AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary DiseaseCYRUSNCT03506295

CrYobiopsy With Radial UltraSound Guidance

A study testing Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound Probe and Flouroscopy in people with Pulmonary Disease, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Transbronchial cryobiopsy carries a higher chance of establishing pathological diagnosis in diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD) than traditional transbronchial forceps guided biopsy. It is a novel technique capable of obtaining large, high-quality samples of lung tissue in a minimally invasive manner. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Disease
What is being tested?
Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound Probe and Flouroscopy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
6 Apr 2018to 3 Oct 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Referral to interventional pulmonary services for diagnostic transbronchial cryobiopsy for diffuse parenchymal lung disease.
  • Transbronchial cryobiopsy is determined to be appropriately indicated as determined by consulting interventional pulmonologist.
  • Age > 18 years

Who cannot join

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Study subject has any condition that interferes with safe completion of the study including:
  • Coagulopathy, with criteria left at the discretion of the operator
  • Respiratory insufficiency with DLCO < 30% or baseline requirements of oxygen >2 liters
  • Hemodynamic instability with systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or heart rate > 120 beats/min, unless deemed to be stable with these values by the attending physicians
  • Patients representing vulnerable populations (prisoners, pregnant women, etc.)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: CrYobiopsy With Radial UltraSound Guidance (CYRUS)...

Transbronchial cryobiopsy carries a higher chance of establishing pathological diagnosis in diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD) than traditional transbronchial forceps guided biopsy. It is a novel technique capable of obtaining large, high-quality samples of lung tissue in a minimally invasive manner. This procedure may decrease the need for surgical lung biopsy in 75% of cases. However, there is an increased risk of pneumothorax and airway bleeding compared to traditional transbronchial forceps guided biopsy.

Several strategies are used by practitioners of this technique to mitigate the risks of significant bleeding and pneumothorax. These include prophylactic placement of an endobronchial blocker, the use of fluoroscopy guidance, instillation of cold saline to promote vasoconstriction, and establishment of a secure airway with endotracheal tube placement or rigid bronchoscopy

Read more

. Vanderbilt University Medical Center is one of the most active centers in terms of cryobiopsies performed as part of the diagnostic workup of DPLD. Currently all transbronchial cryobiopsies here are performed under fluoroscopic guidance, with endotracheal tube intubation and endobronchial blocker placement. Despite these precautions, post biopsy bleeding complications occur and can substantially lengthen the duration of the procedure and occasionally expose patients to procedural complications.

Radial ultrasound has been well utilized to define anatomy of peripheral lung and localization of peripheral pulmonary nodules. We postulate that using radial ultrasound to identify peribronchial lung parenchyma with low vascularity will mitigate the risk of hemorrhage during peripheral lung cryobiopsy in patients with DPLD and hence improve patient safety.

Read the detailed description

Diffuse parenchymal lung diseases comprise a group of noninfectious, non-neoplastic lung diseases, each characterized by varying degrees of inflammation or fibrosis of the parenchyma of both lungs. The differentiation of these disorders may require biopsy material, particularly in patients with atypical clinical or radiological presentations. Cryobiopsies offer specialists the advantage of being able to collect much larger specimens than can be collected with forceps biopsy, while preserving the underlying lung architecture (no crush artifact). The biggest disadvantage of cryobiopsy is a higher risk of procedural bleeding and, to a lesser extent, pneumothorax than conventional transbronchial lung biopsies.

Existing cryobiopsy literature is significantly limited by lack of procedure standardization, variable diagnostic endpoints and non-uniform grading of complications. Surgical lung biopsy, currently the gold standard for histological diagnosis of DPLD, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The rate of in-hospital mortality following SLB for DPLD was recently found to be 1.7% in a large dataset, with a complication rate of 30% (including post-operative pneumothorax, pneumonia, respiratory failure). Mortality was slightly lower at 1.5% for elective operations but markedly higher at 16% for operations labeled "non-elective," presumably performed in the setting of acute disease exacerbations. Clearly, less invasive strategies, such as cryobiopsy, are urgently needed.

Recent studies demonstrate that there might be a trend toward more bleeding complications with transbronchial cryobiopsies. The increased risk of bleeding is due to the larger biopsies thus obtained, and the necessity to retrieve bronchoscope and cryoprobe en-bloc as biopsies are too large to be pulled through he working channel of the bronchoscope, preventing the proceduralist from keeping he bronchoscope wedged in the biopsied segment allowing bleeding tamponade. Accordingly, most proceduralists perform cryobiopsy with prophylactic placement of bronchial blocker positioned proximal to the selected lobe to occlude the segmental airway after biopsy. While this technique has essentially eliminated the risk of life-threatening bleeding after cryobiopsies, significant bleeding complications persist and can occasionally substantially lengthen the duration of the procedure, leading to premature termination and potentially quantitatively inadequate biopsy acquisition.

Conceptually it seems that the ability to select a less vascular area for a somewhat larger cryobiopsy may result in decreased risk of hemorrhage and/or reduction in bleeding severity. Average peripheral cryobiopsy size varies significantly and may be dependent on freezing time and cryoprobe size. Increase in resource utilization due to the use of radial ultrasound could be offset by a decrease in complication rate, decreased procedural time and potentially decreased endobronchial blocker need. This use of radial probe ultrasound use has not been widely reported in literature except for a recent single center retrospective review of 10 patients undergoing transbronchial cryobiopsies for ILD(Berim, 2017). Six of these patients underwent vascular localization with radial probe endobronchial localization with trends towards less bleeding.

The purported benefit of radial ultrasound-guided transbronchial cryobiopsy is the avoidance of excessive bleeding, which has been associated with this procedure. With the systematic use of a prophylactic bronchial blocker, an ideal endpoint for this pilot study would be the time spent obtaining each biopsy. We propose to study in a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled fashion, the efficacy of radial endobronchial ultrasound (in combination with fluoroscopy) guided transbronchial cryobiopsy as compared to conventional fluoroscopy guided cryobiopsy in reducing time needed to achieve hemostasis (primary endpoint) and need for additional modalities to control bleeding and size of biopsies obtained (secondary endpoints).

Being tested
Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound Probe, Flouroscopy
Medical subject headings
Lung Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound ProbeDevice

    The radial EBUS procedure is performed by inserting a miniature ultrasound probe (radial EBUS probe) through the working channel of a flexible bronchoscope or catheter (guide sheath). Real-time imaging of the surrounding tissue enables the clinician to determine the lesion's exact location and size.

  • FlouroscopyDevice

    Real-time fluoroscopy will be used in all cases to guide the radial probe ultrasound and/or cryobiopsy probe placement.

Study groups in NCT03506295
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlOtherStandard of Care - Transbronchial cryobiopsies are obtained as a standard of care under fluoroscopy guidance
Receives: Device: Flouroscopy
InterventionExperimentalIn the intervention arm , radial ultrasound probe will be used in addition to standard of care described above to confirm adequate position of the cryoprobe before transbronchial cryobiopsy is obtained.
Receives: Device: Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound Probe; Device: Flouroscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Achieve Hemostasis After Obtaining Cryobiopsy

    This is defined as time from when the bronchoscope and cryoprobe are removed en bloc after obtaining the cryobiopsy to the time when it is determined to be safe to proceed to next cryobiopsy("Ready for next biopsy").

    Measured: From time of randomization up to 120 minutes.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Grade of Bleeding

    0)No or only scant bleeding, stops spontaneously

    1. Mild, stops with suction or iced saline or scope tamponade
    2. Modest, stops with balloon blockade < 3 min
    3. Moderate,requires bleeding side down in addition to balloon
    4. Severe, requires prolonged blockade (> 3 min)
    5. Very severe,soils opposite lung, hypoxemia, increase level of care, additional procedures All participants received both interventions during the same procedure.

    Measured: From time of randomization up to 120 minutes.

  2. Number of Biopsies That Required Additional Interventions to Manage Bleeding

    Cold saline, patient positioning, rigid bronchoscopy, embolization, ICU admission etc. are techniques to control bleeding after cryobiopsy. Use of these techniques will be recorded.

    Measured: From time of randomization up to 120 minutes.

  3. Biopsy Specimen Quality

    Each biopsy obtained will be assessed by pathologist for quality of sample obtained and injury patterns identified

    Measured: From time of randomization until acquisition of results from pathology, assessed up to 12 months.

  4. Biopsy Size

    Each biopsy obtained will be assessed by pathologist for size of sample obtained.

    Measured: From time of randomization until acquisition of results from pathology, assessed up to 12 months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Apr 2018
  2. Study start6 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completion3 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion3 Oct 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03506295
Sponsor's protocol ID
180058
Acronym
CYRUS
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
7 Mar 2018
Last updated
12 Nov 2019
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound Probe and Flouroscopy in people with Pulmonary Disease, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to Achieve Hemostasis After Obtaining Cryobiopsy (time frame: From time of randomization up to 120 minutes.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in