AzTrials
AzTrials

Urothelial CarcinomaIDENTIFYNCT03548688

Investigation and Detection of Urological Neoplasia in Patients Referred With Suspected Urinary Tract Cancer:

An observational study of Urothelial Carcinoma, run by British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Bladder cancer is common in the UK and can kill. A common sign of bladder cancer is blood in the urine (haematuria). GPs will refer to a specialist (Urologist) for further investigation of haematuria if they suspect cancer. Hospitals often have a 'blanket' approach for investigating patients with haematuria. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Urothelial Carcinoma
How many people
11,059 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
14 Dec 2017to 1 Jan 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients referred to secondary care for further investigation of suspected urinary tract cancer

Who may be able to join

  • Any patient referred with haematuria (visible and non-visible) undergoing cystoscopy
  • Any patient referred without haematuria undergoing cystoscopy for the purpose of ruling out urothelial cancer suspected due to other symptoms (e.g. lower urinary tract symptoms, recurrent urinary tract symptoms, dysuria)

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a previous or known diagnosis of primary upper or lower urinary tract urothelial cancers (renal, ureteric, bladder, prostate, urethral and penile cancers)
  • Patients with suspected recurrence of upper or lower urinary tract primary urothelial cancer (renal, ureteric, bladder, prostate, urethra and penile cancers)
  • Patients undergoing flexible cystoscopy for a reason unrelated to ruling out urinary tract urothelial cancer

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • BURST

    London

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Investigation and Detection of Urological Neoplasia in Patients Referred With Suspected Urinary Tract Cancer: A Multicentre Analysis

Bladder cancer is common in the UK and can kill. A common sign of bladder cancer is blood in the urine (haematuria).

GPs will refer to a specialist (Urologist) for further investigation of haematuria if they suspect cancer.

Hospitals often have a 'blanket' approach for investigating patients with haematuria. IDENTIFY will collect data on patients having these tests across the UK and internationally, looking at any trends with an aim to create a personalised diagnostic approach for each patient. The data will give patients the ability to make informed decisions, as well as reducing unnecessary and potentially harmful tests.

Read the detailed description

IDENTIFY aims to be the largest contemporary study providing data on the utility of the current diagnostic pathway for bladder and upper urinary tract cancer in patients presenting with haematuria.

It also aims to provide a contemporary evaluation of current urological practices and assessment of the prevalence of urinary tract cancers (bladder cancer, upper tract cancer, renal cancer) in patients with haematuria. This will allow us to recommend changes in cancer diagnosis pathways that may reduce the number of invasive procedures, reduce waste of resources and optimize use of the most appropriate tests. This will mean resources are spent effectively, allowing for early diagnosis and faster treatment pathways.

An evaluation of the patient factors that predict urinary tract cancer, particularly high-risk disease, may allow clinicians to better recognise groups of patients that will benefit from invasive investigations and are more likely to benefit from prompt diagnosis and treatment. Upper tract urinary cancer is quite rare and difficult to diagnose. It requires a large patient cohort such as the IDENTIFY study in order to recognise associations with the diagnosis of this disease and optimize the way we diagnose it.

Shared-decision making is extremely important in patients presenting with haematuria and the outcomes of IDENTIFY will allow a more personalized approach to the diagnosis of urinary tract cancer. For example, rather than a blanket approach in which all patients undergo flexible cystoscopy and one or more imaging tests, we will generate data that could offer patients information on the likelihood of a flexible cystoscopy or other test finding cancer for them, given their personal characteristics.

IDENTIFY results are also hoped to help inform national and international guidelines on referral for haematuria.

Keywords
Bladder Cancer, Haematuria, Collaborative study
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Hematuria

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Prevalence

    Determine the prevalence of urological cancers in patients presenting to secondary care with suspected urinary tract cancer

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Specific prevalence

    Determine the difference in prevalence of urological cancer in those undergoing flexible cystoscopy with visible haematuria, non-visible haematuria and without haematuria

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Diagnostic strategies

    Describe the current practices in urothelial cancer diagnosis across a range of different healthcare settings in secondary care (district general vs university teaching hospital) with regards to percentage of ultrasound, CT and other imaging modality used for visible and non visible haematuria.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Diagnostic performance of imaging

    Determine the diagnostic performance of US, CT, urine cytology and flexible cystoscopy in patients presenting with haematuria in the diagnosis of bladder cancer, using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value.

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Associated factors

    Perform a multivariable analysis to determine factors associated with the diagnosis of bladder cancer and upper urinary tract cancer in patients presenting with haematuria

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jun 2018
  2. Study start14 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completion14 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
11,059 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03548688
Sponsor's protocol ID
IDENTIFY
Other IDs
ABC UK 2017/18, TUF Grant 2017
Acronym
IDENTIFY
Status last verified
Nov 2021
First submitted
28 Apr 2018
Last updated
11 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Country specific data to be given to each country

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Urothelial Carcinoma, run by British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Prevalence (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in