AzTrials
AzTrials

Opioid UsePhase 4NCT03540030

Opioid-Free Shoulder Arthroplasty

A Phase 4 study testing Gabapentin, Celecoxib and toradol in people with Opioid Use and Shoulder Osteoarthritis, run by OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Purpose of Study: To identify and provide a safe, opioid-free treatment pathway for shoulder arthroplasty with a focus on perioperative pain control and postoperative symptoms from treatment Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
What is being tested?
Gabapentin, Celecoxib and toradol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
86 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2016to Jun 2019
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient undergoing elective primary total shoulder or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, cuff tear arthropathy, or inflammatory arthritis etiologies
  • Age greater than or equal to 50.

Who cannot join

  • Revision total shoulder arthroplasty
  • Chronic opioid therapy - per investigator discretion
  • Liver or renal insufficiency - per investigator discretion
  • Arthroplasty for fracture
  • Sickle cell disease
  • Workers compensation
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Inability to receive block
  • Intervention Arm Only: Creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min
  • Intervention Arm Only: Allergy to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • OrthoCarolina Research Institute

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207

Other trials in United States

About this study

Purpose of Study:

To identify and provide a safe, opioid-free treatment pathway for shoulder arthroplasty with a focus on perioperative pain control and postoperative symptoms from treatment

Read the detailed description

Background and Significance:

Opioid-based analgesia has been a cornerstone of patient care in the setting of acute pain for the last century and has undergone logarithmic increase over the past twenty years. Unfortunately, the rise in utilization has brought with it a rise in opioid-induced side effects. These include constipation, nausea/vomiting, hyperalgesia, delirium, addiction/withdrawal (with 67% of those prescribed a long-term opioid program still on opioids at an average of 4.8 years of follow-up), and in some cases even respiratory depression/death. Patient expectations of opioid-based pain medication has driven a rapid rise in outpatient opioid prescriptions including both short and long-acting opioids. These prescriptions have in turn become a source of significant mortality in the United States, with nearly 20,000 deaths due to opioid overdose in 2014 alone.

There have been momentous efforts made in identifying synergistic compounds to use for acute pain management in the perioperative time period to begin to minimize the opioid requirement for pain control. These studies have focused on nerve modulation with gabapentinoids, intravenous and local administration of sodium-channel blockers such as lidocaine and bupivacaine, and even increased interest in non-steroidal anti-inflammatories and acetaminophen. At this time, no study has looked at the possibility of utilizing a multi-modal acute post-surgical pain control pathway that did not include some form of opioid medication for the general population.

Arthroplasty continues to be a dominant procedure in the orthopaedic armamentarium and accounts for well over a million surgeries done in the United States per year. With the ability to utilize targeted nerve blocks by anesthesia, and the increasing data showing efficacy of multi-modal therapy for acute pain, we propose a patient care pathway that is completely free of all opioid-based medications. From the time that patients are checked in until the time the patient follows up in clinic, they will utilize a pathway designed to eliminate pain and opioid-related side effects following shoulder arthroplasty. Our hope is that a well-designed pathway for total shoulder arthroplasty can quickly be modeled for other surgical procedures in an attempt to minimize the negative effects of opioid utilization both acutely and on a societal level.

Being tested
Gabapentin, Celecoxib, toradol, acetaminophen, regional block
Keywords
Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty, Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Medical subject headings
Osteonecrosis, Rotator Cuff Injuries, Arthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GabapentinDrug

    opioid-free treatment pathway for shoulder arthroplasty with a focus on perioperative pain control and postoperative symptoms from treatment

  • CelecoxibDrug

    opioid-free treatment pathway for shoulder arthroplasty with a focus on perioperative pain control and postoperative symptoms from treatment

  • toradolDrug

    opioid-free treatment pathway for shoulder arthroplasty with a focus on perioperative pain control and postoperative symptoms from treatment

  • acetaminophenDrug

    opioid-free treatment pathway for shoulder arthroplasty with a focus on perioperative pain control and postoperative symptoms from treatment

  • regional blockDrug

    opioid-free treatment pathway for shoulder arthroplasty with a focus on perioperative pain control and postoperative symptoms from treatment

  • propofolDrug

    opioid-free treatment pathway for shoulder arthroplasty with a focus on perioperative pain control and postoperative symptoms from treatment

  • IV lidocaineDrug

    opioid-free treatment pathway for shoulder arthroplasty with a focus on perioperative pain control and postoperative symptoms from treatment

  • rocuroniumDrug

    opioid-free treatment pathway for shoulder arthroplasty with a focus on perioperative pain control and postoperative symptoms from treatment

  • vecuroniumDrug

    opioid-free treatment pathway for shoulder arthroplasty with a focus on perioperative pain control and postoperative symptoms from treatment

  • sevofluraneDrug

    opioid-free treatment pathway for shoulder arthroplasty with a focus on perioperative pain control and postoperative symptoms from treatment

  • desfluraneDrug

    opioid-free treatment pathway for shoulder arthroplasty with a focus on perioperative pain control and postoperative symptoms from treatment

Study groups in NCT03540030
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ObservationalNo interventionThe observational treatment group will not have any changes from your surgeon's normal pain management process. Anesthesia will be utilized in a routine fashion with all routine perioperative medications. You will be discharged on routine postoperative medications including opioids, NSAIDS, and any other modalities typically used by the treating surgeon.
Non-Opioid InterventionActive comparatorOral dose of both gabapentin and celecoxib (toradol if sulfa allergy) in the preop area. US-guided interscalene regional block without the aid of opioid co-medication. Intra-op management by anesthesia with non-opioid modalities but should include one dose of IV acetaminophen during the procedure. Anesthetic modalities will include, but not limited to, regional block, propofol, IV lidocaine, rocuronium/vecuronium, and sevoflurane/desflurane. If the attending anesthesiologist deems it necessary to dose with opioids during procedure, it will be recorded and reported. Liposomal bupivacaine will be injected into the peri-articular soft tissues as an adjunct to the block. Post Op, cryotherapy, gabapentin, toradol. Toradol will transition to celecoxib for the duration of the hospitalization (or meloxicam for patients with sulfa allergy). As needed medications will include both oral and IV acetaminophen, as well as up to an additional 15mg of toradol per 6hr, depending on Cr clearance.
Receives: Drug: Gabapentin; Drug: Celecoxib; Drug: toradol; Drug: acetaminophen; Drug: regional block; Drug: propofol; Drug: IV lidocaine; Drug: rocuronium; Drug: vecuronium; Drug: sevoflurane; Drug: desflurane

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Post Op Pain

    Pain at patient discharge or 24-hours, whichever comes first - measured on a 0 (no pain) -10 (worst possible pain) numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0(no pain) is preferable to 10(worst possible pain)

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Additional Post Op Pain

    post-operative pain: measured on a 0 (no pain) -10 (worst) numeric rating scale (NRS) at 6hrs, 12hrs, 2 weeks, and 2 months. A score of 0(no pain) is preferable to 10(worst possible pain)

    Measured: 6hrs, 12hrs, 2weeks, 2 months

  2. Nausea

    rate of nausea

    Measured: 2 Weeks

  3. Constipation

    rate of constipation

    Measured: 2 Weeks

  4. Falls

    rate of falls

    Measured: 2 Weeks

  5. Morphine Use

    Morphine milli-equivalents In-hospital post-operative. Continuous scale of MME, no defined better/worse. Measured as number and dose of medications taken. For example, if the patient received an opioid, the drug and dose was recorded and converted to MME. A time frame of when to assess opioid use in-hospital post-operative was not used but was a continuous monitor for rescue opioid from in-hospital post-operative through discharge.

    Measured: In-hospital Stay

  6. Pain Satisfaction

    Satisfaction with overall pain using Numeric Pain Rating (NRS) scale. yes, no. No being better than yes.

    Measured: 2 Weeks

  7. ASES

    American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score for pain and function. Range 0-100. Low score = worse shoulder condition. Function, disability, and pain subscores (all ranges 0-50), and are summed for total ASES score.

    Measured: 2 Weeks

  8. Simple Shoulder Test

    Simple Shoulder Test (SST) activity score. Range 0-12. 0 = worse activity score.

    Measured: 2 Weeks

  9. Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12©) Physical Health Subscore, and Mental Health Subscore

    quality of life using VR-12 subscores. Physical Health (PCS) subscore and Mental Health (MCS) subscore, not summed. Range reported in weighted units. Physical Health subscore: 1 point increase in PCS is associated with 6% lower total health care expenditures, 5% lower pharmacy expenditures, 9% lower rate of hospital inpatient visits, 4% lower rate of medical provider visits, 5% lower rate of hospital outpatient visits. Mental Health sub score a 1 point increase in MCS is associated with 7% lower total health care expenditures, 4% lower pharmacy expenditures, 15% lower rate of hospital inpatient visits, and 4% lower rate of medical provider visits. Both PCS/MCS are score 0-100 with 100 indicating the highest level of health.

    Measured: 2 Weeks

  10. Nausea

    rate of nausea

    Measured: 2 Months

  11. Constipation

    rate of constipation

    Measured: 2 Months

  12. Falls

    rate of falls

    Measured: 2 Months

  13. Pain Satisfaction

    Satisfaction with overall pain using Numeric Pain Rating (NRS) scale. yes, no. No being better than yes.

    Measured: 2 Months

  14. Simple Shoulder Test

    Simple Shoulder Test (SST) activity score. Range 0-12. 0 = worse activity score.

    Measured: 2 Months

  15. Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12©) Physical Health Subscore, and Mental Health Subscore

    quality of life using VR-12 subscores. Physical Health (PCS) subscore and Mental Health (MCS) subscore, not summed. Range reported in weighted units. Physical Health subscore: 1 point increase in PCS is associated with 6% lower total health care expenditures, 5% lower pharmacy expenditures, 9% lower rate of hospital inpatient visits, 4% lower rate of medical provider visits, 5% lower rate of hospital outpatient visits. Mental Health sub score a 1 point increase in MCS is associated with 7% lower total health care expenditures, 4% lower pharmacy expenditures, 15% lower rate of hospital inpatient visits, and 4% lower rate of medical provider visits. Both PCS/MCS are score 0-100 with 100 indicating the highest level of health.

    Measured: 2 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 May 2018
  2. Study startSep 2016
  3. Primary completionMar 2019
  4. Study completionJun 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
86 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03540030
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00021833
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
8 May 2018
Last updated
14 Oct 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Fletcher D, Martinez V. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in patients after surgery: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;112(6):991-1004. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu137.

    PubMed 24829420
  • Lee HJ, Yeomans DC. Opioid induced hyperalgesia in anesthetic settings. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Nov;67(5):299-304. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.5.299. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

    PubMed 25473457
  • McKeown JL. Pain Management Issues for the Geriatric Surgical Patient. Anesthesiol Clin. 2015 Sep;33(3):563-76. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 Jul 3.

    PubMed 26315638
  • Macintyre PE, Huxtable CA, Flint SL, Dobbin MD. Costs and consequences: a review of discharge opioid prescribing for ongoing management of acute pain. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014 Sep;42(5):558-74. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1404200504.

    PubMed 25233168
  • Seib RK, Paul JE. Preoperative gabapentin for postoperative analgesia: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2006 May;53(5):461-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03022618.

    PubMed 16636030
  • Doleman B, Heinink TP, Read DJ, Faleiro RJ, Lund JN, Williams JP. A systematic review and meta-regression analysis of prophylactic gabapentin for postoperative pain. Anaesthesia. 2015 Oct;70(10):1186-204. doi: 10.1111/anae.13179. Epub 2015 Aug 24.

    PubMed 26300519
  • Mishriky BM, Waldron NH, Habib AS. Impact of pregabalin on acute and persistent postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;114(1):10-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu293. Epub 2014 Sep 10.

    PubMed 25209095
  • Banerjee P, Rogers BA. Systematic review of high-volume multimodal wound infiltration in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2014 Jun;37(6):403-12. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140528-07.

    PubMed 24972430
  • Marques EM, Jones HE, Elvers KT, Pyke M, Blom AW, Beswick AD. Local anaesthetic infiltration for peri-operative pain control in total hip and knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analyses of short- and long-term effectiveness. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jul 5;15:220. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-220.

    PubMed 24996539
  • Skolnik A, Gan TJ. New formulations of bupivacaine for the treatment of postoperative pain: liposomal bupivacaine and SABER-Bupivacaine. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014 Aug;15(11):1535-42. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2014.930436. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

    PubMed 24992382
  • Kazerooni R, Tran MH. Evaluation of Celecoxib Addition to Pain Protocol After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Stratified by Opioid Tolerance. Clin J Pain. 2015 Oct;31(10):903-8. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000178.

    PubMed 25380221
  • Khan JS, Margarido C, Devereaux PJ, Clarke H, McLellan A, Choi S. Preoperative celecoxib in noncardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;33(3):204-14. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000346.

    PubMed 26760402
  • Koh W, Nguyen KP, Jahr JS. Intravenous non-opioid analgesia for peri- and postoperative pain management: a scientific review of intravenous acetaminophen and ibuprofen. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Feb;68(1):3-12. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.1.3. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

    PubMed 25664148
  • Nir RR, Nahman-Averbuch H, Moont R, Sprecher E, Yarnitsky D. Preoperative preemptive drug administration for acute postoperative pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain. 2016 Aug;20(7):1025-43. doi: 10.1002/ejp.842. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

    PubMed 26991963
  • Rouhani A, Tabrizi A, Elmi A, Abedini N, Mirza Tolouei F. Effects of preoperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on pain mitigation and patients' shoulder performance following rotator cuff repair. Adv Pharm Bull. 2014 Dec;4(4):363-7. doi: 10.5681/apb.2014.053. Epub 2014 Aug 10.

    PubMed 25436192

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Gabapentin, Celecoxib and toradol in people with Opioid Use and Shoulder Osteoarthritis, run by OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Oct 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Post Op Pain (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03540030, which also lists 27 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in