AzTrials
AzTrials

Surgical Procedure, UnspecifiedNCT03537352

Shared Decision Making in a General Hospital

An observational study of Surgical Procedure, Unspecified and General Medical Condition, run by Psychiatric Hospital of Attica at 1 site in Greece.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A pilot cross-sectional study will investigate the differential effect of the type of disorder (surgical versus non-surgical) on the scores of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
Any appropriate surgical treatment and Any appropriate drug or non-drug treatment excluding surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteGreece
Study dates
14 May 2018to 21 Nov 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients hospitalized in 4 acute wards (2 for surgical and 2 for non-surgical disorders) or the relevant outpatient departments

Who may be able to join

  • Hospitalization in the Thriassion General Hospital of Elefsina
  • Ability to give informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Inability to complete the neuropsychological assessment
  • Mental retardation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Greece1 site
  • Thriassion General Hospital

    Elefsina, 19600

Other trials in Greece

About this study

Official title: Shared Decision Making in Patients With Surgical or Non-Surgical Diseases in a General Hospital: A Pilot Study

A pilot cross-sectional study will investigate the differential effect of the type of disorder (surgical versus non-surgical) on the scores of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire.

Read the detailed description

During a pilot cross-sectional study, the 9- Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (9SDMQ) will be administered in two groups of participants, one (N=60) suffering from surgical diseases and one (N=60) from non-surgical medical diseases. Patients hospitalized in four acute wards (2 surgical and 2 non-surgical wards) or visiting the relevant outpatient departments of the Triassion General Hospital of Elefsina, Greece will be recruited. The primary outcome will be the difference on the 9SDMQ scores (transformed in a 1-100% scale) in patients suffering from surgical versus non-surgical disorders. Secondary outcome measures will include the effect of patients' demographic and clinical variables, of physicians' demographic variables and of the score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment on the 9SDMQ scores. Additionally the relationship of patients' satisfaction on the 9SDMQ scores will also be investigated.

Being tested
Any appropriate surgical treatment, Any appropriate drug or non-drug treatment excluding surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Any appropriate surgical treatmentProcedure or surgery

    Any appropriate surgical treatment for the management of patient's current disorder

  • Any appropriate drug or non-drug treatment excluding surgeryDrug

    Any appropriate drug or non-drug treatment excluding surgery for the management of patient's current disorder

Study groups in NCT03537352
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Surgical DisordersA. Surgical Disorders: 1. Current Hospitalization at the Surgical Inpatient Department or at the Inpatient Department of Otorhinolaryngology or at the Inpatient Department of Cardiology OR 2. Current Follow-up at the Surgical Outpatient Department or at the Outpatient Department of Otorhinolaryngology or at the Outpatient Department of Cardiology due to a disorder for which any appropriate surgical treatment (surgery) is a treatment option.
Receives: Procedure: Any appropriate surgical treatment
Non-Surgical General Medical Disorders1. Current Hospitalization at the Internal Medicine Inpatient Department or at the Inpatient Department of Cardiology OR 2. Current Follow-up at the Internal Medicine Outpatient Department or at the Outpatient Department of Cardiology due to a disorder for which surgery is not a treatment option and any appropriate drug or non-drug treatment excluding surgery is a treatment option.
Receives: Drug: Any appropriate drug or non-drug treatment excluding surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in scores of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire between surgical and non-surgical disorders

    Difference in scores of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire between surgical and non-surgical disorders

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Effect of patients' age, education, gender, maternal education, nationality on 9-item SDM Questionnaire scores

    Effect of patients' age, education, gender, maternal education, nationality on 9-item SDM Questionnaire scores

    Measured: one year

  2. Effect of treating physicians' age, specialty, years of experience on 9-item SDM Questionnaire scores

    Effect of treating physicians' age, specialty, years of experience on 9-item SDM Questionnaire scores

    Measured: one year

  3. Effect of patients' Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores on 9-item SDM Questionnaire scores

    Effect of patients' Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores on 9-item SDM Questionnaire scores

    Measured: one year

  4. Correlation of the 9-item SDM Questionnaire scores with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire scores

    Correlation of the 9-item SDM Questionnaire scores with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire scores

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 May 2018
  2. Study start14 May 2018
  3. Primary completion21 Nov 2018
  4. Study completion21 Nov 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
120 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03537352
Sponsor's protocol ID
PsychiatricHA
Status last verified
Nov 2018
First submitted
15 May 2018
Last updated
27 Nov 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Taking shared decision making more seriously. Lancet. 2011 Mar 5;377(9768):784. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60290-0. No abstract available.

    PubMed 21377556
  • Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, Arora NK, Gueguen JA, Makoul G. Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

    PubMed 21474265
  • De Las Cuevas C, Penate W, Perestelo-Perez L, Serrano-Aguilar P. Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:1045-52. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S49021. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

    PubMed 23950646
  • Flynn KE, Smith MA, Vanness D. A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision making. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Sep;63(5):1158-69. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.030. Epub 2006 May 11.

    PubMed 16697096
  • Kriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Harter M. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034. Epub 2009 Oct 30.

    PubMed 19879711
  • Mah HC, Muthupalaniappen L, Chong WW. Perceived involvement and preferences in shared decision-making among patients with hypertension. Fam Pract. 2016 Jun;33(3):296-301. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw012. Epub 2016 Mar 18.

    PubMed 26993483
  • Pollard S, Bansback N, Bryan S. Physician attitudes toward shared decision making: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Sep;98(9):1046-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 23.

    PubMed 26138158
  • Schneider A, Korner T, Mehring M, Wensing M, Elwyn G, Szecsenyi J. Impact of age, health locus of control and psychological co-morbidity on patients' preferences for shared decision making in general practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 May;61(2):292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.008.

    PubMed 15896943
  • Smith GL, Volk RJ. Nonclinical Factors Affecting Shared Decision Making. JAMA. 2017 Jul 25;318(4):391. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7841. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28742899
  • Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L, Wu JH. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28;(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.

    PubMed 24470076

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Surgical Procedure, Unspecified and General Medical Condition, run by Psychiatric Hospital of Attica at 1 site in Greece.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in scores of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire between surgical and non-surgical disorders (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03537352, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in