Vasomotor SymptomsNCT03512002
HIRREM Hot Flashes Study
A study testing HIRREM and Continued Current Care in people with Vasomotor Symptoms and Hot Flashes, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this research study is to determine the effects of a technique called High-resolution, relational, resonance-based, electroencephalic mirroring (HIRREM®), for women in any stage of menopause, who are experiencing menopause-related hot flashes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Vasomotor Symptoms, Hot Flashes, Menopause
- What is being tested?
- HIRREM and Continued Current Care
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 8 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2018to 27 May 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women, age 40 and above
- Intact uterus and ovaries
- Have at least 5 hot flashes per day (with at least one being categorized as moderate to severe, in a stable pattern for one month).
Who cannot join
- Less than 5 hot flashes per day
- Does not experience at least 1 moderate to severe hot flash per day
- Unable, unwilling, or incompetent to provide informed consent
- Physically unable to come to the study visits, or to sit comfortably in a chair for up to two hours
- Known seizure disorder
- Known or potential pregnancy (females with last menstrual period less than one year from enrollment will be tested for pregnancy prior to randomization)
Show all 16Show fewer
- Severe hearing impairment (because the subject will be using headphones during the interventions)
- Ongoing need for treatment with opiate, benzodiazepine, or anti-psychotic medications, anti-depressant medications such as SSRI, SNRI, or tricyclic, and sleep medications such as zolpidem or eszopiclone
- Use of pharmaceuticals for treatment of vasomotor symptoms or any type of hormone replacement therapy
- Use of supplements for improvement of vasomotor symptoms including but not limited to black cohosh, soy isoflavone extract, and red clover leaf extract
- Menopausal symptoms resulting from, or associated with surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, or use of other chemicals or medications
- Anticipated and ongoing use of recreational drugs, alcohol, or energy drinks
- Ongoing need for treatment with thyroid medications
- Weight is over the chair limit (285 pounds)
- Are enrolled in another research study that includes an active intervention
- Have previously received brainwave optimization (BWO), used a B2 or a B2v2 wearable device, or previously participated in a HIRREM research study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
About this study
Official title: High-Resolution, Relational, Resonance-Based, Electroencephalic Mirroring (HIRREM) for Vasomotor Symptoms (Hot Flashes) in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
The purpose of this research study is to determine the effects of a technique called High-resolution, relational, resonance-based, electroencephalic mirroring (HIRREM®), for women in any stage of menopause, who are experiencing menopause-related hot flashes.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this research study is to determine the effects of a technique called High-resolution, relational, resonance-based, electroencephalic mirroring (HIRREM®), for hot flashes. HIRREM uses scalp sensors to monitor brain electrical activity, and computer software algorithms translate selected brain frequencies into audible tones in real time. Those tones are reflected back to participants via ear buds in as little as four to eight milliseconds, providing the brain an opportunity for self-adjustment of its electrical pattern.
This study will compare acoustic stimulation linked to brainwave activity (HIRREM, along with continued current care, HCC), with continued current clinical care alone (CCC). Both groups will continue their other current care throughout, including non-pharmacological, and lifestyle modification therapies.
- Conditions
- Vasomotor Symptoms, Hot Flashes, Menopause
- Being tested
- HIRREM, Continued Current Care
- Keywords
- Neurotechnology, Autonomic Dysregulation, Hyperarousal, Brain Electrical Activity, HIRREM, Acoustic Stimulation, Perimenopausal, Postmenopausal, Hot Flashes, Night Sweats, Vasomotor Symptoms, Allostatis
- Medical subject headings
- Hot Flashes, Primary Dysautonomias
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HIRREMDevice
Also called High-resolution, relational, resonance-based, electroencephalic mirroring, Brainwave Optimization
Technology
Continued Current CareOther
Continue their current clinical care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HIRREM | Active comparator | High-resolution, relational, resonance-based, electroencephalic mirroring (HIRREM) is a novel, noninvasive, closed-loop, brainwave mirroring, acoustic stimulation neurotechnology to support relaxation and auto-calibration of neural oscillations, using auditory tones to reflect brain frequencies in near real time. Receives: Device: HIRREM; Other: Continued Current Care |
| Continued Current Care | Other | Participants will continue their current care. Receives: Device: HIRREM; Other: Continued Current Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reduction in Hot Flash Severity Score Based on Diary Data
Both groups maintained a hot flash diary for 7-14 days, after which the intervention will begin for the HCC group. Post-intervention data collections will include an intermediate post-intervention visit (V2, primary outcome, 4-6 weeks after intervention completion for HCC, and 10-12 weeks after V1 for CCC), and a final follow up visit (V3, 12-14 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, and 18-20 weeks after V1 for CCC). Both groups will maintain a hot flash diary for 1-2 weeks prior to the V2 and V3 visits. The primary outcome will be change in hot flashes score from V1 to V2. The hot flash severity score for each day was calculated as the sum of the number of hot flashes within each severity category, multiplied by the severity score for that category, with the resulting sum divided by the total number of hot flashes. Scale ranges from 0 (no hot flashes) to an open ended upper number (no max since participant dependent). A higher number suggest worse hot flashes.
Measured: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change in Heart Rate Variability
Blood pressure and heart rate are acquired from 10 minute recordings of noninvasive finger arterial pressure measurements and ECG with participants lying quietly, supine. Systolic BP and beat to beat, RR intervals files generated via the data acquisition system (BIOPAC acquisition system and Acknowledge 4.2 software, Santa Barbara, CA), at 1000 Hz, are analyzed using Nevrokard BRS software (Nevrokard BRS, Medistar, Ljubljana, Slovenia). Analysis is conducted on the first complete 5-minute epoch that is considered to be acceptable for analysis. Heart rate variability is measured in the time domain as standard deviation of beat-to-beat interval (SDNN, milliseconds). For calculation of SDNN, the R-R intervals are visually inspected, and data considered as artifact is manually removed.
Measured: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Baroreflex Sensitivity
Blood pressure and heart rate are acquired from 10 minute recordings of noninvasive finger arterial pressure measurements and ECG with participants lying quietly, supine. Systolic BP and beat to beat, RR intervals files generated via the data acquisition system at 1000 Hz, are analyzed using Nevrokard BRS software. Analysis is conducted on the first complete 5-minute epoch. Power spectral densities of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and R-R interval (RRI) oscillations are computed by 512 points Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and integrated over specified frequency ranges (HF: 0.15-0.4 Hz). The square-root of the ratio of RRI's and SBP powers is computed to calculate HF alpha indices, which reflect BRS. The software scans the RRI and SBP records, identifies sequences, and calculates linear correlation between RRI and SBP for each sequence. A measure of sequence BRS is then calculated as Sequence ALL.
Measured: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
The severity of insomnia symptoms is measured using the ISI with each data collection visit. The ISI is a 7 question measure, with responses from 0-4 for each question, yielding scores ranging from 0-28. Higher scores indicate the strength of the insomnia severity.
Measured: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
The PSQI is a 19 item inventory that assesses sleep quality over a 1-month time interval. Items are weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. A global PSQI score is calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality.
Measured: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS)
The ESS measures a person's general level of daytime sleepiness, or their average sleep propensity in daily life. The simple questionnaire is based on retrospective reports of the likelihood of dozing off or falling asleep in a variety of different situations. Rated on a 4-point scale (0-3), it evaluates their usual chances of dozing off or falling asleep while engaged in eight different activities. The ESS score (the sum of 8 item scores, 0-3) can range from 0 to 24. Lower scores denote a lower level of daytime sleepiness.
Measured: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
The CES-D is a 20-item survey assessing affective depressive symptomatology to screen for risk of depression. Scores range from 0-60, with a score of 16 commonly used as a clinically relevant cut-off. Higher scores indicate the presence of more symptomatology.
Measured: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
The GAD-7 is a seven item screening tool for anxiety that is widely used in primary care. Scores range from 0-21. A lower score denotes a lower level of anxiety.
Measured: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
The PSS is a ten-item psychological instrument for measuring the perception of stress. It is a measure of the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful. Scores range from 0-40. A lower score denotes a lower level of perceived stress.
Measured: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Quality of Life Scale (QOLS)
The QOLS is a 16-item scale that was modified from a 15-item scale used in chronic disease patients. Topics include different components of daily life such as relationships, community engagement, personal fulfillment, and recreation. Each item is scaled from 1 to 7 and a sum score is calculated to represent higher levels of satisfaction in life (range is 16-112).
Measured: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Drop Stick Reaction Time
Reaction testing will be evaluated by a drop-stick, clinical reaction time apparatus. The apparatus is placed between the thumb and index finger of the subject and released at a random time during a countdown. The subject catches the apparatus and the distance fallen (cm) is converted to reaction. Following two practice trials, participants perform eight trials, and a mean distance value is calculated. This is repeated with a second set of 8 trials later during the enrollment visit, and the mean distance value from the second trial will be used as the baseline value. Use of the average distance from the second set of trials will be used as the baseline value so as to avoid the impact of learning effect for this test. Only one set of trials will be used for comparison at follow up data collections. A lower average indicates a faster reaction time.
Measured: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Grip Strength
Grip strength will be evaluated using a hydraulic hand dynamometer (Baseline Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer). Participants will squeeze the dynamometer three times in each hand. The scores from each hand will be averaged separately. A higher score indicates stronger grip strength.
Measured: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)
The HFRDIS is a 10 item measure to capture the daily impact of vasomotor symptoms in a variety of domains within the past week. Items are scored from 0 (do not interfere) to 10 (completely interfere). Total scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates that the symptoms are interfering with daily life more.
Measured: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Menopause Rating Scale (MRS)
The MRS is a survey that generates a score between 0 and 44 based on the individual's symptom severity rankings. There are 11 symptoms listed related to perimenopause that are each assigned a score of 0 to 4 by the individual. A score of 0 indicates none, 1 is mild, 2 is moderate, 3 is severe, and 4 is very severe. After completion, the individual's score is tallied to create an overall score. Scores from 0-4 are considered zero to little, scores from 5-8 are considered mild, scores from 9-16 are moderate, and scores 17 or greater are considered severe.
Measured: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Apr 2018
- Study start1 Jun 2018
- Primary completion27 May 2020
- Study completion27 May 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Vasomotor SymptomsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- This study will compare acoustic stimulation linked to brainwave activity (HIRREM, along with continued current care, HCC), with continued current clinical care alone (CCC). Both groups will continue their other current care throughout, including non-pharmacological, and lifestyle modification therapies. The participants in the CCC group will be offered the opportunity to crossover and receive a course of HCC.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Charles H. Tegeler, MD, Principal investigator, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03512002
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00049252
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 18 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 23 May 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- High-Resolution, Relational, Resonance-Based, Electroencephalic Mirroring (HIRREM) for Vasomotor Symptoms (Hot Flashes) in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03512002
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00049252
- Conditions
- Vasomotor Symptoms, Hot Flashes, Menopause
- Keywords
- Neurotechnology, Autonomic Dysregulation, Hyperarousal, Brain Electrical Activity, HIRREM, Acoustic Stimulation, Perimenopausal, Postmenopausal
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 May 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 23 May 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this research study is to determine the effects of a technique called High-resolution, relational, resonance-based, electroencephalic mirroring (HIRREM®), for women in any stage of menopause, who are experiencing menopause-related hot flashes.
Detailed description
The purpose of this research study is to determine the effects of a technique called High-resolution, relational, resonance-based, electroencephalic mirroring (HIRREM®), for hot flashes. HIRREM uses scalp sensors to monitor brain electrical activity, and computer software algorithms translate selected brain frequencies into audible tones in real time. Those tones are reflected back to participants via ear buds in as little as four to eight milliseconds, providing the brain an opportunity for self-adjustment of its electrical pattern.
This study will compare acoustic stimulation linked to brainwave activity (HIRREM, along with continued current care, HCC), with continued current clinical care alone (CCC). Both groups will continue their other current care throughout, including non-pharmacological, and lifestyle modification therapies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study will compare acoustic stimulation linked to brainwave activity (HIRREM, along with continued current care, HCC), with continued current clinical care alone (CCC). Both groups will continue their other current care throughout, including non-pharmacological, and lifestyle modification therapies. The participants in the CCC group will be offered the opportunity to crossover and receive a course of HCC.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HIRREM | Active comparator | Device: HIRREM, Other: Continued Current CareHigh-resolution, relational, resonance-based, electroencephalic mirroring (HIRREM) is a novel, noninvasive, closed-loop, brainwave mirroring, acoustic stimulation neurotechnology to support relaxation and auto-calibration of neural oscillations, using auditory tones to reflect brain frequencies in near real time. |
| Continued Current Care | Other | Device: HIRREM, Other: Continued Current CareParticipants will continue their current care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Women, age 40 and above
- Intact uterus and ovaries
- Have at least 5 hot flashes per day (with at least one being categorized as moderate to severe, in a stable pattern for one month).
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Less than 5 hot flashes per day
- Does not experience at least 1 moderate to severe hot flash per day
- Unable, unwilling, or incompetent to provide informed consent
- Physically unable to come to the study visits, or to sit comfortably in a chair for up to two hours
- Known seizure disorder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HIRREMAlso: High-resolution, relational, resonance-based, electroencephalic mirroring, Brainwave OptimizationTechnology | Device | Continued Current Care, HIRREM |
| Continued Current CareContinue their current clinical care. | Other | Continued Current Care, HIRREM |
Primary outcome
Reduction in Hot Flash Severity Score Based on Diary Data
Time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Both groups maintained a hot flash diary for 7-14 days, after which the intervention will begin for the HCC group. Post-intervention data collections will include an intermediate post-intervention visit (V2, primary outcome, 4-6 weeks after intervention completion for HCC, and 10-12 weeks after V1 for CCC), and a final follow up visit (V3, 12-14 weeks following completion of the intervention for HCC, and 18-20 weeks after V1 for CCC). Both groups will maintain a hot flash diary for 1-2 weeks prior to the V2 and V3 visits. The primary outcome will be change in hot flashes score from V1 to V2. The hot flash severity score for each day was calculated as the sum of the number of hot flashes within each severity category, multiplied by the severity score for that category, with the resulting sum divided by the total number of hot flashes. Scale ranges from 0 (no hot flashes) to an open ended upper number (no max since participant dependent). A higher number suggest worse hot flashes.
13 secondary outcomes
Change in Heart Rate Variability
Time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Baroreflex Sensitivity
Time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS)
Time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Quality of Life Scale (QOLS)
Time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Drop Stick Reaction Time
Time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Grip Strength
Time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)
Time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Change in Menopause Rating Scale (MRS)
Time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 May 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Vasomotor Symptoms
Not yet recruiting
Waning Moon: A Whole Person Health Intervention Designed by and for Urban Menopausal American Indian/Alaska Native Women
Menopause, Vasomotor Symptoms (VMS)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The DISCOVER INOCA Prospective Multi-center Registry
Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Not yet recruiting
Internet-Delivered CBT Program for Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms
Menopause, Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms
Not yet recruiting
Exercise Training Intensity and Nitrate Supplementation in Post-Menopausal Females on Hormone Therapy
Postmenopausal Female Patients, Vasomotor Symptoms
Recruiting
Effects of a Dietary Supplement in Women With Late Perimenopause or Early Postmenopause
Perimenopause, Postmenopause
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charles H. Tegeler, MD principal investigator
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HIRREM and Continued Current Care in people with Vasomotor Symptoms and Hot Flashes, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 May 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reduction in Hot Flash Severity Score Based on Diary Data (time frame: Baseline to V2 (4-6 weeks following completion of the intervention).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2023.