AzTrials
AzTrials

StuntingNCT03523182

Spirulina Supplementation and Infant Growth, Morbidity and Motor Development

A study testing Spirulina in people with Stunting and Underweight, run by Programme Against Malnutrition at 1 site in Zambia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: In developing countries, micronutrient deficiency in infants is associated with growth faltering, morbidity, and delayed motor development. One of the potentially low-cost and sustainable solutions is to use locally producible food for the home fortification of complementary foods. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 18 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Stunting, Underweight, Pneumonia, Pneumocystis
What is being tested?
Spirulina
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
501 participants
Where
1 siteZambia
Study dates
1 Mar 2015to 30 Jan 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 18 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • All infants were eligible for the study if they are between 6 and 18 month of age

Who cannot join

  • Non-singleton birth infants were excluded

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Zambia1 site
  • Programme Against Malnutrition

    Mansa, Luapura

Other trials in Zambia

About this study

Official title: Promoting Spirulina Production and Utilization in Luapula Province of Zambia

Background: In developing countries, micronutrient deficiency in infants is associated with growth faltering, morbidity, and delayed motor development. One of the potentially low-cost and sustainable solutions is to use locally producible food for the home fortification of complementary foods.

Objective: The objectives are to test the hypothesis that locally producible spirulina platensis supplementation would achieve the following: 1) increase infant physical growth; 2) reduce morbidity; and 3) improve motor development.

Design: 501 Zambian infants are randomly assigned into a control (CON) group or a spirulina (SP) group. Children in the CON group (n=250) receive a soya-maize-based porridge for 12 months, whereas those in the SP group (n=251) receive the same food but with the addition of spirulina. The change in infants' anthropometric status, morbidity, and motor development over 12 months are assessed.

Read the detailed description

Micronutrient deficiency in the infancy is associated with growth faltering, morbidity, and delayed motor development, and is common in developing countries where the food available for infants has low micronutrient density.

A low-cost and sustainable way to address this problem is to utilize locally producible foods rich in multi-micronutrients as home supplements to complementary food. Arthrospira platensis, also known as spirulina, is a blue-green micro-algae indigenous to Africa.

It contains a high percentage of protein, and is rich in multiple micronutrients know to support infant growth such as beta carotene, B vitamins, and minerals such as calcium, iron, magnesium, manganese, potassium, and zinc. The cost of producing spirulina is much lower than that of producing other comparably protein-rich foods, such as soya beans and beef, and therefore may potentially sustainably meet the nutritional demands of African infants.

Our objective is to assess the acceptability and effects of spirulina supplementation on growth, incidence of morbidity, and level of motor development in infants in Zambia. The testable hypothesis is that spirulina supplementation for 12 months would increase infant height, reduce the incidence of morbidity, and reduce time taken to achieve motor development milestones (ability to walk unassisted).

This study is conducted from April 2015 to April 2016 in the form of an open-labeled randomized control trial, and involves in a spirulina-fed treatment (SP) group and a control (CON) group.

501 Zambian infants are randomly assigned into a control (CON) group or a spirulina (SP) group. Children in the CON group (n=250) receive a soya-maize-based porridge for 12 months, whereas those in the SP group (n=251) receive the same food but with the addition of spirulina.

The change in infants' anthropometric status, morbidity, and motor development over 12 months are assessed.

Amendment: the study period has been extended by 4 months. Without no-intervention period, monthly supplementation was restarted in study are.

Being tested
Spirulina, Control
Keywords
Micronutrient supplementation, Home fortification, Spirulina, Zambia
Medical subject headings
Growth Disorders, Thinness, Pneumonia, Pneumocystis, Cough, Malaria, Fever, Psychomotor Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SpirulinaDietary supplement

    Arthrospira platensis, also known as spirulina, is a blue-green micro-algae indigenous to Africa.

    Spirulina group (n=251) receive a soya-maize-based porridge with the addition of spirulina.

    We used 10 g per day of spirulina powder with a mealie meal and soya flour porridge blend.

  • ControlDietary supplement

    Children receive a soya-maize-based porridge for 12 months. We use a mealie meal and soya flour porridge blend.

Study groups in NCT03523182
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Spirulina (SP)ExperimentalChildren in the SP group (n=251) received a soya-maize-based porridge for 12 months with the addition of spirulina.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Spirulina; Dietary Supplement: Control
Control (CON)Active comparatorChildren in the CON group (n=250) received a soya-maize-based porridge for 12 months.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) at 32 month follow up

    Primary outcome is changes in HAZ. Height of the infants is transformed to standardized scores using the World Health Organization (WHO) Multicentre Growth Standards

    Measured: Height of the infants are measured by experienced field workers at at 0, 6, and 12 month. Amendment: also measured at extension endline (October 2016), at 24 month follow up (April 2017) and at 32 month follow up (January 2018) survey.

  2. Child development

    Study children will be assessed at 32 month follow up (January 2018) using the Malawi Development Assessment Tool (MDAT) instrument. Scores will be standardized within the study sample for analysis. Scores of children in treatment group will be compared with children in comparison group to determine differences.

    Measured: At 32 month follow up (January 2018) survey

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Change from baseline in weight-for-age z-scores (WAZ) at 32 month follow up

    Secondary outcome is changes in WAZ. Weight of the infants is transformed to standardized scores using the WHO Multicentre Growth Standards

    Measured: Weight of the infants are measured at 0, 6, and 12 month by experienced field workers. Amendment: also measured at extension endline (October 2016), at 24 month follow up (April 2017) and at 32 month follow up (January 2018)

  2. Change from baseline in pneumonia incidence at 32 month follow up

    Secondary outcome is changes in pneumonia incidence. Pneumonia was defined as cough accompanied by short and rapid breathing and difficulty in breathing

    Measured: Data on pneumonia indicators were collected up to 12 months by trained local health workers. Amendment: also measured at extension endline (October 2016), at 24 month follow up (April 2017) and at 32 month follow up (January 2018)

  3. Change from baseline in cough incidence at 32 month follow up

    Secondary outcome is changes in cough incidence in the 4 weeks preceding the interview.

    Measured: Data on cough morbidity indicators are collected up to 12 months by trained local health workers. Amendment: also measured at extension endline (October 2016), at 24 month follow up (April 2017) and at 32 month follow up (January 2018)

  4. Change from baseline in severe high fever incidence at 32 month follow up

    Secondary outcome is changes in severe high fever incidence. Severe high fever was defined based on the following clinical signs: fever with rash on child's body, fever with chills, shaking, nausea, or alternating high and low body temperature

    Measured: Data are collected up to 12 months by trained local health workers. Amendment: also measured at extension endline (October 2016), at 24 month follow up (April 2017) and at 32 month follow up (January 2018)

  5. Change from baseline in fever incidence at 32 month follow up

    Secondary outcome is changes in fever incidence in the 4 weeks preceding the interview

    Measured: Data are collected up to 12 months by trained local health workers. Amendment: also measured at extension endline (October 2016), at 24 month follow up (April 2017) and at 32 month follow up (January 2018)

  6. Ability of the infant to walk independently.

    The ability of children to walk without assistance measured by the questionnaire.

    Measured: This indicator was evaluated at 0, 6 and 12 months by research assistants who visited the participants' homes

  7. Child development at 24 month follow up

    Study children will be assessed at 24 month follow up (April 2017) using the Malawi Development Assessment Tool (MDAT) instrument. Scores will be standardized within the study sample for analysis. Scores of children in treatment group will be compared with children in comparison group to determine differences.

    Measured: At 24 month follow up survey (April 2017)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 May 2018
  2. Study start1 Mar 2015
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2016
  4. Study completion30 Jan 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
501 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03523182
Sponsor's protocol ID
FWA00000338
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
19 Apr 2018
Last updated
11 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Spirulina in people with Stunting and Underweight, run by Programme Against Malnutrition at 1 site in Zambia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Zambia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) at 32 month follow up (time frame: Height of the infants are measured by experienced field workers at at 0, 6, and 12 month. Amendment: also measured at extension endline (October 2016), at 24 month follow up (April 2017) and at 32 month follow up (January 2018) survey.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in