Respiratory Distress SyndromeNeovestNCT03510169
Use of Gentle Synchronized Negative Pressure in Helping Babies Breathe
A study testing NeoVest in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome and TTN, run by Unity Health Toronto at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The NeoVest delivery device is a wearable vest/shell that surrounds the infant's abdomen. It was developed using serial body measurements of infants previously admitted to the St. Michael's Hospital NICU (REB #15-183). It gently pulls on the abdomen by applying negative pressure, thereby displacing the diaphragm. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 hours to 2 weeks
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, TTN, RDS of Prematurity
- What is being tested?
- NeoVest
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 2 Sep 2019to 30 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 hours to 2 weeks
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- 20 infants, admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at St. Michael's Hospital
- >1.5kg birthweight
- Clinically stable, with symptoms of respiratory distress (due to transient tachypnea of the newborn, respiratory distress syndrome, etc.)
- Stable on nasal CPAP (5-8cm H2O) for a minimum of 6 hours
- Within the first two weeks of life
Who cannot join
- Infants with FiO2 requirements >0.35
- Infants with clinically significant apnoea or bradycardia (> 2 A\&B in last hour, or apnea >20 sec, or bradycardia requiring significant stimulation)
- Infants with hemodynamic instability (mean BP < weeks GA), or any infant requiring fluid boluses and/or inotropic medications
- Infants with genetic conditions or dysmorphic facial features
- Infants that have been recently extubated in the last 48 hours
- Infants in whom placement of the NG tube is contra-indicated
Show all 10Show fewer
- Infants with any clinical suspicion of upper airway distress such as symptoms of stridor
- Infants with abdominal wall defects and other visible abnormalities of the abdomen or chest
- Infants with umbilical arterial and/or venous catheters
- Infants that have allergies and/or previous skin reactions to silicone based materials
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
St. Michael's Hospital NICU
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8
Douglas Campbell, MD, 416-864-5232, campbelld@smh.ca
About this study
Official title: Novel Use of Negative Pressure Assist in Neonates With Respiratory Distress: a Feasibility Study Using Neovest
The NeoVest delivery device is a wearable vest/shell that surrounds the infant's abdomen. It was developed using serial body measurements of infants previously admitted to the St. Michael's Hospital NICU (REB #15-183). It gently pulls on the abdomen by applying negative pressure, thereby displacing the diaphragm. The materials used for the NeoVest are lightweight and suitable for the infants' sensitive skin.
The AIM of the present study is to demonstrate the feasibility of applying negative pressure NIV, that is synchronized and proportional to the infant's respiratory demand. The preliminary data on feasibility can be used to apply for larger grants from the CIHR, for a study of the NeoVest in smaller premature infants.
Read the detailed description
Respiratory distress is a common reason why newborn infants require intensive care soon after birth. Premature infants are at risk of having immature lungs and/or weak respiratory muscles requiring the provision of respiratory support with a mechanical ventilator. Full term infants can also require respiratory support for lung disease or lung immaturity. The most commonly used form of non-invasive respiratory support is positive pressure delivered via nasal prongs or a nasal mask, also known as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). Nasal CPAP is thought to be effective in a variety of newborn lung disorders including respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea of the newborn, etc. Although many forms of nCPAP exist, they are not typically synchronized to a baby's breathing efforts (1,2).
Furthermore, due to the infants' sensitive skin and underdeveloped nasal bridges, continued use of nasal devices can lead to skin breakdown and permanent damage to the nose (3). In order to provide optimal ventilation, these devices must be tight-fitting nasal interfaces to provide a leak-free environment (3). There is also variability in the success of nasal interfaces in providing uniform ventilation. This is because the positive pressure provided at the level of the infants' nostrils is dissipated (through the open mouth, etc.) as it travels down the infants' airways to the alveoli of their lungs (3). Additionally, prolonged use of nasal ventilation methods may impede infant bonding with their mothers via decreased skin-to-skin time, etc. Nasal CPAP is often cited as a reason why feeding (including breastfeeding) is delayed in babies requiring neonatal intensive care stay.
Negative pressure ventilation (NPV) involves the application of sub-atmospheric pressures around the abdomen to displace the diaphragm. It is a unique alternative for administering NIV to infants and would avoid complications associated with nasal interfaces. NPV has previously been used in treating infants with respiratory distress using old-fashioned, large and bulky "iron-lung" devices (4-12). One of the earliest studies using NPV for infants with respiratory failure showed that in a series of 26 patients, NPV provided a sustained increase in PaO2 (5). The infants were a mean gestational age of 32 to 33 weeks and met the criteria for respiratory failure defined by PaO2 < 40mmHg on 100% inspired oxygen and/or PCO2 > 70mmHg during bag-mask ventilation (5). Further studies on NPV, continued to show effectiveness in the ventilation of infants with lung disease with improved oxygenation (6-12).
In this study, the investigators propose a novel negative pressure interface and device that is synchronized to the infant's respiratory drive and provides intermittent application of negative pressure. The device utilizes Neurally Adjusted Ventilator Assist (NAVA) technology to achieve synchronization to the infant's underlying respiratory drive and control.
The electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) is measured using a specialized feeding tube catheter with miniaturized sensors at the end. There is a small balloon at the tip of the catheter that measures the gastric pressure which provides evidence that the diaphragm is being displaced. The Edi catheter has been shown in previous work to be effective in delivering both invasive and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation with the FDA-approved NAVA and a variety of interfaces (13-15). The Edi catheter is used routinely in many NICUs worldwide as a conventional nasal or oral catheter.
NAVA is a mode of ventilation that is neurally integrated with the inherent lung protective reflexes by utilizing the information obtained from the Edi catheter. During spontaneous breathing, as lung inflation progresses, stretch receptors in the lungs will eventually sense an adequate inspired volume, and "switch off" inspiration. For a patient on NAVA, where the neural inspiration also controls the assist delivery, the ventilator breath will be cycled-off when neural exhalation begins. Several studies have demonstrated that infants spontaneously choose lower peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) and tidal volume during NAVA compared to conventional ventilation (targeted by the clinician) (16-23).
"Traditional" NAVA is triggered on and off with the Edi and delivers assist proportionally to the Edi on inspiration only. The PEEP is fixed and defined by the clinician. During this "traditional NAVA" there is a fair amount of tonic Edi that is not assisted. With continuous NAVA, the Edi is used to continuously adjust the assist. The Edi controls both the inspiratory and expiratory assist. A safety and tolerance study in 20 preterm infants using neutrally adjusted PEEP (neuroPAP) was done using nasal prongs as the delivery interface (See Appendix 2).
In this study, the investigators plan to control a negative pressure delivery device (NeoVest) to deliver synchronized negative NIV for a short period of time. Preliminary data in small rats (~400g) and larger rabbits (~3-4kg) have demonstrated feasibility and efficacy in experimental conditions mimicking neonatal respiratory distress (See Appendix 3). The Neovest was able to generate multiple effective levels of ventilator support in these animals with no side effects.
The NeoVest delivery device is a wearable vest/shell that surrounds the infant's abdomen. It was developed using serial body measurements of infants previously admitted to the St. Michael's Hospital NICU (REB #15-183). It gently pulls on the abdomen by applying negative pressure, thereby displacing the diaphragm. The materials used for the NeoVest are lightweight and suitable for the infants' sensitive skin.
The AIM of the present study is to demonstrate the feasibility of applying negative pressure NIV, that is synchronized and proportional to the infant's respiratory demand. The preliminary data on feasibility can be used to apply for larger grants from the CIHR, for a study of the NeoVest in smaller premature infants.
- Being tested
- NeoVest
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Respiratory Distress Syndrome In Premature Infants, Pulmonary Atelectasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NeoVestDevice
Also called Negative Pressure Ventilation
Negative pressure ventilation with NeoVest
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NeoVest | Experimental | Negative pressure ventilation using NeoVest Receives: Device: NeoVest |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of negative pressure ventilation with NeoVest
Ability to provide negative pressure ventilation with the NeoVest
Measured: 22 minutes
Secondary outcomes (6)
Diaphragm Electrical Activity
Obtained from Edi catheter
Measured: Will be obtained every 1-5 minutes, or following any change in respiratory support
Respiratory Rate
Breaths per minute
Measured: Will be obtained every 1-5 minutes, or following any change in respiratory support
Heart Rate
Beats per minute
Measured: Will be obtained every 1-5 minutes, or following any change in respiratory support
Oxygen Saturation
Percent oxygen saturation
Measured: Will be obtained every 1-5 minutes, or following any change in respiratory support
Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Level
Transcutaneous meassurement in mmHg
Measured: Will be obtained every 1-5 minutes, or following any change in respiratory support
Blood Pressure
Obtained with blood pressure cuff in mmHg
Measured: Will be obtained every 1-5 minutes, or following any change in respiratory support
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Apr 2018
- Study start2 Sep 2019
- Primary completion30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Respiratory Distress SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Unity Health TorontoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Unity Health Toronto
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Douglas Campbell, MD, Principal investigator, Unity Health Toronto
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03510169
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17-282Neovest
- Acronym
- Neovest
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 5 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 10 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Novel Use of Negative Pressure Assist in Neonates With Respiratory Distress: a Feasibility Study Using Neovest
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03510169
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Neovest / 17-282Neovest
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Unity Health TorontoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The NeoVest delivery device is a wearable vest/shell that surrounds the infant's abdomen. It was developed using serial body measurements of infants previously admitted to the St. Michael's Hospital NICU (REB #15-183). It gently pulls on the abdomen by applying negative pressure, thereby displacing the diaphragm. The materials used for the NeoVest are lightweight and suitable for the infants' sensitive skin.
The AIM of the present study is to demonstrate the feasibility of applying negative pressure NIV, that is synchronized and proportional to the infant's respiratory demand. The preliminary data on feasibility can be used to apply for larger grants from the CIHR, for a study of the NeoVest in smaller premature infants.
Detailed description
Respiratory distress is a common reason why newborn infants require intensive care soon after birth. Premature infants are at risk of having immature lungs and/or weak respiratory muscles requiring the provision of respiratory support with a mechanical ventilator. Full term infants can also require respiratory support for lung disease or lung immaturity. The most commonly used form of non-invasive respiratory support is positive pressure delivered via nasal prongs or a nasal mask, also known as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). Nasal CPAP is thought to be effective in a variety of newborn lung disorders including respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea of the newborn, etc. Although many forms of nCPAP exist, they are not typically synchronized to a baby's breathing efforts (1,2).
Furthermore, due to the infants' sensitive skin and underdeveloped nasal bridges, continued use of nasal devices can lead to skin breakdown and permanent damage to the nose (3). In order to provide optimal ventilation, these devices must be tight-fitting nasal interfaces to provide a leak-free environment (3). There is also variability in the success of nasal interfaces in providing uniform ventilation. This is because the positive pressure provided at the level of the infants' nostrils is dissipated (through the open mouth, etc.) as it travels down the infants' airways to the alveoli of their lungs (3). Additionally, prolonged use of nasal ventilation methods may impede infant bonding with their mothers via decreased skin-to-skin time, etc. Nasal CPAP is often cited as a reason why feeding (including breastfeeding) is delayed in babies requiring neonatal intensive care stay.
Negative pressure ventilation (NPV) involves the application of sub-atmospheric pressures around the abdomen to displace the diaphragm. It is a unique alternative for administering NIV to infants and would avoid complications associated with nasal interfaces. NPV has previously been used in treating infants with respiratory distress using old-fashioned, large and bulky "iron-lung" devices (4-12). One of the earliest studies using NPV for infants with respiratory failure showed that in a series of 26 patients, NPV provided a sustained increase in PaO2 (5). The infants were a mean gestational age of 32 to 33 weeks and met the criteria for respiratory failure defined by PaO2 < 40mmHg on 100% inspired oxygen and/or PCO2 > 70mmHg during bag-mask ventilation (5). Further studies on NPV, continued to show effectiveness in the ventilation of infants with lung disease with improved oxygenation (6-12).
In this study, the investigators propose a novel negative pressure interface and device that is synchronized to the infant's respiratory drive and provides intermittent application of negative pressure. The device utilizes Neurally Adjusted Ventilator Assist (NAVA) technology to achieve synchronization to the infant's underlying respiratory drive and control.
The electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) is measured using a specialized feeding tube catheter with miniaturized sensors at the end. There is a small balloon at the tip of the catheter that measures the gastric pressure which provides evidence that the diaphragm is being displaced. The Edi catheter has been shown in previous work to be effective in delivering both invasive and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation with the FDA-approved NAVA and a variety of interfaces (13-15). The Edi catheter is used routinely in many NICUs worldwide as a conventional nasal or oral catheter.
NAVA is a mode of ventilation that is neurally integrated with the inherent lung protective reflexes by utilizing the information obtained from the Edi catheter. During spontaneous breathing, as lung inflation progresses, stretch receptors in the lungs will eventually sense an adequate inspired volume, and "switch off" inspiration. For a patient on NAVA, where the neural inspiration also controls the assist delivery, the ventilator breath will be cycled-off when neural exhalation begins. Several studies have demonstrated that infants spontaneously choose lower peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) and tidal volume during NAVA compared to conventional ventilation (targeted by the clinician) (16-23).
"Traditional" NAVA is triggered on and off with the Edi and delivers assist proportionally to the Edi on inspiration only. The PEEP is fixed and defined by the clinician. During this "traditional NAVA" there is a fair amount of tonic Edi that is not assisted. With continuous NAVA, the Edi is used to continuously adjust the assist. The Edi controls both the inspiratory and expiratory assist. A safety and tolerance study in 20 preterm infants using neutrally adjusted PEEP (neuroPAP) was done using nasal prongs as the delivery interface (See Appendix 2).
In this study, the investigators plan to control a negative pressure delivery device (NeoVest) to deliver synchronized negative NIV for a short period of time. Preliminary data in small rats (~400g) and larger rabbits (~3-4kg) have demonstrated feasibility and efficacy in experimental conditions mimicking neonatal respiratory distress (See Appendix 3). The Neovest was able to generate multiple effective levels of ventilator support in these animals with no side effects.
The NeoVest delivery device is a wearable vest/shell that surrounds the infant's abdomen. It was developed using serial body measurements of infants previously admitted to the St. Michael's Hospital NICU (REB #15-183). It gently pulls on the abdomen by applying negative pressure, thereby displacing the diaphragm. The materials used for the NeoVest are lightweight and suitable for the infants' sensitive skin.
The AIM of the present study is to demonstrate the feasibility of applying negative pressure NIV, that is synchronized and proportional to the infant's respiratory demand. The preliminary data on feasibility can be used to apply for larger grants from the CIHR, for a study of the NeoVest in smaller premature infants.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NeoVest | Experimental | Device: NeoVestNegative pressure ventilation using NeoVest |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 hours to 2 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- 20 infants, admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at St. Michael's Hospital
- >1.5kg birthweight
- Clinically stable, with symptoms of respiratory distress (due to transient tachypnea of the newborn, respiratory distress syndrome, etc.)
- Stable on nasal CPAP (5-8cm H2O) for a minimum of 6 hours
- Within the first two weeks of life
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Infants with FiO2 requirements >0.35
- Infants with clinically significant apnoea or bradycardia (> 2 A\&B in last hour, or apnea >20 sec, or bradycardia requiring significant stimulation)
- Infants with hemodynamic instability (mean BP < weeks GA), or any infant requiring fluid boluses and/or inotropic medications
- Infants with genetic conditions or dysmorphic facial features
- Infants that have been recently extubated in the last 48 hours
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NeoVestAlso: Negative Pressure VentilationNegative pressure ventilation with NeoVest | Device | NeoVest |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of negative pressure ventilation with NeoVest
Time frame: 22 minutes
Ability to provide negative pressure ventilation with the NeoVest
6 secondary outcomes
Diaphragm Electrical Activity
Time frame: Will be obtained every 1-5 minutes, or following any change in respiratory support
Respiratory Rate
Time frame: Will be obtained every 1-5 minutes, or following any change in respiratory support
Heart Rate
Time frame: Will be obtained every 1-5 minutes, or following any change in respiratory support
Oxygen Saturation
Time frame: Will be obtained every 1-5 minutes, or following any change in respiratory support
Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Level
Time frame: Will be obtained every 1-5 minutes, or following any change in respiratory support
Blood Pressure
Time frame: Will be obtained every 1-5 minutes, or following any change in respiratory support
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 May 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Multicenter Validation of an Explainable System for Neonatal ARDS-Compatible Phenotyping
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Blood Viscosity in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
ARDS
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Recruiting
REspiratory MEchanics for Delivering Individualised Exogenous Surfactant
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Douglas Campbell, MD principal investigator
Unity Health Toronto
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing NeoVest in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome and TTN, run by Unity Health Toronto at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Douglas Campbell, MD (416-864-6060 ext. 6560, campbelld@smh.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of negative pressure ventilation with NeoVest (time frame: 22 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2023.