AnesthesiaNCT03547193
Two Neck Ultrasound Measurements as Predictors of Difficult Laryngoscopy
An observational study of Anesthesia and Airway Complication of Anesthesia, run by Università Politecnica delle Marche at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Background: Unpredictable laryngoscopic difficulty remains a dramatic challenge for anaesthesiologists. Ultrasound (US) based airway assessment has been recently proposed as a useful tool in adjunct to clinical methods, but to date few studies are available about the potential role of ultrasound in difficult airway… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia, Airway Complication of Anesthesia, Difficult Intubation
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 5 May 2017to 30 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All the adult patients undergoing to pre-operative evaluation for elective surgery at AOU-University Hospital of Ancona
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients undergoing pre-operative evaluation for elective surgery
Who cannot join
- Predicted difficult intubation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
AOU Ospedali Riuniti Ancona - Università Politecnica delle Marche
Ancona, 60126
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Two Neck Ultrasound Measurements as Predictors of Difficult Laryngoscopy: a Prospective Trial
Background: Unpredictable laryngoscopic difficulty remains a dramatic challenge for anaesthesiologists. Ultrasound (US) based airway assessment has been recently proposed as a useful tool in adjunct to clinical methods, but to date few studies are available about the potential role of ultrasound in difficult airway evaluation.
The aim of this study is to determine the correlation between the sonographic measurements of anterior cervical soft tissues's thickness and Cormack-Lehane grade view at direct laryngoscopy in patients with normal clinical screening tests.
Read more
Design: Prospective, single blinded, observational study. Number of patients: 300 adult patients Methods: All patients are assessed before surgery to evaluate clinical evidence of difficult airways. Simultaneous ultrasound measures of the anterior cervical soft tissues are performed.
At induction of anaesthesia the laryngoscopic view is graded by a different anaesthetist, blinded to the ultrasound assessments.
Statistical analysis:
Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) are used to determine the "difficulty prediction capability" of each sonographic measurement and to assess the optimal cut-off scores To allow for comparisons between "restricted-difficult" airway and "easy" airway groups, a two-sided Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test is employed as appropriate. The results will be averaged (mean ± standard deviation SD) for each parameter for continuous data. Values of p < 0.05 are considered as statistically significant.
Read the detailed description
Unpredictable laryngoscopic difficulty, especially if difficult ventilation occurs, during standard laryngoscopy, remains a dramatic challenge for anaesthesiologists. Accurate airway assessment should always be performed, but the common clinical screening tests have shown low sensitivity and specificity with a limited predictive value. Ultrasound (US) based airway assessment has been recently proposed as a useful, simple, bedside and non-invasive tool in adjunct to clinical methods, but to date few studies are available about the potential role of ultrasound in difficult airway evaluation and these are mostly limited on specific groups of patients.
The aim of this prospective, single blinded, observational study is to determine the correlation between two neck ultrasound measures assessed at the pre-operative visit and Cormack-Lehane grade view at direct laryngoscopy, assessed at the induction of anaesthesia 24 hours later.
METHODS: During the pre-operative visit (24 hours before surgery), clinical screening tests to predict a difficult airway are performed and the anterior cervical soft tissue's thickness is assesses.
The thickness of the anterior cervical soft tissues is measured at two levels, thyro-hyoid membrane (pre-epiglottis space) and vocal cords (laryngeal inlet), using a US probe 10-13-MHz linear transducer placed in the transverse plane with the patient's head in neutral position.
On each level the distance from the skin in the median axis in cm (mDSE = median distance skin to epiglottis; mVC = median distance skin to vocal cords) and the surrounding Area in cm2 (PEA = pre-epiglottis area; AVC = Area pre vocal cords) are measured.
At the induction of anaesthesia the laryngoscopic view is graded by a different anaesthetist blinded to the ultrasound assessments and with more than 5 years of experience with OR activity. For each patient it's considered only the best attempt at direct laryngoscopy obtained after optimizing position, complete muscle relaxation (TOF=0), and, if necessary, external laryngeal manipulation. A decrease of SpO2 < 92% is a criterion for abandoning the procedure and a maximum of three attempts are admitted before declaring intubation failure with direct laryngoscopy. A Cormack-Lehane Grade 1 or 2a are classified as easy laryngoscopy and grade 2b - 3a - 3b or 4 as restricted or difficult laryngoscopy.
STATISTICAL ANALISYS: According to the literature, ultrasound measurements should predict as difficult at least 80% of the intubations that are really difficult (with a C-L ≥ 2b). Since the incidence of difficult intubation is about 5-10% of all intubations 1-3,6, it is necessary to study at least 244 patients in order to obtain statistically significant differences between the two groups accepting an alpha error of 0.05 and a beta error of 0.20.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's test is used to test the normality of distribution. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) is used to determine the "difficulty prediction capability" of each sonographic measurement and to assess the optimal cut-off scores To allow for comparisons between "restricted-difficult" airway and "easy" airway groups, a two-sided Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test are employed as appropriate. The results will be averaged (mean ± standard deviation SD) for each parameter for continuous data. Values of p < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
ETHICS: Ethical approval for this study was provided by Marche's Regional Ethics Committee (CERM), Ancona, ITA (Protocol No. 2016-0405); Chairperson: Prof Marcello D'Errico on 23 March 2017. Informed written consent was obtained. The study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines.
- Keywords
- difficult laringoscopy, difficult airway, airway management
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
median Distance Skin to Epiglottis (mDSE)
The median Distance Skin to Epiglottis, unit of measure cm, is detected using a US linear probe (10-13-MHz) with the transducer placed in the transverse plane and the patient's head in neutral position. It represents the distance from the skin in the median axis and the epiglottis
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jun 2018
- Study start5 May 2017
- Primary completion30 Aug 2017
- Study completion30 Aug 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Università Politecnica delle Marche
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Abele Donati, MD, Università Politecnica delle Marche
- Investigators
- Abele Donati, MD, PhD, Study director, UNIVPM, University of Ancona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03547193
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016-0405
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 12 May 2018
- Last updated
- 6 Jun 2018
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Falcetta S, Cavallo S, Gabbanelli V, Pelaia P, Sorbello M, Zdravkovic I, Donati A. Evaluation of two neck ultrasound measurements as predictors of difficult direct laryngoscopy: A prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;35(8):605-612. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000832.
PubMed 29889671
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jun 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Two Neck Ultrasound Measurements as Predictors of Difficult Laryngoscopy: a Prospective Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03547193
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2016-0405
- Keywords
- difficult laringoscopy, difficult airway, airway management
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Università Politecnica delle MarcheUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Unpredictable laryngoscopic difficulty remains a dramatic challenge for anaesthesiologists. Ultrasound (US) based airway assessment has been recently proposed as a useful tool in adjunct to clinical methods, but to date few studies are available about the potential role of ultrasound in difficult airway evaluation.
The aim of this study is to determine the correlation between the sonographic measurements of anterior cervical soft tissues's thickness and Cormack-Lehane grade view at direct laryngoscopy in patients with normal clinical screening tests.
Design: Prospective, single blinded, observational study. Number of patients: 300 adult patients Methods: All patients are assessed before surgery to evaluate clinical evidence of difficult airways. Simultaneous ultrasound measures of the anterior cervical soft tissues are performed.
At induction of anaesthesia the laryngoscopic view is graded by a different anaesthetist, blinded to the ultrasound assessments.
Statistical analysis:
Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) are used to determine the "difficulty prediction capability" of each sonographic measurement and to assess the optimal cut-off scores To allow for comparisons between "restricted-difficult" airway and "easy" airway groups, a two-sided Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test is employed as appropriate. The results will be averaged (mean ± standard deviation SD) for each parameter for continuous data. Values of p < 0.05 are considered as statistically significant.
Detailed description
Unpredictable laryngoscopic difficulty, especially if difficult ventilation occurs, during standard laryngoscopy, remains a dramatic challenge for anaesthesiologists. Accurate airway assessment should always be performed, but the common clinical screening tests have shown low sensitivity and specificity with a limited predictive value. Ultrasound (US) based airway assessment has been recently proposed as a useful, simple, bedside and non-invasive tool in adjunct to clinical methods, but to date few studies are available about the potential role of ultrasound in difficult airway evaluation and these are mostly limited on specific groups of patients.
The aim of this prospective, single blinded, observational study is to determine the correlation between two neck ultrasound measures assessed at the pre-operative visit and Cormack-Lehane grade view at direct laryngoscopy, assessed at the induction of anaesthesia 24 hours later.
METHODS: During the pre-operative visit (24 hours before surgery), clinical screening tests to predict a difficult airway are performed and the anterior cervical soft tissue's thickness is assesses.
The thickness of the anterior cervical soft tissues is measured at two levels, thyro-hyoid membrane (pre-epiglottis space) and vocal cords (laryngeal inlet), using a US probe 10-13-MHz linear transducer placed in the transverse plane with the patient's head in neutral position.
On each level the distance from the skin in the median axis in cm (mDSE = median distance skin to epiglottis; mVC = median distance skin to vocal cords) and the surrounding Area in cm2 (PEA = pre-epiglottis area; AVC = Area pre vocal cords) are measured.
At the induction of anaesthesia the laryngoscopic view is graded by a different anaesthetist blinded to the ultrasound assessments and with more than 5 years of experience with OR activity. For each patient it's considered only the best attempt at direct laryngoscopy obtained after optimizing position, complete muscle relaxation (TOF=0), and, if necessary, external laryngeal manipulation. A decrease of SpO2 < 92% is a criterion for abandoning the procedure and a maximum of three attempts are admitted before declaring intubation failure with direct laryngoscopy. A Cormack-Lehane Grade 1 or 2a are classified as easy laryngoscopy and grade 2b - 3a - 3b or 4 as restricted or difficult laryngoscopy.
STATISTICAL ANALISYS: According to the literature, ultrasound measurements should predict as difficult at least 80% of the intubations that are really difficult (with a C-L ≥ 2b). Since the incidence of difficult intubation is about 5-10% of all intubations 1-3,6, it is necessary to study at least 244 patients in order to obtain statistically significant differences between the two groups accepting an alpha error of 0.05 and a beta error of 0.20.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's test is used to test the normality of distribution. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) is used to determine the "difficulty prediction capability" of each sonographic measurement and to assess the optimal cut-off scores To allow for comparisons between "restricted-difficult" airway and "easy" airway groups, a two-sided Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test are employed as appropriate. The results will be averaged (mean ± standard deviation SD) for each parameter for continuous data. Values of p < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
ETHICS: Ethical approval for this study was provided by Marche's Regional Ethics Committee (CERM), Ancona, ITA (Protocol No. 2016-0405); Chairperson: Prof Marcello D'Errico on 23 March 2017. Informed written consent was obtained. The study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All the adult patients undergoing to pre-operative evaluation for elective surgery at AOU-University Hospital of Ancona
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult patients undergoing pre-operative evaluation for elective surgery
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Predicted difficult intubation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
median Distance Skin to Epiglottis (mDSE)
Time frame: 24 hours
The median Distance Skin to Epiglottis, unit of measure cm, is detected using a US linear probe (10-13-MHz) with the transducer placed in the transverse plane and the patient's head in neutral position. It represents the distance from the skin in the median axis and the epiglottis
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jun 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29889671Falcetta S, Cavallo S, Gabbanelli V, Pelaia P, Sorbello M, Zdravkovic I, Donati A. Evaluation of two neck ultrasound measurements as predictors of difficult direct laryngoscopy: A prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;35(8):605-612. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000832.
Related trials for Anesthesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"Comparison of Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI), End-Tidal Oxygen, and Time-Based Preoxygenation Targets With Arterial Blood Gas During Preoxygenation
Preoxygenation Adequacy Assessed by Oxygen Reserve Index, End-tidal Oxygen and Arterial Blood Gas
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled SaCo-VLM Trial
General Anaesthesia Using Supraglotic Airway
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Abele Donati, MD, PhD study director
UNIVPM, University of Ancona
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Anesthesia and Airway Complication of Anesthesia, run by Università Politecnica delle Marche at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
median Distance Skin to Epiglottis (mDSE) (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03547193, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2018.