AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain, PostoperativeNCT03535792

Nalbuphine Versus Fentanyl As Additives To Bupivacaine In Spinal Anaesthesia For Internal FixationI Of Tibia

A study testing Fentanyl/Hyperbaric bupivacaine and Nalbuphine/Hyperbaric bupivacaine in people with Pain, Postoperative, run by University of Alexandria at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Efficacy Of Nalbuphine Versus Fentanyl As Additives To Bupivacaine In Spinal Anaesthesia For Internal FixationI Of Tibia Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Postoperative
What is being tested?
Fentanyl/Hyperbaric bupivacaine and Nalbuphine/Hyperbaric bupivacaine
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
4 Nov 2017to 20 Aug 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients aged 18-50 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II
  • Scheduled for elective internal fixation of tibia, of expected duration less than 3 h, under subarachnoid block

Who cannot join

  • Patients with significant co-existing conditions such as hepatic, renal and cardiovascular diseases.
  • Patients with contraindications to regional anesthesia like local infection or bleeding disorders.
  • Patients with allergy to opioids, long-term opioids use, and a history of chronic pain.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Alexandria Faculty of Medicine

    Alexandria, 21111

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: The Efficacy Of Nalbuphine Versus Fentanyl As Additives To Bupivacaine In Spinal Anaesthesia For Internal FixationI Of Tibia

The Efficacy Of Nalbuphine Versus Fentanyl As Additives To Bupivacaine In Spinal Anaesthesia For Internal FixationI Of Tibia

Read the detailed description

The Efficacy Of Nalbuphine Versus Fentanyl As Additives To Bupivacaine In Spinal Anaesthesia For Internal FixationI Of Tibia

INTRODUCTION Regional techniques, such as spinal anaesthesia may offer advantages over general anaesthesia including reduced stress response to surgery and analgesia extending into the postoperative period.(1,2) Adequate pain management to facilitate rehabilitation and to accelerate functional recovery after lower limb orthopedic surgery is essential to enable patients to resume normal activity as soon as possible.(3) To increase the duration of analgesia produced by local anesthetic, a number of adjuvants have been added through the central neuraxial route.(4) The profound segmental anti-nociception produced by neuraxial opioids in doses much smaller than would be required for comparable anti-nociception if administered systemically has made them very popular and effective in the treatment of many painful states.(5)The anti-nociception is also devoid of motor, sensory and autonomic blockade so there is no paralysis or hypotension. Furthermore, the availability of a specific opioid receptor antagonist naloxone to reverse their action when necessary has made the use of opioids more acceptable.(6) Opioids work in the intrathecal space by activating opioid- receptors in the dorsal gray matter of spinal cord, which modulates the function of afferent pain fibers.(7)Intrathecal and epidural narcotics seem to modulate pain primarily at the spinal cord rather than in the brain as do intravenous narcotics.(8) Site of action in the spinal cord may provide analgesia with less sedation, confusion and nausea, which are adverse effects associated with intravenous narcotics.(9) Various opioids have been used along with bupivacaine to prolong its effect, to improve the quality of analgesia and minimize the requirement of postoperative analgesics.(10,11) The main obstacles for optimal use of opioids are their side effects which include pruritis, nausea/ emesis, constipation, urinary retention, respiratory depression, undesirable sedation and the development of tolerance/ dependence. Though some side effects may be benign but others like respiratory depression can prove to be life threatening.(12-14) Nalbuphine is a semisynthetic opioid with mixed mu antagonist and kappa agonist properties. When used singly or in combination with other agents it has the potential to maintain or even enhance opioid based analgesia while simultaneously mitigating the common mu-opioid side effects. (15) Nalbuphine binds readily to both mu- and kappa-receptors. The binding of nalbuphine to mu receptors only serves to competitively displace other mu-agonists from the receptor, without itself displaying any agonist activity.(16)When nalbuphine binds to kappa-receptors, however, it has an agonist effect. Kappa-opioid receptors are distributed throughout brain and spinal cord involved in nociception. Nalbuphine binds avidly to kappa-receptors in these areas to produce analgesia. This pattern of binding and effects defines nalbuphine as a mixed agonist-antagonist.(17) Fentanyl, a lipophilic opioid has rapid onset of action, It does not tend to migrate intrathecally to the 4th ventricle in sufficient concentration to cause delayed respiratory depression.(18,19)

AIM OF THE WORK The aim of our study is to compare the effect of intrathecal nalbuphine versus intrathecal fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine, as regard the intra-operative and post-operative analgesia, the hemodynamic stability, the onset of sensory/motor block and the duration of action in patients undergoing internal fixation of tibia.

PATIENTS This study will be carried out in El-Hadara University Hospital on sixty patients aged 18-50 years; belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, scheduled for elective internal fixation of tibia, of expected duration less than 3 h, under subarachnoid block, this prospective study will be done in a double-blinded, randomized way.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with significant co-existing conditions such as hepatic, renal and cardiovascular diseases.
  • Patients with contraindications to regional anesthesia like local infection or bleeding disorders.
  • Patients with allergy to opioids, long-term opioids use, and a history of chronic pain.

After approval from the local ethical committee, a written consent will be obtained from each patient.

Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups according to intrathecal drug injected using closed envelope method.

Group F:

Patients will receive intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 1 ml fentanyl (50μg).

Group N:

Patients will receive intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 1ml nalbuphine hydrochloride (1.6 mg); (nalufin 20 mg in 1 ml ampoule, Amoun Pharmaceutical Co. Cairo, Egypt).

METHODS

  1. Preoperative preparation: Preoperative screening of all patients including:
  • History taking.
  • Complete physical examination.
  • Laboratory investigation:
  • Complete blood picture (CBC)
  • Prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), Prothrombin activity and INR.
  • Liver enzymes: Aspartate transaminase, Alanine transaminase.
  • Serum urea and creatinine.
  • Fasting blood sugar. Nothing per month in previous 6 hours.
  1. Monitoring: All patients will be monitored by:
  • Electrocardiogram (ECG) for heart rate (beat/min).
  • Non-invasive arterial blood pressure: mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure (SAP) and diastolic arterial blood pressure (DAP).
  • Pulse oximeter for arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2).
  1. Intraoperative procedure:
  • After securing intravenous (18G) access in the non-dominant hand, preloading with Ringer's solution 10 ml/kg in 15 min will be done.
  • Subarachnoid block will be performed with 3 ml of the study drug injected in L3/4 intervertebral space, using a 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle, in the sitting position, maintaining aseptic precautions, according to the standard institutional protocol.
  • The patients will be randomized using close envelope method equally into two groups according to the additive (fentanyl or nalbuphine), and all patients will receive the same amount of local anesthetic (2 ml 0.5% heavy bupivacaine). Thereafter, patients will be placed in the supine position for surgery, elevation of the head by a pillow and oxygen mask will be applied. Advanced equipment and drugs for resuscitation, airway management and ventilation will be ready. MEASUREMENTS 1. Hemodynamic parameters:
  • Patient heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure will be monitored and recorded at the following periods:
  • 5 minutes before the intrathecal injection.
  • At 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 minutes after the injection.
  • Every 15 min until the patient will be moved to the post anaesthesia care unit (PACU).
  1. Assessment of sensory blockade:
  • The onset of sensory block is defined as the time in minutes to reach highest sensory level (20), it will be evaluated by ice at midclavicular level bilaterally every 2min for 15 min.
  • The duration of sensory block will be defined as the time it takes for sensory level to decrease to dermatomal level 12 measured from the highest sensory level evaluated by ice every 15 minutes. (21)
  • The maximal level of sensory block will be evaluated by 20 min after the completion of injection.
  1. Assessment of the motor block:
  • Onset time of motor block will be assessed immediately after sensory block assessment using modified Bromage scale.(22) Modified Bromage scale
  • The onset of motor block will be defined as the time from intrathecal injection to Bromage score 3 tested every 2min for 15 min. (23)
  • Duration of motor block will be evaluated every 15 minutes intraoperative from Bromage score 3 then every 30 minutes in the post anaesthesia care unit (PACU) until full recovery of motor function.
  1. post operative analgesia:
  2. Duration of analgesia:
  • The duration of analgesia will be defined as the period from spinal injection to the first time when the patient complained of pain in the postoperative period.
  • Patients will be assessed using Visual analogue scale (VAS), in the immediate postoperative period, then every 2hours for the first 8hours, then every 6hours for the rest of the first 24hours. Visual analogue scale (VAS)
  • It ranges from 0 indicating no pain till 10 indicating severe intolerable pain with variable degrees of ascending pain in between.(24)
  1. Postoperative analgesic requirements:
  • The time of the first request analgesia will be recorded and treated by intramuscular diclofenac sodium (75mg) in a dose of 1mg/kg and repeated after 1 hour if needed up to 2 ampoules.
  • Paracetamol 1 g IV every 8 hours will be given for analgesia to all patients starting immediately postoperative (time zero).
  • Total dose of analgesic requirements will be calculated and elaborated statistically.
  1. Postoperative Complication:

Any complication will be recorded and managed such as hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, shivering and respiratory depression.

  • Hypotension will be defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90mmHg and\or a decrease of more than 20% from baseline blood pressure. (25)
  • Bradycardia will be defined as HR<50 beat\min.
  • Respiratory depression will be defined as respiratory rate <10 breath\min.

ETHICS OF RESEARCH Prospective study: Informed consent will be taken from patients. In case of incompetent patients the informed consent will be taken from the guardians.

Being tested
Fentanyl/Hyperbaric bupivacaine, Nalbuphine/Hyperbaric bupivacaine
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fentanyl/Hyperbaric bupivacaineDrug

    Also called Spinal Fentanyl/Hyperbaric bupivacaine

    Intrathecal Fentanyl/Hyperbaric bupivacaine and Tibial internal fixation.

  • Nalbuphine/Hyperbaric bupivacaineDrug

    Also called Spinal Nalbuphine/Hyperbaric bupivacaine

    Intrathecal Nalbuphine/Hyperbaric bupivacaine and Tibial internal fixation.

Study groups in NCT03535792
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fentanyl/Hyperbaric BupivacaineActive comparatorGroup F: Patients will receive intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 1 ml fentanyl (50μg) and will have Tibial internal fixation.
Receives: Drug: Fentanyl/Hyperbaric bupivacaine
Nalbuphine/Hyerbaric BupivacaineActive comparatorGroup N: Patients will receive intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 1ml nalbuphine hydrochloride (1.6 mg); (nalufin 20 mg in 1 ml ampoule, Amoun Pharmaceutical Co. Cairo, Egypt) and will have Tibial internal fixation.
Receives: Drug: Nalbuphine/Hyperbaric bupivacaine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Postoperative

    VAS 0-10

    Measured: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 May 2018
  2. Study start4 Nov 2017
  3. Primary completion19 Aug 2018
  4. Study completion20 Aug 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Group F: 25 Patients will receive intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 1 ml fentanyl (50μg). Group N: 25 Patients will receive intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 1ml nalbuphine hydrochloride (1.6 mg); (nalufin 20 mg in 1 ml ampoule, Amoun Pharmaceutical Co. Cairo, Egypt).
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03535792
Sponsor's protocol ID
050108393
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
12 May 2018
Last updated
23 Jan 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Fentanyl/Hyperbaric bupivacaine and Nalbuphine/Hyperbaric bupivacaine in people with Pain, Postoperative, run by University of Alexandria at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Postoperative (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in