AzTrials
AzTrials

HivSMARTNCT03511131

A Pragmatic Trial of An Adaptive eHealth HIV Prevention Program for Diverse Adolescent MSM

A study testing Queer Sex Ed, Keep It Up and Young Men's Health Project in people with Hiv and Adolescent Behavior, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This pragmatic trial of an HIV prevention program focuses on HIV risk-reduction in men who have sex with men (MSM) ages 13-18. The design is a three-tiered, internet-based HIV prevention intervention series that uses a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) to track adolescent MSM reporting varying… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 13 to 18 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Hiv, Adolescent Behavior, Sex, Safe
What is being tested?
Queer Sex Ed, Keep It Up and Young Men's Health Project
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,306 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
18 Apr 2018to 12 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 13 to 18 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • identifying as male-assigned at birth
  • reporting attraction to men;
  • 13-18 years old
  • self-reported HIV-negative at the beginning of the study (or have never been HIV tested/do not know their HIV status)
  • able to read English or Spanish,
  • has a usable e-mail address, textable phone number, and access to the internet or smart-phone/-device

Who cannot join

  • identifying as female-assigned at birth
  • reporting no attraction men
  • identifying as under 13 years of age
  • identifying as 19 years old or older
  • self-reported HIV-positive
  • unable to read English or Spanish
  • unable to have access to or use email, text messaging, voice calling
  • unable to have access to the internet or a smart-phone/-device

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Northwestern University

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

Other trials in United States

About this study

This pragmatic trial of an HIV prevention program focuses on HIV risk-reduction in men who have sex with men (MSM) ages 13-18. The design is a three-tiered, internet-based HIV prevention intervention series that uses a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) to track adolescent MSM reporting varying degree of sexual risk.The program package includes: (1-low risk) a universally-delivered, brief, online sexual health education program designed for sexual and gender minority youth regardless of whether they are sexually active (Queer Sex Ed); (2-middle risk) a more intensive online intervention designed for diverse AMSM engaging in HIV transmission risk behaviors (Keep It Up!), and (3-high risk) the most intensive is a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention that will be delivered by MI therapists via online videochat (Young Men's Health Project).

Read the detailed description

Adolescent (ages 13-18) men who have sex with men (AMSM) experience a dramatic health disparity as they represent 2% of young people but account for almost 80% of HIV diagnoses in youth. Despite this disproportionate burden, current evidence-based HIV prevention programs focus primarily on adults and heterosexual youth. Because issues affecting sexual health decisions among AMSM are unique, interventions need to be designed to ensure appropriate content that resonates with AMSM. Prevention programs must also be responsive to minority AMSM that experience disparities in incidence or lack of access to prevention services. For example, Hispanics represent 27% of HIV infections among MSM, but Spanish speaking MSM face significant language barriers to accessing HIV services.

Implementation issues are particularly critical as traditional HIV prevention delivery channels have significant limitations for AMSM: few adolescents attend LGBT youth oriented programs, schools place many restrictions on discussions of MSM sexual health, and major questions remain as to the feasibility of enrolling parents of AMSM into HIV prevention programs. With 92% of adolescents (across all races and income levels) going online every day, eHealth interventions represent a critical modality for delivering AMSM- specific intervention material where youth "are." Combining online recruitment with intervention delivery across a range of devices can overcome many access barriers to engagement of AMSM in HIV prevention.

Unfortunately, there will be no single magic solution that will work for all AMSM and public health programmers should not continue to deliver the same fixed intervention when a participant is not responding. Alternatively, stepped-care strategies increase in intensity to meet the needs of those who do not respond to a less intense intervention. Using a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) design, the investigators will evaluate the impact of a package of increasingly intensive interventions that have already shown evidence of efficacy with diverse adolescent and young adult MSM. The SMART methodology is an ideal approach because SMART designs mimic treatment decisions as they are made in real-world clinical settings, components of traditional RCTs are embedded within the design, and participant data can be used post-hoc to inform decision rules in order to optimize implementation. Collectively the investigators brand this package of eHealth interventions as the SMART Program (Sexual Minority Adolescent Risk Taking). The SMART Program package includes: (1) a universally-delivered, brief, online sexual health education program designed for sexual and gender minority youth regardless of whether they are sexually active ("Queer Sex Ed") (2) a more intensive online intervention designed for diverse AMSM engaging in HIV transmission risk behaviors ("Keep It Up!"); and (3) a more intensive motivational interviewing (MI) intervention that will be delivered by MI therapists via online videochat ("Young Men's Health Project"). The investigators will evaluate the impact of the SMART Program and carefully document implementation context to inform scale out with the following aims:

Aim 1: Evaluate the impact of the SMART Program and its constituent components at reducing HIV risk among AMSM. To do this, the investigators will:

  1. Involve diverse AMSM (e.g., Youth Advisory Council) in developmentally adapting existing SMART Program components for AMSM ages 13-18 using the ADAPT-ITT framework.
  2. Culturally and linguistically adapt the SMART Program for Spanish speaking Latino AMSM in the US.
  3. Embed the SMART Program content into an eHealth platform that will allow access on a range of devices and accommodate updates. Perform alpha and beta testing.
  4. Enroll a national sample of 1,938 AMSM who are diverse in terms of race/ethnicity, age, geographic region, socioeconomic status, and sexual experience history.
  5. Test the effectiveness of the SMART Program at reducing HIV risk taking behaviors, increasing HIV testing, and improving prevention intentions. Consistent with a SMART design, the investigators operationalize and power the primary test of effectiveness as the first point of randomization, which tests the effectiveness of "Keep It Up!". Additional comparisons will allow the investigators to establish the response rate for "Queer Sex Ed", examine whether the more intensive "Young Men's Health Project" outperforms the less intensive "Keep It Up!" among non-responders to "Queer Sex Ed," and determine whether "Young Men's Health Project" provides added benefit to AMSM who did not respond to "Keep it Up!".

Aim 2: Test if the SMART Program has differential efficacy across important sub-groups of AMSM. Consistent with the RFA, the investigators will test intervention effects within each of the NIH designated health disparity populations (racial/ethnicity minorities, rural, low SES), and by age and language (Spanish).

Aim 3: Evaluate the delivery of the SMART Program nationally to inform scale out and determine cost-effectiveness. To reduce the science-practice gap, the investigators will utilize mixed methods to identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the SMART Program using a Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation trial design. The investigators will assess process metrics and indicators of its acceptability among AMSM and key national stakeholders, scale out feasibility, sustainability potential, and conduct a cost analysis to estimate the cost of program implementation compare to monetized benefits.

Being tested
Queer Sex Ed, Keep It Up, Keep It Up-Control, Young Men's Health Project
Keywords
HIV prevention, Adolescent risk-taking behaviors
Medical subject headings
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Adolescent Behavior, Safe Sex

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Queer Sex EdBehavioural

    Also called QSE, SMART Sex Ed

    Comprehensive sexual health education program condition (Informational)

  • Keep It UpBehavioural

    Also called KIU, SMART Squad

    Culturally/situation-relevant HIV-prevention experimental condition (Motivational/behavioral)

  • Keep It Up-ControlBehavioural

    Also called KIU-Control, SMART Sex Ed 2.0

    HIV knowledge control condition, attention-matched to KIU (Informational)

  • Young Men's Health ProjectBehavioural

    Also called YMHP, SMART Sessions

    Motivational enhancement video interviewing condition (Motivational/behavioral)

Study groups in NCT03511131
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
QSE Resp (Only follow)OtherAll participants enter Queer Sex Ed (QSE) and are measured at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12-months. This arm is comprised of participants who responded to QSE, were randomized at month-6 to no additional treatment, and then followed for the rest of the study.
Receives: Behavioral: Queer Sex Ed
QSE Resp (KIU at 6-month)OtherAll participants enter Queer Sex Ed (QSE) and are measured at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12-months. This arm is comprised of participants who responded to QSE, were randomized at month-6 to receive Keep It Up (KIU), and then followed for the rest of the study.
Receives: Behavioral: Queer Sex Ed; Behavioral: Keep It Up
QSE Non-Resp, KIU-Control RespOtherAll participants enter Queer Sex Ed (QSE) and are measured at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12-months. This arm is comprised of participants who did not respond to QSE, were randomized at month-3 to receive Keep It Up-Control (KIU-Control), responded to KIU-Control at month-6, and then were followed for the rest of the study.
Receives: Behavioral: Queer Sex Ed; Behavioral: Keep It Up-Control
QSE Non-Resp, KIU-Control Non-Resp, KIUOtherAll participants enter Queer Sex Ed (QSE) and are measured at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12-months. This arm is comprised of participants who did not respond to QSE, were randomized at month-3 to receive Keep It Up-Control (KIU-Control), did not respond to KIU-Control at month-6, and so were randomized into Keep It Up (KIU). After KIU, they were followed for the rest of the study.
Receives: Behavioral: Queer Sex Ed; Behavioral: Keep It Up; Behavioral: Keep It Up-Control
QSE Non-Resp, KIU Control Non-Resp, YMHPOtherAll participants enter Queer Sex Ed (QSE) and are measured at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12-months. This arm is comprised of participants who did not respond to QSE, were randomized at month-3 to receive Keep It Up-Control (KIU-Control), did not respond to KIU-Control at month-6, and so were randomized into Young Men's Health Project (YMHP). After YMHP, they were followed for the rest of the study.
Receives: Behavioral: Queer Sex Ed; Behavioral: Keep It Up-Control; Behavioral: Young Men's Health Project
QSE Non-Resp, KIU RespOtherAll participants enter Queer Sex Ed (QSE) and are measured at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12-months. This arm is comprised of participants who did not respond to QSE, were randomized at month-3 to receive Keep It Up (KIU), responded to KIU at month-6, and then were followed for the rest of the study.
Receives: Behavioral: Queer Sex Ed; Behavioral: Keep It Up
QSE Non-Resp, KIU Non-RespOtherAll participants enter Queer Sex Ed (QSE) and are measured at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12-months. This arm is comprised of participants who did not respond to QSE, were randomized at month-3 to receive Keep It Up (KIU), did not respond to KIU at month-6, and then were randomized into no treatment/just follow for the rest of the study.
Receives: Behavioral: Queer Sex Ed; Behavioral: Keep It Up
QSE Non-Resp, KIU Non-Resp, YMHPOtherAll participants enter Queer Sex Ed (QSE) and are measured at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12-months. This arm is comprised of participants who did not respond to QSE, were randomized at month-3 to receive Keep It Up (KIU), did not respond to KIU at month-6, and then were randomized into Young Men's Health Project. After YMHP, they were followed for the rest of the study.
Receives: Behavioral: Queer Sex Ed; Behavioral: Keep It Up; Behavioral: Young Men's Health Project

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Condomless anal sex

    Changes in condomless anal sex acts from baseline to 12-months.

    Measured: 12-months

  2. Condom Use Intentions Scale

    This is a multi-item scale which asks participants about their plans and abilities to use condoms in the future. It has two subscales. The first subscale (Condom Use) asks about participants' likelihood to use condoms with partners. An example item for Condom Use is: "How likely is it that you will use a condom every time you have sex?" The 11-items for this subscale are measured from very unlikely (1) to very likely (4) [averaged min value 1, averaged max value 4]. High values mean a better outcome, or likely condom use with partners. The second subscale (Self-Efficacy) asks participants' ability to use condoms. An example item for Self-Efficacy is: "How confident are you that you would be able to be sure you had condoms with you?" The 5-items for this subscale are measured from not at all confident (1) to extremely confident (7) [averaged min value 1, averaged max value 7]. High values mean a better outcome, or more confidence at using condoms. The two subscales are not combined.

    Measured: 12-months

  3. HIV Testing

    Participants are asked to self-reported their history of actual getting HIV tested.

    Measured: 12-months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. HIV Knowledge

    The brief HIV/AIDS Knowledge questionnaire assesses knowledge of transmission and prevention of HIV. Example items that are dichotomously measured as true/false, include: "A person can get HIV by sharing a glass of water with someone who has HIV," "There is a vaccine that can stop people (or adults) from getting HIV," "Using a latex condom or rubber can lower a person's chance of getting HIV," etc.

    Measured: Months: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12

  2. HIV/AIDS Motivation and Behavioral Skills

    Motivation (e.g. perceived threat of HIV/STI infection, motivation to become safer), social norms (e.g., partners/friends/family members opinions about condom use), and behavioral skills (e.g., negotiating condom use) will be assessed. An example of motivation-based measures would be: "True or False: You really only need to use condoms during one night stands." An example of social norm-based measures would be: "How likely/unlikely is it that you will have sex without a condom because you are afraid of what a partner might do to you if you ask to use condoms?" An example of skills-based measures would be: "How hard would it be for you to discuss safer sex with a partner in a non-sexual setting, such as while riding in your car?" More specific behavioral skills are also measured within the The Health Protective Communication Scale. An example of this would be, "In the past 12 months, have you asked a new sex partner about the number of past sex partners (he/she) had?"

    Measured: Months: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12

  3. Condom Errors

    An adaptation of the Condom Errors Questionnaire will be asked, which has been found to be predictive of condom breakage and slippage, and STI contraction. An example item from this questionnaire is: "When you used condoms during the LAST 6 MONTHS, how often was the condom package checked for visible damage before having sex?"

    Measured: Months: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Apr 2018
  2. Study start18 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completion12 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion12 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
1,306 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03511131
Sponsor's protocol ID
5U01MD011281
Other IDs
5U01MD011281
Acronym
SMART
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
29 Mar 2018
Last updated
12 Aug 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Yellin H, Wang Y, Huebner DM, Rodriguez-Diaz CE, Macapagal K, Newcomb ME, Mustanski B, Ruiz MS. An empirical test of the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills model of willingness and intention to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among adolescent men who have sex with men. Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1):kaaf070. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaf070.

    PubMed 40971723
  • Mustanski B, Macapagal K, Li DH, Rodriguez-Diaz CE, Saber R, Matson M, Moskowitz DA, Rendina HJ, Laber E, Ryan DT, Newcomb ME. Effectiveness of the smart program: Stepped-care HIV prevention for gay and bisexual adolescent boys. Health Psychol. 2025 Mar;44(3):321-331. doi: 10.1037/hea0001471.

    PubMed 39992778
  • Sinno J, Macapagal K, Mustanski B. Social Media and Online Dating Safety Practices by Adolescent Sexual and Gender Diverse Men: Mixed-Methods Findings From the SMART Study. J Adolesc Health. 2024 Jan;74(1):113-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.07.030. Epub 2023 Oct 4.

    PubMed 37791926
  • Xavier Hall CD, Wood CV, Hurtado M, Moskowitz DA, Dyar C, Mustanski B. Identifying leaks in the STEM recruitment pipeline among sexual and gender minority US secondary students. PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0268769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268769. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 35658021
  • Moskowitz DA, Moran KO, Matson M, Alvarado-Avila A, Mustanski B. The PrEP Cascade in a National Cohort of Adolescent Men Who Have Sex With Men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 Apr 15;86(5):536-543. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002613.

    PubMed 33399311
  • Mustanski B, Moskowitz DA, Moran KO, Newcomb ME, Macapagal K, Rodriguez-Diaz C, Rendina HJ, Laber EB, Li DH, Matson M, Talan AJ, Cabral C. Evaluation of a Stepped-Care eHealth HIV Prevention Program for Diverse Adolescent Men Who Have Sex With Men: Protocol for a Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness Implementation Trial of SMART. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Aug 11;9(8):e19701. doi: 10.2196/19701.

    PubMed 32779573
  • Mustanski B, Moskowitz DA, Moran KO, Rendina HJ, Newcomb ME, Macapagal K. Factors Associated With HIV Testing in Teenage Men Who Have Sex With Men. Pediatrics. 2020 Mar;145(3):e20192322. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2322. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

    PubMed 32047100

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Queer Sex Ed, Keep It Up and Young Men's Health Project in people with Hiv and Adolescent Behavior, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Condomless anal sex (time frame: 12-months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03511131, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in