AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV/AIDSPrEP-OINCT03532191

Improving the HIV PrEP Cascade Using an Intervention for Healthcare Providers

A study testing PrEP Optimization Intervention (PrEP-OI) in people with HIV/AIDS, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The PrEP Optimization Intervention (PrEP-OI) aims to educate healthcare providers on PrEP and assist providers in the appropriate targeting of patients at increased risk for HIV acquisition, initiating PrEP when appropriate, and providing guidance on the ongoing monitoring and adherence counseling of patients on PrEP. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
HIV/AIDS
What is being tested?
PrEP Optimization Intervention (PrEP-OI)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Nov 2018to 31 Jan 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • San Francisco Department of Public Health (DPH) clinics that have agreed to participate
  • HCPs and medical directors employed at the study clinics
  • Patients who are seen at these study clinics and are offered HIV PrEP during the study

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UCSF Center for AIDS Prevention Studies

    San Francisco, California, 94158

Other trials in United States

About this study

The PrEP Optimization Intervention (PrEP-OI) aims to educate healthcare providers on PrEP and assist providers in the appropriate targeting of patients at increased risk for HIV acquisition, initiating PrEP when appropriate, and providing guidance on the ongoing monitoring and adherence counseling of patients on PrEP. The intervention includes a web-based panel management tool (called PrEP-Rx) and PrEP coordination (by a PrEP Coordinator). The PrEP-OI study will take place among participating primary care and specialty clinics across the San Francisco Department of Public Health.

Read the detailed description

Despite data indicating nearly 80,000 individuals starting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) by the end of 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that there are over 1.2 million adults with a substantial risk for HIV acquisition. Therefore, only 6% of these individuals are receiving PrEP. One of the barriers to PrEP implementation is lack of healthcare provider (HCP) knowledge and willingness to prescribe it. In a 2015 national survey, only 66% of primary care clinicians were aware of PrEP. However, once PrEP was defined, 91% indicated a willingness to prescribe it for high risk patients and expressed an interest in education about how to deliver PrEP. A descriptive report on the early experiences with PrEP uptake and delivery in San Francisco identified the following priority steps for HCPs to address PrEP delivery issues and to maximize PrEP's public health impact: (1) increase PrEP knowledge among HCPs and (2) expand PrEP access by training HCPs and developing tools to facilitate PrEP delivery in clinical settings. Additionally, based on the framework of the PrEP care continuum, interventions to enhance PrEP uptake include HCP education, tools to assess sexual risk, and systems to minimize HCP burden. Given these proposals and recommendations, innovative and effective approaches are needed to support and provide guidance to HCPs regardless of level of experience prescribing PrEP.

The investigators propose a PrEP optimization intervention targeted at HCPs to increase PrEP uptake and persistence among those at risk for HIV acquisition. This intervention includes: (1) an integrated web-based panel management tool called PrEP-Rx, which provides structured HIV risk assessment, automates reminders for laboratory testing and appointments, and reports patients' history of PrEP use; and (2) a centralized PrEP coordination overseen by a clinical support staff (referred to as the PrEP coordinator) who can identify individuals at high risk for HIV through direct patient contact or by reviewing registries for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and who can support multiple HCPs. PrEP-Rx consists of three components: (a) Risk Assessment, (b) Provider Dashboard, and (c) Knowledge Base. The brief online behavioral Risk Assessment will be provided to patients to complete prior to their initial visits with HCPs. This assessment allows patients to respond to sensitive risk questions in private, removes the need for HCPs to ask detailed risk questions, provides a standardized and comprehensive view of patient's HIV risk, and decreases the time burden on HCPs. Based on responses to the Risk Assessment, a patient's risk is categorized (high, medium, or low) and results are presented to the HCP on a "Provider Dashboard" along with laboratory test results that are required prior to PrEP initiation, and the patient's history of PrEP use (if applicable). Based on these data, the HCP and patient can discuss the risks and benefits of PrEP initiation. If a PrEP prescription is given, PrEP-Rx will generate automated follow-up reminders which are sent to the PrEP Coordinator for scheduling office appointments or laboratory visits. The activities of PrEP-Rx and the role of the HCP are augmented and managed by the PrEP Coordinator, who has the ability to identify and contact patients who have tested positive for STIs, follow-up with patients to minimize loss-to-follow-up and improve adherence, and ensure timely laboratory monitoring. PrEP-Rx also contains a Knowledge Base for HCP education and ongoing training.

Therefore, the investigators propose the following aims:

Primary Aim: Evaluate the efficacy of the PrEP optimization intervention (PrEP Coordinator + PrEP-Rx) to increase PrEP prescriptions through a stepped-wedge design among 10 San Francisco primary care clinics. The investigators hypothesize that the mean number of prescriptions issued will be significantly higher when the clinics use the PrEP intervention versus when they do not.

Secondary Aims:

  1. Explore differences in PrEP initiation, duration of use, and reasons for discontinuation based on patient's age, race/ethnicity, and sex/gender, and by clinic and HCP characteristics among study clinics.
  2. Explore sustainability of the intervention during an eight-month follow-up after the Stepped-wedge Phase.
  3. Investigate facilitators and barriers of PrEP delivery and experiences with the proposed PrEP intervention through qualitative interviews with HCPs, PrEP Coordinators, and clinic directors of study clinics.

The combination of the PrEP Coordinator plus PrEP-Rx has the potential to improve all steps of the PrEP continuum and enhance overall care by identifying individuals at high risk of HIV acquisition, standardizing HIV risk assessment, helping in PrEP initiation, systematizing follow-up visits or laboratory assessments, and educating HCPs about emerging PrEP data. These goals can have a significant public health impact and be attained with minimal burden on existing clinic resources.

Conditions
HIV/AIDS
Being tested
PrEP Optimization Intervention (PrEP-OI)
Keywords
Quality Improvement, Healthcare Providers, Health Disparity
Medical subject headings
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PrEP Optimization Intervention (PrEP-OI)Other

    PrEP-Rx + PrEP Coordinator

Study groups in NCT03532191
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PrEP-OI InterventionExperimentalAll clinics that have crossed over to initiate the intervention at this time. The order of crossover is determined at random.
Receives: Other: PrEP Optimization Intervention (PrEP-OI)
Control until randomized for interventionNo interventionAll clinics that have not yet initiated the intervention at this time (i.e., control clinics). A new clinic will cross over to receive the intervention each month, with the order of clinic crossover determined at random, until all clinics are receiving the intervention.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Efficacy of PrEP-OI

    Mean number of PrEP prescriptions initiated

    Measured: 10 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. PrEP usage

    Explore differences in PrEP initiation, duration of use, and reasons for discontinuation

    Measured: 10 months

  2. Sustainability during 12 month Follow-up Phase

    Explore sustainability of the intervention by determining if prescription numbers change in the Follow-up relative to the Stepped-wedge Phase

    Measured: 22 months

  3. Facilitators and barriers of PrEP delivery

    Investigate facilitators and barriers of PrEP delivery and experiences with the proposed PrEP intervention through one-on-one qualitative interviews with HCPs and PrEP Coordinators

    Measured: 22 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 May 2018
  2. Study start1 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2020
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
The proposed intervention study will be implemented using a stepped-wedge design, which is a type of one-way crossover design in which all clinics will begin the study without the PrEP-OI intervention. Each clinic will cross over to receive the intervention one-by-one every month, with the order of clinic crossover determined at random to maximize internal validity.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03532191
Sponsor's protocol ID
R01NR017573
Other IDs
R01NR017573
Acronym
PrEP-OI
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
29 Apr 2018
Last updated
17 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Saberi P, Stoner MCD, Ming K, Lisha NE, Hojilla JC, Scott HM, Liu AY, Steward WT, Johnson MO, Neilands TB. The effect of an HIV preexposure prophylaxis panel management strategy to increase preexposure prophylaxis prescriptions. AIDS. 2022 Nov 1;36(13):1783-1789. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003283. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

    PubMed 35730363
  • Shrestha I, Ming K, Jimenez V, Wendelborn J, Vazquez A, Steward W, Scott H, Saberi P. Lessons Learned from an HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Coordination Program in San Francisco Primary Care Clinics. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2022 Aug;38(8):611-614. doi: 10.1089/AID.2022.0013. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

    PubMed 35592996
  • Saberi P, Ming K, Shrestha I, Scott H, Thorson B, Liu A. Feasibility and Acceptability of Home-Collected Samples for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Preexposure Prophylaxis and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Laboratory Tests in San Francisco Primary Care Clinics. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 21;9(2):ofab657. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab657. eCollection 2022 Feb.

    PubMed 35087913
  • Chan CT, Ming K, Camp C, Saberi P. Sexual Behaviors, Substance Use, and Quality of Life Among Individuals Using PrEP in San Francisco During the COVID-19 Pandemic Shelter-In-Place Orders: A Cross-Sectional Survey. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022 Apr 1;89(4):e39-e42. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002900. No abstract available.

    PubMed 34974469
  • Saberi P, Ming K, Scott H, Liu A, Steward W. "You can't have a PrEP program without a PrEP Coordinator": Implementation of a PrEP panel management intervention. PLoS One. 2020 Oct 16;15(10):e0240745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240745. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 33064763
  • Ming K, Shrestha I, Vazquez A, Wendelborn J, Jimenez V, Lisha N, Neilands TB, Scott H, Liu A, Steward W, Johnson MO, Saberi P. Improving the HIV PrEP continuum of care using an intervention for healthcare providers: a stepped-wedge study protocol. BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 14;10(7):e040734. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040734.

    PubMed 32665393
  • Saberi P, Ming K, Hojilla JC, Scott HM, Neilands TB. HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis in the Time of COVID-19: How a Robust and Responsive HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Intervention Can Avert Loss of HIV Prevention Coverage During a Global Pandemic. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 May 1;87(1):e173-e176. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002652. No abstract available.

    PubMed 33534275

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PrEP Optimization Intervention (PrEP-OI) in people with HIV/AIDS, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Efficacy of PrEP-OI (time frame: 10 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03532191, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in