Sleep ApneaNCT03526133
Validation of Sleep Apnea Diagnosis Device
An observational study of Sleep Apnea, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common and largely underdiagnosed disease. The standard method for the diagnosis of OSA is a complete night polysomnography (PSG). Simple methods for OSA diagnosis are necessary. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sleep Apnea
- What is being tested?
- Polysomnography (PSG) and wireless sensor Oxistar
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 7 Jul 2017to 7 Feb 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Consecutive patients referred to a university-based tertiary sleep referral centre.
Who may be able to join
- referred by medical staff for an overnight assessment for suspected sleep apnea
Who cannot join
- polysomnography for the CPAP titration
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Validation of a Wireless Wearable Sensor Using Mobile Technology and Cloud Computing for the Diagnosis of Sleep Apnea
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common and largely underdiagnosed disease. The standard method for the diagnosis of OSA is a complete night polysomnography (PSG). Simple methods for OSA diagnosis are necessary. The overnight oximetry with the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) has been largely investigated as a diagnostic test for OSA but its accuracy remains undefined. The aim of our study is to evaluate if an wireless polygraph (Oxistar) is accurate to diagnosis OSA in patients referred to a Sleep Lab.
Read the detailed description
Consecutive patients referred to the sleep laboratory with suspected diagnosis of OSA underwent in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) and simultaneously wireless polygraph. The PSG oximeter and the wireless polygraph were worn on different fingers of the same hand. All sleep studies were reviewed by one blind investigator according the 2017 American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommendations. The number of desaturations from wireless polygraph at the 3 predefined threshold levels (of ODI-2%, ODI-3%, or ODI-4%) was derived automatically using proprietary algorithm. Moderate to severe OSA was defined as AHI ≥ 15 events/h. The diagnostic accuracy of ODI-2%, 3%, and 4% for the diagnosis of moderate-severe OSA were calculated for cut-off values from 1 to 20 desaturation events/h. The sleep actimetry was compared with the sleep stages from PSG, most of the statistical metrics applied for diagnosis were used to evaluate the applicability of this proposed method. Finally, the snoring events computed by the smartphone application were compared with the events heard by a specialist and the statistical comparison metrics were evaluated.
- Conditions
- Sleep Apnea
- Being tested
- Polysomnography (PSG) and wireless sensor Oxistar
- Keywords
- sleep apnea, polygraph, home sleep apnea test (HSAT), apnea hypopnea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), portable monitor, sleep actimetry, snoring
- Medical subject headings
- Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Snoring
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Polysomnography (PSG) and wireless sensor OxistarDiagnostic test
Monitoring the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) derived from PSG and the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) obtained by the Oxistar.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity
Sensitivity of Oxistar device to detect apnea events compared to gold-standard polysomnography
Measured: Night during the polysomnography exam
Specificity
Specificity of Oxistar device to detect apnea events compared to gold-standard polysomnography
Measured: Night during the polysomnography exam
Area under the curve (AUC)
AUC from ROC curves reflects the accuracy of Oxistar device to detect apnea events compared to gold-standard polysomnography
Measured: Night during the polysomnography exam
Bland-Altman Graph
The Bland-Altman graph evaluates the "agreement" between the gold-standard polysomnography and Oxistar device
Measured: Night during the polysomnography exam
Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)
ICC measures the reliability of measurements or ratings between the gold-standard polysomnography and Oxistar device
Measured: Night during the polysomnography exam
Secondary outcomes (2)
Sleep Actigraphy
Actigraphy is the continuous measurement of activity or movement with the use of a small device called an actigraph. Periods of movement suggest wakefulness while those of relative stillness would likely correspond to sleep or quiescence. The Oxistar has a embeded actigraph whose data will be compared with the sleep stage scoring from polysomnography (PSG), the gold standard for sleep assessment. Epoch-by-epoch (30 seconds) agreement between the actigraph and PSG will be assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), Bland-Altman graph and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
Measured: Night during the polysomnography exam
Number of snoring events per hour of register (snoring/h)
Snoring is one of the signs suggestive of obstructive sleep apnea and has recently been considered as having great diagnostic potential. The smartphone application (app) through microphone performs the recording and the characteristics extraction of the patient's audio during sleep (register time). A multilayer perceptron (MPL) neural network classifies the event as snoring or non-snoring. Lastly, the amount of snoring occured is accounted and divided by the register time leading to the number of snoring/h. The agreement between snoring/h measured by the app and the heard by a specialist will be assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under the curve (AUC).
Measured: Night during the polysomnography exam
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 May 2018
- Study start7 Jul 2017
- Primary completion7 Dec 2018
- Study completion7 Feb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sleep ApneaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Biologix Sistemas Ltda
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Geraldo Lorenzi-Filho, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Associate Professor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03526133
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 70485317.0.0000.0068
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 12 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Pinheiro GDL, Cruz AF, Domingues DM, Genta PR, Drager LF, Strollo PJ, Lorenzi-Filho G. Validation of an Overnight Wireless High-Resolution Oximeter plus Cloud-Based Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020 Nov 27;75:e2414. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e2414. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33263626
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation of a Wireless Wearable Sensor Using Mobile Technology and Cloud Computing for the Diagnosis of Sleep Apnea
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03526133
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 70485317.0.0000.0068
- Conditions
- Sleep Apnea
- Keywords
- sleep apnea, polygraph, home sleep apnea test (HSAT), apnea hypopnea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), portable monitor, sleep actimetry, snoring
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Biologix Sistemas Ltda
- Study start
- 7 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 May 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common and largely underdiagnosed disease. The standard method for the diagnosis of OSA is a complete night polysomnography (PSG). Simple methods for OSA diagnosis are necessary. The overnight oximetry with the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) has been largely investigated as a diagnostic test for OSA but its accuracy remains undefined. The aim of our study is to evaluate if an wireless polygraph (Oxistar) is accurate to diagnosis OSA in patients referred to a Sleep Lab.
Detailed description
Consecutive patients referred to the sleep laboratory with suspected diagnosis of OSA underwent in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) and simultaneously wireless polygraph. The PSG oximeter and the wireless polygraph were worn on different fingers of the same hand. All sleep studies were reviewed by one blind investigator according the 2017 American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommendations. The number of desaturations from wireless polygraph at the 3 predefined threshold levels (of ODI-2%, ODI-3%, or ODI-4%) was derived automatically using proprietary algorithm. Moderate to severe OSA was defined as AHI ≥ 15 events/h. The diagnostic accuracy of ODI-2%, 3%, and 4% for the diagnosis of moderate-severe OSA were calculated for cut-off values from 1 to 20 desaturation events/h. The sleep actimetry was compared with the sleep stages from PSG, most of the statistical metrics applied for diagnosis were used to evaluate the applicability of this proposed method. Finally, the snoring events computed by the smartphone application were compared with the events heard by a specialist and the statistical comparison metrics were evaluated.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Consecutive patients referred to a university-based tertiary sleep referral centre.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- referred by medical staff for an overnight assessment for suspected sleep apnea
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- polysomnography for the CPAP titration
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Polysomnography (PSG) and wireless sensor OxistarMonitoring the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) derived from PSG and the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) obtained by the Oxistar. | Diagnostic test | – |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity
Time frame: Night during the polysomnography exam
Sensitivity of Oxistar device to detect apnea events compared to gold-standard polysomnography
Specificity
Time frame: Night during the polysomnography exam
Specificity of Oxistar device to detect apnea events compared to gold-standard polysomnography
Area under the curve (AUC)
Time frame: Night during the polysomnography exam
AUC from ROC curves reflects the accuracy of Oxistar device to detect apnea events compared to gold-standard polysomnography
Bland-Altman Graph
Time frame: Night during the polysomnography exam
The Bland-Altman graph evaluates the "agreement" between the gold-standard polysomnography and Oxistar device
Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)
Time frame: Night during the polysomnography exam
ICC measures the reliability of measurements or ratings between the gold-standard polysomnography and Oxistar device
2 secondary outcomes
Sleep Actigraphy
Time frame: Night during the polysomnography exam
Number of snoring events per hour of register (snoring/h)
Time frame: Night during the polysomnography exam
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33263626Pinheiro GDL, Cruz AF, Domingues DM, Genta PR, Drager LF, Strollo PJ, Lorenzi-Filho G. Validation of an Overnight Wireless High-Resolution Oximeter plus Cloud-Based Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020 Nov 27;75:e2414. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e2414. eCollection 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sleep Apnea
Recruiting
The Effects of Successful OSA Treatment on Memory and AD Biomarkers in Older Adults Study
Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Cognitive Decline
RecruitingObservational study
Prevalence, Phenotypes, Predictors and Prognostic Implication of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pulmonary Hypertension
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Two Types of Breathing Support in People With COPD, High Carbon Dioxide Levels, and Sleep Apnea
OSA COPD Overlap Syndrome
Recruiting
Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation on Polysomnographic Parameters in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Not yet recruiting
Physical Activity, Sleep Quality, and Respiratory Function in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Sleep Quality
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Geraldo Lorenzi-Filho, MD, PhD principal investigator
Associate Professor
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Sleep Apnea, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity (time frame: Night during the polysomnography exam). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03526133, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2019.