
A study testing Tailored feedback in people with Adolescent Behavior and Sexual Behavior, run by Rhode Island Hospital.
Trial summary
This is an exploratory pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and potential effects of an innovative, individualized electronic inpatient sexual health intervention (iRAP) for adolescent females. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 18 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Adolescent Behavior, Sexual Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Tailored feedback
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 4 Jan 2017to 29 Oct 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 18 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Admitted to the Hospitalist service, English speaking, parent available for consent, medically/psychologically stable.
Who cannot join
- Wards of the state, no parent/guardian for consent, non-English speaking
About this study
This is an exploratory pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and potential effects of an innovative, individualized electronic inpatient sexual health intervention (iRAP) for adolescent females. The central hypothesis is that the electronic intervention, a sexual health questionnaire with tailored feedback based on the Trans Theoretical Model (TTM) of behavior change, will significantly increase adolescent females' requests for sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening and sexual health management during their hospital admission.
Read the detailed description
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are disproportionately common among 15-24 year-old females, and can have detrimental effects including pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility. Most STI's are asymptomatic, especially for females, making screening programs essential. Current guidelines recommend HIV screening for all adolescents, and yearly chlamydia and gonorrhea screening for sexually active females under 25 years-old. Yet only one-third of primary care physicians report screening asymptomatic adolescents. Most adolescents report no sexual health discussion during preventative healthcare visits. Furthermore the majority do not regularly attend preventative healthcare visits. Therefore, urgent healthcare visits, often in emergency departments (ED) and inpatient settings, provide an important point of contact.
Given adolescents infrequently obtain outpatient sexual health services, the inpatient stay may serve as a critical intervention point. Other studies have found success with STI screening programs in the ED; none to our knowledge examined the efficacy of an inpatient sexual health screening protocol. Previous pilot data demonstrated, however, significant interest in sexual health information and desire for STI testing among adolescents admitted to a children's hospital.
Investigators conducted an exploratory study to evaluate the feasibility and potential effects of an innovative, individualized electronic inpatient sexual health intervention (iRAP) for adolescent females. The central hypothesis is that the electronic intervention, based on the Trans Theoretical Model (TTM) of behavior change, will significantly increase adolescent females' requests for STI screening and sexual health management.
Investigators enrolled 70 14-18 year-old, medically stable female inpatients admitted to the hospitalist service at Hasbro Children's Hospital for a randomized control trial during a one-year period. Participants were randomized to receive an electronic sexual risk assessment with or without real-time tailored feedback. Feedback was based on the TTM, utilizing readiness for change to determine appropriate messaging. Participants were then able to electronically request sexual health management options, including STI testing, discussion with their inpatient or outpatient physician, or technology-hosted information on contraception. Investigators conducted a chart review of enrolled adolescents to determine if sexual health topics were addressed.
The investigators are examining participation rates, length of time to perform all study elements, and proportion of teens that obtain requested service. Additionally, the investigators are comparing participants' perceived reproductive health risk and uptake of offered services between the intervention and control groups.
- Conditions
- Adolescent Behavior, Sexual Behavior
- Being tested
- Tailored feedback
- Medical subject headings
- Adolescent Behavior, Sexual Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tailored feedbackBehavioural
Electronic feedback based on participants "stage of change" which provided risk reduction behavior regarding their sexual health including use of condoms, contraceptions, and STI testing.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Received tailored feedback regarding sexual health risks Receives: Behavioral: Tailored feedback |
| Control group | No intervention | Did not receive tailored feedback. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants with requests for sexual health services, as assessed by sexual health options questionnaire
All participants were able to request sexual health services while admitted to the hospital (options included: STI testing, speak with their MD, or watching contraception video). The services were offered using an electronic REDCap questionnaire, with prompt of "Would you like to request X during your hospital stay?" and response options of yes/no. The outcome will be assessed for each sexual health option (number of participants requesting STI testing, discussion with MD, or contraception video viewing) individually, as well as a variable created to show "any uptake" ie. request made for any one or more services.
Measured: Immediate
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Apr 2018
- Study start4 Jan 2017
- Primary completion29 Oct 2017
- Study completion29 Oct 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Adolescent BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rhode Island Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03502226
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Oh-Zopfi Pilot Award 2016-2017
- Acronym
- iRAP
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 18 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of an Inpatient Sexual Risk Behavior Assessment Program
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03502226
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- iRAP / Oh-Zopfi Pilot Award 2016-2017
- Conditions
- Adolescent Behavior, Sexual Behavior
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rhode Island HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Oct 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an exploratory pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and potential effects of an innovative, individualized electronic inpatient sexual health intervention (iRAP) for adolescent females. The central hypothesis is that the electronic intervention, a sexual health questionnaire with tailored feedback based on the Trans Theoretical Model (TTM) of behavior change, will significantly increase adolescent females' requests for sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening and sexual health management during their hospital admission.
Detailed description
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are disproportionately common among 15-24 year-old females, and can have detrimental effects including pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility. Most STI's are asymptomatic, especially for females, making screening programs essential. Current guidelines recommend HIV screening for all adolescents, and yearly chlamydia and gonorrhea screening for sexually active females under 25 years-old. Yet only one-third of primary care physicians report screening asymptomatic adolescents. Most adolescents report no sexual health discussion during preventative healthcare visits. Furthermore the majority do not regularly attend preventative healthcare visits. Therefore, urgent healthcare visits, often in emergency departments (ED) and inpatient settings, provide an important point of contact.
Given adolescents infrequently obtain outpatient sexual health services, the inpatient stay may serve as a critical intervention point. Other studies have found success with STI screening programs in the ED; none to our knowledge examined the efficacy of an inpatient sexual health screening protocol. Previous pilot data demonstrated, however, significant interest in sexual health information and desire for STI testing among adolescents admitted to a children's hospital.
Investigators conducted an exploratory study to evaluate the feasibility and potential effects of an innovative, individualized electronic inpatient sexual health intervention (iRAP) for adolescent females. The central hypothesis is that the electronic intervention, based on the Trans Theoretical Model (TTM) of behavior change, will significantly increase adolescent females' requests for STI screening and sexual health management.
Investigators enrolled 70 14-18 year-old, medically stable female inpatients admitted to the hospitalist service at Hasbro Children's Hospital for a randomized control trial during a one-year period. Participants were randomized to receive an electronic sexual risk assessment with or without real-time tailored feedback. Feedback was based on the TTM, utilizing readiness for change to determine appropriate messaging. Participants were then able to electronically request sexual health management options, including STI testing, discussion with their inpatient or outpatient physician, or technology-hosted information on contraception. Investigators conducted a chart review of enrolled adolescents to determine if sexual health topics were addressed.
The investigators are examining participation rates, length of time to perform all study elements, and proportion of teens that obtain requested service. Additionally, the investigators are comparing participants' perceived reproductive health risk and uptake of offered services between the intervention and control groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Tailored feedbackReceived tailored feedback regarding sexual health risks |
| Control group | No intervention | –Did not receive tailored feedback. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 18 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Admitted to the Hospitalist service, English speaking, parent available for consent, medically/psychologically stable.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Wards of the state, no parent/guardian for consent, non-English speaking
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tailored feedbackElectronic feedback based on participants "stage of change" which provided risk reduction behavior regarding their sexual health including use of condoms, contraceptions, and STI testing. | Behavioural | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Number of participants with requests for sexual health services, as assessed by sexual health options questionnaire
Time frame: Immediate
All participants were able to request sexual health services while admitted to the hospital (options included: STI testing, speak with their MD, or watching contraception video). The services were offered using an electronic REDCap questionnaire, with prompt of "Would you like to request X during your hospital stay?" and response options of yes/no. The outcome will be assessed for each sexual health option (number of participants requesting STI testing, discussion with MD, or contraception video viewing) individually, as well as a variable created to show "any uptake" ie. request made for any one or more services.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Apr 2018.
Related trials for Adolescent Behavior
RecruitingObservational study
Psychotherapy for Irritability in Youth: Comparing Active Treatment to Nonactive Psychoeducation Supportive Psychotherapy
Irritability, Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Advancing Cardiovascular Health Among Adolescents With Intellectual Disabilities: Co-Development of Technology Interventions to Enhance Physical Activity
Physical Activity, Intellectual Disabilities
Not yet recruiting
A Novel Miniature Equine-Assisted Diabetes Education Program for Youth: Evaluating the Diabetes Equine Empowerment Program (DEEP).
Diabetes (Insulin-requiring, Type 1 or Type 2), Pediatric Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Personalized Mobile Health Platform to Promote Physical Activity in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cystic Fibrosis
Cystic Fibrosis (CF)
RecruitingObservational study
Psychological Treatments for Youth With Severe Irritability.
Irritability
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tailored feedback in people with Adolescent Behavior and Sexual Behavior, run by Rhode Island Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants with requests for sexual health services, as assessed by sexual health options questionnaire (time frame: Immediate). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2018.