AzTrials
AzTrials

Intubation;DifficultNCT03514745

Comparison of Lighted Stylet and GlideScope for Double-lumen Endobronchial Intubation

A study testing GlideScope and Lighted stylet in people with Intubation;Difficult, run by SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We evaluate the GlideScope and lighted stylet for DLT intubation in terms of the intubation time, number of intubation attempts, difficulty in DLT advancement towards the glottis, postoperative sore throat and hoarseness, and hemodynamic responses during intubation in patients with predicted difficult airways. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Intubation;Difficult
What is being tested?
GlideScope and Lighted stylet
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
6 May 2018to May 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • adult patients undergoing thoracic surgery requiring endobronchial intubation for one-lung ventilation

Who cannot join

  • presence of sore throat and hoarseness
  • requirements for postoperative mechanical ventilation
  • at risk of aspiration.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Jin-Young Hwang, M.D., Ph.D. contact

82-2-870-2518

mistyblue15@naver.com

South Korea1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center

    Seoul, 156-707

    Jin-Young Hwang, M.D., +82-2-870-2518, mistyblue15@naver.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Lighted Stylet and GlideScope for Double-lumen Endobronchial Intubation in Patients With a Predicted Difficult Airway

We evaluate the GlideScope and lighted stylet for DLT intubation in terms of the intubation time, number of intubation attempts, difficulty in DLT advancement towards the glottis, postoperative sore throat and hoarseness, and hemodynamic responses during intubation in patients with predicted difficult airways.

Being tested
GlideScope, Lighted stylet

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GlideScopeDevice

    Endobronchial intubation is performed using the GlideScope.

  • Lighted styletDevice

    Endobronchial intubation is performed using a lighted stylet.

Study groups in NCT03514745
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GlideScope groupActive comparatorAfter the induction of anesthesia, endobronchial intubation is performed using the GlideScope.
Receives: Device: GlideScope
Lighted stylet groupExperimentalAfter the induction of anesthesia, endobronchial intubation is performed using a lighted stylet.
Receives: Device: Lighted stylet

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intubation time taken for endobronchial intubation

    Intubation time is defined as the time elapsed from picking up GlideScope or lighted stylet to confirmation of successful intubation by capnometry.

    Measured: During endobronchial intubation

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Number of intubation attempts

    Total intubation attempts are counted.

    Measured: During endobronchial intubation

  2. Difficulty of DLT advancement towards the glottis

    It is categorised as very easy, easy, difficult, and very difficult

    Measured: During endobronchial intubation

  3. Resistance to DLT insertion through the glottis

    It is categorized as none, mild, and moderate

    Measured: During endobronchial intubation

  4. The incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat

    It is quantified by using a 100-point numerical rating scale (NRS, 0 [no pain], 100 [worst pain imaginable]).

    Measured: At 1 and 24 hours after surgery

  5. The incidence and severity of postoperative hoarseness

    Hoarseness is defined as a voice quality different from the preoperative voice and graded as follows: none (no hoarseness), mild (recognized by the patient), moderate (obvious to the investigator), and severe (aphonia).

    Measured: At 1 and 24 hours after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 May 2018
  2. Study start6 May 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03514745
Sponsor's protocol ID
20171227
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
20 Apr 2018
Last updated
3 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing GlideScope and Lighted stylet in people with Intubation;Difficult, run by SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jin-Young Hwang, M.D., Ph.D. (82-2-870-2518, mistyblue15@naver.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intubation time taken for endobronchial intubation (time frame: During endobronchial intubation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in