AzTrials
AzTrials

High Tibial Osteotomy With Allograft WedgeNCT03526172

Assessing Physical Activity Levels of Patients Following HTO.

An observational study of High Tibial Osteotomy With Allograft Wedge and High Tibial Osteotomy Without Allograft Wedge, run by University of Winchester at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

High tibial osteotomy (HTO is often indicated in physically active patients. The insertion of a bone graft during surgery has been shown to have good clinical and biomechanical outcomes, however objective data regarding post-surgery physical activity (PA) levels in patients who have undergone HTO with and without bone… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
High tibial osteotomy, Allograft wedge and Accelerometer
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
26 Feb 2019to 30 May 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Prospective HTO patients on a patient database at Basingstoke \& North Hampshire Hospital, UK.

Who may be able to join

  • Patient undergoing unilateral medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy at Basingstoke \& North Hampshire Hospital, UK

Who cannot join

  • Concurrent procedures during HTO surgery
  • The use of an off-loader knee brace in the 3 weeks leading up to surgery
  • Revision surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • University of Winchester

    Winchester, SO22 4NR

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Assessing Physical Activity Levels of Patients Following High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) With and Without Bone Grafting.

High tibial osteotomy (HTO is often indicated in physically active patients. The insertion of a bone graft during surgery has been shown to have good clinical and biomechanical outcomes, however objective data regarding post-surgery physical activity (PA) levels in patients who have undergone HTO with and without bone grafts does not exist in the literature.

Using accelerometers and questionnaires, this study will be the first to investigate this in an objective way.

Being tested
High tibial osteotomy, Allograft wedge, Accelerometer, Questionnaire

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • High tibial osteotomyProcedure or surgery

    Uni-lateral medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy following a minimally invasive approach.

  • Allograft wedgeDevice

    Insertion of allograft wedge into the osteotomy gap during the HTO procedure

  • AccelerometerDevice

    ActivPal accelerometer attached to thigh of patient to collect objective physical activity data at pre-determined intervals before and after surgery

  • QuestionnaireOther

    Validated clinical questionnaires administered to patients to collect subjective physical activity data at pre-determined intervals before and after surgery

Study groups in NCT03526172
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlPatients undergoing HTO without the inclusion of any bone wedge
Receives: Procedure: High tibial osteotomy; Device: Accelerometer; Other: Questionnaire
AllograftPatients undergoing HTO with the inclusion of an allograft bone wedge
Receives: Procedure: High tibial osteotomy; Device: Allograft wedge; Device: Accelerometer; Other: Questionnaire

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Objective physical activity levels (measured in steps per day)

    Physical activity data (step-count and body position) collected via an accelermeter that is attached to the thigh for 7 day periods at pre-determined intervals before and after surgery

    Measured: 14 weeks per patient

  2. Intensity of physical activity (measured in steps per minute)

    Physical activity data (step-count and body position) collected via an accelermeter that is attached to the thigh for 7 day periods at pre-determined intervals before and after surgery

    Measured: 14 weeks per patient

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Subjective reasons, thoughts and feelings behind post-operative physical activity levels (thematic analysis)

    interviews with fully healed patients to determine their reasons, thoughts and feelings behind their post-operative levels of physical activity

    Measured: 1 hour per patient

  2. Subjective physical activity levels

    Physical activity data (step-count and body position) collected via the implementation of validated questionnaires at pre-determined intervals before and after surgery

    Measured: 14 weeks per patient

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 May 2018
  2. Study start26 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion30 May 2020
  4. Study completion30 May 2020

Why it stopped: Halting of all research and elective surgeries due to the Covid-19 pandemic

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03526172
Sponsor's protocol ID
UMT057/13
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
21 Apr 2018
Last updated
15 Oct 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: No individual participant data will be made available to other researchers. Aggregated and analysed data will be anonymised and included in publications in peer-reviewed journals

Publications

  • Copeland JL, Esliger DW. Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in active, healthy older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2009 Jan;17(1):17-30. doi: 10.1123/japa.17.1.17.

    PubMed 19299836
  • Eisenberg MH, Phillips LA, Fowler L, Moore PJ. The Impact of E-diaries and Accelerometers on Young Adults' Perceived and Objectively Assessed Physical Activity. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2017 May;30:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

    PubMed 28966555
  • Falck RS, Landry GJ, Brazendale K, Liu-Ambrose T. Measuring Physical Activity in Older Adults Using MotionWatch 8 Actigraphy: How Many Days are Needed? J Aging Phys Act. 2017 Jan;25(1):51-57. doi: 10.1123/japa.2015-0256. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

    PubMed 27281368
  • Martins RC, Reichert FF, Bielemann RM, Hallal PC. One-year Stability of Objectively Measured Physical Activity in Young Brazilian Adults. J Phys Act Health. 2017 Mar;14(3):208-212. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0384. Epub 2016 Dec 20.

    PubMed 27997276

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of High Tibial Osteotomy With Allograft Wedge and High Tibial Osteotomy Without Allograft Wedge, run by University of Winchester at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Halting of all research and elective surgeries due to the Covid-19 pandemic). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Objective physical activity levels (measured in steps per day) (time frame: 14 weeks per patient). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03526172, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in