AzTrials
AzTrials

DyspepsiaNCT03548363

Effect of Gingest on Symptoms of Dyspepsia

A study testing Gingest powdered extract obtained from Ginger rhizomes in people with Dyspepsia and Epigastric Fullness, run by Atlantia Food Clinical Trials at 1 site in Ireland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study on the effect of Gingest (ginger root extract) on symptoms of dyspepsia in 150 participants with mild to moderate dyspepsia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Dyspepsia, Epigastric Fullness, Bloating
What is being tested?
Gingest powdered extract obtained from Ginger rhizomes
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteIreland
Study dates
13 Mar 2018to 2 Jan 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy free-living men and women,
  • Be aged 30 to 55 years (inclusive),
  • Be willing to provide informed consent,
  • Subject has upper abdominal pain or discomfort that is an unpleasant sensation, characterized by one or more of the following symptoms: early satiety, postprandial fullness, bloating, and nausea for at least 3 months during last year, without an identifiable underlying structural or biochemical motivation.
  • Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire score 8 to 24 (mild-moderate)
  • Beck's Depression Inventory score between 4 and 15

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy/lactation
  • Subjects with relevant gastroesophageal reflux symptoms (retrosternal pain, burning, or regurgitation.
  • Subjects with clear evidence of irritable bowel syndrome.
  • Subjects under treatment with pharmacological substances that could influence the gastrointestinal system, such as prokinetics, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), cholagogues, protonpump inhibitors, and H2 blockers, were asked to interrupt this treatment for one month before starting the study treatment.
  • Subjects with previous diagnosis of cancer or with previous surgery of the upper gastro gastrointestinal endoscopy were performed in order to exclude the presence of structural or biochemical causes of dyspepsia.
  • Participants are asked to avoid all foods containing ginger within the 14 days prior to study product administration and throughout the study. A list of foods high in ginger will be provided to subjects as a guide and this list will be reviewed at each visit.
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Subject with known allergy to components of the test product
  • Any medical condition deemed exclusionary by the Principal Investigator
  • Subject has a history of drug and / or alcohol abuse at the time of enrolment
  • Change of dietary habit within the preceding month
  • Subject with known organic disease, including an inflammatory bowel disease, a benign or malign tumour of intestine or colon and significant systemic disease
  • Subject currently involved in any other clinical trial or having participated in a trial within the preceding 60 days,
  • Subject has any concurrent medical or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would compromise his/her ability to comply with the study requirements,
  • Current illnesses which could interfere with the study (e.g. prolonged severe diarrhea, regurgitation/severe, difficulty swallowing)
  • Subject has a history of cancer within the last 5 years, except basal cell carcinoma, non-squamous skin carcinoma, prostate cancer or carcinoma in situ with no significant progression over the past 2 years,
  • Subject has a significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, liver, infectious disease, immune disorder, or metabolic/endocrine disorders or other disease that would preclude supplement ingestion and/or assessment of safety and the study objectives,

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ireland1 site
  • Atlantia CRO, Heron House

    Blackpool, Munster, T23R50R

Other trials in Ireland

About this study

Official title: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Gingest on Symptoms of Dyspepsia

This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study on the effect of Gingest (ginger root extract) on symptoms of dyspepsia in 150 participants with mild to moderate dyspepsia.

Read the detailed description

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a chronic disorder of sensation and movement (peristalsis) in the upper digestive tract. A diagnosis of functional dyspepsia is determined when there is no evidence of structural disease and there have been at least three months of one or more of the following (with onset at least six months earlier). Ginger (Zingiber officinale) is traditionally used to treat a number of medical conditions, including those affecting the digestive tract, such as dyspepsia, flatulence, nausea and abdominal pain. Recent human clinical studies have found beneficial effects of ginger extract in patients with dyspepsia and gastric emptying in healthy populations.

The aim of the present study is therefore to investigate if two different doses of Gingest (100mg and 200 mg) reduces intensity of functional dyspepsia (based on a symptom severity questionnaire) compared to placebo (maltodextrin) in 150 subjects with mild to moderate dyspepsia (as determined through the Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire).

Being tested
Gingest powdered extract obtained from Ginger rhizomes, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Dyspepsia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Gingest powdered extract obtained from Ginger rhizomesDietary supplement

    Description: Powdered extract obtained from Ginger rhizomes. Botanical name: Zingiber officinale Roscoe Plant part used: Dried rhyzome Extraction solvent: CO2 Extract Ratio 45-60 / 1 100mg of extract are equivalent to an average of 4400 mg of dry ginger rhizomes

    Composition: Natural extract, Calcium Hydroxide, Polysorbate 80, De-oiled soya lecithin, Calcium silicate

  • PlaceboDietary supplement

    200 mg/d maltodextrin

Study groups in NCT03548363
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Gingest HighActive comparator200 mg/d Gingest (powdered extract obtained from Ginger rhizomes) for 4-weeks
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Gingest powdered extract obtained from Ginger rhizomes
Gingest lowActive comparator100 mg/d Gingest (powdered extract obtained from Ginger rhizomes) + 100 mg maltodextrin for 4-weeks
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Gingest powdered extract obtained from Ginger rhizomes
PlaceboPlacebo comparator200 mg/d maltodextrin for 4-weeks
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intensity of functional dyspepsia symptom score over 4-weeks as measured by subject rating score at week-4

    Overall score indicates the intensity of functional dyspepsia as defined by Subject's rating after four weeks of intervention with Gingest (100mg and 200mgs) versus placebo. The lower the score, the higher the intensity of the dyspeptic symptoms.

    0: Not improved or worsened

    1. Slightly improved
    2. Markedly improved
    3. Completely improved

    Measured: 4-weeks

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Intensity of functional dyspepsia symptoms over 2-weeks as measured by subject rating score

    Overall score indicates the intensity of functional dyspepsia as defined by Subject's rating after two weeks of intervention with Gingest (100mg and 200mgs) versus placebo.

    0: Not improved or worsened

    1. Slightly improved
    2. Markedly improved
    3. Completely improved

    Measured: 2-weeks

  2. Severity of dyspeptic symptoms as measured by subject severity score measured at week-4.

    Overall severity of specific suite of dyspeptic symptoms (including epigastric fullness, bloating, early satiety, nausea, vomiting epigastric pain) Absence of symptoms =0 Mild Symptoms = 1 Moderate Symptoms = 2 Severe symptoms = 3

    Measured: 4-weeks

  3. Participant Global Assessment as measured by Participant Global Assessment Score at week-4

    Participant Global Assessment Short Form 36 assesses the overall general mental and physical health. Answers are combined to produce the following.

    Physical function score= a higher score means better health Role limitation due to physical health Score: a lower score means better health Role limitations due to emotional problems Score: a lower score means better health Energy/ fatigue Score: a lower score means better health Emotional well-being Score: a higher score means better health Social Functioning Score: a higher score means better health Pain Score: a lower score means better health General health Score: a higher score means better health

    Measured: 4 weeks

  4. Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire as measured by total score at week-4

    Overall score is calculated from subject rating for frequency and severity responses for each symptom of dyspepsia.

    a summed total score of the frequency and severity responses for each symptom( Indigestion, heartburn, regurgitation, nausea combined) range: 0-32). 0= least severe.32= most severe each symptom = indigestion, regurgitation, heartburn and nausea a summed score of the frequency responses for each symptom (range: 0-16); a summed score of the severity responses for each symptom (range: 0-16); a categorized score of the single most frequent symptom (range: 0-4) and a categorized score of the single most severe symptom (range: 0-4).

    Measured: 4 weeks

  5. Profile of Mood States Questionnaire (POMS) as measured by score at week-4.

    Overall score assess changes in mood Not at all= 0 little = 1 Moderately = 2 Quite a lot = 3 Extremely = 4 Answers are combined. Higher the score for negative feelings i.e. tense the worse the mood. Higher the score for positive feelings i.e. Energetic the better the mood.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  6. Beck's Depression Inventory as measured by score at week-4.

    Overall score indicates severity of depressive symptoms

    1-10 = These ups and downs are considered normal 11-16__ Mild mood disturbance 17-20__Borderline clinical depression 21-30_Moderate depression 31-40_Severe depression over 40__________________Extreme depression

    Measured: 4 weeks

  7. Cortisol awakening response (nmol/L) at week-4.

    Measures salivary cortisol (nmol/L)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  8. Reduction in medication to manage number of episodes requiring medication for dyspeptic symptoms as measured at week-4

    Number of times medication is taken to manage dyspeptic symptoms

    Measured: 4 weeks

  9. Safety as assessed by adverse events and serious adverse events ongoing throughout the trial

    Number of adverse events and serious adverse events

    Measured: 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jun 2018
  2. Study start13 Mar 2018
  3. Primary completion2 Jan 2019
  4. Study completion2 Jan 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-week parallel intervention in subjects with mild to moderate Dyspepsia (as defined by the Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire) in 3-treatment arms: 1.) 100 mg/d Gingest; 2.) 200 mg/d Gingest; 3.) Placebo (maltodextrin)
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
150 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03548363
Sponsor's protocol ID
AFCRO 085
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
11 Apr 2018
Last updated
10 Jan 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: All data will remain proprietary and will only be shared with Naturex (commercial partner) and contract statisticians.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Gingest powdered extract obtained from Ginger rhizomes in people with Dyspepsia and Epigastric Fullness, run by Atlantia Food Clinical Trials at 1 site in Ireland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intensity of functional dyspepsia symptom score over 4-weeks as measured by subject rating score at week-4 (time frame: 4-weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in