Dietary HabitsNCT03511937
Impact of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warnings
A study testing Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Label and Neutral Label in people with Dietary Habits, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) like sodas, sports drinks, and fruit drinks remains a pressing public health concern in the United States. Consumption of SSBs remains well above recommended levels, and has been linked to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dietary Habits
- What is being tested?
- Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Label and Neutral Label
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 11 May 2018to 19 Sep 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years or older
- Consume at least 12oz/week of sugar-sweetened beverages during the past month
- Be able to read and speak English
Who cannot join
- Under the age of 18 years
- Consume less than 12 ounces/week of sugar-sweetened beverages during the past month
- Unable to read or speak English
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warnings on Purchases
Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) like sodas, sports drinks, and fruit drinks remains a pressing public health concern in the United States. Consumption of SSBs remains well above recommended levels, and has been linked to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. In response, policymakers across the U.S. have proposed requiring warning messages on SSB containers to inform the public and reduce consumption to healthier levels. While online studies find that such warnings reduce intentions to purchase SSBs, no studies have yet examined the impact of warnings on actual consumer behavior. The purpose of this randomized trial is to determine whether health warnings on sugar-sweetened beverages are more effective than control labels at reducing purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages. The trial will take place in a mock convenience store. Participants will be randomly assigned to a health warnings arm in which all sugar-sweetened beverages in the store are labeled with a health warning, or to a control arm in which all sugar-sweetened beverages in the store are labeled with a neutral label. Participants will select items to purchase with cash, and purchases will be compared across trial arms.
Read the detailed description
Background: Obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease are among the leading causes of death in the United States. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) such as sodas, fruit drinks and sports drinks increases risk of these preventable conditions. SSBs are particularly problematic because they are high in calories but offer little nutritional value, and because the liquid calories in SSBs cause faster spikes in blood sugar and lower feelings of fullness than solid foods.
Despite these risks, the average American adult consumes more than 130 calories per day from SSBs, well above recommended levels. A promising strategy for reducing SSB consumption is requiring health warnings on SSB containers. Online studies show that health warnings attract consumers' attention and reduce intentions to purchase SSBs. However, no research has tested the impact of SSB health warnings on actual behaviors. This randomized trial evaluates whether health warnings reduce purchases of SSBs.
Setting: The trial will take place a mock convenience store setting created for researchers to examine how store and product characteristics influence consumer purchases in a controlled but realistic environment. The store reflects a convenience store's characteristics, selling foods, beverages, and household items at real-world prices. Participants can buy these products using cash.
Recruitment: Participants will be recruited via university community subject pools, printed flyers posted, and online listings. Interested potential participants will complete an online pre-enrollment screening questionnaire to determine their eligibility. If eligible, they will be invited to schedule a time to visit the mock store for the trial.
Informed consent: At the beginning of the study visit, research staff will review the consent documents with the participants. After reviewing the form, the research staff member will ask the participant if he or she has any questions. Then both parties will sign the consent form and the participant will receive a copy of the consent form to keep.
Randomization: Participants will be randomly assigned to trial arms. An independent biostatistician will conduct the randomization a priori. Participants will have an equal chance of being randomized to either arm of the trial. Randomization will be carried out by generating a random number for each participant identification code (ID). Participant IDs will be ordered on this random number from smallest to largest. The bottom half of the IDs will be assigned to the control arm and the top half to the treatment arm (trial arms are described below). When participants arrive for their study visit, they will be assigned the next consecutive participant ID and will be allocated to the trial arm previously assigned to that ID.
Experimental Procedures: When participants arrive at the mock store, they will be provided with a shopping basket and their participation incentive in cash. Participants will be instructed to pretend they are on a usual shopping trip and reminded that there are no right or wrong products to select. They will not be told the trial's purpose.
Participants will be asked to complete a shopping task. They will be given a list of product categories and asked to select their preferred products in each of these categories. They will indicate their selections by placing products in their shopping basket. Before they begin the shopping task, participants will be instructed that they will be required to purchase one of the items they select, and that this item will be chosen for them at random by the experimenter. This procedure incentivizes participants to only select products they are actually interested in purchasing. After participants have completed the shopping task, the experimenter will randomly choose one of the products in the participant's basket for participant to purchase with his or her incentive cash. The participant will pay for the product and will receive change as necessary. After paying for their item, participants will complete a computer-based survey in another room.
Assessment: The products participants select will be recorded by the experimenter at the end of the shopping task. Participants will also complete 1 computer-based survey immediately after completing the shopping task.
Detailed description of the trial arms: Participants will be assigned to either a health warnings arm or a control arm. In the health warnings arm, all SSB products will be labeled with a health warning label. Investigators developed the text and design of these labels based on previous research and on label designs described in US and international legislation. In the control arm, all SSB products will be labeled with a neutral label, also developed by the investigators. In both arms, labels will be adhered directly on the front-of-package of SSB containers.
- Conditions
- Dietary Habits
- Being tested
- Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Label, Neutral Label
- Keywords
- Food and beverage purchases, Sugar-sweetened beverages, Beverages
- Medical subject headings
- Feeding Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning LabelBehavioural
Labels with a health warning will be applied to the front-of-package of all sugar-sweetened beverage containers in the mock store. Investigators developed the text and design of these labels based on previous research and on designs described in US and international legislation.
Neutral LabelOther
Neutral labels will be applied to the front-of-package of all sugar-sweetened beverage containers in the mock store. Investigators developed the design of these labels.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Label | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Label |
| Neutral Label | Other | Not described Receives: Other: Neutral Label |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Number of Calories (kcal) Purchased From Sugar-sweetened Beverages
The primary outcome is calories of sugar-sweetened beverages purchased during the shopping task. Calories from sugar-sweetened beverage purchases is defined as the total number of calories from sugar-sweetened beverages in the participant's basket when they complete the shopping task, calculated as the sum of calories/container for all SSB containers. Purchases will be recorded by the experimenter immediately after the participant completes the ~10-minute shopping task.
Measured: At completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Secondary outcomes (14)
Mean Number of Calories (kcal) Purchased From All Foods and Beverages
Total calories purchased from all foods and beverages is defined as the total number of calories from all products (including sugar-sweetened beverages, non-sugar-sweetened beverages, and all foods) in the participant's basket when they complete the shopping task. Total calories purchased will be calculated as the sum of calories/container for all products. Purchases will be recorded by the experimenter immediately after the participant completes the ~10 minute shopping task.
Measured: At completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Percent of Participants Who Purchase a Sugar-sweetened Beverage
Purchase of a sugar-sweetened beverage is defined as the participant having one or more sugar-sweetened beverage in their basket when they complete the shopping task. Purchases will be recorded by the experimenter immediately after the participant completes the ~10-minute shopping task.
Measured: At completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Number of Sugar-sweetened Beverages Purchased
Number of sugar-sweetened beverages purchased is defined as the number of sugar-sweetened beverages in the participants' basket when they complete the shopping task. Purchases will be recorded by the experimenter immediately after the participant completes the ~10-minute shopping task.
Measured: At completion of ~10 minute shopping task
Mean Intentions Score to Limit Consumption of Beverages Added Sugar
Intentions to limit consumption of beverages with added sugar will be measured at post-test using 3 items adapted from Klein, Zajax \& Monin (2009). The items ask participants to rate the extent to which they want to, plan to, and are likely to, drink less than 1 beverage with added sugar in the next week. Responses to these three items will be averaged to create a mean intentions score. Response options are on a 1 to 7 scale, thus, mean scores can range from 1-7, with higher scores indicating higher intentions to limit consumption of beverages with added sugar.
Measured: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Intentions Sore to Limit Consumption of Specific Sugar-sweetened Beverages
Intentions to limit consumption of specific beverage categories (i.e., soda, fruit drinks, sport drinks/flavored waters, sweetened coffee/tea, and energy drinks) will be measured at post-test using measures adapted from Klein, Zajax, \& Monin (2009). For each of the five beverage categories, participants will rate the extent to which they are likely to drink less than 1 serving of the beverage in the next week. Responses will be averaged to a create a mean intentions score. Response options are on a 1 to 7 scale. Thus, mean scores can range from 1-7, with higher scores indicating higher intentions to limit consumption of these beverages.
Measured: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Percent of Participants Who Notice the Trial Labels
Noticing of the trial labels will be measured at post-test using 1 item adapted from Roberto et al. (2016). The item asks participants to indicate whether they noticed the trial labels. Response options are 0 (no) and 1 (yes).
Measured: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Attention Score to the Trial Labels
Attention to the trial labels will be measured at post-test using 2 items adapted from Nonnemaker et al. (2010). The items ask participants to rate their agreement with statements about whether the label grabbed their attention and whether they read and looked closely at the label. Responses will be averaged to create a mean attention score. Responses are on a 1 to 5 scale. Thus, mean scores can range from 1-5, with higher scores indicating higher attention to the labels.
Measured: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Emotional Reactions Score to Trial Labels
Emotional reactions to the trial labels will be measured at post-test using 6 items adapted from Brewer et al. (2018). The items ask participants to indicate the extent to which trial labels elicited particular emotional reactions (e.g., fear, guilt, disgust). Responses will be averaged to create a mean emotional reactions score. Response options are on a 1 to 5 scale. Thus, mean scores can range from 1-5, with higher scores indicating stronger emotional reactions.
Measured: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Cognitive Elaboration Score
Cognitive elaboration will be measured at post-test using 2 items adapted from Moodie, MacKintosh \& Hammond (2010) and Fathelrahman et al. (2010). Items ask participants to rate the amount they thought about the information conveyed by the trial label and about the health consequences of consuming beverages with added sugar. Responses will be averaged to create a mean cognitive elaboration score. Response options range from 1 to 5. Thus, mean scores can range from 1-5, with higher scores indicating more elaboration.
Measured: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Social Interactions About the Labels
Social interactions of the labels will be measured at post-test with a single item adapted from Brewer et al. (2018). Participants will rate the extent to which they are likely to have social interactions about the trial label. Response options are on a 1 to 5 scale. Thus, mean scores can range from 1-5, with higher scores indicating a higher likelihood of having social interactions.
Measured: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Perceptions of Added Sugar Score Content in Specific Sugar-sweetened Beverages
Perceptions of added sugar content in specific categories of sugar-sweetened beverages (i.e., soda, fruit drinks, sport drinks/flavored waters, sweetened coffee/tea, and energy drinks) will be measured at post-test using items adapted from Roberto et al. (2016). Items ask participants to rate the amount of added sugar they think is in 1 serving of the beverage. Responses will be averaged to create a mean perceptions of added sugar score. Response options are on a 1 to 4 scale. Thus, mean scores can range from 1-4, with higher scores indicating perceiving higher added sugar content.
Measured: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Attitudes Score Toward Consuming Specific Sugar-sweetened Beverages
Attitudes toward consuming specific sugar-sweetened beverages (i.e., soda, fruit drinks, sport drinks/flavored waters, sweetened coffee/tea, and energy drinks) will be measured at post-test using 5 items adapted from Bollard et al. (2016). Items ask participants to rate how healthy/unhealthy it is for them to consume each beverage category. Responses will be averaged to create an average attitudes score. Response options are on a 1 to 7 scale. Thus, mean scores can range from 1-7, with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes toward consuming these sugar-sweetened beverages.
Measured: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Product Attitudes Score Toward Specific Sugar-sweetened Beverages
Product attitudes toward specific sugar-sweetened beverages (i.e., soda, fruit drinks, sport drinks/flavored waters, sweetened coffee/tea, and energy drinks) will be measured at post-test using 10 items adapted from Bollard et al. (2016). Items ask participants to rate the appeal and the coolness of each beverage category. Responses will be averaged to create a mean product attitude score. Responses are on a 1 to 7 scale. Thus, mean scores can range from 1-7, with higher scores indicating more positive product attitudes toward these sugar-sweetened beverages.
Measured: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Outcome Expectations Score Regarding Consumption of Beverages With Added Sugar
Outcome expectations will be measured at post-test with items adapted from Roberto et al. (2016). Participants will rate the extent to which they expect that consuming beverages with added sugar would increase their risk of negative health outcomes (e.g., tooth decay). Responses will be averaged to a create a mean outcome expectations score. Responses are on a 1 to 7 scale. Thus, mean scores can range from 1-7, with higher scores indicating more negative outcome expectations.
Measured: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Apr 2018
- Study start11 May 2018
- Primary completion19 Sep 2018
- Study completion19 Sep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dietary HabitsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of North Carolina, Chapel HillThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anna H Grummon, MSPH, Principal investigator, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03511937
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17-3375
- Other IDs
- 2KR951708
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 18 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Bollard T, Maubach N, Walker N, Ni Mhurchu C. Effects of plain packaging, warning labels, and taxes on young people's predicted sugar-sweetened beverage preferences: an experimental study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Sep 1;13(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0421-7.
PubMed 27580589Roberto CA, Wong D, Musicus A, Hammond D. The Influence of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Labels on Parents' Choices. Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20153185. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3185. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
PubMed 26768346Zoellner J, Estabrooks PA, Davy BM, Chen YC, You W. Exploring the theory of planned behavior to explain sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Mar-Apr;44(2):172-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
PubMed 22154130Nonnemaker, J., Farrelly, M., Kamyab, K., Busey, A., & Mann, N. (2010). Experimental study of graphic cigarette warning labels. Final Results Report. RTI Project, 7. Accessed March 20, 2018. Available at: http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/USA-2010-Experimental-Study-of-Graphic-Cigarette-Warning-Labels-Final-Results-Report-and-Appendices-FDA.pdf
Moodie C, MacKintosh AM, Hammond D. Adolescents' response to text-only tobacco health warnings: results from the 2008 UK Youth Tobacco Policy Survey. Eur J Public Health. 2010 Aug;20(4):463-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp199. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
PubMed 19959613Klein WM, Zajac LE, Monin MM. Worry as a moderator of the association between risk perceptions and quitting intentions in young adult and adult smokers. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38(3):256-61. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9143-2.
PubMed 20049660Fathelrahman AI, Omar M, Awang R, Cummings KM, Borland R, Bin Mohd Samin AS. Impact of the new Malaysian cigarette pack warnings on smokers' awareness of health risks and interest in quitting smoking. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Nov;7(11):4089-99. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7114089. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
PubMed 21139879Brewer NT, Jeong M, Mendel JR, Hall MG, Zhang D, Parada H Jr, Boynton MH, Noar SM, Baig SA, Morgan JC, Ribisl KM. Cigarette pack messages about toxic chemicals: a randomised clinical trial. Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):74-80. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054112. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
PubMed 29654122Grummon AH, Taillie LS, Golden SD, Hall MG, Ranney LM, Brewer NT. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warnings and Purchases: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Prev Med. 2019 Nov;57(5):601-610. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.06.019. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
PubMed 31586510
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warnings on Purchases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03511937
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 17-3375
- Conditions
- Dietary Habits
- Keywords
- Food and beverage purchases, Sugar-sweetened beverages, Beverages
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute
- Study start
- 11 May 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 10 Mar 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) like sodas, sports drinks, and fruit drinks remains a pressing public health concern in the United States. Consumption of SSBs remains well above recommended levels, and has been linked to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. In response, policymakers across the U.S. have proposed requiring warning messages on SSB containers to inform the public and reduce consumption to healthier levels. While online studies find that such warnings reduce intentions to purchase SSBs, no studies have yet examined the impact of warnings on actual consumer behavior. The purpose of this randomized trial is to determine whether health warnings on sugar-sweetened beverages are more effective than control labels at reducing purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages. The trial will take place in a mock convenience store. Participants will be randomly assigned to a health warnings arm in which all sugar-sweetened beverages in the store are labeled with a health warning, or to a control arm in which all sugar-sweetened beverages in the store are labeled with a neutral label. Participants will select items to purchase with cash, and purchases will be compared across trial arms.
Detailed description
Background: Obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease are among the leading causes of death in the United States. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) such as sodas, fruit drinks and sports drinks increases risk of these preventable conditions. SSBs are particularly problematic because they are high in calories but offer little nutritional value, and because the liquid calories in SSBs cause faster spikes in blood sugar and lower feelings of fullness than solid foods.
Despite these risks, the average American adult consumes more than 130 calories per day from SSBs, well above recommended levels. A promising strategy for reducing SSB consumption is requiring health warnings on SSB containers. Online studies show that health warnings attract consumers' attention and reduce intentions to purchase SSBs. However, no research has tested the impact of SSB health warnings on actual behaviors. This randomized trial evaluates whether health warnings reduce purchases of SSBs.
Setting: The trial will take place a mock convenience store setting created for researchers to examine how store and product characteristics influence consumer purchases in a controlled but realistic environment. The store reflects a convenience store's characteristics, selling foods, beverages, and household items at real-world prices. Participants can buy these products using cash.
Recruitment: Participants will be recruited via university community subject pools, printed flyers posted, and online listings. Interested potential participants will complete an online pre-enrollment screening questionnaire to determine their eligibility. If eligible, they will be invited to schedule a time to visit the mock store for the trial.
Informed consent: At the beginning of the study visit, research staff will review the consent documents with the participants. After reviewing the form, the research staff member will ask the participant if he or she has any questions. Then both parties will sign the consent form and the participant will receive a copy of the consent form to keep.
Randomization: Participants will be randomly assigned to trial arms. An independent biostatistician will conduct the randomization a priori. Participants will have an equal chance of being randomized to either arm of the trial. Randomization will be carried out by generating a random number for each participant identification code (ID). Participant IDs will be ordered on this random number from smallest to largest. The bottom half of the IDs will be assigned to the control arm and the top half to the treatment arm (trial arms are described below). When participants arrive for their study visit, they will be assigned the next consecutive participant ID and will be allocated to the trial arm previously assigned to that ID.
Experimental Procedures: When participants arrive at the mock store, they will be provided with a shopping basket and their participation incentive in cash. Participants will be instructed to pretend they are on a usual shopping trip and reminded that there are no right or wrong products to select. They will not be told the trial's purpose.
Participants will be asked to complete a shopping task. They will be given a list of product categories and asked to select their preferred products in each of these categories. They will indicate their selections by placing products in their shopping basket. Before they begin the shopping task, participants will be instructed that they will be required to purchase one of the items they select, and that this item will be chosen for them at random by the experimenter. This procedure incentivizes participants to only select products they are actually interested in purchasing. After participants have completed the shopping task, the experimenter will randomly choose one of the products in the participant's basket for participant to purchase with his or her incentive cash. The participant will pay for the product and will receive change as necessary. After paying for their item, participants will complete a computer-based survey in another room.
Assessment: The products participants select will be recorded by the experimenter at the end of the shopping task. Participants will also complete 1 computer-based survey immediately after completing the shopping task.
Detailed description of the trial arms: Participants will be assigned to either a health warnings arm or a control arm. In the health warnings arm, all SSB products will be labeled with a health warning label. Investigators developed the text and design of these labels based on previous research and on label designs described in US and international legislation. In the control arm, all SSB products will be labeled with a neutral label, also developed by the investigators. In both arms, labels will be adhered directly on the front-of-package of SSB containers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Label | Experimental | Behavioral: Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Label |
| Neutral Label | Other | Other: Neutral Label |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 18 years or older
- Consume at least 12oz/week of sugar-sweetened beverages during the past month
- Be able to read and speak English
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Under the age of 18 years
- Consume less than 12 ounces/week of sugar-sweetened beverages during the past month
- Unable to read or speak English
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning LabelLabels with a health warning will be applied to the front-of-package of all sugar-sweetened beverage containers in the mock store. Investigators developed the text and design of these labels based on previous research and on designs described in US and international legislation. | Behavioural | Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Label |
| Neutral LabelNeutral labels will be applied to the front-of-package of all sugar-sweetened beverage containers in the mock store. Investigators developed the design of these labels. | Other | Neutral Label |
Primary outcome
Mean Number of Calories (kcal) Purchased From Sugar-sweetened Beverages
Time frame: At completion of ~10-minute shopping task
The primary outcome is calories of sugar-sweetened beverages purchased during the shopping task. Calories from sugar-sweetened beverage purchases is defined as the total number of calories from sugar-sweetened beverages in the participant's basket when they complete the shopping task, calculated as the sum of calories/container for all SSB containers. Purchases will be recorded by the experimenter immediately after the participant completes the ~10-minute shopping task.
14 secondary outcomes
Mean Number of Calories (kcal) Purchased From All Foods and Beverages
Time frame: At completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Percent of Participants Who Purchase a Sugar-sweetened Beverage
Time frame: At completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Number of Sugar-sweetened Beverages Purchased
Time frame: At completion of ~10 minute shopping task
Mean Intentions Score to Limit Consumption of Beverages Added Sugar
Time frame: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Intentions Sore to Limit Consumption of Specific Sugar-sweetened Beverages
Time frame: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Percent of Participants Who Notice the Trial Labels
Time frame: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Attention Score to the Trial Labels
Time frame: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Emotional Reactions Score to Trial Labels
Time frame: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Cognitive Elaboration Score
Time frame: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Social Interactions About the Labels
Time frame: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Perceptions of Added Sugar Score Content in Specific Sugar-sweetened Beverages
Time frame: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Attitudes Score Toward Consuming Specific Sugar-sweetened Beverages
Time frame: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Product Attitudes Score Toward Specific Sugar-sweetened Beverages
Time frame: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Outcome Expectations Score Regarding Consumption of Beverages With Added Sugar
Time frame: Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 27580589Bollard T, Maubach N, Walker N, Ni Mhurchu C. Effects of plain packaging, warning labels, and taxes on young people's predicted sugar-sweetened beverage preferences: an experimental study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Sep 1;13(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0421-7.
- Background: PubMed 26768346Roberto CA, Wong D, Musicus A, Hammond D. The Influence of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Labels on Parents' Choices. Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20153185. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3185. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
- Background: PubMed 22154130Zoellner J, Estabrooks PA, Davy BM, Chen YC, You W. Exploring the theory of planned behavior to explain sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Mar-Apr;44(2):172-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
- BackgroundNonnemaker, J., Farrelly, M., Kamyab, K., Busey, A., & Mann, N. (2010). Experimental study of graphic cigarette warning labels. Final Results Report. RTI Project, 7. Accessed March 20, 2018. Available at: http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/USA-2010-Experimental-Study-of-Graphic-Cigarette-Warning-Labels-Final-Results-Report-and-Appendices-FDA.pdf
- Background: PubMed 19959613Moodie C, MacKintosh AM, Hammond D. Adolescents' response to text-only tobacco health warnings: results from the 2008 UK Youth Tobacco Policy Survey. Eur J Public Health. 2010 Aug;20(4):463-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp199. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
- Background: PubMed 20049660Klein WM, Zajac LE, Monin MM. Worry as a moderator of the association between risk perceptions and quitting intentions in young adult and adult smokers. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38(3):256-61. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9143-2.
- Background: PubMed 21139879Fathelrahman AI, Omar M, Awang R, Cummings KM, Borland R, Bin Mohd Samin AS. Impact of the new Malaysian cigarette pack warnings on smokers' awareness of health risks and interest in quitting smoking. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Nov;7(11):4089-99. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7114089. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
- Background: PubMed 29654122Brewer NT, Jeong M, Mendel JR, Hall MG, Zhang D, Parada H Jr, Boynton MH, Noar SM, Baig SA, Morgan JC, Ribisl KM. Cigarette pack messages about toxic chemicals: a randomised clinical trial. Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):74-80. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054112. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31586510Grummon AH, Taillie LS, Golden SD, Hall MG, Ranney LM, Brewer NT. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warnings and Purchases: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Prev Med. 2019 Nov;57(5):601-610. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.06.019. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Dietary Habits
Recruiting
Nutrition Outcomes Using a Randomized Intervention Via Smartphone on Dietary Habits
Healthy Adult Participants, Mindful Eating Intervention
Recruiting
Lifewise Preventive Video Education in Primary Care
Prevention Harmful Effects, Health Maintenance
Not yet recruiting
Project GAME ON! A Digital Comic Tool to Promote Healthy Behaviors
Obesity & Overweight, Childhood
Recruiting
SMART GOALS for Youth With Prediabetes
PreDiabetes, Adolescent Obesity
Recruiting
Can Food Timing Reduce Your Diabetes Risk?
Dietary Habits
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anna H Grummon, MSPH principal investigator
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Label and Neutral Label in people with Dietary Habits, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Mar 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Number of Calories (kcal) Purchased From Sugar-sweetened Beverages (time frame: At completion of ~10-minute shopping task). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03511937, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2021.