AzTrials
AzTrials

Liver Function After Partial Liver ResectionPhase 4XeLivNCT03504033

Xenon-anesthesia on Patients Undergoing Major Liver-resection

A Phase 4 study testing Xenon and Desflurane in people with Liver Function After Partial Liver Resection, run by RWTH Aachen University at 1 site in Germany.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative outcome of patients undergoing major liver resection under xenon- compared to desflurane-anesthesia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Xenon and Desflurane
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
11 Apr 2018to 27 Sep 2019
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ≥ 3 segments liver resection
  • ≥ 18 years
  • Both gender
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-III
  • Written informed consent prior to study participation

Who cannot join

  • Subjects, fulfilling one or more of the following exclusion criteria will not be included in the study:
  • Severe pulmonary or airway disease
  • Severe liver disease, accompanied by a Child-Pugh class >A
  • Allergy/hypersensitivity to study medications
  • ASA ≥ IV
  • Patients susceptible to malignant hyperthermia
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding or women of childbearing potential not using adequate contraceptive methods
  • Patients with preeclampsia or eclampsia
  • Patients legally unable to give written informed consent.
  • Patients with risk of high oxygen demand
  • Patient with seriously impaired cardiac function
  • All contraindications for xenon anesthesia according to the summary of product characteristics LENOXe
  • Patient participates in a parallel interventional clinical trial during this study or receives an investigational drug within 30 days prior to inclusion into this study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Department of Anesthesiology

    Aachen, 52074

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Xenon-anesthesia on Patients Undergoing Major Liver-resection: Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative outcome of patients undergoing major liver resection under xenon- compared to desflurane-anesthesia.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative liver function and additional outcome parameters of patients undergoing major liver resection under xenon- compared to desflurane-anesthesia. Xenon is known to maintain hemodynamic stability and consecutive tissue perfusion. Together with its potential for ischemic pre-conditioning, we hypothesize a protective effect of xenon on post-operative liver failure and ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Being tested
Xenon, Desflurane
Keywords
Xenon, Liver resection, post-operative liver failure, anesthetics, inhalation, Desflurane, Randomized controlled trail, RCT
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Aspiration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • XenonDrug

    Also called LenoXe

    inhalation to maintain anesthesia

  • DesfluraneDrug

    Also called Suprane

    inhalation to maintain anesthesia

Study groups in NCT03504033
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
XenonExperimentalXenon concentration of 50-60 % will be used for maintenance of general anesthesia and will be adjusted to maintain Bispectral index (BIS) value between 40 and 60.
Receives: Drug: Xenon
DesfluraneActive comparatorDesflurane concentrations of 4-5%/0.8 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) respectively will be used for maintenance of general anesthesia and will be adjusted to maintain BIS index value between 40 and 60.
Receives: Drug: Desflurane

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time-course of postoperative liver injury and function

    The primary study outcome is the difference in postoperative liver injury and function between the two study arms, measured by the perioperative time-course of the liver transaminase alanine-aminotransferase (ALAT) preoperative and on postoperative days (POD) 1-3, 5 and 7.

    Measured: Within the first 7 postoperative days

Secondary outcomes (37)
  1. Intra- and postoperative blood loss

    Difference of intra- and postoperative blood loss between the two study arms until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: Surgery and ICU stay (maximum POD 7)

  2. Quantity of intra- and postoperative infusions

    Difference in quantity of infused crystalloids abd colloids between the two study arms until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: Surgery and ICU stay (maximum POD 7)

  3. Quantity of intra- and postoperative blood products

    Difference in quantity of transfused packed red blood cells (RBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelet concentrates between the two study arms until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: Surgery and ICU stay (maximum POD 7)

  4. Quantity of intra- and postoperative coagulation products

    Difference in quantity of administered tranexamic acid, fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrates between the two study arms until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: Surgery and ICU stay (maximum POD 7)

  5. Necessity and duration of surgical pringle maneuver

    Difference in necessity and duration of intraoperative pringle maneuver performed by the surgeon between study groups

    Measured: Surgery

  6. Necessity and duration of surgical total vascular occlusion

    Difference in necessity and duration of intraoperative total vascular occlusion performed by the surgeon between study groups

    Measured: Surgery

  7. Surgery time

    Difference in surgery time between study groups

    Measured: Surgery

  8. Fibrosis in the resected liver tissue

    Difference in fibrosis in the resected liver tissue between the two study arms

    Measured: Surgery

  9. Number of hepatocytes in synthesis phase in the resected liver tissue

    Difference in number of hepatocytes in synthesis phase in the resected liver tissue between the two study arms

    Measured: Surgery

  10. Number of macrophages in the resected liver tissue

    Difference in number of macrophages in the resected liver tissue between the two study arms

    Measured: Surgery

  11. Expression of Interleukin 6 (IL-6) in the resected liver tissue

    Difference in expression of Interleukin 6 (IL-6) in the resected liver tissue between the two study arms

    Measured: Surgery

  12. Expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in the resected liver tissue

    Difference in expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in the resected liver tissue between the two study arms

    Measured: Surgery

  13. Expression of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) in the resected liver tissue

    Difference in expression of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) in the resected liver tissue between the two study arms

    Measured: Surgery

  14. Expression of epidermal growth factor (EGF) in the resected liver tissue

    Difference in expression of epidermal growth factor (EGF) in the resected liver tissue between the two study arms

    Measured: Surgery

  15. Expression of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) in the resected liver tissue

    Difference in expression of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) in the resected liver tissue between the two study arms

    Measured: Surgery

  16. Expression of insulin-like growth factors I/II (IGF-I/II) in the resected liver tissue

    Difference in expression of insulin-like growth factors I/II (IGF-I/II) in the resected liver tissue between the two study arms

    Measured: Surgery

  17. Weight of the resected liver tissue

    Difference in weight of the resected liver tissue normalized to body weight (%BW) between the two study arms

    Measured: Surgery

  18. Computer tomography-assisted planimetry of the resected liver tissue

    Difference in area of the resected liver tissue, assessed with computer tomography assisted planimetry, between the two study arms

    Measured: Surgery

  19. Time-course of hemoglobin (Hb)

    Difference in laboratory data, measured by the time-course of hemoglobin (Hb), between the two study arms postoperatively until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: Within the first 7 postoperative days

  20. Time-course of platelet count

    Difference in laboratory data, measured by the time-course of platelet count, between the two study arms postoperatively until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: Within the first 7 postoperative days

  21. Time-course of prothrombin time (PT)

    Difference in laboratory data, measured by the time-course of prothrombin time (PT), between the two study arms postoperatively until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: Within the first 7 postoperative days

  22. Time-course of partial thromboplastin time (PTT)

    Difference in laboratory data, measured by the time-course of partial thromboplastin time (PTT), between the two study arms postoperatively until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: Within the first 7 postoperative days

  23. Time-course of bilirubin

    Difference in laboratory data, measured by the time-course of bilirubin, between the two study arms postoperatively until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: Within the first 7 postoperative days

  24. Time-course of aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT)

    Difference in laboratory data, measured by the time-course of aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), between the two study arms postoperatively until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: Within the first 7 postoperative days

  25. Time-course of creatinine

    Difference in laboratory data, measured by the time-course of creatinine, between the two study arms postoperatively until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: Within the first 7 postoperative days

  26. Time-course of lactate

    Difference in laboratory data, measured by the time-course of lactate, between the two study arms postoperatively until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: Within the first 7 postoperative days

  27. Time-course of albumin

    Difference in laboratory data, measured by the time-course of albumin, between the two study arms postoperatively until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: Within the first 7 postoperative days

  28. Time-course of international normalized ratio (INR)

    Difference in laboratory data, measured by the time-course of international normalized ratio (INR) levels, between the two study arms postoperatively until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: Within the first 7 postoperative days

  29. Postoperative peak of blood lactate

    Difference in postoperative peak of blood lactate between the two study groups until discharge from ICU or POD 7 (whichever occurs first)

    Measured: During ICU stay, maximum POD 7

  30. Length of ICU stay

    Difference in ICU length of stay between the two study arms

    Measured: Until postoperative day 30

  31. Length of hospital stay

    Difference in hospital length of stay between the two study arms

    Measured: Until postoperative day 30

  32. Postoperative mortality

    Difference in mortality between the two study arms until postoperative day 30

    Measured: Until postoperative day 30

  33. Adverse events

    Difference in quality and quantity of adverse events between the two study arms

    Measured: Until postoperative day 30

  34. Difference in mortality, assessed by 30 days follow up via phone

    Difference in mortality between the two study arms

    Measured: Postoperative day 30

  35. Difference in coagulation disorder, assessed by 30 days follow up via phone

    Difference in coagulation disorder between the two study arms

    Measured: Postoperative day 30

  36. Difference in re-admission to hospital, assessed by 30 days follow up via phone

    Difference in re-admission to hospital between the two study arms

    Measured: Postoperative day 30

  37. Difference in other adverse events, assessed by 30 days follow up via phone

    Difference in other adverse events between the two study arms

    Measured: Postoperative day 30

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Apr 2018
  2. Study start11 Apr 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion27 Sep 2019
  4. Study completion27 Sep 2019

Why it stopped: A device would have had to be maintained. The maintenance company is insolvent; both another maintenance company and another serviced device were not available.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Single-center, controlled, double-blinded, randomized, two-arm parallel, interventional clinical trial
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03504033
Sponsor's protocol ID
15-163
Acronym
XeLiv
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
14 Mar 2018
Last updated
29 Oct 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Xenon and Desflurane in people with Liver Function After Partial Liver Resection, run by RWTH Aachen University at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time-course of postoperative liver injury and function (time frame: Within the first 7 postoperative days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in