AzTrials
AzTrials

HypertensionNCT03515005

Using Lay Health Advisors to Improve Hypertension Management

A study testing Lay Health Advisor in people with Hypertension, run by MetroHealth Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hypertension disproportionately affects and is inadequately controlled among African American and poor populations. The investigators propose to determine the impact of using trained lay health advisors to help patients address social contextual factors that influence the management of hypertension. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 64 years
Conditions the study is for
Hypertension
What is being tested?
Lay Health Advisor
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
69 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
3 Dec 2018to 1 Sep 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • At least 2 outpatient blood pressures with systolic >140 or diastolic >90 mm Hg in last 6 months. Separate occurrences at least 1 day apart
  • Age 18-59 years
  • Non-diabetic
  • Preserved kidney function (glomerular filtration rate >60 ml/min)
  • English speaking

Who cannot join

  • Mentally incompetent
  • Pregnant
  • Terminal illness
  • Active substance abuse
  • Documented coronary, peripheral arterial, or cerebrovascular disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The MetroHealth System

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44109

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Using Lay Health Advisors to Help African Americans Address the Social Context of Hypertension Management

Hypertension disproportionately affects and is inadequately controlled among African American and poor populations. The investigators propose to determine the impact of using trained lay health advisors to help patients address social contextual factors that influence the management of hypertension.

Read the detailed description

Hypertension disproportionately affects and is inadequately controlled among African American and poor populations. Health providers generally lack the skills and resources to address social contextual factors (i.e. health and community services, social networks, social stressors, physical environment, and economic resources) that influence management of hypertension. Instead, providers tend to focus on adjusting antihypertensive medication prescriptions and exhorting patients to exercise and eat better. The investigators propose to determine the impact of using trained lay health advisors to help patients address social contextual factors that influence the management of hypertension. Helping patients address these barriers may lead not only to improved blood pressure but also to increased survival, reduced organ damage, and decreased health care costs. This project may also serve as a model of healthcare delivery innovation that could be used to address other health disparity conditions.

Conditions
Hypertension
Being tested
Lay Health Advisor
Keywords
Hypertension, Community Health Workers, Community-Based Participatory Research, Health Equity
Medical subject headings
Hypertension

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lay Health AdvisorBehavioural

    Patients will meet regularly Lay Health Advisors who will address the social context of their hypertension.

Study groups in NCT03515005
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lay Health AdvisorsExperimentalIntervention patients will meet monthly in small groups with a trained Lay Health Advisor.
Receives: Behavioral: Lay Health Advisor
Usual CareNo interventionControl patients will receive usual care from their doctors.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    Difference between final and initial systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change in quality of life.

    Differences in quality of life between final and initial measurements using the 12 item short form survey (SF-12). The SF-12 provides physical and mental health composite scores ranging from 0 (lowest level of health) to 100 (highest level of health)

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 May 2018
  2. Study start3 Dec 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2019
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2019

Why it stopped: Enrollment target not reached

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
69 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03515005
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB18-00038
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
29 Mar 2018
Last updated
14 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Egan BM, Li J, Hutchison FN, Ferdinand KC. Hypertension in the United States, 1999 to 2012: progress toward Healthy People 2020 goals. Circulation. 2014 Nov 4;130(19):1692-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010676. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

    PubMed 25332288
  • James SA, Van Hoewyk J, Belli RF, Strogatz DS, Williams DR, Raghunathan TE. Life-course socioeconomic position and hypertension in African American men: the Pitt County Study. Am J Public Health. 2006 May;96(5):812-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.076158. Epub 2006 Mar 29.

    PubMed 16571689
  • Matthews KA, Kiefe CI, Lewis CE, Liu K, Sidney S, Yunis C; Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study (CARDIA). Socioeconomic trajectories and incident hypertension in a biracial cohort of young adults. Hypertension. 2002 Mar 1;39(3):772-6. doi: 10.1161/hy0302.105682.

    PubMed 11897761
  • Cook S, Drum ML, Kirchhoff AC, Jin L, Levie J, Harrison JF, Lippold SA, Schaefer CT, Chin MH. Providers' assessment of barriers to effective management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia in community health centers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006 Feb;17(1):70-85. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2006.0021.

    PubMed 16520513
  • Mercuri M, Sherbino J, Sedran RJ, Frank JR, Gafni A, Norman G. When guidelines don't guide: the effect of patient context on management decisions based on clinical practice guidelines. Acad Med. 2015 Feb;90(2):191-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000542.

    PubMed 25354075
  • Borzecki AM, Oliveria SA, Berlowitz DR. Barriers to hypertension control. Am Heart J. 2005 May;149(5):785-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.01.047. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15894958
  • Hill MN, Bone LR, Hilton SC, Roary MC, Kelen GD, Levine DM. A clinical trial to improve high blood pressure care in young urban black men: recruitment, follow-up, and outcomes. Am J Hypertens. 1999 Jun;12(6):548-54. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00007-2.

    PubMed 10371363
  • Dennison CR, Post WS, Kim MT, Bone LR, Cohen D, Blumenthal RS, Rame JE, Roary MC, Levine DM, Hill MN. Underserved urban african american men: hypertension trial outcomes and mortality during 5 years. Am J Hypertens. 2007 Feb;20(2):164-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.08.003.

    PubMed 17261462
  • Rose LE, Kim MT, Dennison CR, Hill MN. The contexts of adherence for African Americans with high blood pressure. J Adv Nurs. 2000 Sep;32(3):587-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01538.x.

    PubMed 11012800
  • Russell E, Johnson B, Larsen H, Novilla ML, van Olmen J, Swanson RC. Health systems in context: a systematic review of the integration of the social determinants of health within health systems frameworks. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013 Dec;34(6):461-7.

    PubMed 24569976
  • Wong K, Smalarz A, Wu N, Boulanger L, Wogen J. The association between hypertension-specific care management processes and blood pressure outcomes in US-based physician organizations. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2011 Nov-Dec;5(6):505-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

    PubMed 21958468
  • Jackson EJ, Parks CP. Recruitment and training issues from selected lay health advisor programs among African Americans: a 20-year perspective. Health Educ Behav. 1997 Aug;24(4):418-31. doi: 10.1177/109019819702400403.

    PubMed 9247822
  • Dye CJ, Williams JE, Evatt JH. Improving hypertension self-management with community health coaches. Health Promot Pract. 2015 Mar;16(2):271-81. doi: 10.1177/1524839914533797. Epub 2014 May 16.

    PubMed 24837989
  • Margolius D, Bodenheimer T, Bennett H, Wong J, Ngo V, Padilla G, Thom DH. Health coaching to improve hypertension treatment in a low-income, minority population. Ann Fam Med. 2012 May-Jun;10(3):199-205. doi: 10.1370/afm.1369.

    PubMed 22585883
  • Brownstein JN, Chowdhury FM, Norris SL, Horsley T, Jack L Jr, Zhang X, Satterfield D. Effectiveness of community health workers in the care of people with hypertension. Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5):435-47. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.011.

    PubMed 17478270

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lay Health Advisor in people with Hypertension, run by MetroHealth Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Enrollment target not reached). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03515005, which also lists 18 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in