Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisPhase 3REFALSNCT03505021
Effects of Oral Levosimendan (ODM-109) on Respiratory Function in Patients With ALS
A Phase 3 study testing Levosimendan in people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, run by Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma at 104 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate whether prolonged oral levosimendan can preserve respiratory function more effectively than placebo, resulting in better patient functionality as measured by the ALSFRS-R scale. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
- What is being tested?
- Levosimendan
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 496 participants
- Where
- 104 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- 21 Jun 2018to 23 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Written or verbal informed consent (IC) for participation in the study
- Male or female subjects with diagnosis of laboratory supported probable, probable or definite ALS according to El Escorial revised criteria. Full electromyogram (EMG) report available consistent with ALS (but not necessarily fulfilling the electrodiagnostic criteria for ALS) from an experienced neurophysiologist
- Able to swallow study treatment capsules, and in the opinion of the investigator, is expected to continue to do so during the study
- Sitting SVC between 60-90% of the predicted value for age, height and sex at screening visit
- Disease duration from symptom onset (defined by first muscle weakness or dysarthria) 12-48 months at the time of visit 1 (baseline)
- Able to perform supine SVC in an adequate and reliable way at screening and baseline visits as judged by the investigator
- Subjects with or without riluzole and/or edaravone. If using riluzole (any daily dose up to 100 mg), the dose must have been stable for at least 4 weeks before the screening visit and should not be changed during the study. If using edaravone, the treatment should have been started at least 4 weeks before the screening visit (at least one 28-day treatment cycle as indicated) and should not be changed during the study. If not on riluzole and/or edaravone, the respective treatments should not be started during the study
Who cannot join
- Subject in whom other causes of neuromuscular weakness have not been excluded
- Subject with a diagnosis of another neurodegenerative disease (e.g. Parkinson's or Alzheimer's disease)
- Assisted ventilation of any type within 3 months before the screening visit or at screening
- Any use of a diaphragm pacing system (DPS) within 3 months before the screening visit
- Any form of stem cell or gene therapy for the treatment of ALS
- Known hypersensitivity to levosimendan
Show all 28Show fewer
- Administration of levosimendan within 3 months before the screening visit or previous participation in the present phase III study or earlier study with oral levosimendan in ALS patients (LEVALS)
- Any use of tirasemtiv or reldesemtiv within 1 month before the screening visit.
- Participation in a clinical trial with any experimental treatment within 30 days or within 5 half-lives of that treatment (whichever is longer) before the screening visit
- Any botulinum toxin use within 3 months before the screening visit
- Recorded diagnosis or evidence of major psychiatric diagnosis, significant cognitive impairment or clinically evident dementia that may interfere with the patient's ability to comply with study procedures
- Pulmonary illness (e.g. asthma or COPD) requiring regular treatment
- Haemodynamically significant uncorrected valve disease or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or restrictive cardiomyopathy
- Any cardiovascular event (e.g. myocardial infarction, HF, arrhythmia or stroke) requiring hospitalisation within 3 months before the screening visit
- History of Torsades de Pointes (TdP) or diagnosed long QT-syndrome
- History of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia, unless treated with reliable measures to prevent recurrence (e.g. with placement of implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD] or catheter ablation)
- History of second or third degree atrioventricular (AV) block or sinus node disease at screening, if not treated with pacemaker
- HR repeatedly > 100 bpm in the 12-lead ECG after a 5-minute rest at screening. If the HR is > 100 bpm in the first recording, then the second recording must be done after another 5 min rest to confirm HR > 100 bpm
- Systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg at screening
- Potassium < 3.7 mmol/l or > 5.5 mmol/l at screening
- Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min at screening), creatinine > 170 μmol/l at screening or on dialysis
- Blood haemoglobin < 10 g/dl at screening or blood donation or loss of significant amount of blood within 60 days before the screening visit
- Clinically significant hepatic impairment at the discretion of the investigator
- Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 18.5kg/m2 (BMI = weight/height2)
- Women who are lactating or of reproductive age without a negative pregnancy test and without a commitment to using a highly effective method of contraception (e.g. oral hormonal contraceptives associated with inhibition of ovulation, intrauterine devices and long acting progestin agents), if sexually active during the study, and for 1 month after the last dose of the study treatment. Women who are postmenopausal (1 year since last menstrual cycle), surgically sterilised or who have undergone a hysterectomy are considered not to be reproductive and can be included
- Patient judged to be actively suicidal by the investigator during 3 months before the screening visit
- Patients with known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
- Any other clinically significant cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological or psychiatric disorder or any other major concurrent illness that in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with the interpretation of the study results or constitute a health risk for the subject if he/she took part in the study
Trial locations and contacts
104 sites in 14 countries.
104 sites in 14 countries
United States48 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 49007
Emory University School of Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Augusta University
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
The Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
University of Vermont Medical Center
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
Neurosciences Institute - Neurology Charlotte
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Colorado Springs Neurological Associates
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Texas Neurology
Dallas, Texas, 75214
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
Providence Holy Cross Medical Center
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33308
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32611
Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Florida Health - Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209
Mayo Clinic - Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
University of California San Diego
La Jolla, California, 92037-0886
University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
Neurology Associates
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68506
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Kentucky Neuroscience Research
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Froedtert Hospital
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Hospital for Special Care
New Britain, Connecticut, 06053
Mount Sinai Beth Israel
New York, New York, 10003
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021
Columbia Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10032
University of California Irvine
Orange, California, 92868
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Temple University School of Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
Phoenix Neurological Associates
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Neuromuscular Research Center and Neuromuscular Clinic of Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, 85028
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97201-3098
Providence Brain and Spine Institute
Portland, Oregon, 97213
Mayo Clinic - Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
HealthPartners Specialty Center
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55130-5302
University of Utah - Imaging & Neurosciences Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108
California Pacific Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94115
Swedish Neuroscience Institute
Seattle, Washington, 98122
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Georgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
The George Washington Medical Faculty Associates - Foggy Bottom North Pavilion
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1023
Canada9 sites
Alberta Health Services - Neuromuscular Clinic
Calgary, Alberta, T3M 1M4
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G3
Stan Cassidy Centre for Rehabilitation
Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 0C7
McMaster University Medical Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5
Moncton Hospital, Southeast Regional Health Authority
Moncton, New Brunswick, E1C 2Z3
Centre De Recherche Du Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal - Hopital Notre-Dame
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4
Centre Hospitalier Affilie Universitaire de Quebec
Québec, Quebec, G1J 1Z4
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Germany9 sites
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Campus Virchow-Klinikum
Berlin, 13353
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus
Dresden, Saxony, 01307
Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus Rüttenscheid
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45131
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625
Universitätsklinikum Jena
Jena, Thuringia, 07747
Universitätsklinikum Münster
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149
Universitätsmedizin Rostock
Rostock, Mecklenburg-western-pommerania, 18147
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, 89081
Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik
Wiesbaden, Hesse, 65191
Italy6 sites
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino
Genova, 16132
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria-Maggiore della Carità di Novara
Novara, 28100
ICS Maugeri Spa SB
Pavia, 27100
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana Ospedale Santa Chiara
Pisa, 56126
Policlinico Umberto I di Roma
Roma, 0016
Azienda Ospedaliera - Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
Torino, 10126
Australia5 sites
Flinders Medical Centre
Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, 4029
Brain and Mind Centre
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
Calvary Health Care Bethlehem
Caulfield South, Victoria, 3162
Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science
Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
Spain5 sites
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
Barcelona, 08207
Hospital de Basurto
Bilbao, Vizcaya, 48013
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
Córdoba, 14011
Hospital San Rafael - Madrid
Madrid, 28016
Hospital Universitario y Politécnico de La Fe
Valencia, 46026
France4 sites
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges
Limoges, 87042
Hôpital Gui de Chauliac
Montpellier, 34295
Hôpital Pasteur
Nice, 06202
Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Tours Hôpital Bretonneau
Tours, 37044
Austria3 sites
Universität Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Tyrol, 6020
Medizinische Universität Wien
Vienna, 1090
Salzkammergut-Klinikum Vöcklabruck
Vöcklabruck, Upper Austria, 4840
Belgium3 sites
Algemeen Ziekenhuis St. Lucas Gent
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000
Universitaire Ziekenhuis Leuven
Leuven, Flemish Brabant, 3000
Centre Hospitalier Régional de la Citadelle
Liège, Liege, 4000
Finland3 sites
Neurologian Poliklinikka - Meilahden Tornisairaala 3
Helsinki, 00029
Etelä-Karjalan keskussairaala
Lappeenranta, 53130
Turku University Hospital
Turku, 20521
Sweden3 sites
Centralsjukhuset Karlstad
Karlstad, 651 85
Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset
Stockholm, 14186
Norrlands Universitetssjukhus
Umeå, Västerbotten County, 90737
United Kingdom3 sites
The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust
Liverpool, L9 7LJ
Barts Health NHS Trust
London, England, E1 1BB
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, England, SE5 9RS
Netherlands2 sites
Academisch Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht - Rudolf Magnus Instituut voor Neurowetenschappen
Utrecht, 3584 CG
About this study
This study will evaluate whether prolonged oral levosimendan can preserve respiratory function more effectively than placebo, resulting in better patient functionality as measured by the ALSFRS-R scale. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study, subjects are allocated in a 2:1 ratio to receive either levosimendan (1 -2 mg daily) or placebo for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint is slow vital capacity (SVC) at 12 weeks, with the impact on patient function assessed through 48 weeks, adjusted for patient outcome, using ALSFRS-R (combined assessment of function and survival, CAFS). Other important efficacy measures include time to respiratory events, clinical global impression (CGI), assessment of dyspnea using the Borg scale and sleep scales (Pittsburgh sleep quality index and Epworth sleepiness scale). Patient safety is monitored using conventional methods including adverse events, safety laboratory tests, vital signs and 12-lead EKG. Following screening and baseline visits, patients attend the clinic at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks, with telephone assessments conducted at weeks 18, 30 and 42. An end of study visit is performed 14-25 days after the last study treatment administration. The study will be monitored by an independent data and safety monitoring board. A long-term extension study will be available for patients completing the study.
- Conditions
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
- Being tested
- Levosimendan, Placebo for levosimendan
- Medical subject headings
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LevosimendanDrug
Also called ODM-109
Levosimendan 1 mg capsule for oral administration
Placebo for levosimendanDrug
Also called Placebo for ODM-109
Placebo capsule for oral administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Levosimendan | Experimental | Levosimendan 1 mg capsules for oral administration, once to twice a day. The total duration of treatment 48 weeks Receives: Drug: Levosimendan |
| Placebo for levosimendan | Placebo comparator | Placebo capsule for oral administration, once to twice a day. The total duration of treatment 48 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo for levosimendan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Supine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)
Change from baseline to 12 weeks, expressed as % of predicted normal.
Measured: The change from baseline at 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (5)
Combined Assessment of Function and Survival Through 48 Weeks
Scale: The ALS Functional Rating Scale - Revised. This scale includes 12 items. Each item was scored from 0 to 4. Total score is the sum of the scores of all 12 items. Each subject is ranked according to time-to-death (earlier deaths ranked lower than later deaths). Subjects who survive are ranked more favorably than subjects who died. Among the survivors, subjects are ranked according to change in ALSFRS-R (greater worsening of ALSFRS-R is ranked lower than after deaths). Subjects who survive are ranked more favorably than subjects who died. Among the survivors, subjects are ranked according to change in ALSFRS-R (greater worsening of ALSFRS-R is ranked lower than less worsening or an improvement in ALSFRS-R). The ranked scores range from 001 to 496 (the number of participants assessed for the Outcome Measure) with larger rank score numbers associated with a better outcome.
Measured: Mean rank at 48 weeks
Time to Respiratory Event Through 48 Weeks
ALSFRS-R scale contains 3 items that relate to respiratory function: severity of dyspnoea, occurrence of orthopnoea (shortness of breath when lying flat) and the use of mechanical ventilation for respiratory insufficiency. A reduction in any one of these items was considered a respiratory event. Not all patients receive ventilatory support, despite respiratory insufficiency: meeting "protocolised" criteria for NIV relates to patients without NIV whose slow vital capacity declined to a level that would ordinarily trigger such treatment.
Measured: Time to event through 48 weeks
Change From the Baseline in Clinical Global Impression CGI at 48 Weeks
Visual Analogue Scale 0-100 millimeters, rated by study subjects. Score 0 indicates that the subject is completely well without any disability and score 100 indicates the worst possible severity of the condition.
Measured: The change from baseline at 48 weeks
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Function of ALSFRS-R at 48 Weeks
ALSFRS-R scale contains 3 items that relate to respiratory function: severity of dyspnoea, occurrence of orthopnoea (shortness of breath when lying flat) and the use of mechanical ventilation for respiratory insufficiency. These are added together to created the respiratory domain with a score range 0-12 (where 12 represents normal function). Although individual items and patients vary, ALSFRS-R typically declines at a relatively constant rate over time. Plotted over time the slope of the line obtained indicates the speed of progression and thus an effective treatment might be expected to reduce the slope of decline.
Measured: Slope of decline at 48 weeks
Supine Borg Category Ratio 10 Scale at 12 Weeks
Patients rated their perception of the severity of their dysnoea using the Borg scale. The scale ranges from 0 (no dyspnoea) to 10 (maximal). Each category is numbered and most (not all) have verbal cues. At each assessment the patient scored the category they felt best described their symptoms. The analysis measured change from baseline at 12 weeks, where a negative score indicates improvement and a positive score reflects worsening.
Measured: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Apr 2018
- Study start21 Jun 2018
- Primary completion23 Jul 2020
- Study completion23 Jul 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 496 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Merja Mäkitalo, CSD, Study director, Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03505021
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3119002
- Acronym
- REFALS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 16 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 11 May 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Cudkowicz M, Genge A, Maragakis N, Petri S, van den Berg L, Aho VV, Sarapohja T, Kuoppamaki M, Garratt C, Al-Chalabi A; REFALS investigators. Safety and efficacy of oral levosimendan in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (the REFALS study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):821-831. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00242-8.
PubMed 34536404
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Oral Levosimendan (ODM-109) on Respiratory Function in Patients With ALS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03505021
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REFALS / 3119002
- Conditions
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 496 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Orion Corporation, Orion PharmaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 31 Aug 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate whether prolonged oral levosimendan can preserve respiratory function more effectively than placebo, resulting in better patient functionality as measured by the ALSFRS-R scale. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study, subjects are allocated in a 2:1 ratio to receive either levosimendan (1 -2 mg daily) or placebo for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint is slow vital capacity (SVC) at 12 weeks, with the impact on patient function assessed through 48 weeks, adjusted for patient outcome, using ALSFRS-R (combined assessment of function and survival, CAFS). Other important efficacy measures include time to respiratory events, clinical global impression (CGI), assessment of dyspnea using the Borg scale and sleep scales (Pittsburgh sleep quality index and Epworth sleepiness scale). Patient safety is monitored using conventional methods including adverse events, safety laboratory tests, vital signs and 12-lead EKG. Following screening and baseline visits, patients attend the clinic at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks, with telephone assessments conducted at weeks 18, 30 and 42. An end of study visit is performed 14-25 days after the last study treatment administration. The study will be monitored by an independent data and safety monitoring board. A long-term extension study will be available for patients completing the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Levosimendan | Experimental | Drug: LevosimendanLevosimendan 1 mg capsules for oral administration, once to twice a day. The total duration of treatment 48 weeks |
| Placebo for levosimendan | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo for levosimendanPlacebo capsule for oral administration, once to twice a day. The total duration of treatment 48 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 120 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Written or verbal informed consent (IC) for participation in the study
- Male or female subjects with diagnosis of laboratory supported probable, probable or definite ALS according to El Escorial revised criteria. Full electromyogram (EMG) report available consistent with ALS (but not necessarily fulfilling the electrodiagnostic criteria for ALS) from an experienced neurophysiologist
- Able to swallow study treatment capsules, and in the opinion of the investigator, is expected to continue to do so during the study
- Sitting SVC between 60-90% of the predicted value for age, height and sex at screening visit
- Disease duration from symptom onset (defined by first muscle weakness or dysarthria) 12-48 months at the time of visit 1 (baseline)
Key exclusion criteria (28 listed)
- Subject in whom other causes of neuromuscular weakness have not been excluded
- Subject with a diagnosis of another neurodegenerative disease (e.g. Parkinson's or Alzheimer's disease)
- Assisted ventilation of any type within 3 months before the screening visit or at screening
- Any use of a diaphragm pacing system (DPS) within 3 months before the screening visit
- Any form of stem cell or gene therapy for the treatment of ALS
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LevosimendanAlso: ODM-109Levosimendan 1 mg capsule for oral administration | Drug | Levosimendan |
| Placebo for levosimendanAlso: Placebo for ODM-109Placebo capsule for oral administration | Drug | Placebo for levosimendan |
Primary outcome
Supine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)
Time frame: The change from baseline at 12 weeks
Change from baseline to 12 weeks, expressed as % of predicted normal.
5 secondary outcomes
Combined Assessment of Function and Survival Through 48 Weeks
Time frame: Mean rank at 48 weeks
Time to Respiratory Event Through 48 Weeks
Time frame: Time to event through 48 weeks
Change From the Baseline in Clinical Global Impression CGI at 48 Weeks
Time frame: The change from baseline at 48 weeks
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Function of ALSFRS-R at 48 Weeks
Time frame: Slope of decline at 48 weeks
Supine Borg Category Ratio 10 Scale at 12 Weeks
Time frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34536404Cudkowicz M, Genge A, Maragakis N, Petri S, van den Berg L, Aho VV, Sarapohja T, Kuoppamaki M, Garratt C, Al-Chalabi A; REFALS investigators. Safety and efficacy of oral levosimendan in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (the REFALS study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):821-831. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00242-8.
Related trials for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study is to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of VTx-002 in Participants With ALS
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Not yet recruiting
A Study on the Addition of Alsum30 for the Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Bacillus Coagulans
Active, not recruiting
Functional Outcomes and Control Using Synchron BCI - Australia
Neurologic Disorder, Neurologic Diseases
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacodynamic Exploration of Orelabrutinib in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Merja Mäkitalo, CSD study director
Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma
104 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Levosimendan in people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, run by Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma at 104 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 28 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 104 sites in United States, Canada, Germany, Italy, Australia and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Aug 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Supine Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) (time frame: The change from baseline at 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03505021, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2022.