AzTrials
AzTrials

Preterm InfantPretermBabiesNCT03512093

Improving SCBU Care for Preterm Babies

An observational study of Preterm Infant and Preterm Birth, run by University of Oxford at 1 site in Thailand.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Since 2008, preterm neonates are taking care of in a Special Baby Care Unit (SCBU). Those born less than 34 weeks of gestation are followed-up monthly for one year for monitoring their hematocrit level, growth and development. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Preterm Infant, Preterm Birth
What is being tested?
Retrospective chart review, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) of the medical staff and Interviews of mothers
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteThailand
Study dates
1 May 2018to 31 Mar 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients seeking care to SMRU facilities belong to several distinct ethnic groups present along the Thailand-Myanmar border, mostly from Burman and Karen ethnicity, but also from Mon, Kachin, Shan or Rakhine ethnic background. Medical staff caring for those patients are from the same mixed of ethnic background. Part A: All neonates born prematurely (< 37+0 weeks of gestation) in one of the SMRU clinics between January 2008 and December 2017 and for whom a medical record was created between its birth and its first birthday Part B: Medical staff directly involved with preterm care Part C: Mothers who have delivered a preterm neonate (< 37+0 weeks of estation) in one of the SMRU clinics

Who may be able to join

  • Part A: Neonatal medical record for preterm neonates (< 37+0 weeks of gestation) in one of the SMRU clinics between January 2008 and December 2017
  • Part B: Male or female medical staff (Medics, midwives \& nurses) aged 18 years and above, who have been working for SMRU since the introduction of the Special Care Baby Unit (2008-2011) or after its establishment (2012-2017) and have actively cared for preterm newborns. Medical staff (Medics, midwives \& nurses) who have provided written informed consent and willing to participate to a Focus Group Discussion
  • Part C: Mothers, aged 18 years and above, who have had a preterm newborn (< 37+0 weeks of gestation) admitted in SMRU clinics.
  • Multigravida or primigravid, presently in the SCBU or already discharged home who willing to discuss the broad topics include caring for the preterm newborn at home. Any mothers will be approached so that responses might provide a comprehensive overview of mothers concerns.
  • Mothers who have provided written informed consent and willing to participate to an interview

Who cannot join

  • Parts A: Neonatal medical record of neonates < 37+0 weeks of gestation receiving palliative care only.
  • Neonatal medical record of neonates < 37+0 weeks of gestation born and hospitalized in tertiary hospital.
  • Neonatal medical record of neonates < 37+0 weeks of gestation born at home and not hospitalized in SMRU clinics during the neonatal period.
  • Neonatal medical record of neonates < 37+0 weeks of gestation born in SMRU clinics but transferred in tertiary hospital for further neonatal care.
  • Neonatal medical record of neonates born term (37+0 weeks or more)
  • Part B: Medical staff who has never been directly involved in caring for preterm neonates.
  • Part C: Mothers aged less than 18 years old

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Thailand1 site
  • Shoklo Malaria Research Unit

    Mae Sot, Changwat Tak, 63110

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: Born Too Soon in a Resource-limited Setting on the Thailand-Myanmar Border: Can we Improve Care in a Special Care Baby Unit?

Since 2008, preterm neonates are taking care of in a Special Baby Care Unit (SCBU). Those born less than 34 weeks of gestation are followed-up monthly for one year for monitoring their hematocrit level, growth and development.

Medical chart reviews are useful to evaluate the burden of diseases, characterize care treatment patterns and clinical outcomes by patients' subgroups; ultimately it can help identifying gaps in care pathways thus improving quality of care and ultimately reducing mortality. Medical records of all preterm neonates hospitalized in the SCBU including those followed up during their first year of life are computerized.

Read more

The investigators propose to review the clinical charts of the preterm neonates in regards to four main points of care a) feeding, b) infections including early onset of neonatal sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis and umbilical cord infection, c) body temperature control and d) respiratory distress.

This medical charts review will be complemented by i) focus group discussions (FGD) with the medical staff working in the SCBU on the benefits and difficulties in using the existing guidelines for preterm care and by ii) interviews with mothers who delivered a preterm neonate on their experience in caring for their child and the challenges they faced.

While performing the retrospective part of the project and after discussing the preliminary findings from the medical staff perception of the existing guidelines, the investigators will evaluate the feasibility to implement some additional recommendations to improve preterm birth outcomes based on recent literature and new protocols for resource-limited settings.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to describe the neonatal clinical outcome of preterm neonates (< 37+0 weeks of gestation) in terms of mortality and prematurity-related morbidity and the growth and neurodevelopment of preterm neonates (< 34+0 weeks of gestation) in the first year of life in order to optimize service delivery for preterm neonates in a resource-constraint setting. The study will consist of 3 parts as follows:

Part A: A retrospective chart review of preterm neonates born in one of the birthing SMRU unit between January 2008 and December 2017 and for whom a medical chart is available. In addition we propose to analyze the growth trajectory, the prevalence of anemia (Hct < 33%) and the level of neurodevelopment achieved in the first year of life reported in the clinical charts of preterm neonates born < 34+0 weeks of gestation.

Part B: Focus Group Discussion (FGD) of the medical staff working in the SCBU firstly on the benefits and difficulties in using existing guidelines for preterm care and secondly on the feasibility and acceptability of the revised guidelines 3-6 months after their implementation.

Part C: Interviews of mothers who delivered preterm neonates (< 37+0 weeks of gestation) to understand the challenges they faced while caring for their child.

This study was funded by Shoklo Malaria Research Unit Core funding (Wellcome Trust). Grant reference number is 220211.

Summary of Results:

Preterm birth is a major public health concern worldwide with the largest burden of morbidity and mortality falling upon the low- and middle-income countries. Evidence-based interventions for preterm neonatal care exist but often meet with barriers to implementation based on constraints in resource-poor settings.

This study summarizes clinical outcomes among preterm neonates born to mothers attending antenatal care at SMRU, regarding four main points of care: feeding, infections, thermal care, and respiratory care. In addition to these clinical outcomes, mixed methods were employed to highlight key implementation outcomes for SCBU care provision in this setting.

Between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017, a total of 2319 preterm births were documented, of which, 203 stillbirths were excluded from further analysis. There were 237 deaths documented over the study period, with the proportion of deaths decreasing significantly from 14.4% (144/999) during the early establishment period of SCBU (2008-2011) to 11.0% (66/603) during the expansion of SCBU care to all sites (2012-2014) and to 5.3% (27/514) while the continuum of care was performed more routinely at all sites (2015-2017) (p<0.001). Mortality reduction was observed in all categories of prematurity, with the largest reduction (68%) observed among very preterm neonates (EGA 28-32 weeks). Most deaths (184/237, 77.6%) occurred in the early neonatal period, of which half were within hours of birth (93/184).

Admission for surveillance and further care was routine. Very preterm neonates (EGA 28-32 weeks) remained under observation for nearly three weeks longer than moderate preterm neonates (EGA 33-36 weeks) with a median of 34 days (IQR 20, 49 days) compared to a median of 9 days (IQR 4, 14). Hypothermia (temperature < 36.5ºC) was the most common cause of abnormal body temperature on admission (402/480, 83.8%) independent of prematurity. Nearly one-third of neonates (394/1215, 32.4%) received intravenous antibiotics on admission to SCBU. Duration of oxygen therapy was longer for very preterm (median of 18 days [IQR 10, 32]) compared to moderate preterm neonates (2.5 days [IQR 2-6.5]).

Mothers of neonates (n=9) explained acceptability, satisfaction, and coverage outcomes related to SCBU care. Despite difficult circumstances around access and financial issues, many women realized the need for SCBU care for their newborns. The patient-centered care offset risks associated with both seeking care and the substantial toll that extended hospital stays took on women's personal lives. FGDs with medical staff (n=27) helped explain feasibility, fidelity, and effectiveness outcomes.

Conclusions:

SMRU provides a package of routine and specialized services for antenatal, intrapartum, delivery, postpartum, and newborn care that is facility-based. The package of care for preterm birth and small and sick newborns has evolved over the years and now includes the administration of steroids to women with preterm labor between 27-34 weeks of gestation, maternal antibiotic prophylaxis in case of prolonged rupture of membranes, and diagnosis and treatment of maternal infections The Special Baby Care Units for specialized care of preterm, small, or sick neonates has been equipped with equipment for optimizing respiratory support, phototherapy, feeding, and thermoregulation. The on-site medical staff has been trained in newborn resuscitation and participates in routine exercises based on the Basic Emergency Obstetric \& Newborn Care Life Support curriculum. And all these efforts have resulted in a reduction in mortality among all categories of neonates, mostly those very preterms (EGA 28-32 weeks).

However, despite this improvement in survival, interviews and FGDs findings highlighted the barriers in this resource-limited setting and their impact on the feasibility, fidelity, and effectiveness of evidence-based SCBU care. Financial burdens and social issues related to home life were often a pull away from the hospital, hampering the acceptability, appropriateness, and satisfaction mothers felt in accessing clinics or being admitted to the SCBU facility for long periods of time. Medical staff often adapted interventions to fit the financial and environmental constraints imposed by this setting. To further reduce neonatal mortality in preterm neonates there is an urgent need to consider the financial and social constraints on the mothers as well as support to the medical staff that goes beyond improving knowledge.

The final enrolment numbers: Part A: 2116 charts of preterm neonates born to mothers attending ANC at SMRU retrospectively analyzed; 27 participants to FGD and 9 interviews.

Being tested
Retrospective chart review, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) of the medical staff, Interviews of mothers
Keywords
Preterm Infant
Medical subject headings
Premature Birth

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Retrospective chart reviewOther

    A retrospective chart review of preterm neonates born in one of the birthing SMRU unit between January 2008 and December 2017 and for whom a medical chart is available. In addition we propose to analyze the growth trajectory, the prevalence of anemia (Hct < 33%) and the level of neurodevelopment achieved in the first year of life reported in the clinical charts of preterm neonates born < 34+0 weeks of gestation.

  • Focus Group Discussion (FGD) of the medical staffOther

    Focus Group Discussion (FGD) of the medical staff working in the SCBU firstly on the benefits and difficulties in using existing guidelines for preterm care and secondly on the feasibility and acceptability of changes in the guidelines 3-6 months after their implementation.

  • Interviews of mothersOther

    Interviews of mothers who delivered preterm neonates (< 37+0 weeks of gestation) to understand the challenges they faced while caring for their child.

Study groups in NCT03512093
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Retrospective chart reviewNot described
Receives: Other: Retrospective chart review
Focus Group Discussion (FGD) of the medical staffNot described
Receives: Other: Focus Group Discussion (FGD) of the medical staff
Interviews of mothersNot described
Receives: Other: Interviews of mothers

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The neonatal mortality rate of preterm neonates (< 37+ weeks of gestation) expressed in number of newborns dying at less than 28 days of age per 1000 livebirths.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. The neonatal prematurity-related morbidity rates.

    (i.e. necrotizing enterocolitis; sepsis; hypothermia; apnoea of prematurity; respiratory distress syndrome; gastric reflux) expressed as the number of specific-morbidity per number of preterm newborn aged less than 28 days and presented as percentage.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. The time lapse between birth and full enteral feeding expressed as mean (SD) days to reach full enteral feeding.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. The growth trajectory changes during the first year of life of neonates born < 34+0 weeks of gestation expressed as mean (SD) monthly weight/height gain and mean z-scores at end of follow-up.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. The proportion of anaemia (haematocrit < 33%) during the first year of life of neonates born < 34+0 weeks of gestation.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. The mean (SD) neurodevelopment score at 6 and 12 month of life of neonates born < 34+0 weeks of gestation.

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Medical staff and mothers' perception of the difficulties and challenges of caring for preterm neonates analysed by themes and performed using NVivo solfware package.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Apr 2018
  2. Study start1 May 2018
  3. Primary completion16 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03512093
Sponsor's protocol ID
HCR17005
Acronym
PretermBabies
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
19 Feb 2018
Last updated
9 Jan 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All data will be extracted from Microsoft Access databases at SMRU using the existing personal identifier code. Once the link between the paper medical records and the computerized medical records is completed all variables that might identify the patient will be de-identified. Participants' data stored in the database for this study may be shared with other researchers to use in the future. However, the other researchers will not be given any information that could identify the participant. All audio files will be destroyed when all the transcripts have been completed and verified. De-identified data will be stored digitally as documents that will be password protected. All information will be kept confidential and only research team members will have access to them.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Preterm Infant and Preterm Birth, run by University of Oxford at 1 site in Thailand.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The neonatal mortality rate of preterm neonates (< 37+ weeks of gestation) expressed in number of newborns dying at less than 28 days of age per 1000 livebirths. (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in