Geographic AtrophyPhase 3NCT03525600
Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal APL-2 Therapy With Sham Injections in Patients With Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
A Phase 3 study testing APL-2 in people with Geographic Atrophy, run by Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 141 sites in 15 countries.
Trial summary
This is a 24-month, Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham-injection controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of multiple IVT injections of APL-2 in subjects with GA secondary to AMD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Geographic Atrophy
- What is being tested?
- APL-2
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 621 participants
- Where
- 141 sitesin 15 countries
- Study dates
- 31 Aug 2018to 20 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The study eye must meet all inclusion criteria. If both eyes meet the inclusion criteria, the eye with the worst visual acuity at the screening visit will be designated as the study eye. If both eyes have the same visual acuity, the right eye will be selected as the study eye.
- Ocular- specific inclusion criteria apply to the study eye only, unless otherwise specified.
- Age ≥ 60 years.
- Normal Luminance best corrected visual acuity of 24 letters or better using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts (approximately 20/320 Snellen equivalent).
- Clinical diagnosis of GA of the macula secondary to AMD as determined by the Investigator and confirmed by the Reading Center.
- The GA lesion must meet the following criteria as determined by the central reading center's assessment of Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) imaging at screening:
Show all 16Show fewer
- Total GA area must be ≥ 2.5 and ≤ 17.5 mm2 (1 and 7 disk areas [DA] respectively)
- If GA is multifocal, at least one focal lesion must be ≥ 1.25 mm2 (0.5 DA), with the overall aggregate area of GA as specified above in 4a.
- The entire GA lesion must be completely visualized on the macula centered image and must be able to be imaged in its entirety and not contiguous with any areas of peripapillary atrophy.
- Presence of any pattern of hyperautofluorescence in the junctional zone of GA. Absence of hyperautofluorescence (i.e. pattern = none) is exclusionary.
- Adequate clarity of ocular media, adequate pupillary dilation, and fixation to permit the collection of good quality images as determined by the Investigator.
- Female subjects must be:
- Women of non-child-bearing potential (WONCBP), or
- Women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) with a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and must agree to use protocol defined methods of contraception for the duration of the study and refrain from breastfeeding for the duration of the study.
- Males with female partners of child-bearing potential must agree to use protocol defined methods of contraception and agree to refrain from donating sperm for the duration of the study.
- Willing and able to give informed consent and to comply with the study procedures and assessments.
Who cannot join
- Ocular specific exclusion criteria apply to the study eye only, unless otherwise specified.
- GA secondary to a condition other than AMD such as Stargardt disease, cone rod dystrophy or toxic maculopathies like plaquenil maculopathy in either eye.
- Spherical equivalent of the refractive error demonstrating > 6 diopters of myopia or an axial length >26 mm.
- Any history or active choroidal neovascularization (CNV), associated with AMD or any other cause, including any evidence of retinal pigment epithelium rips or evidence of neovascularization anywhere based on SD-OCT imaging and/or fluorescein angiography as assessed by the Reading Center.
- Presence of an active ocular disease that in the opinion of the Investigator compromises or confounds visual function, including but not limited to, uveitis, other macular diseases (e.g. clinically significant epiretinal membrane (ERM), full thickness macular hole or uncontrolled glaucoma/ocular hypertension. Benign conditions in the opinion of the investigator such as peripheral retina dystrophy are not exclusionary).
- Intraocular surgery (including lens replacement surgery) within 3 months prior to randomization.
Show all 17Show fewer
- History of laser therapy in the macular region.
- Aphakia or absence of the posterior capsule. Note: YAG laser posterior capsulotomy for posterior capsule opacification done at least 60 days prior to screening is not exclusionary.
- Any ocular condition other than GA secondary to AMD that may require surgery or medical intervention during the study period or, in the opinion of the Investigator, could compromise visual function during the study period.
- Any contraindication to IVT injection including current ocular or periocular infection.
- History of prior intravitreal injection.
- Prior participation in another interventional clinical study for intravitreal therapies in either eye (including subjects receiving sham).
- Prior participation in another interventional clinical study for geographic atrophy in either eye including investigational oral medication and placebo.
- Participation in any systemic experimental treatment or any other systemic investigational new drug within 6 weeks or 5 half-lives of the active ingredient (whichever is longer) prior to the start of study treatment. Note: clinical trials solely involving observation, over-the-counter vitamins, supplements, or diets are not exclusionary.
- Medical or psychiatric conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, make consistent follow-up over the 24-month treatment period unlikely, or would make the subject an unsafe study candidate.
- Any screening laboratory value (hematology, serum chemistry or urinalysis) that in the opinion of the Investigator is clinically significant and not suitable for study participation.
- Known hypersensitivity to fluorescein sodium for injection or hypersensitivity to APL-2 or any of the excipients in APL-2 solution.
Trial locations and contacts
141 sites in 15 countries.
141 sites in 15 countries
United States73 sites
Retina Research Institute of Texas
Abilene, Texas, 79606
Southwest Retina Specialists
Amarillo, Texas, 79106
Retina Institute of California dba Acuity Eye Grp
Arcadia, California, 91007
Western Carolina Retinal Associates
Asheville, North Carolina, 28803
Southeast Retina Center, PC
Augusta, Georgia, 30909
Retina Consultants of Austin (Retina Research Center)
Austin, Texas, 78705
California Retina Consultants
Bakersfield, California, 93309
Elman Retina Group, PA
Baltimore, Maryland, 21236
Vitreoretinal Associates of Washington
Bellevue, Washington, 98004
Retina Vitreous Associates Medical Group
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Florida Eye Microsurgical Institute, Inc.
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33426
Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat Associates, PS
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903
Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122
Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122
Retina Associates of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, 44130
Cleveland Clinic, Cole Eye Institute
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43212
Danbury Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C. - Danbury
Danbury, Connecticut, 06810
The Retina Partners
Encino, California, 91436
The Retina Group of Washington
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031
Pinnacle Research Institute
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33309
Retina Health Center
Fort Myers, Florida, 33907
Associated Retinal Consultants, P.C
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49546
Retina Specialists of Michigan / Foundation for Vision
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49546
Long Island Vitreoretinal Consultants
Great Neck, New York, 11021
Cumberland Valley Retina Consultants, PC
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Mid Atlantic Retina Specialists
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
New England Retina Associates
Hamden, Connecticut, 06518
Graystone Eye
Hickory, North Carolina, 28602
Retina Consultants of Houston, PA
Houston, Texas, 77030
Midwest Eye Institute
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46290
The Gavin Herbert Eye Institute/UC Irvine
Irvine, California, 92697
Sabates Eye Center
Leawood, Kansas, 66211
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53715
Georgia Retina
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Valley Retina Institute, PA
McAllen, Texas, 78503
Northern California Retina Vitreous Associates
Mountain View, California, 94040
Retina Associates of Utah, PC
Murray, Utah, 84107
Tennessee Retina, PC
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of NY
New York, New York, 10022
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 33418
Retina Institute of California Medical Group
Palm Desert, California, 92260
Byers Eye Institute at Standford, Stanford School of Medicine
Palo Alto, California, 94303
Mid Atlantic Retina
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19006
Retinal Research Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, 85014
Associated Retina Consultants, Ltd
Phoenix, Arizona, 85020
Eye Associates of Pinellas
Pinellas Park, Florida, 33782
Retina Northwest, PC
Portland, Oregon, 97221
Eye Health Northwest
Portland, Oregon, 97225
Retina Consultants San Diego
Poway, California, 92064
Black Hills Regional Eye Institute
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701
Retina Consultants of Southern California
Redlands, California, 92374
Sierra Eye Associates
Reno, Nevada, 89503
Medical Center Ophthalmology Associates
San Antonio, Texas, 78240
Retinal Consultants of San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78240
California Retina Consultants
Santa Barbara, California, 93103
Retina Consultants of Michigan
Southfield, Michigan, 48034
Spokane Eye Clinical Research
Spokane, Washington, 99204
New England Retina Consultants, PC
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01107
East Florida Eye Institute
Stuart, Florida, 34994
Southern Vitreoretinal Associates
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308
Retina Associates of Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33609
University of South Florida (USF) Eye Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Retina Associates of New Jersey (NJ Retina)
Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666
Retina Consultants of Houston
The Woodlands, Texas, 77384
Retina Specialists
Towson, Maryland, 21204
Associated Retinal Consultants PC
Traverse City, Michigan, 49686
Bay Area Retina Associates
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
Virginia Retina Center
Warrenton, Virginia, 20186
Retina Group of New England,PC
Waterford, Connecticut, 06385
Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
Youngstown, Ohio, 44505
Argentina10 sites
Fundacion Zambrano
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., C1023 AAQ
Organizacion Medica de investigacion
Buenos Aires, C1015 ABO
Centro Oftalmologico Dr Charles
Buenos Aires, C1116ABA
Diagnostico Ocular
Buenos Aires, C1425BGE
Centro Privado de Ojos Romagosa SA
Córdoba, X5000AAJ
Instituto Oftalmologico de Cordoba
Córdoba, X5000III
Microcirugia Ocular
El Rosario, Corrientes Province, 2000
Oftar Mendoza SRL
Mendoza, 5500
Grupo Laser Vision
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000 AZH
Oftalmologos Especialistas
Rosario, 1288
United Kingdom10 sites
Bristol Eye Hospital
Bristol, BS1 2LX
Eye Clinic, Acre Mill Outpatients, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary
Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, HD3 3EA
St James's University Hospital
Leeds, LS9 7TF
Leicester Royal Infirmary
Leicester, LEI 5WW
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, England, EC1V 2PD
London North West University Hospital Trust
London, NW10 7NS
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
London, SE5 9RS
Oxford Eye Hospital
Oxford, OX3 9DU
Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust
Salisbury, SP2 8BJ
Sunderland Eye Infirmary
Sunderland, SR2 9HP
France7 sites
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil
Créteil
Hopital de la Croix-Rousse
Lyon, 69004
Centre Monticelli Paradis
Marseille, 13008
CHU de Nantes - Hotel Dieu
Nantes, 44093
Centre Ophtalmologique de l´Odéon
Paris, 75006
Centre Ophthalmologique Saint-Exupery
Saint-Cyr-sur-Loire, 37540
Maison Rouge Ophthalmologic Center
Strasbourg, 67000
Brazil6 sites
Instituto da Visão - Hospital de Olhos Ltda
Belo Horizonte, 32150-274
Clinica Oftalmologica Sao Lucas
Osasco, São Paulo, 06010-130
Hospital De Clinicas De Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, 90036-903
IPEPO - Instituto Da Visao
São Paulo, Vila Clementino, 04038-032
UNIFESP - Federal University
São Paulo, 04021-001
Clinica Ocular Oftalmologia LTDA
Vitória, Espírito Santo, 29055-45
Germany6 sites
Universitäts-Augenklinik Bonn
Bonn, 53127
University Hospital Cologne
Cologne, 50937
Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen gGmbH
Ludwigshafen, 67063
Klinikum rechts der Isar
München, 81675
Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
Regensburg, 93053
University Hospital Würzburg
Würzburg, 97080
Israel6 sites
Shamir Medical Center
Be’er Ya‘aqov, 7030000
Rambam Medical Center
Haifa, 3109601
Meir Medical Center
Kfar Saba, 4428164
Rabin Medical Center
Petah Tikva, 49100
Kaplan Medical Center
Rehovot, 76100
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv, 64239
Canada4 sites
Ivey Eye Institute
London, Ontario, N6A
University of Ottawa Eye Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Retina Centre of Ottawa
Ottawa, K2B 7E9
DRY AMD Clinic - St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5C 1R6
Czechia4 sites
University Hospital Kralovske Vinochrady
Brno-Vinohrady, 100 34
Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava
Ostrava-Poruba, 708 52
OFTEX Eye Clinic
Pardubice, 53002
AXON Clinical, S.R.O.
Prague, 150 00
Poland4 sites
Oftalmika Eye Hospital
Bydgoszcz, 85-631
Jasne Blonia Eye Clinic
Lodz, 91-134
Centrum Diagnostyki i Mikrochirurgii Oka - LENS
Olsztyn, 10-424
Centrum Medyczne UNO-MED
Tarnów, 33-100
Australia3 sites
Centre for Eye Research Australia
East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002
Retina and Eye Consultants
Hurstville, NSW 2220
Sydney Retina
Sydney, New South Wales, 2000
Spain3 sites
Centro Médico Teknon
Barcelona, 08022
Instituto Oftalmologico Gómez-Ulla
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega
Valladolid, 47006
Italy2 sites
Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, 20132
Luigi Sacco Hospital
Milan, 20157
New Zealand2 sites
Retina Specialist
Auckland, 1052
Hamilton Eye Clinic
Hamilton, 3204
Puerto Rico1 site
Emanuelli Research and Development Center
Arecibo, 00612
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Sham-Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Pegcetacoplan Therapy With Sham Injections in Patients With Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
This is a 24-month, Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham-injection controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of multiple IVT injections of APL-2 in subjects with GA secondary to AMD.
- Conditions
- Geographic Atrophy
- Being tested
- APL-2, Sham Procedure
- Medical subject headings
- Geographic Atrophy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
APL-2Drug
Complement (C3) Inhibitor
APL-2Drug
Complement (C3) Inhibitor
Sham ProcedureOther
Subjects will receive a Sham procedure every month
Sham ProcedureOther
Subjects will receive a Sham procedure every other month
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| APL-2 15mg 0.1 mL monthly for 24 months | Experimental | A single dose of 15 mg APL-2/0.1 mL will be administered via intravitreal injection in this study. Subjects will receive an injection every month Receives: Drug: APL-2 |
| APL-2 15mg 0.1 mL EOM for 24 months | Experimental | A single dose of 15 mg APL-2/0.1 mL will be administered via intravitreal injection in this study. Subjects will receive an injection every other month Receives: Drug: APL-2 |
| Sham Procedure Monthly for 24 months | Experimental | Sham Procedure for 24 months Receives: Other: Sham Procedure |
| Sham Procedure Every Other Month for 24 months | Experimental | Sham Procedure every other month for 24 months Receives: Other: Sham Procedure |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Least Squares (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in Total Area of GA Lesions in the Study Eye at Month 12
The GA lesion area was measured by a quantified central reading center based on FAF images. LS mean was calculated using a mixed effect model for repeated measure (MMRM) model. Baseline was defined as the last available, non-missing observation prior to first study drug administration.
Measured: Baseline (screening) and Month 12
Secondary outcomes (5)
LS Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Area of GA Lesions in the Study Eye at Month 24
The GA lesion area was measured by a quantified central reading center based on FAF images. LS mean was calculated using a MMRM model. Baseline was defined as the last available, non-missing observation prior to first study drug administration.
Measured: Baseline (screening) and Month 24
Mean Change in Total Area of GA Lesions in the Study Eye Through Month 24
The mean change in GA lesion area through Month 24 was measured by assuming a piecewise linear trend in time with knots by FAF images at Months 6, 12, and 18 and was calculated using a MMRM model. Baseline was defined as the last available, non-missing observation prior to first study drug administration.
Measured: From Baseline (screening) through Month 24
LS Mean Change From Baseline in Monocular Maximum Reading Speed of the Study Eye at Month 24
The maximum reading speed of the study eye was calculated per Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test (MNREAD) or Radner Reading Charts user manuals, with no adjustment for reading inaccuracy. An additional step to cap resulting reading speed values at a maximum of 300 words per minute (wpm) was implemented. Maximum reading speed was calculated as the mean of the 3 highest non-zero reading speeds (or 2, or 1 value, as available), except when all wpm were calculated as 0 then the maximum reading speed was calculated as 0. LS mean was calculated using a MMRM model. Baseline was defined as the last available, non-missing observation prior to first study drug administration.
Measured: Baseline (screening) and Month 24
LS Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Functional Reading Independence (FRI) Index Score at Month 24
The FRI was an interviewer-administered questionnaire with 7 items on functional reading activities most relevant to GA AMD subjects. It had 1 total index score. For each FRI Index reading activity performed in the past 7 days, subjects were asked about the extent to which they required assistance beyond eyeglasses/contact lenses, including the use of low-vision aids, adjustments in the activity, or help from another subject. Mean FRI Index scores ranged from 1 (unable to do independently) to 4 (totally independent), with higher scores indicating higher functional reading independence. A negative change from baseline indicated a decrease in the FRI; disease worsening. LS mean was calculated using a MMRM model. Baseline was defined as the last available, non-missing observation prior to first study drug administration.
Measured: Baseline (screening) and Month 24
LS Mean Change From Baseline in Normal-Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (NL-BCVA) Score of the Study Eye at Month 24
The NL-BCVA was assessed by early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart prior to dilating the eyes at a starting distance of 4 meters and ranged from 0 (least score) to 100 (best score). If the 4-meter score was >19 letters read correctly, the visual acuity score was the sum of total letters correctly read at 4 meters plus the addition of 30. If the 4-meter score was ≤19 letters read correctly, the visual acuity score was the sum of total letters read correctly at 4 meters and total letters read correctly at the 1-meter distance. If no letters were read correctly at either the 4-meter distance or the 1-meter distance, the visual acuity score was 0. A positive change in the value indicated improvement in visual acuity. LS mean was calculated using a MMRM model. Baseline was defined as the last available, non-missing observation prior to first study drug administration.
Measured: Baseline (screening) and Month 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 May 2018
- Study start31 Aug 2018
- Primary completion21 Jun 2021
- Study completion20 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Geographic AtrophyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 621 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03525600
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APL2-303
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 20 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 18 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Sadda S, Hatcher KA, Shah BK, Kondapalli SS, Li C, Baumal CR. Outer Retinal Tubulation and Geographic Atrophy: A Natural History Analysis of Sham Observed Eyes from the OAKS and DERBY Trials. Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Jul;14(7):1611-1619. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01156-5. Epub 2025 May 19.
PubMed 40388106Wykoff CC, Holz FG, Chiang A, Boyer D, Dhoot DS, Loewenstein A, Mones J, Heier J, Abbey AM, Singerman LJ, Vajzovic L, Lin J, Li C, Vilupuru A, Baumal CR; OAKS, DERBY, and GALE Investigators. Pegcetacoplan Treatment for Geographic Atrophy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Over 36 Months: Data From OAKS, DERBY, and GALE. Am J Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug;276:350-364. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.04.016. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
PubMed 40280279Wykoff CC, Lad EM, Heier JS. Syfovre Approval for Geographic Atrophy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 1;142(7):685-686. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.1754. No abstract available.
PubMed 38814626Fu DJ, Bagga P, Naik G, Glinton S, Faes L, Liefers B, Lima R, Wignall G, Keane PA, Ioannidou E, Ribeiro Reis AP, McKeown A, Scheibler L, Patel PJ, Moghul I, Pontikos N, Balaskas K. Pegcetacoplan Treatment and Consensus Features of Geographic Atrophy Over 24 Months. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun 1;142(6):548-558. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.1269.
PubMed 38722644Heier JS, Lad EM, Holz FG, Rosenfeld PJ, Guymer RH, Boyer D, Grossi F, Baumal CR, Korobelnik JF, Slakter JS, Waheed NK, Metlapally R, Pearce I, Steinle N, Francone AA, Hu A, Lally DR, Deschatelets P, Francois C, Bliss C, Staurenghi G, Mones J, Singh RP, Ribeiro R, Wykoff CC; OAKS and DERBY study investigators. Pegcetacoplan for the treatment of geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration (OAKS and DERBY): two multicentre, randomised, double-masked, sham-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2023 Oct 21;402(10411):1434-1448. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01520-9.
PubMed 37865470Tzoumas N, Riding G, Williams MA, Steel DH. Complement inhibitors for age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 14;6(6):CD009300. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009300.pub3.
PubMed 37314061
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Sham-Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Pegcetacoplan Therapy With Sham Injections in Patients With Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03525600
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- APL2-303
- Conditions
- Geographic Atrophy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 621 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 May 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 18 Jun 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a 24-month, Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham-injection controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of multiple IVT injections of APL-2 in subjects with GA secondary to AMD.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| APL-2 15mg 0.1 mL monthly for 24 months | Experimental | Drug: APL-2A single dose of 15 mg APL-2/0.1 mL will be administered via intravitreal injection in this study. Subjects will receive an injection every month |
| APL-2 15mg 0.1 mL EOM for 24 months | Experimental | Drug: APL-2A single dose of 15 mg APL-2/0.1 mL will be administered via intravitreal injection in this study. Subjects will receive an injection every other month |
| Sham Procedure Monthly for 24 months | Experimental | Other: Sham ProcedureSham Procedure for 24 months |
| Sham Procedure Every Other Month for 24 months | Experimental | Other: Sham ProcedureSham Procedure every other month for 24 months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- The study eye must meet all inclusion criteria. If both eyes meet the inclusion criteria, the eye with the worst visual acuity at the screening visit will be designated as the study eye. If both eyes have the same visual acuity, the right eye will be selected as the study eye.
- Ocular- specific inclusion criteria apply to the study eye only, unless otherwise specified.
- Age ≥ 60 years.
- Normal Luminance best corrected visual acuity of 24 letters or better using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts (approximately 20/320 Snellen equivalent).
- Clinical diagnosis of GA of the macula secondary to AMD as determined by the Investigator and confirmed by the Reading Center.
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Ocular specific exclusion criteria apply to the study eye only, unless otherwise specified.
- GA secondary to a condition other than AMD such as Stargardt disease, cone rod dystrophy or toxic maculopathies like plaquenil maculopathy in either eye.
- Spherical equivalent of the refractive error demonstrating > 6 diopters of myopia or an axial length >26 mm.
- Any history or active choroidal neovascularization (CNV), associated with AMD or any other cause, including any evidence of retinal pigment epithelium rips or evidence of neovascularization anywhere based on SD-OCT imaging and/or fluorescein angiography as assessed by the Reading Center.
- Presence of an active ocular disease that in the opinion of the Investigator compromises or confounds visual function, including but not limited to, uveitis, other macular diseases (e.g. clinically significant epiretinal membrane (ERM), full thickness macular hole or uncontrolled glaucoma/ocular hypertension. Benign conditions in the opinion of the investigator such as peripheral retina dystrophy are not exclusionary).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| APL-2Complement (C3) Inhibitor | Drug | APL-2 15mg 0.1 mL monthly for 24 months |
| APL-2Complement (C3) Inhibitor | Drug | APL-2 15mg 0.1 mL EOM for 24 months |
| Sham ProcedureSubjects will receive a Sham procedure every month | Other | Sham Procedure Monthly for 24 months |
| Sham ProcedureSubjects will receive a Sham procedure every other month | Other | Sham Procedure Every Other Month for 24 months |
Primary outcome
Least Squares (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in Total Area of GA Lesions in the Study Eye at Month 12
Time frame: Baseline (screening) and Month 12
The GA lesion area was measured by a quantified central reading center based on FAF images. LS mean was calculated using a mixed effect model for repeated measure (MMRM) model. Baseline was defined as the last available, non-missing observation prior to first study drug administration.
5 secondary outcomes
LS Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Area of GA Lesions in the Study Eye at Month 24
Time frame: Baseline (screening) and Month 24
Mean Change in Total Area of GA Lesions in the Study Eye Through Month 24
Time frame: From Baseline (screening) through Month 24
LS Mean Change From Baseline in Monocular Maximum Reading Speed of the Study Eye at Month 24
Time frame: Baseline (screening) and Month 24
LS Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Functional Reading Independence (FRI) Index Score at Month 24
Time frame: Baseline (screening) and Month 24
LS Mean Change From Baseline in Normal-Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (NL-BCVA) Score of the Study Eye at Month 24
Time frame: Baseline (screening) and Month 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jun 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40388106Sadda S, Hatcher KA, Shah BK, Kondapalli SS, Li C, Baumal CR. Outer Retinal Tubulation and Geographic Atrophy: A Natural History Analysis of Sham Observed Eyes from the OAKS and DERBY Trials. Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Jul;14(7):1611-1619. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01156-5. Epub 2025 May 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40280279Wykoff CC, Holz FG, Chiang A, Boyer D, Dhoot DS, Loewenstein A, Mones J, Heier J, Abbey AM, Singerman LJ, Vajzovic L, Lin J, Li C, Vilupuru A, Baumal CR; OAKS, DERBY, and GALE Investigators. Pegcetacoplan Treatment for Geographic Atrophy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Over 36 Months: Data From OAKS, DERBY, and GALE. Am J Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug;276:350-364. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.04.016. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38814626Wykoff CC, Lad EM, Heier JS. Syfovre Approval for Geographic Atrophy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 1;142(7):685-686. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.1754. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38722644Fu DJ, Bagga P, Naik G, Glinton S, Faes L, Liefers B, Lima R, Wignall G, Keane PA, Ioannidou E, Ribeiro Reis AP, McKeown A, Scheibler L, Patel PJ, Moghul I, Pontikos N, Balaskas K. Pegcetacoplan Treatment and Consensus Features of Geographic Atrophy Over 24 Months. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun 1;142(6):548-558. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.1269.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37865470Heier JS, Lad EM, Holz FG, Rosenfeld PJ, Guymer RH, Boyer D, Grossi F, Baumal CR, Korobelnik JF, Slakter JS, Waheed NK, Metlapally R, Pearce I, Steinle N, Francone AA, Hu A, Lally DR, Deschatelets P, Francois C, Bliss C, Staurenghi G, Mones J, Singh RP, Ribeiro R, Wykoff CC; OAKS and DERBY study investigators. Pegcetacoplan for the treatment of geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration (OAKS and DERBY): two multicentre, randomised, double-masked, sham-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2023 Oct 21;402(10411):1434-1448. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01520-9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37314061Tzoumas N, Riding G, Williams MA, Steel DH. Complement inhibitors for age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 14;6(6):CD009300. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009300.pub3.
Related trials for Geographic Atrophy
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase 1/2 Study of VOY-101 in Patients With Advanced Non-Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Autologous Transplantation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelium for Geographic Atrophy Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Investigating Subcutaneously Administered Pozelimab in Combination With Cemdisiran or Cemdisiran Alone in Adult Participants With Geographic Atrophy
Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), Geographic Atrophy (GA)
RecruitingPhase 1
Phase 1 Study of C.001 in Retinal Degeneration
Geographic Atrophy, Stargardt Disease
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Long-term Extension Study of JNJ-81201887 (AAVCAGsCD59) Parent Studies in Participants With Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Geographic Atrophy, Macular Degeneration
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
141 sites in 15 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing APL-2 in people with Geographic Atrophy, run by Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 141 sites in 15 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 141 sites in United States, Argentina, United Kingdom, France, Brazil and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Jun 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Least Squares (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in Total Area of GA Lesions in the Study Eye at Month 12 (time frame: Baseline (screening) and Month 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03525600, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2023.