AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal CarcinomaMULTIPLI-0NCT03546127

Molecular Profiling to Improve Outcome of Patients in Cancer. A Pilot Study

An observational study of Colorectal Carcinoma and Soft Tissue Sarcoma, run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France at 3 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Next Generation Sequencing in cancer: a feasibility study in France to assess sample circuit and to perform analyzes within a limited time. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Carcinoma, Soft Tissue Sarcoma
What is being tested?
Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): exome, RNA seq
How many people
24 participants
Where
3 sitesFrance
Study dates
23 May 2017to 21 Sep 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients included in this prospective cohort study are patients who have previously consented to tumor sequencing either as part of others studies or as part of standard care (voluntary signed informed consent). Two participating centers have been retained. Samples used (blood and tumor) are issued from these previous collection and analyzed for the same purpose: no additional samples will be collected.

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients
  • Disease: Advanced and/or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma OR metastatic carcinoma
  • Patient consenting to tumor sequencing, secondary reuse of their data
  • Patient informed about this study

Who cannot join

  • N/A

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

France3 sites
  • Institut Bergonié

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • CEA / Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine

    Évry, 91057

  • Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou

    Paris, 75000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Molecular Profiling to Improve Outcome of Patients in Cancer. A Pilot Study (MULTIPLI-0)

Next Generation Sequencing in cancer: a feasibility study in France to assess sample circuit and to perform analyzes within a limited time.

Read the detailed description

The first France disease genomic medicine program in the field of cancer has been retained by the 2025 Genomic Medicine France Plan. This program, called MULTIPLI encompasses two innovative personalized medicine clinical trials in soft-tissue sarcoma and colorectal carcinoma involving targeted molecules according to the tumor profile of each patient.

This 1st clinical research program aims implementing exome sequencing and RNA sequencing to determine the genomic profile and to provide a therapeutic decision for each patient. Genomic analyzes will be performed on different technical platforms: samples will be collected in each investigating center, nucleic acids extraction will be performed on two genetic platforms, Inca labeled and identified for the purpose of this study: Institut Bergonié and Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou. CNRGH (Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine) was retained for operational platform genomics and Institut Bergonie for bioinformatics data processing. Each genomic profile will be discussed within a multidisciplinary tumor board which aims at providing a therapeutic decision for each patient and to propose a targeted treatment in case of actionable molecular alteration.

The purpose of this program is to perform analysis on a set of gene, in order to provide results no more than after 6 weeks after the sample arrival on the biopathological platform. This gene panel analysis is based on the predefined list of genes that are direct targets of the drugs available in the MULTIPLI program.

Before implanting this program in a large-scale launch, it was essential to set up a pilot study in order to evaluate both sample's management between several platforms, and the time to report the results, and to verify that it was in line with the objectives set.

Being tested
Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): exome, RNA seq
Keywords
Next Generation Sequencing, Exome, RNA sequencing, Soft-tissue sarcoma, Colorectal carcinoma
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms, Sarcoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): exome, RNA seqGenetic

    Tumor and blood samples will be sequenced at medium-high coverage at the whole genome (exome) and transcriptome levels (RNA Seq). This will allow detecting variants in a larger set of samples even though only from the main clone will be precisely measured. The whole exome will be performed at a mean coverage of at least 60x for the normal DNA samples and 120x for the tumor DNA samples. The transcriptome of the tumor will be performed at enough depth of coverage to detect gene fusions, transcriptome variants and measure the digital expression of already annotated isoforms.

    For both sequencing configurations:

    • Data from each cancer and normal genome will be analysed for the presence of somatic variants.
    • DNA and RNA sequencing results will be integrated.
    • Technical replication for the mutations / chromosome alterations / transcript fusions that most likely drive the tumour process will be performed via Target Resequencing of the genomic / coding regions of interest.
Study groups in NCT03546127
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
STSPatients with advanced/metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma
Receives: Genetic: Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): exome, RNA seq
CCRPatients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma
Receives: Genetic: Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): exome, RNA seq

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Delay time to send a validated exome sequencing report from sample receipt

    The time delay between the date of sample receipt by the platform and the date of dispatch of a validated MTB report to physician

    Measured: an average of 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. The rate of patients with samples received by Platform for whom a validated exome sequencing report is available

    Rate of patients for whom a report was transmitted, within the patients for whom the samples were received by the platforms

    Measured: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months

  2. Delay time to send a validated exome sequencing report from signature to informed consent by the patient

    The time delay between the date of informed consent signature and the date of dispatch of a validated MTB report to physician

    Measured: an average of 8 weeks

  3. The rate of patients with signed informed consent for whom a validated exome sequencing report is available

    Rate of patients for whom a report was transmitted, within the patients for whom signed consent has been signed

    Measured: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months

  4. Delay time to receive sample on Platform from signature of informed consent

    The time delay between the date of informed consent signature and the date of sample receipt on platform

    Measured: on average of 2 weeks

  5. The rate of patients with signed informed consent for whom samples have been received by platform

    Rate of patients for whom samples have been received by platform, within the patients for whom signed consent has been signed

    Measured: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months

  6. Delay time to receipt nucleic acids on CNRGH from samples receipt on platform

    The time delay between the date of sample receipt on platform and the date of nucleic acids receipt on CNRGH

    Measured: on average of 1 week

  7. The rate of patients with samples sending date completed on electronic case for whom samples have been received by platform

    Rate of patients for whom samples have been received by platform, within the patients for whom sending date has been completed on electronic case

    Measured: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months

  8. The rate of patients with samples received on platform for whom these samples have been qualified in first step by platform and nucleic acids have been received by CNRGH

    Rate of patients for whom samples have been qualified in first step by platform and nucleic acids received by CNRGH, within the patients for whom samples have been received by platform

    Measured: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months

  9. The rate of patients with samples received on Platform for whom these samples have been qualified in second step by platform and nucleic acids have been received by CNRGH

    Rate of patients for whom samples have been qualified in second step by platform and nucleic acids received by CNRGH, within the patients for whom samples have been received by platform

    Measured: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months

  10. The rate of patients with samples received on platform for whom these samples have been qualified in first and second step by Platform and nucleic acids have been received by CNRGH

    Rate of patients for whom samples have been qualified in first and second step by platform and nucleic acids received by CNRGH, within the patients for whom samples have been received by platform

    Measured: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months

  11. Delay time to receive all sequencing files from nucleic acids receipt on CNRGH

    The time delay between the date of nucleic acids receipt on CNRGH and the date of receipt of all sequencing files by bioinformatic platform

    Measured: on average of 3 weeks

  12. The rate of patients with nucleic acids received on CNRGH for whom all sequencing files have been qualified by bioinformatics platform

    Rate of patients for whom all sequencing files have been qualified by bioinformatics platform, within the patients for whom samples have been received by CNRGH

    Measured: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months

  13. The rate of patients with nucleic acids received on CNRGH for whom sequencing have been qualified by CNRGH

    Rate of patients for whom sequencing have been qualified by CNRGH, within the patients for whom samples have been received by CNRGH

    Measured: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months

  14. Delay time to receive bioinformatics analysis for interpretation from availability of all sequencing files

    The time delay between the date of receipt of all sequencing files by bioinformatics platform and the date of receipt of bioinformatics analysis by biologist for interpretation

    Measured: on average of 1 week

  15. The rate of patients with sequencing files received by bioinformatic Platform for whom these files have been qualified for analysis

    Rate of patients for whom all sequencing file have been qualified by bioinformatic platform, within the patients for whom all sequencing file have been received by bioinformatic platform

    Measured: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months

  16. The rate of patients with sequencing files received by bioinformatic Platform for whom analysis have been transmitted for interpretation

    Rate of patients for whom bioinformatic analysis have been transmitted for interpretation, within the patients for whom all sequencing file have been received by bioinformatic platform

    Measured: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months

  17. Delay time to send a validated exome sequencing report from availability of bioinformatic analysis

    The time delay between the date of bioinformatic analysis availability for interpretation and the date of dispatch of a validated MTB report to physician

    Measured: on average of 1 week

  18. The rate of patients with bioinformatic analysis available for interpretation for whom biological interpretation has been performed

    Rate of patients for whom bioinformatic analysis has been interpreted by biologist, within the patients for whom bioinformatics analysis have been transmitted

    Measured: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months

  19. The rate of patients with bioinformatic analysis available for interpretation for whom results has been discussed by MTB

    Rate of patients for whom biological report has been discussed by MTB, within the patients for whom bioinformatics analysis have been transmitted

    Measured: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jun 2018
  2. Study start23 May 2017
  3. Primary completion21 Sep 2017
  4. Study completion21 Sep 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03546127
Sponsor's protocol ID
C17-11 MULTIPLI
Acronym
MULTIPLI-0
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
17 May 2018
Last updated
11 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • FGM 2025 Workflow Study Group (Alliance nationale des Sciences de la Vie et de la Sante); Auzanneau C, Bacq D, Bellera C, Blons H, Boland A, Boucheix M, Bourdon A, Chollet E, Chomienne C, Deleuze JF, Delmas C, Dinart D, Esperou H, Geillon F, Geneste D, Italiano A, Jean D, Khalifa E, Laizet Y, Laurent-Puig P, Lethimonnier F, Levy-Marchal C, Lucchesi C, Malle C, Mancini P, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Meyer V, Marie-Ange P, Perkins G, Sellan-Albert S, Soubeyran I, Wallet C. Feasibility of high-throughput sequencing in clinical routine cancer care: lessons from the cancer pilot project of the France Genomic Medicine 2025 plan. ESMO Open. 2020 Jul;5(4):e000744. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000744.

    PubMed 32713836

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Colorectal Carcinoma and Soft Tissue Sarcoma, run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France at 3 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Delay time to send a validated exome sequencing report from sample receipt (time frame: an average of 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03546127, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in