Neuromuscular BlockadePhase 2CRoSSECTNCT03532178
Comparison Of Rocuronium Reversal By Sugammadex To Succinylcholine For Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
A Phase 2 study testing Group A. "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex; "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +saline and Group B. "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +saline; "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex; in people with Neuromuscular Blockade, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators propose to compare the recovery of neuromuscular blockade from rocuronium reversal by sugammadex to succinylcholine in ECT. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuromuscular Blockade
- What is being tested?
- Group A. "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex; "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +saline and Group B. "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +saline; "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex;
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2019to 1 Apr 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligible and scheduled for ECT
- Has the capacity to consent for the study
Who cannot join
- Any acute major organ failure in the last 30 days
- Any known or suspected neuromuscular disorders
- Any history of allergic reaction or intolerance to sugammadex, rocuronium, or succinylcholine
- Any conditions with severe renal impairment, including those requiring dialysis
- Anyone currently taking lithium
- Anyone currently taking hormonal contraceptives
- Anyone taking anti-coagulants, including vitamin K antagonists, unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparinoids, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UCSF Parnassus Campus
San Francisco, California, 94143
About this study
Official title: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Crossover Design Study To Compare The Rocuronium Reversal By Sugammadex To Succinylcholine For Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
The investigators propose to compare the recovery of neuromuscular blockade from rocuronium reversal by sugammadex to succinylcholine in ECT.
Read the detailed description
The proposed study is a single center, randomized, double-blind (patients, psychiatrists and outcome assessor), cross-over clinical trial comparing the recovery of neuromuscular blockade from rocuronium with reversal of sugammadex to succinylcholine in participants receiving ECT. The primary outcome will be the measurement of time when the first train-of-four (TOF) twitch (T1) returns to 90% of baseline. The secondary aims are to document the safety (adverse event rates) of rocuronium/sugammadex compared to succinylcholine in ECT patients. The exploratory aims are to establish the perioperative efficacy and efficiency of sugammadex reversal of rocuronium in ECT procedures in comparison with succinylcholine.
- Conditions
- Neuromuscular Blockade
- Being tested
- Group A. "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex; "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +saline, Group B. "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +saline; "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex;
- Keywords
- Electroconvulsive Therapy, Neuromuscular Blockade
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Group A. "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex; "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +salineDrug
Also called Rocuronium: Zemuron. Sugammadex: Bridion. Succinylcholine: Suxamethonium
The participants will be randomized to start with "Muscle relaxant #1" in the first study treatment, and will switch to "Muscle relaxant #2" in the second study treatment period.
Group B. "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +saline; "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex;Drug
The participants will be randomized to start with "Muscle relaxant #2" in the first study treatment, and will switch to "Muscle relaxant #1" in the second study treatment period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | rocuronium + sugammadex / succinylcholine + normal saline Receives: Drug: Group A. "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex; "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +saline |
| Group B | Experimental | succinylcholine + normal saline / rocuronium + sugammadex Receives: Drug: Group B. "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +saline; "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex; |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recovery Time of T1 to 90% Baseline
The time of neuromuscular recovery from sugammadex 4mg/kg dose reversal rocuronium at 0.6 mg/kg compared with traditionally used succinylcholine in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).
Measured: 30 minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Treatment or Emergent Adverse Events of the Drugs
To document the side-effect profiles of sugammadex reversal of rocuronium and succhinylcholine in the ECT patient population
Measured: 24 hours after the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 May 2018
- Study start1 Jan 2019
- Primary completion31 Mar 2022
- Study completion1 Apr 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neuromuscular BlockadeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- The participants will be randomized to one of the two drug groups to start with, and will switch to the other group for the next treatment period. For the study, each participant will take two treatments in a random order: (1) rocuronium to be reversed by sugammadex, and (2) succinylcholine plus normal saline placebo.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Chanhung Lee, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03532178
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MISP#56343
- Acronym
- CRoSSECT
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lisanby SH. Electroconvulsive therapy for depression. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 8;357(19):1939-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct075234. No abstract available.
PubMed 17989386Fink M. What was learned: studies by the consortium for research in ECT (CORE) 1997-2011. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014 Jun;129(6):417-26. doi: 10.1111/acps.12251. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
PubMed 24571807Friedman S, Baker T, Gatti M, Simon G, Paskin S. Probable succinylcholine-induced rhabdomyolysis in a male athlete. Anesth Analg. 1995 Aug;81(2):422-3. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199508000-00040. No abstract available.
PubMed 7618742Iwatsuki N, Kuroda N, Amaha K, Iwatsuki K. Succinylcholine-induced hyperkalemia in patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Anesthesiology. 1980 Jul;53(1):64-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198007000-00013. No abstract available.
PubMed 7386911Gijsenbergh F, Ramael S, Houwing N, van Iersel T. First human exposure of Org 25969, a novel agent to reverse the action of rocuronium bromide. Anesthesiology. 2005 Oct;103(4):695-703. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200510000-00007.
PubMed 16192761Ali HH, Utting JE, Nightingale DA, Gray C. Quantitative assessment of residual curarization in humans. Br J Anaesth. 1970 Sep;42(9):802-3. No abstract available.
PubMed 4248487Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):120-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da832d. Epub 2010 May 4.
PubMed 20442260Lee C, Jahr JS, Candiotti KA, Warriner B, Zornow MH, Naguib M. Reversal of profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex administered three minutes after rocuronium: a comparison with spontaneous recovery from succinylcholine. Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1020-5. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819dabb0.
PubMed 19387176Mirzakhani H, Guchelaar HJ, Welch CA, Cusin C, Doran ME, MacDonald TO, Bittner EA, Eikermann M, Nozari A. Minimum Effective Doses of Succinylcholine and Rocuronium During Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Trial. Anesth Analg. 2016 Sep;123(3):587-96. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001218.
PubMed 26967896Sparr HJ, Vermeyen KM, Beaufort AM, Rietbergen H, Proost JH, Saldien V, Velik-Salchner C, Wierda JM. Early reversal of profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex in a randomized multicenter study: efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Anesthesiology. 2007 May;106(5):935-43. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000265152.78943.74.
PubMed 17457124Kadoi Y, Hoshi H, Nishida A, Saito S. Comparison of recovery times from rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation after reversal with three different doses of sugammadex and succinylcholine during electroconvulsive therapy. J Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):855-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1236-y. Epub 2011 Sep 24.
PubMed 21947754
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Blind, Randomized, Crossover Design Study To Compare The Rocuronium Reversal By Sugammadex To Succinylcholine For Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03532178
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRoSSECT / MISP#56343
- Conditions
- Neuromuscular Blockade
- Keywords
- Electroconvulsive Therapy, Neuromuscular Blockade
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 May 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 8 Sep 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators propose to compare the recovery of neuromuscular blockade from rocuronium reversal by sugammadex to succinylcholine in ECT.
Detailed description
The proposed study is a single center, randomized, double-blind (patients, psychiatrists and outcome assessor), cross-over clinical trial comparing the recovery of neuromuscular blockade from rocuronium with reversal of sugammadex to succinylcholine in participants receiving ECT. The primary outcome will be the measurement of time when the first train-of-four (TOF) twitch (T1) returns to 90% of baseline. The secondary aims are to document the safety (adverse event rates) of rocuronium/sugammadex compared to succinylcholine in ECT patients. The exploratory aims are to establish the perioperative efficacy and efficiency of sugammadex reversal of rocuronium in ECT procedures in comparison with succinylcholine.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The participants will be randomized to one of the two drug groups to start with, and will switch to the other group for the next treatment period. For the study, each participant will take two treatments in a random order: (1) rocuronium to be reversed by sugammadex, and (2) succinylcholine plus normal saline placebo.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Drug: Group A. "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex; "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +salinerocuronium + sugammadex / succinylcholine + normal saline |
| Group B | Experimental | Drug: Group B. "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +saline; "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex;succinylcholine + normal saline / rocuronium + sugammadex |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Eligible and scheduled for ECT
- Has the capacity to consent for the study
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Any acute major organ failure in the last 30 days
- Any known or suspected neuromuscular disorders
- Any history of allergic reaction or intolerance to sugammadex, rocuronium, or succinylcholine
- Any conditions with severe renal impairment, including those requiring dialysis
- Anyone currently taking lithium
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Group A. "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex; "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +salineAlso: Rocuronium: Zemuron. Sugammadex: Bridion. Succinylcholine: SuxamethoniumThe participants will be randomized to start with "Muscle relaxant #1" in the first study treatment, and will switch to "Muscle relaxant #2" in the second study treatment period. | Drug | Group A |
| Group B. "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +saline; "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex;The participants will be randomized to start with "Muscle relaxant #2" in the first study treatment, and will switch to "Muscle relaxant #1" in the second study treatment period. | Drug | Group B |
Primary outcome
Recovery Time of T1 to 90% Baseline
Time frame: 30 minutes
The time of neuromuscular recovery from sugammadex 4mg/kg dose reversal rocuronium at 0.6 mg/kg compared with traditionally used succinylcholine in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).
1 secondary outcome
Number of Participants With Treatment or Emergent Adverse Events of the Drugs
Time frame: 24 hours after the procedure
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 17989386Lisanby SH. Electroconvulsive therapy for depression. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 8;357(19):1939-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct075234. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24571807Fink M. What was learned: studies by the consortium for research in ECT (CORE) 1997-2011. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014 Jun;129(6):417-26. doi: 10.1111/acps.12251. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
- Background: PubMed 7618742Friedman S, Baker T, Gatti M, Simon G, Paskin S. Probable succinylcholine-induced rhabdomyolysis in a male athlete. Anesth Analg. 1995 Aug;81(2):422-3. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199508000-00040. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 7386911Iwatsuki N, Kuroda N, Amaha K, Iwatsuki K. Succinylcholine-induced hyperkalemia in patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Anesthesiology. 1980 Jul;53(1):64-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198007000-00013. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16192761Gijsenbergh F, Ramael S, Houwing N, van Iersel T. First human exposure of Org 25969, a novel agent to reverse the action of rocuronium bromide. Anesthesiology. 2005 Oct;103(4):695-703. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200510000-00007.
- Background: PubMed 4248487Ali HH, Utting JE, Nightingale DA, Gray C. Quantitative assessment of residual curarization in humans. Br J Anaesth. 1970 Sep;42(9):802-3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 20442260Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):120-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da832d. Epub 2010 May 4.
- Background: PubMed 19387176Lee C, Jahr JS, Candiotti KA, Warriner B, Zornow MH, Naguib M. Reversal of profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex administered three minutes after rocuronium: a comparison with spontaneous recovery from succinylcholine. Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1020-5. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819dabb0.
- Background: PubMed 26967896Mirzakhani H, Guchelaar HJ, Welch CA, Cusin C, Doran ME, MacDonald TO, Bittner EA, Eikermann M, Nozari A. Minimum Effective Doses of Succinylcholine and Rocuronium During Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Trial. Anesth Analg. 2016 Sep;123(3):587-96. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001218.
- Background: PubMed 17457124Sparr HJ, Vermeyen KM, Beaufort AM, Rietbergen H, Proost JH, Saldien V, Velik-Salchner C, Wierda JM. Early reversal of profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex in a randomized multicenter study: efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Anesthesiology. 2007 May;106(5):935-43. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000265152.78943.74.
- Background: PubMed 21947754Kadoi Y, Hoshi H, Nishida A, Saito S. Comparison of recovery times from rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation after reversal with three different doses of sugammadex and succinylcholine during electroconvulsive therapy. J Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):855-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1236-y. Epub 2011 Sep 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neuromuscular Blockade
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Laparoscopic-Assisted TAP Block in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Blockades Neuromuscular
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diaphragm Ultrasound and Neuromuscular Monitoring for Predicting Early Respiratory Events After Extubation
Residual Neuromuscular Blockade, Diaphragm Dysfunction
Recruiting
Inspiratory Muscle Training and Diaphragmatic Breathing in GAD
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Effects Of Exercises Targeting Upper Trapezius In Patients With Non Specific Neck Pain
Non Specific Neck Pain
RecruitingObservational study
The Association Between Residual Neuromuscular Block Risk Prediction Score and the Train-of-Four Ratio
Muscle Relaxants
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chanhung Lee, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Group A. "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex; "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +saline and Group B. "Muscle relaxant #2": succinylcholine +saline; "Muscle relaxant #1": rocuronium + sugammadex; in people with Neuromuscular Blockade, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Sep 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recovery Time of T1 to 90% Baseline (time frame: 30 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03532178, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2023.