AzTrials
AzTrials

Phosphopyruvate HydrataseNCT03551223

Neural Damage and Anesthetic Treatment in the Preeclamptic Parturient; a Prospective Observational Study.

An observational study of Phosphopyruvate Hydratase, run by Rabin Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Objectives: Our primary objective is to evaluate the effect of anesthetic method (general versus regional anesthesia) on neural outcomes in the preeclamptic population undergoing cesarean delivery. Secondary outcome is to examine the fetal cerebral outcomes associated with the anesthetic method. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Phosphopyruvate Hydratase
What is being tested?
Neuron specific enolase (NSE)
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
1 Aug 2018to 1 Jun 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • Women only
  • Adult

Study population: Fifty preeclamptic parturients aged 18 and above, undergoing cesarean delivery under SA or GA, will be included in the study. This study is a purely observational study, it will not have any clinical intervention nor will it interfere with standard cesarean delivery protocols in any way.

Who may be able to join

  • Fifty preeclamptic parturients age 18 and above presenting for cesarean delivery under SA or GA, with ability to comply with study requirements will be enrolled in the study.

Who cannot join

  • The following parturients will be excluded:
  • Parturients under age 18
  • Parturients undergoing a vaginal delivery.
  • Parturients unable to sign an informed consent forum.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Beilinson hospital

    Petach Tikvah

    Sharon Orbach, MD, 972-54-538-3093, sharonorbach@yahoo.com

    Sharon Orbach-zinger

    Recruiting

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Official title: Neural Damage and Anesthetic Treatment in the Preeclamptic Parturient; a Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Objectives: Our primary objective is to evaluate the effect of anesthetic method (general versus regional anesthesia) on neural outcomes in the preeclamptic population undergoing cesarean delivery. Secondary outcome is to examine the fetal cerebral outcomes associated with the anesthetic method.

Methodology: This prospective, observational study, will include 50 preeclamptic parturients undergoing cesarean section under general and regional anesthesia.

Read more

Neuron specific enolase and S100B Protein are neuronal injury biomarkers. Increased levels of these biomarkers in serum indicate neuron damage. Following enrollment venous blood will be drawn from the participants and assessed for NSE and S100B serum levels at the following points; Upon hospital admission and one day postpartum. Furthermore in order to evaluate fetal outcomes upon fetal delivery, umbilical cord blood will be examined for NSE and S100B.

Study significance: While spinal anesthesia is the preferred anesthetic method for the preeclamptic parturient undergoing cesarean delivery, it remains uncertain which anesthetic method is neuroprotective.

This study will be the first study, to our knowledge, to examine the effect of anesthetic method on neuronal outcomes for a parturient with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean delivery, by the use of noninvasive cerebral biomarkers.

Read the detailed description

Scientific background:

Preeclampsia is an idiopathic maternal, multi organ, specific pregnancy disorder, associated with significant maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Preeclampsia complicates approximately 2-8% of all pregnancies. The disorder is characterized by new-onset of hypertension and proteinuria developing after gestational week 20. While the pathogenesis of the disease remains not completely understood, a possible explanation is endothelial cell dysfunction in which placenta-derived mediators causes multisystem organ dysfunction .

Preeclampsia increases the risk for acute cerebrovascular complications such as intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral edema and eclampsia. Treatment with magnesium sulfate reduces the risk for seizures and treatment with antihypertensive therapy reduces the risk for a stroke , however the only effective treatment for the syndrome is prompt delivery of the fetus .

When considering the optimal anesthetic method for a preeclamptic parturient undergoing cesarean delivery, neuraxial anesthetic techniques, when feasible, are strongly preferred to general anesthesia (GA) . Spinal anesthesia (SA) is favored over general anesthesia since it is associated with increased benefits and reduced risks compared with general anesthesia. Increased benefits of SA include higher patient satisfaction, decreased pain and favorable neonatal outcomes. GA has been associated with increased risk for aspiration, unstable hemodynamics and difficult airway management . In addition GA has been shown to increase the risk for a stroke in women with preeclampsia . Nevertheless GA is sometime used in the preeclamptic parturient due to maternal or fetal indications with an incidence as high as 44% in some European countries .

Accumulative evidence from animal studies indicate that general anesthetic agents are neurotoxic and can induce subsequent behavioral abnormalities in the developmental mind . However the fetal and pediatric implications remain inconclusive. In a population-based birth cohort study fetal exposure to general anesthesia during cesarean delivery was not associated with increased risk for learning disabilities compared to delivering vaginally . In contrast in a population-based birth cohort study conducted in Taiwan the incidence of autism was increased in neonates who were delivered by cesarean delivery under general anesthesia compared with regional anesthesia .

Despite experts favoring neuraxial anesthesia for the preeclamptic population, to date research remains inconclusive regarding which anesthetic method is neuroprotective.

In recent years numerous biochemical tests have become usual clinical cerebral damage biomarkers, amongst them is the Neuron specific enolase (NSE). The NSE is an intracytoplasmic glycolytic enzyme enolase . The enzyme is expressed in neurons and neuroendocrine tissue . Increased levels of NSE are released into the blood circulation according to the death rate of those cells . Elevated levels of NSE have been observed after severe head trauma and in association to postoperative cognitive dysfunction .

S100B Protein, an additional neuronal injury biomarker, is an acidic calcium-binding protein, and physiological serum levels of S100B protein are low . The protein is found primarily in astrocytes and Schwann cells and has both intracellular and extracellular targets.

Elevated serum and CSF levels of S100B indicate neural damage . Research evaluating cerebral damage biomarkers in parturients with preeclampsia has found increased levels of neuronal injury biomarkers compared with healthy parturients . Furthermore increased plasma levels of S100B have been correlated with neurological symptoms in the form of visual disturbances . Lisa et al demonstrated persistent increased levels of NSE up to one year postpartum .

Additionally, various studies have examined the correlation between cerebral biomarkers levels in umbilical cord blood, amniotic fluid and fetal pathological conditions: intra uterine fetal death, preterm delivery, cerebral palsy and preeclampsia . Tskitishvili, et al showed increased levels of cerebral injury damage in amniotic fluid of parturients with preeclampsia .

In this study we aim to evaluate the effect of anesthetic method on neural outcomes in the preeclamptic population undergoing cesarean delivery.

Specific Aims:

Our primary objective is to examine which anesthetic method (GA versus RA) is associated with reduced neural damage as measured by NSE and S100B serum levels in preeclamptic parturients undergoing cesarean delivery.

Our secondary objective is to examine the effect of anesthetic method on fetal cerebral outcomes as measured by NSE and S100B umbilical cord blood levels in parturients with preeclampsia.

Study Design:

This is a prospective, single center, observational trial to assess the effect of anesthetic method on cerebral outcomes. The study will be conducted at the Rabin Medical Center (Beilinson Campus), Petach Tikva, Israel, a tertiary university hospital.

Fifty preeclamptic parturients aged 18 and above, undergoing cesarean delivery under SA or GA, will be included in the study.

This study is a purely observational study, it will not have any clinical intervention nor will it interfere with standard cesarean delivery protocols in any way. Inclusion criteria Fifty preeclamptic parturients age 18 and above presenting for cesarean delivery under SA or GA, with ability to comply with study requirements will be enrolled in the study.

Exclusion criteria

The following parturients will be excluded:

  1. Parturients under age 18
  2. Parturients undergoing a vaginal delivery.
  3. Parturients unable to sign an informed consent forum.

Study enrollment:

All preeclamptic parturients will be recruited upon admission to the women's emergency room. All participating patients will undergo an informed consent process, which will include a through explanation of the study design and patient requirements, by the study investigator. Following which patients will be requested to sign the informed consent document.

Index procedure:

Following obtaining approval from parturients 5 cc of venous blood will be drawn from each of the participants and will be examined for NSE and S100B serum levels at the following time points:

  1. Upon hospital admission following obtaining informed consent approval.
  2. Upon fetal delivery, umbilical cord blood will be examined for NSE and S100B.
  3. 1 day postpartum. The blood samples will be collected in heparin containing tubes, the samples will be kept in room temperature for no longer than an hour before being sent to the laboratory for centrifugation. Following centrifugation the samples will be frozen at -70 °C until levels of NSE and S100B can be analyzed. Plasma levels will be tested to detect NSE and S100B levels using commercially available kits (Liasion Sangtec 100) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

Intraoperative anesthetic technique will be administered at anesthesiologists' discretion. The study cohort will be divided into two groups: women undergoing cesarean delivery under general anesthesia, and women undergoing cesarean delivery under regional-spinal anesthesia.

NSE and S100B levels will be compared for both groups in order to evaluate which anesthetic method is associated with reduced neuronal injury Additionally, umbilical cord blood NSE and S100B levels will be compared for both groups, in order to assess the fetal outcomes of each anesthetic method.

Data collection:

For each participant the following additional data will be collected and documented:

  1. Demographic data obstetric age, weight, height,
  2. Obstetric data; gravidity and parity, obstetric history comorbidities, regular medication and preeclampsia management protocols and more.
  3. Anesthetic and analgesic data: type of anesthesia / analgesia, anesthetic drug solution, anesthetic drug doses, vasopressor treatment, hemodynamic data, and other anesthetic data.
Being tested
Neuron specific enolase (NSE)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Neuron specific enolase (NSE)Biological

    Also called S100B Protein

    5 cc of venous blood will be drawn from all of the participants and be examined for NSE and S100 B serum levels in order to evaluate evaluate which anesthetic method (general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia) is associated with reduced neuronal injury in a preeclamptic parturients undergoing a cesarean section.

Study groups in NCT03551223
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Women undergoing cesarean delivery with general anesthesiaPreeclamptic parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under general anesthesia
Receives: Biological: Neuron specific enolase (NSE)
Women undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthPreeclamptic parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under regional-spinal anesthesia
Receives: Biological: Neuron specific enolase (NSE)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. NSE serum levels

    Maternal serum NSE levels after delivery in both study groups

    Measured: 1 Day postpartum

  2. S100 B protein

    Maternal serum S100B levels after delivery in both study groups. Maternal serum NSE levels after delivery in both study groups

    Measured: 1 Day postpartum

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Fetal serum NSE levels

    Umbilical cord serum NSE levels

    Measured: At delivery

  2. Fetal serum S100b levels

    Umbilical cord serum S100b levels

    Measured: At delivery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jun 2018
  2. Study start1 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03551223
Sponsor's protocol ID
0504-17
Status last verified
Jun 2019
First submitted
28 May 2018
Last updated
8 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Bergman L, Akerud H. Plasma Levels of the Cerebral Biomarker, Neuron-Specific Enolase, are Elevated During Pregnancy in Women Developing Preeclampsia. Reprod Sci. 2016 Mar;23(3):395-400. doi: 10.1177/1933719115604732. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

    PubMed 26355117
  • US Preventive Services Task Force; Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Barry MJ, Davidson KW, Doubeni CA, Epling JW Jr, Kemper AR, Krist AH, Kurth AE, Landefeld CS, Mangione CM, Phillips WR, Phipps MG, Silverstein M, Simon MA, Tseng CW. Screening for Preeclampsia: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2017 Apr 25;317(16):1661-1667. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3439.

    PubMed 28444286
  • Clark VA, Sharwood-Smith GH, Stewart AV. Ephedrine requirements are reduced during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in preeclampsia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005 Jan;14(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.08.002.

    PubMed 15627532
  • Henke VG, Bateman BT, Leffert LR. Focused review: spinal anesthesia in severe preeclampsia. Anesth Analg. 2013 Sep;117(3):686-693. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829eeef5. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

    PubMed 23868886
  • Tskitishvili E, Komoto Y, Temma-Asano K, Hayashi S, Kinugasa Y, Tsubouchi H, Song M, Kanagawa T, Shimoya K, Murata Y. S100B protein expression in the amnion and amniotic fluid in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia. Mol Hum Reprod. 2006 Dec;12(12):755-61. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gal083. Epub 2006 Oct 5.

    PubMed 17023485
  • Huang CJ, Fan YC, Tsai PS. Differential impacts of modes of anaesthesia on the risk of stroke among preeclamptic women who undergo Caesarean delivery: a population-based study. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;105(6):818-26. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq266. Epub 2010 Oct 6.

    PubMed 20926478
  • Pant M, Fong R, Scavone B. Prevention of peri-induction hypertension in preeclamptic patients: a focused review. Anesth Analg. 2014 Dec;119(6):1350-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000424.

    PubMed 25405694
  • De Tina A, Palanisamy A. General Anesthesia During the Third Trimester: Any Link to Neurocognitive Outcomes? Anesthesiol Clin. 2017 Mar;35(1):69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

    PubMed 28131121
  • Graham MR. Clinical update regarding general anesthesia-associated neurotoxicity in infants and children. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Dec;30(6):682-687. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000520.

    PubMed 28915132
  • Sprung J, Flick RP, Wilder RT, Katusic SK, Pike TL, Dingli M, Gleich SJ, Schroeder DR, Barbaresi WJ, Hanson AC, Warner DO. Anesthesia for cesarean delivery and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort. Anesthesiology. 2009 Aug;111(2):302-10. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181adf481.

    PubMed 19602960
  • Chien LN, Lin HC, Shao YH, Chiou ST, Chiou HY. Risk of autism associated with general anesthesia during cesarean delivery: a population-based birth-cohort analysis. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Apr;45(4):932-42. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2247-y.

    PubMed 25256350
  • Lee A, Kim SH, Hong JY, Hwang JH. Effect of anesthetic methods on cerebral oxygen saturation in elderly surgical patients: prospective, randomized, observational study. World J Surg. 2012 Oct;36(10):2328-34. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1676-z.

    PubMed 22736340
  • Hoppenstein D, Zohar E, Ramaty E, Shabat S, Fredman B. The effects of general vs spinal anesthesia on frontal cerebral oxygen saturation in geriatric patients undergoing emergency surgical fixation of the neck of femur. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Sep;17(6):431-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.09.013.

    PubMed 16171663
  • Hirose N, Kondo Y, Maeda T, Suzuki T, Yoshino A. Relationship between regional cerebral blood volume and oxygenation and blood pressure during spinal anesthesia in women undergoing cesarean section. J Anesth. 2016 Aug;30(4):603-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2165-6. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

    PubMed 27011334
  • Sun S, Liu NH, Huang SQ. Role of cerebral oxygenation for prediction of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for caesarean section. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Aug;30(4):417-21. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9733-4. Epub 2015 Jul 18.

    PubMed 26186992

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Phosphopyruvate Hydratase, run by Rabin Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

NSE serum levels (time frame: 1 Day postpartum). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03551223, which also lists 24 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in