AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory InsufficiencyHiFlOViPNCT03515031

High Flow Nasal Cannulae vs Venturi Mask in Respiratory Failure Due to Pneumonia

A study testing High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation and Venturi Mask Oxygenation in people with Respiratory Insufficiency and Pneumonia, run by Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of treatment with HFNC (group A) compared to administration of oxygen therapy by Venturi mask (group B, standard therapy) in terms of reaching of endotracheal intubation criteria during acute respiratory failure due to severe pneumonia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Respiratory Insufficiency, Pneumonia
What is being tested?
High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation and Venturi Mask Oxygenation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
1 Jun 2023to 30 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • male or female of any ethnic group
  • age greater than or equal to 18 years;
  • respiratory rate (RR) at rest ≥ 20 breaths/minute or presence of respiratory distress (severe - dyspnea at rest or use of accessory respiratory muscles or paradox abdominal movement) PaO 2/ FiO 2 ≤250 during oxygen therapy with Venturi mask with FiO 2 50% administered for at least 60 minutes;
  • diagnosis of pneumonia as the unique cause of acute respiratory failure
  • informed consent obtained from the patient or the closest relative in case of patient's inability to give it.

Who cannot join

  • other diagnoses (instead of pneumonia) as a cause of acute respiratory failure
  • unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction in place;
  • Acute respiratory acidosis with pH <7.35 and PaCO 2 > 45 mmHg;
  • systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg unresponsive to fluids or with amines
  • severe arrhythmias;
  • epileptic seizures;
Show all 13Show fewer
  • the degree of vigilance depending on the Kelly scale > 3 (see Appendix II)
  • impaired swallowing, which increases the risk of pneumonia aspiration inability to protect airways
  • craniofacial trauma or burns
  • uncooperative patient
  • presence of open wound (skull, chest, abdomen)
  • respiratory arrest or need for intubation
  • ongoing pregnancy or suspected

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

roberto cosentini, MD contact

+39 338 600 2601

r.cosentini@gmail.com

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Vicky Rubini

    Bergamo, 24127

    Vicky Rubini, 3923633715, v.rubini.95@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Open Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Oxygen Therapy by High Flow Nasal Cannulae and by Venturi Mask in the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure Due to Severe Pneumonia (Hi Flow Oxygen vs Venturi Mask In Pneumonia)

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of treatment with HFNC (group A) compared to administration of oxygen therapy by Venturi mask (group B, standard therapy) in terms of reaching of endotracheal intubation criteria during acute respiratory failure due to severe pneumonia.

Inclusion Criteria: Respiratory rate (RR) at rest ≥20 bpm or presence of respiratory distress (severe dyspnoea at rest or use of accessory respiratory muscles or abdominal paradox); PaO2 / FiO2 ≤250 during oxygenation with Venturi Oxygenation mask at FiO2 = 50% administered for at least 60 minutes; Diagnosis of pneumonia as the sole cause of acute respiratory failure. Randomization: 150 consecutive patients will be randomized either to High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation (75 patients, HFNCO with flow ≥ 60 L/min and FiO2 to maintain SpO2 ≥ ) or Venturi Mask Oxygenation (control, 75 patients).

Read more

Patients from both groups will be treated with antibiotic therapy according to the IDSA/ATS 2007 guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia and the IDSA/ATS 2016 guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia.

Intubation Criteria:

MAJOR CRITERIA:

Cardiac or respiratory arrest Breathing pauses with loss of consciousness Severe hemodynamic instability Need for sedation

MINOR CRITERIA (maintained for ≥1h):

Reduction ≥30% of the value of the PaO2/FiO 2 compared to baseline Increased 20% if PaCO2 PaCO2 previous ≥40mmHg Worsening alertness as increased by one degree on the Kelly scale Persistence or onset of respiratory distress Vital parameters, Kelly scale and arterial blood gas analysis (BGA) will be performed on admission, and at 1, 24, at 48 hours, at the achievement of clinical stability, and whenever there is a clinical worsening.

Patients enrolled in HFNC arm will continue HFNC oxygenation until clinical stability, defined as:

Body temperature ≤ 37°C and ≥36°C for 24 consecutive hours Good ability in swallowing CRP and WBC normalization trend than the admission exams Hemodynamic stability Lack of respiratory distress SpO2 94-98% The primary outcome variable is the proportion of patients who reach the endotracheal intubation criteria - regardless of the actual intubation rate - within the first 48 hours of treatment. The primary analysis will be performed on the ITT population

Read the detailed description

1.1 Basic information Pneumonia is still the most important infectious disease in terms of morbidity and mortality and is one of the most common causes of hospitalization for acute respiratory failure. The aim of this trial is to compare the use of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) oxygenation versus standard oxygen therapy in patients with hypoxemia due to pneumonia.

1.2 Rationale The oxygenation through HFNC allows the use of high concentrations of oxygen administered by a high gas flow, heated and humidified. This device allows both higher FiO2 and the presence of a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with a greater gas exchange.

  1. Aims OF THE STUDY 2.1 Primary aim The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of treatment with HFNC (group A) compared to administration of oxygen therapy by Venturi mask (group B, standard therapy) in terms of clinical failure during acute respiratory failure due to severe pneumonia 2.2 Secondary aims

The secondary aims are:

30-day mortality gas exchange improvement in-hospital length of stay adverse events as per prior

  1. STUDY DESIGN 3.1 Design This is randomized, open, controlled, multicenter study 3.2 Number of patients The sample size is 150 patients. The enrolled subjects will be randomized in two Arms: Arm 1, intervention, 75 patients treated with HFNC, minimum flow ≥ 60L / min, FiO2 such as to maintain a SpO2 ≥ 92%, and Arm 2, reference technique, 75 patients treated with oxygen with Venturi mask, with FiO2 as to maintain a SpO 2 ≥ 92%.

3.3 Duration of the study The estimated time to complete the recruitment of cases is 24 months. Each subject will be followed from enrolment until discharge.

3.4 Evaluation 3.5.1 Primary endpoint The primary endpoint is the achievement of clinical failure defined as at least one major criteria Or

At least ≥2 of the minor criteria maintained for at least 1 consecutive hour:

MAJOR CRITERIA:

Cardiac or respiratory arrest Breathing pauses with loss of consciousness Severe hemodynamic instability Need for sedation

MINOR CRITERIA:

Reduction ≥30% of the value of the PaO 2 / FiO 2 compared to baseline Increased 20% if PaCO2 PaCO2 previous ≥40mmHg Worsening alertness as increased by one degree on the Kelly scale Persistence or onset of respiratory distress

3.5.2 Secondary endpoint

The secondary endpoint includes:

30 days mortality after admission. improvement of respiratory exchanges compared to baseline, rated at 1, 24 and 48 hours and at the achievement of clinical stability with arterial blood gas.

rate of adverse events length of hospital stay. 3.5.3 Follow-up At 30 days from admission, each subject will be assessed, possibly through telephone contact, to determine the status of life (secondary endpoint).

  1. STUDIED POPULATION AND SELECTION CRITERIA 4.1 Examined population The studied population consists of individuals with pneumonia presenting to the Emergency Departments 4.2 Inclusion/exclusion criteria (see appropriate section)
  2. SCREENING PROCEDURES, RANDOMISATION, MASKING 5.1 Randomization The statistician of the study will make randomization, preparing a list generated by the computer using a special program. The experimenter center will receive a group of envelopes progressively numbered, opaque, sealed in order to avoid any opening.

5.2 Masking This study is open, not being justified a possible double masking technique or sham procedures.

  1. SCHEDULE AND STUDY PROCEDURES The study is divided into a baseline visit, followed by 1 visit at 1 hour, in the next 24 hours, followed by another visit during the 48-hour and the last when clinical stability is achieved The patient then will be followed until discharge and with a visit or a follow-up interview after 30 days of admission to determine the status of life.

6.1 Clinical evaluation

Clinical evaluations include:

collection of history (prior and concomitant diseases), and any concomitant therapies complete physical exam only at baseline respiratory symptoms at each evaluation vital signs during each evaluation dyspnea assessment at every clinical evaluation, using the Borg scale axillary body temperature (BT) every 8 hours Kelly scale assessment at each evaluation.

6.2 Laboratory evaluations Unless otherwise specified, the following tests will be performed on admission, 24 hours and then every 48 hours until discharge criteria are reached.

CBC: (5 mL in EDTA); Biochemistry: blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, serum sodium, potassium, glucose, ALT, AST, creatine phosphokinase (CPK), bilirubin, C-reactive protein, albumin (5 mL whole blood); lactates: performed at baseline and subsequent blood gas controls (3 mL of whole blood) pregnancy test on the urine sample (only at baseline) The arterial blood gas analysis (BGA) with the calculation of PaO2/FiO2 will be performed on admission, at 1, 24, at 48 hours, and at the achievement of clinical stability, and whenever there is a clinical worsening.

6.3 Instrumental exams Routine chest x-ray on admission, as well as whenever a clinical deterioration occurs.

6.4 Examinations plan 6.4.1 Baseline medical exam For each patient it will be made physical examination and lab evaluation as described previously Then it will proceed to randomization as indicated in § 5.2. 6.4.2 Treatment period The doctor in charge is free to perform all measurements, including BGA, as needed to assess the patient's condition. These will be in the clinic folder but they are not part of the data analyzed for the study, with the exception of blood gas analysis necessary to determine the minor intubation criteria (§ 3.5.1). Such measures will be noted for determination of primary endpoint, but they will not be used for the measurement of gas exchange trend (secondary endpoint).

For the analysis of secondary endpoint, after 24 hours, 48 hours and the achievement of clinical stability should be measured and recorded:

vital parameters (BP, HR, RR). The BT is measured every 8 hours with other vital parameters evaluation of dyspnea using both the Borg scale and the Kelly scale adverse events BGA during the treatment with lactate measurement (maintaining the HFNC and oxygen therapy with a mask as defined for randomization) and evaluation of P/F ratio, A-a difference of O2 and arterial O2 consumption.

24 hours after randomization there will be rated the severity score the SAPS-II scale and the SOFA score in case of sepsis.

Every 48 hours there will be performed blood samples (CBC, biochemistry, CRP) until the clinical stability is reached.

If intubation criteria are reached, the study must be regarded as concluded. For patients enrolled in HFNC arm, the ventilatory support therapy using HFNC must be continued until the clinical stability, considered as the fulfillment of the following clinical stability.

After attainment of all clinical stability, there will be an attempt to remove HFNC and to put the patient in Venturi mask, with the same FiO2 as the HFNC used before.

This step will be considered definitive when one hour after the attempt the SpO2 remains 94-98% and the absence of respiratory distress or FR <25 acts per minutes.

For patients in Venturi group, as soon as clinical stability is reached through the fulfillment of clinical stability criteria, the successive evaluation takes place at the time of discharge.

6.4.3 End-study medical examination The visit will take place at the end of the study at the time of discharge or when intubation criteria will be achieved.

Evaluation will include:

vital parameters (BP, HR, RR) respiratory symptoms using both the Borg and the Kelly scale SpO2 6.4.4 Observations to 30 days or in case of unplanned evaluation

After 30 days of enrolment the patient will be requested via telephone interview of the subject or of the reference family:

If the participant is alive any hospitalization

  1. STUDIED TECHNIQUES The two techniques in this trial are widely known and used for oxygen therapy, although still lacks a comparative assessment of efficiency in the case examined in this study
  2. ASSESSMENT OF SCIENTIFIC AIMS 8.1 See appropriate section on Outcome measures 9. STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 9.1 Studied population The study population consists of adult and consenting subjects, from to the ER population diagnosed with pneumonia as the unique cause of acute respiratory and PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 250 during oxygen with Venturi mask with FiO2 50% administered for at least 60 minutes.

9.2 Study design The study follows the randomized, controlled design vs. standard open intervention. Randomization is defined by the main statistician. The center receives a set of disposable sealed envelopes, opaque, prepared by the main statistician in blocks in accordance with procedures stored by itself. Each subject enrolled will receive the treatment indicated inside the envelope with the lowest number available.

9.3 Outcome measures of the study See appropriate section on Outcome Measures

9.4 Study hypothesis The study aims to evaluate the null hypothesis according to the proportion of patients reaching the primary endpoint does not differ in its populations.

9.5 Sample size The aim of the study is the null hypothesis examination, which indicates that the groups in the two populations are the same.

With the proposed sample of 75 subjects in both the two groups (a total of 150 subjects), the study has a power of 80% to give statistically significant results. This calculation assumes that the proportion of subjects that reach the primary endpoint is approximately the 60% of the control group and that the treatment in question is able to reduce this proportion of 35%.

9.6 Patients enrolling and follow-up Overall, it is expected to enrol approximately 150 patients. The estimated duration of enrolment is about 12 months. Considering the period of follow up of the patients, the expected study duration is approximately 36 months.

9.7 Analysis plan 9.7.1 Primary variable analysis The primary variable is the proportion of patients who meet the criteria for endotracheal intubation - regardless of the actual intubation - during the treatment until the achievement of the clinical stability criteria. The primary analysis will be performed on the ITT population. The proportion of subjects qualified as a "failure" related to the achievement of the criteria for intubation will be analyzed by contingency tables (chi-square) accompanied by the confidence interval of the difference, by the relative risk estimates and by the NNT, if applicable. It may also be analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.

The proportion of subjects who achieved the outcome at a set time (secondary analysis), if relevant, will be tabulated by relative confidence intervals for the difference and estimated odds-ratios for daily intervals.

9.7.2 Secondary variables analysis The Secondary endpoints include both continuous and binary distribution variables. The 30-day mortality will be analyzed by contingency tables and using multivariate logistic regression, considering as membership population these three categories: HFNC, Venturi (if randomized to standard after treatment maintained until the end of observation) and Mixed (if randomized to standard treatment and subsequently transferred to HFNC before the observation term)

Being tested
High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation, Venturi Mask Oxygenation
Keywords
High Flow Nasal Cannula, Venturi mask
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Insufficiency, Pneumonia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • High Flow Nasal Cannula OxygenationDevice

    Delivery of humidified and heated (37ºC) high flow oxygen

  • Venturi Mask OxygenationDevice

    delivery of high flow oxygen

Study groups in NCT03515031
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High Flow Nasal Cannula OxygenationExperimentalHigh Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation with a minimum flow ≥ 60L / min, and an FiO2 such as to maintain a SpO2 ≥ 92% for at least 48 hours until clinical stability
Receives: Device: High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation
Venturi Mask OxygenationActive comparatorVenturi Mask Oxygenation, with an FiO2 such as to maintain an SpO2 ≥ 92% for at least 48 hours until clinical stability
Receives: Device: Venturi Mask Oxygenation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical Failure

    The primary endpoint is the achievement of clinical failure defined as:

    At least one of major criteria Or

    At least 2 or more of the minor criteria maintained for at least 1 consecutive hour:

    MAJOR CRITERIA:

    Cardiac or respiratory arrest Breathing pauses with loss of consciousness Severe hemodynamic instability (Heart Rate ≤ 50 bpm with loss of alertness or Systolic Blood Pressure ≤ 70 mmHg) Need for sedation

    MINOR CRITERIA (observed for ≥ 1 hour):

    Reduction ≥30% of the value of the PaO 2 / FiO 2 compared to baseline Increased 20% if PaCO2 PaCO2 previous ≥40mmHg Worsening alertness as increased by one degree on the Kelly scale (see Appendix II) Persistence or onset of respiratory distress ( severe dyspnea or use of accessories respiratory muscles or paradoxical abdominal motion)

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, for a maximum of 30 days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. 30-day mortality after admission

    mortality rate at 30 days after admission

    Measured: day 30

  2. improvement of respiratory exchanges compared to baseline

    arterial blood gas evaluation of gas exchange and ventilation

    Measured: hospital admission (=day 1), day 2, until the achievement of clinical stability

  3. adverse events

    observation adverse events rate

    Measured: Hospital discharge; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week

  4. hospital stay

    length of hospital stay

    Measured: Hospital discharge; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 May 2018
  2. Study start1 Jun 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
open randomized controlled trial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03515031
Sponsor's protocol ID
PapaGiovanniH
Acronym
HiFlOViP
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
11 Apr 2018
Last updated
7 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Frat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, Perbet S, Prat G, Boulain T, Morawiec E, Cottereau A, Devaquet J, Nseir S, Razazi K, Mira JP, Argaud L, Chakarian JC, Ricard JD, Wittebole X, Chevalier S, Herbland A, Fartoukh M, Constantin JM, Tonnelier JM, Pierrot M, Mathonnet A, Beduneau G, Deletage-Metreau C, Richard JC, Brochard L, Robert R; FLORALI Study Group; REVA Network. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2185-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503326. Epub 2015 May 17.

    PubMed 25981908
  • Liesching TN, Lei Y. Efficacy of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Intensive Care Units. J Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jan 1:885066616689043. doi: 10.1177/0885066616689043. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 28110612
  • Ischaki E, Pantazopoulos I, Zakynthinos S. Nasal high flow therapy: a novel treatment rather than a more expensive oxygen device. Eur Respir Rev. 2017 Aug 9;26(145):170028. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0028-2017. Print 2017 Sep 30.

    PubMed 28794144
  • Brambilla AM, Aliberti S, Prina E, Nicoli F, Del Forno M, Nava S, Ferrari G, Corradi F, Pelosi P, Bignamini A, Tarsia P, Cosentini R. Helmet CPAP vs. oxygen therapy in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):942-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3325-5. Epub 2014 May 10.

    PubMed 24817030
  • Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Niederman MS, Torres A, Whitney CG; Infectious Diseases Society of America; American Thoracic Society. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S27-72. doi: 10.1086/511159. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17278083
  • Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M, Muscedere J, Sweeney DA, Palmer LB, Napolitano LM, O'Grady NP, Bartlett JG, Carratala J, El Solh AA, Ewig S, Fey PD, File TM Jr, Restrepo MI, Roberts JA, Waterer GW, Cruse P, Knight SL, Brozek JL. Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 1;63(5):e61-e111. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw353. Epub 2016 Jul 14.

    PubMed 27418577

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation and Venturi Mask Oxygenation in people with Respiratory Insufficiency and Pneumonia, run by Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact roberto cosentini, MD (+39 338 600 2601, r.cosentini@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical Failure (time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, for a maximum of 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03515031, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in