AzTrials
AzTrials

NeuroimagingNCT03531580

Comparing Brain Images Before and After MRI-upgrade - TimFit Upgrade Study

A study testing Magnetic Resonance Imaging in people with Neuroimaging and Quality Control, run by University Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In the Ghent University, an upgrade of the MRI-scanner used for research from Siemens Trio Tim to Siemens Prisma Fit is planned in the near future. As a change of MRI hard- and software might influence brain images, it is necessary to evaluate the images before and after the upgrade. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Neuroimaging, Quality Control
What is being tested?
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
6 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
29 Nov 2017to 30 Jun 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy volunteer

Who cannot join

  • Protheses or artificial implants, no magnetic or metal parts in the body
  • Being pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Having claustrophobia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Ghent University

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Brain Images Before and After Upgrade of the MRI-scanner (Siemens Tim TRIO vs Siemens PRISMA FIT) - The TimFit Study

In the Ghent University, an upgrade of the MRI-scanner used for research from Siemens Trio Tim to Siemens Prisma Fit is planned in the near future. As a change of MRI hard- and software might influence brain images, it is necessary to evaluate the images before and after the upgrade.

Being tested
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Magnetic Resonance ImagingDevice

    Brain imaging using magnetic resonance imaging, using several MRI sequences: structural imaging (grey matter, using T1-imaging), cerebral perfusion using arterial spin labeling), functional and effective connectivity (using resting-state functional MRI), white matter tracts (using diffusion imaging), white matter lesions (using Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI (FLAIR)) and microbleeds (using Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI))

Study groups in NCT03531580
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Healthy volunteersExperimentalsix healthy volunteers: 3 male (age 20-40; 40-60 and 60+) and 3 female (age 20-40; 40-60 and 60+)
Receives: Device: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in grey matter volume before versus after MRI-upgrade

    Measured: 7 months, 4 scan sessions of max 1 hour

  2. Change in cerebral perfusion (ml/100g/min) using Arterial Spin Labeling before versus after MRI-upgrade

    Measured: 7 months, 4 scan sessions of max 1 hour

  3. Change in arterial transit times before versus after MRI-upgrade

    Measured: 7 months, 4 scan sessions of max 1 hour

  4. Change in functional connectivity (fc) using Resting State functional MRI before versus after MRI-upgrade

    Measured: 7 months, 4 scan sessions of max 1 hour

  5. Change in effective connectivity using resting state functional MRI before versus after MRI-upgrade

    Measured: 7 months, 4 scan sessions of max 1 hour

  6. Change in white matter diffusion before versus after MRI-upgrade

    Measured: 7 months, 4 scan sessions of max 1 hour

  7. Difference in image quality of FLAIR image before versus after MRI-upgrade

    Measured: 7 months, 4 scan sessions of max 1 hour

  8. Difference in image quality of SWI image before versus after MRI-upgrade

    Measured: 7 months, 4 scan sessions of max 1 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 May 2018
  2. Study start29 Nov 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2018
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
6 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03531580
Sponsor's protocol ID
EC/2017/1103
Status last verified
Nov 2021
First submitted
20 Nov 2017
Last updated
1 Dec 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Magnetic Resonance Imaging in people with Neuroimaging and Quality Control, run by University Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in grey matter volume before versus after MRI-upgrade (time frame: 7 months, 4 scan sessions of max 1 hour). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Dec 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in