CancerNCT03514680
Clinician Decision Support Algorithm for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
A study testing CIPN Assessment and Management Algorithm in people with Cancer and Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy, run by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This research study is evaluating how well a decision support tool works to improve clinicians' use of recommended chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) assessment and management strategies in participants receiving chemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer, Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
- What is being tested?
- CIPN Assessment and Management Algorithm
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 226 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 Jun 2018to 23 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- over 18 years of age,
- completed one infusion of neurotoxic chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer
- has at least three more planned clinic visits associated with neurotoxic chemotherapy receipt after the day of consent
- ambulatory,
- signed informed consent,
- willingness to participate in all study activities,
Show all 10Show fewer
- speaks/reads English,
- receives care from one of the clinicians enrolled in the study.
- -if they are a Medical Doctor, Physician Assistant, or Nurse Practitioner and provide care to oncology patients at one of the study sites
- -if they are an adult (18+) who does not have cancer or symptoms of peripheral nerve injury from any cause and speak/read English
Who cannot join
- prognosis of ≤ two months or
- documented peripheral neuropathy due to other causes (diabetes, alcohol abuse, central nervous system malignancy, vitamin B deficiency, hereditary, nerve compression injury).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
About this study
Official title: Evaluating a Clinician Support Algorithm to Enhance Implementation of Evidence-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment and Management Recommendations
This research study is evaluating how well a decision support tool works to improve clinicians' use of recommended chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) assessment and management strategies in participants receiving chemotherapy.
Read the detailed description
This research study will test a new clinician decision support tool for the assessment and management of CIPN. The algorithm is designed to help clinicians make decisions about which strategies to use for the assessment and/or management of CIPN. The investigators need to recruit participants receiving chemotherapy that is known to cause CIPN to determine how well the algorithm works to increase clinicians' use of recommended CIPN assessment and management strategies.
- Conditions
- Cancer, Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
- Being tested
- CIPN Assessment and Management Algorithm
- Keywords
- Cancer Care, Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CIPN Assessment and Management AlgorithmBehavioural
The revised algorithm incorporates evidence-based CIPN assessment and management strategies and standardized CIPN/pain patient-reported outcomes measures. In terms of processes, trained study staff will administer the screening questionnaires (e.g., PRO-CTCAE, 0 - 10 numerical rating scale of worst CIPN pain intensity) to consented patients before their clinician visit (e.g., in the waiting room). Following patient completion of the screening questionnaires, study staff will provide the clinicians with a color-coded summary of the patients' responses to the screening questionnaires and the CIPN assessment and management algorithm. Clinicians may then use the algorithm at their discretion to guide the assessment and management of their patients' CIPN symptoms
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Period I | No intervention | -Consented patients will complete electronic versions of the PRO-CTCAE CIPN severity and interference items, 0 - 10 worst CIPN pain numerical rating scale, and QLQ-CIPN20 via tablet prior to their clinician visit at the outpatient oncology center at three consecutive clinic visits: baseline, visit 2, visit 3. |
| Period II | Experimental | * Consented patients will complete the same battery of assessments from the usual care period at the baseline, visit 2, and visit 3 time points.
* Following patient completion of the screening questionnaires, study staff will provide the clinicians with a color-coded summary of the patients' responses to the screening questionnaires and the CIPN assessment and management algorithm Receives: Behavioral: CIPN Assessment and Management Algorithm |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinician Medical Record Abstraction Form
Frequency of clinician CIPN assessment and management documentation for each period.
Measured: From enrollment until the date of the patient's visit 3 time point, assessed up to approximately 10 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (5)
European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Scale (QLQ-CIPN20): Sensory and Motor Subscales
Change in QLQ-CIPN20 scores between periods. Subscale total scores are scored from 0 - 100, higher scores represent worse neuropathy symptoms.
Measured: From enrollment until the date of the patient's visit 3 time point, assessed up to approximately 10 weeks.
Patient-Reported Outcomes National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events CIPN Severity and Interference Items
Reliability and validity testing of measure. The severity and interference items are scored from 0 - 4, with higher scores representing worse neuropathy.
Measured: From enrollment until the date of the patient's visit 3 time point, assessed up to approximately 10 weeks.
0 - 10 Worst CIPN Numerical Rating Scale
Change in 0 - 10 Worst CIPN Numerical Rating Scale score between periods. Scored from 0 - 10, higher scores represent worse pain.
Measured: From enrollment until the date of the patient's visit 3 time point, assessed up to approximately 10 weeks.
Adapted Acceptability E - Scale
Mean score will be calculated to determine clinician-related acceptability and satisfaction with intervention use. Each item is scored from 1 - 5, with higher scores representing greater acceptability and satisfaction.
Measured: From enrollment to until all patient participants complete both study periods, assessed up to approximately one year.
Feasibility of Algorithm Implementation
Mean score to examine feasibility of intervention feasibility. Each item is scored from 1 - 5, with higher scores representing greater feasibility. Will be completed by clinicians only.
Measured: From enrollment to until all patient participants complete both study periods, assessed up to approximately one year.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 May 2018
- Study start4 Jun 2018
- Primary completion30 Dec 2019
- Study completion23 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The study expect to enroll 162 patients, 60 clinicians, and 30 healthy controls for a total of 252. 81 patients will be recruited in Period 1 (usual care) and a separate 81 will be recruited in Period 2 (algorithm use). The 60 clinicians will be recruited and will participate in Periods I and II. We will use purposive sampling to recruit 30 health controls to match the age and demographic characteristics of the recruited patients. The healthy controls will receive no intervention.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 226 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Robert Knoerl, PhD, RN, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Investigators
- Robert Knoerl, PhD, RN, Principal investigator, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03514680
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18-049
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 21 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Knoerl R, Mazzola E, Mitchell SA, Hong F, Salehi E, McCleary N, Ligibel JA, Reyes K, Berry DL. Measurement properties of brief neuropathy screening items in cancer patients receiving taxanes, platinums, or proteasome inhibitors. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Sep 26;5(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00377-z.
PubMed 34568984Knoerl R, Mazzola E, Hong F, Salehi E, McCleary N, Ligibel J, Reyes K, Berry DL. Exploring the impact of a decision support algorithm to improve clinicians' chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy assessment and management practices: a two-phase, longitudinal study. BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07965-8.
PubMed 33676431
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluating a Clinician Support Algorithm to Enhance Implementation of Evidence-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment and Management Recommendations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03514680
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18-049
- Conditions
- Cancer, Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
- Keywords
- Cancer Care, Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 226 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 May 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research study is evaluating how well a decision support tool works to improve clinicians' use of recommended chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) assessment and management strategies in participants receiving chemotherapy.
Detailed description
This research study will test a new clinician decision support tool for the assessment and management of CIPN. The algorithm is designed to help clinicians make decisions about which strategies to use for the assessment and/or management of CIPN. The investigators need to recruit participants receiving chemotherapy that is known to cause CIPN to determine how well the algorithm works to increase clinicians' use of recommended CIPN assessment and management strategies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The study expect to enroll 162 patients, 60 clinicians, and 30 healthy controls for a total of 252. 81 patients will be recruited in Period 1 (usual care) and a separate 81 will be recruited in Period 2 (algorithm use). The 60 clinicians will be recruited and will participate in Periods I and II. We will use purposive sampling to recruit 30 health controls to match the age and demographic characteristics of the recruited patients. The healthy controls will receive no intervention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Period I | No intervention | –-Consented patients will complete electronic versions of the PRO-CTCAE CIPN severity and interference items, 0 - 10 worst CIPN pain numerical rating scale, and QLQ-CIPN20 via tablet prior to their clinician visit at the outpatient oncology center at three consecutive clinic visits: baseline, visit 2, visit 3. |
| Period II | Experimental | Behavioral: CIPN Assessment and Management Algorithm* Consented patients will complete the same battery of assessments from the usual care period at the baseline, visit 2, and visit 3 time points. * Following patient completion of the screening questionnaires, study staff will provide the clinicians with a color-coded summary of the patients' responses to the screening questionnaires and the CIPN assessment and management algorithm |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- over 18 years of age,
- completed one infusion of neurotoxic chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer
- has at least three more planned clinic visits associated with neurotoxic chemotherapy receipt after the day of consent
- ambulatory,
- signed informed consent,
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- prognosis of ≤ two months or
- documented peripheral neuropathy due to other causes (diabetes, alcohol abuse, central nervous system malignancy, vitamin B deficiency, hereditary, nerve compression injury).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CIPN Assessment and Management AlgorithmThe revised algorithm incorporates evidence-based CIPN assessment and management strategies and standardized CIPN/pain patient-reported outcomes measures. In terms of processes, trained study staff will administer the screening questionnaires (e.g., PRO-CTCAE, 0 - 10 numerical rating scale of worst CIPN pain intensity) to consented patients before their clinician visit (e.g., in the waiting room). Following patient completion of the screening questionnaires, study staff will provide the clinicians with a color-coded summary of the patients' responses to the screening questionnaires and the CIPN assessment and management algorithm. Clinicians may then use the algorithm at their discretion to guide the assessment and management of their patients' CIPN symptoms | Behavioural | Period II |
Primary outcome
Clinician Medical Record Abstraction Form
Time frame: From enrollment until the date of the patient's visit 3 time point, assessed up to approximately 10 weeks.
Frequency of clinician CIPN assessment and management documentation for each period.
5 secondary outcomes
European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Scale (QLQ-CIPN20): Sensory and Motor Subscales
Time frame: From enrollment until the date of the patient's visit 3 time point, assessed up to approximately 10 weeks.
Patient-Reported Outcomes National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events CIPN Severity and Interference Items
Time frame: From enrollment until the date of the patient's visit 3 time point, assessed up to approximately 10 weeks.
0 - 10 Worst CIPN Numerical Rating Scale
Time frame: From enrollment until the date of the patient's visit 3 time point, assessed up to approximately 10 weeks.
Adapted Acceptability E - Scale
Time frame: From enrollment to until all patient participants complete both study periods, assessed up to approximately one year.
Feasibility of Algorithm Implementation
Time frame: From enrollment to until all patient participants complete both study periods, assessed up to approximately one year.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34568984Knoerl R, Mazzola E, Mitchell SA, Hong F, Salehi E, McCleary N, Ligibel JA, Reyes K, Berry DL. Measurement properties of brief neuropathy screening items in cancer patients receiving taxanes, platinums, or proteasome inhibitors. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Sep 26;5(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00377-z.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33676431Knoerl R, Mazzola E, Hong F, Salehi E, McCleary N, Ligibel J, Reyes K, Berry DL. Exploring the impact of a decision support algorithm to improve clinicians' chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy assessment and management practices: a two-phase, longitudinal study. BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07965-8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE in Adult Patients With Metastatic, Radioactive Iodine Non-Responsive Oncocytic (Hurthle-Cell) Thyroid Cancer
Thyroid Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Clinical Study of MK-2870 Alone or With Other Treatments to Treat Gastrointestinal Cancers (MK-9999-02A)
Colorectal Cancer, Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Raludotatug Deruxtecan With or Without Bevacizumab as First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Non-HRD-Positive Advanced Ovarian Cancer (MK-5909-006, (ENGOT-ov102/GOG-3141/ REJOICE-Ovarian 04)
Ovarian Cancer, Ovarian Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax, Ibrutinib, Prednisone, Obinutuzumab, and Revlimid (ViPOR) in Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Lymphoma
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Pivotal Open-label Phase 3 Clinical Study of QTX-2101 in Adult Patients With Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL), Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert Knoerl, PhD, RN principal investigator
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CIPN Assessment and Management Algorithm in people with Cancer and Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy, run by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinician Medical Record Abstraction Form (time frame: From enrollment until the date of the patient's visit 3 time point, assessed up to approximately 10 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03514680, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.