Critical Limb IschemiaPhase 3SAVALNCT03551496
The DES BTK Vascular Stent System vs PTA in Subjects With Critical Limb Ischemia
A Phase 3 study testing Drug Eluting Stent - Below the Knee in people with Critical Limb Ischemia, run by Boston Scientific Corporation at 42 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
Single phased global, prospective, multicenter clinical trial designed to demonstrate a superior patency rate and acceptable safety in below the knee arteries with lesions treated with the DES BTK Vascular Stent System vs. percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- What is being tested?
- Drug Eluting Stent - Below the Knee
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 201 participants
- Where
- 42 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- 31 Aug 2018to 20 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject is 18 years or older and has signed and dated the trial informed consent form (ICF)
- Subject is willing and able to comply with the trial testing, procedures and follow-up schedule
- Subject has chronic, symptomatic lower limb ischemia, determined by Rutherford categories 4 or 5 in the target limb, with wound(s) confined to toes/forefoot
- Subject is a male or non-pregnant female. If female of child-bearing potential, and if sexually active must be using, or agree to use, a medically-acceptable method of birth control as confirmed by the investigator
- Intra-procedure Inclusion Criteria:
- Stenotic, restenotic or occlusive target lesion(s) located in the tibioperoneal trunk, anterior tibial, posterior tibial and/or peroneal artery(ies).
Show all 16Show fewer
- Target lesion(s) must be at least 4cm above the ankle joint
- A single target lesion per vessel, in up to 2 vessels, in a single limb
- Degree of stenosis ≥ 70% by visual angiographic assessment
- Reference vessel diameter is between 2.5 - 3.25mm for phase A RCT
- Total target lesion length (or series of lesion segments) to be treated is ≤ 70 mm for phase A RCT prior to the data monitoring committee's approval for stent overlap. (Note: Lesion segment(s) must be fully covered with one DES BTK stent, if randomized to stent)
- Total target lesion length (or series of lesion segments) to be treated is ≤ 140 mm for phase A RCT after the data monitoring committee's approval for stent overlap (Note: Lesion segment(s) must be fully covered with up to two DES BTK stents, if randomized to stent)
- Target vessel(s) reconstitute(s) at or above the stenting limit zone (4cm above the ankle joint)
- Target lesion(s) is located in an area that may be stented without blocking access to patent main branches
- Treatment of all above the knee inflow lesion(s) is successful prior to treatment of the target lesion
- Guidewire has successfully crossed the target lesion(s)
Who cannot join
- Life expectancy ≤ 1year
- Stroke ≤ 90 days prior to the procedure date
- Prior or planned major amputation in the target limb
- Previous surgery in the target vessel(s) (including prior ipsilateral crural bypass)
- Previously implanted stent in the target vessel(s)
- Failed PTA of target lesion/vessel ≤ 60 days prior to the procedure date
Show all 28Show fewer
- Renal failure as measured by a GFR ≤ 30ml/min per 1.73m2, measured ≤ 30 days prior to the procedure date
- Subject has a platelet count ≤ 50 or ≥ 600 X 103/µL ≤ 30 days prior to the procedure date
- NYHA class IV heart failure
- Subject has symptomatic coronary artery disease (ie, unstable angina)
- History of myocardial infarction or thrombolysis ≤ 90 days prior to the procedure date
- Non-atherosclerotic disease resulting in occlusion (eg, embolism, Buerger's disease, vasculitis)
- Subject is currently taking Canagliflozin
- Body Mass Index (BMI) <18
- Active septicemia or bacteremia
- Coagulation disorder, including hypercoagulability
- Contraindication to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
- Known allergies to stent or stent components
- Known allergy to contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-medicated prior to the interventional procedure
- Known hypersensitivity to heparin
- Subject is on a high dose of steroids or is on immunosuppressive therapy
- Subject is currently participating, or plans to participate in, another investigational trial that may confound the results of this trial (unless written approval is received from the Boston Scientific study team)
- Intra-procedure Exclusion Criteria
- Angiographic evidence of intra-arterial acute/subacute thrombus or presence of atheroembolism
- Treatment required in > 2 target vessels (Note: a target lesion originating in one vessel and extending into another vessel is considered 1 target vessel)
- Treatment requires the use of alternate therapy in the target vessel(s)/lesion(s), (eg, atherectomy, cutting balloon, re-entry devices, laser, radiation therapy)
- Aneurysm is present in the target vessel(s)
- Extremely calcified lesions
Trial locations and contacts
42 sites in 5 countries.
42 sites in 5 countries
United States26 sites
New Mexico Heart Institute, PA
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Heart Hospital of Austin
Austin, Texas, 78756
Willis Knighton Bossier Medical Center - Grace Research, LLC
Bossier City, Louisiana, 71111
Bradenton Cardiology
Bradenton, Florida, 34205
Amputation Prevention Center of North Carolina
Cary, North Carolina, 27518
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
OhioHealth Research and Innovation Institute - Riverside Methodist Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Colorado VA
Denver, Colorado, 80220
Saint Vincent Consultants in Cardiovascular Diseases at St. Vincent Hospital
Erie, Pennsylvania, 16544
Advanced Cardiac & Vascular Centers for Amputation Prevention
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49525
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Cardiovascular Institute of the South Clinical Research Corporation
Houma, Louisiana, 70360
Jackson-Madison County General Hospital
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
St. Bernards Medical Center
Jonesboro, Arkansas, 72401
Arkansas Heart Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72211
Texas Tech University Health
Lubbock, Texas, 79430
New York University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029
Integris Baptist Medical Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
THR Presbyterian Plano
Plano, Texas, 75093
NC Heart and Vascular Research, LLC
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Wake Medical Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27610
United Heart and Vascular Clinic
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Holy Name Medical Center
Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666
Japan8 sites
Kansai Rosai Hospital
Amagasaki, Hyōgo, 660-8511
Asahikawa Medical University Hospital
Asahikawa-shi, Hokkaido, 078-8510
Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Medical Hospital
Bunkyō-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8510
Nara Medical University Hospital
Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522
Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital
Kishiwada, Osaka, 596-8522
Kokura Memorial Hospital
Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 802-8555
Toho University Ohashi Medical Center
Meguro City, Tokyo, 153-8515
Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center
Urayasu-shi, Chiba, 279-0001
France4 sites
CHU Nantes
Nantes, 44000
Hopital Paris Saint Joseph
Paris, 75014
Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou
Paris, 75015
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, 31076
Belgium3 sites
AZ Sint-Blasius
Dendermonde, 9200
ZOL Genk (Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg)
Genk, 3600
UZ Gent (Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent)
Ghent, 9000
Netherlands1 site
HAGA Ziekenhuis (Haga Ziekenhuis van Den Haag)
The Hague, 2566
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Trial Comparing the Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) Below-the-Knee (BTK) Vascular Stent System (DES BTK Vascular Stent System) vs Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) Treating Infrapopliteal Lesions in Subjects With Critical Limb Ischemia
Single phased global, prospective, multicenter clinical trial designed to demonstrate a superior patency rate and acceptable safety in below the knee arteries with lesions treated with the DES BTK Vascular Stent System vs. percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).
Read the detailed description
A global, prospective, multicenter, 2:1 randomized trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the DES BTK Vascular Stent System compared to standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to treat infrapopliteal artery lesions in subjects with critical limb ischemia(CLI).
Approximately 201 subjects will be randomized/enrolled to support a 2:1 randomization.
- Conditions
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- Being tested
- Drug Eluting Stent - Below the Knee, Standard PTA Control Arm
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Drug Eluting Stent - Below the KneeCombination product
Treatment arm with DES-BTK, starting with one size of the device - 3.5 mm X 80 mm
Standard PTA Control ArmDevice
The PTA device used must be market-released in the investigational center's geography and the size (ie, diameter, balloon length and catheter length) will be determined by the investigator.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| DES BTK | Experimental | Treatment with DES BTK Receives: Combination Product: Drug Eluting Stent - Below the Knee |
| Conventional PTA | Active comparator | Treatment with standard PTA Receives: Device: Standard PTA Control Arm |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Primary Patency
Twelve-Month Primary Patency defined as a binary endpoint to be determined via duplex ultrasound (DUS) measuring flow at the 12-month follow-up visit, in the absence of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or bypass of the target lesion. Data table consists of the number of participants with flow as assessed by DUS.
Measured: 12 months
Number of Participants Free From Major Adverse Events (MAE)
The primary safety endpoint assesses freedom from major adverse events (MAE) at 12 months post-procedure. (MAE is defined as: above ankle amputation in index limb; major re-intervention; and perioperative (30 day) mortality)
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jun 2018
- Study start31 Aug 2018
- Primary completion21 Apr 2022
- Study completion20 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Critical Limb IschemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boston Scientific CorporationThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Approximately 201 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion for phase A RCT. Randomizations will be stratified by investigational center and lesion length with 2 subjects receiving the DES BTK for every 1 subject receiving treatment with standard PTA.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 201 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jihad Mustapha, MD, Principal investigator, Advanced Cardiac & Vascular Centers for Amputation PreventionHendrik van Overhagen, MD, Principal investigator, HAGA Ziekenhuis (HagaZiekenhuis van Den Haag)Patrick Geraghty, MD, Principal investigator, Washington University School of MedicineMasato Nakamura, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center - Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03551496
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S2348
- Acronym
- SAVAL
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 15 May 2018
- Last updated
- 1 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kolte D, Kennedy KF, Shishehbor MH, Abbott JD, Khera S, Soukas P, Mamdani ST, Hyder ON, Drachman DE, Aronow HD. Thirty-Day Readmissions After Endovascular or Surgical Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia: Analysis of the 2013 to 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Databases. Circulation. 2017 Jul 11;136(2):167-176. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027625. Epub 2017 May 2.
PubMed 28465288Conte MS, Geraghty PJ, Bradbury AW, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Moneta GL, Nehler MR, Powell RJ, Sidawy AN. Suggested objective performance goals and clinical trial design for evaluating catheter-based treatment of critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Dec;50(6):1462-73.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.09.044. Epub 2009 Nov 7.
PubMed 19897335Scheinert D, Katsanos K, Zeller T, Koppensteiner R, Commeau P, Bosiers M, Krankenberg H, Baumgartner I, Siablis D, Lammer J, Van Ransbeeck M, Qureshi AC, Stoll HP; ACHILLES Investigators. A prospective randomized multicenter comparison of balloon angioplasty and infrapopliteal stenting with the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ischemic peripheral arterial disease: 1-year results from the ACHILLES trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 4;60(22):2290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.989.
PubMed 23194941Spreen MI, Martens JM, Hansen BE, Knippenberg B, Verhey E, van Dijk LC, de Vries JP, Vos JA, de Borst GJ, Vonken EJ, Wever JJ, Statius van Eps RG, Mali WP, van Overhagen H. Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Drug-Eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Critical Limb Ischemia (PADI) Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb;9(2):e002376. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002376.
PubMed 26861113Kinlay S. Management of Critical Limb Ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb;9(2):e001946. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.001946.
PubMed 26858079Elsayed S, Clavijo LC. Critical limb ischemia. Cardiol Clin. 2015 Feb;33(1):37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2014.09.008.
PubMed 25439329Conte MS. Critical appraisal of surgical revascularization for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2 Suppl):8S-13S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.114.
PubMed 23336860Gray BH, Diaz-Sandoval LJ, Dieter RS, Jaff MR, White CJ; Peripheral Vascular Disease Committee for the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. SCAI expert consensus statement for infrapopliteal arterial intervention appropriate use. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct 1;84(4):539-45. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25395. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
PubMed 25045160Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, Bell J, Bradbury AW, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG, Gillepsie I, Ruckley CV, Raab G, Storkey H; BASIL trial participants. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 Dec 3;366(9501):1925-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67704-5.
PubMed 16325694Popplewell MA, Davies HOB, Narayanswami J, Renton M, Sharp A, Bate G, Patel S, Deeks J, Bradbury AW. A Comparison of Outcomes in Patients with Infrapopliteal Disease Randomised to Vein Bypass or Plain Balloon Angioplasty in the Bypass vs. Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) Trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Aug;54(2):195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
PubMed 28602580Sadaghianloo N, Jean-Baptiste E, Declemy S, Mousnier A, Brizzi S, Hassen-Khodja R. Percutaneous angioplasty of long tibial occlusions in critical limb ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Oct;27(7):894-903. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.02.008.
PubMed 23993107Bosiers M, Scheinert D, Peeters P, Torsello G, Zeller T, Deloose K, Schmidt A, Tessarek J, Vinck E, Schwartz LB. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in patients with critical limb ischemia and infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb;55(2):390-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.099. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
PubMed 22169682Spreen MI, Martens JM, Knippenberg B, van Dijk LC, de Vries JPM, Vos JA, de Borst GJ, Vonken EPA, Bijlstra OD, Wever JJ, Statius van Eps RG, Mali WPTM, van Overhagen H. Long-Term Follow-up of the PADI Trial: Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Critical Limb Ischemia. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Apr 14;6(4):e004877. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004877.
PubMed 28411244de Weger VA, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH. Cellular and clinical pharmacology of the taxanes docetaxel and paclitaxel--a review. Anticancer Drugs. 2014 May;25(5):488-94. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000093.
PubMed 24637579Ng VG, Mena C, Pietras C, Lansky AJ. Local delivery of paclitaxel in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Clin Invest. 2015 Mar;45(3):333-45. doi: 10.1111/eci.12407. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
PubMed 25615282
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Trial Comparing the Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) Below-the-Knee (BTK) Vascular Stent System (DES BTK Vascular Stent System) vs Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) Treating Infrapopliteal Lesions in Subjects With Critical Limb Ischemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03551496
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SAVAL / S2348
- Conditions
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 201 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Scientific CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 14 Aug 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Single phased global, prospective, multicenter clinical trial designed to demonstrate a superior patency rate and acceptable safety in below the knee arteries with lesions treated with the DES BTK Vascular Stent System vs. percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).
Detailed description
A global, prospective, multicenter, 2:1 randomized trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the DES BTK Vascular Stent System compared to standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to treat infrapopliteal artery lesions in subjects with critical limb ischemia(CLI).
Approximately 201 subjects will be randomized/enrolled to support a 2:1 randomization.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Approximately 201 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion for phase A RCT. Randomizations will be stratified by investigational center and lesion length with 2 subjects receiving the DES BTK for every 1 subject receiving treatment with standard PTA.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| DES BTK | Experimental | Combination Product: Drug Eluting Stent - Below the KneeTreatment with DES BTK |
| Conventional PTA | Active comparator | Device: Standard PTA Control ArmTreatment with standard PTA |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Subject is 18 years or older and has signed and dated the trial informed consent form (ICF)
- Subject is willing and able to comply with the trial testing, procedures and follow-up schedule
- Subject has chronic, symptomatic lower limb ischemia, determined by Rutherford categories 4 or 5 in the target limb, with wound(s) confined to toes/forefoot
- Subject is a male or non-pregnant female. If female of child-bearing potential, and if sexually active must be using, or agree to use, a medically-acceptable method of birth control as confirmed by the investigator
- Stenotic, restenotic or occlusive target lesion(s) located in the tibioperoneal trunk, anterior tibial, posterior tibial and/or peroneal artery(ies).
Key exclusion criteria (28 listed)
- Life expectancy ≤ 1year
- Stroke ≤ 90 days prior to the procedure date
- Prior or planned major amputation in the target limb
- Previous surgery in the target vessel(s) (including prior ipsilateral crural bypass)
- Previously implanted stent in the target vessel(s)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Drug Eluting Stent - Below the KneeTreatment arm with DES-BTK, starting with one size of the device - 3.5 mm X 80 mm | Combination product | DES BTK |
| Standard PTA Control ArmThe PTA device used must be market-released in the investigational center's geography and the size (ie, diameter, balloon length and catheter length) will be determined by the investigator. | Device | Conventional PTA |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Primary Patency
Time frame: 12 months
Twelve-Month Primary Patency defined as a binary endpoint to be determined via duplex ultrasound (DUS) measuring flow at the 12-month follow-up visit, in the absence of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or bypass of the target lesion. Data table consists of the number of participants with flow as assessed by DUS.
Number of Participants Free From Major Adverse Events (MAE)
Time frame: 12 months
The primary safety endpoint assesses freedom from major adverse events (MAE) at 12 months post-procedure. (MAE is defined as: above ankle amputation in index limb; major re-intervention; and perioperative (30 day) mortality)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jul 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 28465288Kolte D, Kennedy KF, Shishehbor MH, Abbott JD, Khera S, Soukas P, Mamdani ST, Hyder ON, Drachman DE, Aronow HD. Thirty-Day Readmissions After Endovascular or Surgical Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia: Analysis of the 2013 to 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Databases. Circulation. 2017 Jul 11;136(2):167-176. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027625. Epub 2017 May 2.
- Background: PubMed 19897335Conte MS, Geraghty PJ, Bradbury AW, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Moneta GL, Nehler MR, Powell RJ, Sidawy AN. Suggested objective performance goals and clinical trial design for evaluating catheter-based treatment of critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Dec;50(6):1462-73.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.09.044. Epub 2009 Nov 7.
- Background: PubMed 23194941Scheinert D, Katsanos K, Zeller T, Koppensteiner R, Commeau P, Bosiers M, Krankenberg H, Baumgartner I, Siablis D, Lammer J, Van Ransbeeck M, Qureshi AC, Stoll HP; ACHILLES Investigators. A prospective randomized multicenter comparison of balloon angioplasty and infrapopliteal stenting with the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ischemic peripheral arterial disease: 1-year results from the ACHILLES trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 4;60(22):2290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.989.
- Background: PubMed 26861113Spreen MI, Martens JM, Hansen BE, Knippenberg B, Verhey E, van Dijk LC, de Vries JP, Vos JA, de Borst GJ, Vonken EJ, Wever JJ, Statius van Eps RG, Mali WP, van Overhagen H. Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Drug-Eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Critical Limb Ischemia (PADI) Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb;9(2):e002376. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002376.
- Background: PubMed 26858079Kinlay S. Management of Critical Limb Ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb;9(2):e001946. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.001946.
- Background: PubMed 25439329Elsayed S, Clavijo LC. Critical limb ischemia. Cardiol Clin. 2015 Feb;33(1):37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2014.09.008.
- Background: PubMed 23336860Conte MS. Critical appraisal of surgical revascularization for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2 Suppl):8S-13S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.114.
- Background: PubMed 25045160Gray BH, Diaz-Sandoval LJ, Dieter RS, Jaff MR, White CJ; Peripheral Vascular Disease Committee for the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. SCAI expert consensus statement for infrapopliteal arterial intervention appropriate use. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct 1;84(4):539-45. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25395. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
- Background: PubMed 16325694Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, Bell J, Bradbury AW, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG, Gillepsie I, Ruckley CV, Raab G, Storkey H; BASIL trial participants. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 Dec 3;366(9501):1925-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67704-5.
- Background: PubMed 28602580Popplewell MA, Davies HOB, Narayanswami J, Renton M, Sharp A, Bate G, Patel S, Deeks J, Bradbury AW. A Comparison of Outcomes in Patients with Infrapopliteal Disease Randomised to Vein Bypass or Plain Balloon Angioplasty in the Bypass vs. Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) Trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Aug;54(2):195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
- Background: PubMed 23993107Sadaghianloo N, Jean-Baptiste E, Declemy S, Mousnier A, Brizzi S, Hassen-Khodja R. Percutaneous angioplasty of long tibial occlusions in critical limb ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Oct;27(7):894-903. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.02.008.
- Background: PubMed 22169682Bosiers M, Scheinert D, Peeters P, Torsello G, Zeller T, Deloose K, Schmidt A, Tessarek J, Vinck E, Schwartz LB. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in patients with critical limb ischemia and infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb;55(2):390-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.099. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Critical Limb Ischemia
RecruitingObservational study
miRNAs in Critical Limb Ischemia (miRNACLI)
Critical Limb Ischemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Laser Atherectomy and Sirolimus-eluting Balloon Angioplasty for CLTI
Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia
Recruiting
Radiotracer-Based Perfusion Imaging of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus
RecruitingObservational study
Vessel Recoil in Specific CLTI Populations
Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia
Not yet recruiting
DCB Outcomes After Non-Compliant Balloon Vessel Preparation With or Without Scoring in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease
Femoropopliteal Disease, Drug Coated Balloon
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jihad Mustapha, MD principal investigator
Advanced Cardiac & Vascular Centers for Amputation Prevention
Hendrik van Overhagen, MD principal investigator
HAGA Ziekenhuis (HagaZiekenhuis van Den Haag)
Patrick Geraghty, MD principal investigator
Washington University School of Medicine
42 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Drug Eluting Stent - Below the Knee in people with Critical Limb Ischemia, run by Boston Scientific Corporation at 42 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 28 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 42 sites in United States, Japan, France, Belgium, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Aug 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Primary Patency (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03551496, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2024.