Frenulum; Hypertrophy, LipNCT03552809
Clinical Evaluation of Postoperative Healing After Conventional And Laser Assisted Frenectomy Operations
A study testing Gigaa Cheese 810 nm Diode Laser and Conventional Frenectomy Operation in people with Frenulum; Hypertrophy, Lip, run by Marmara University.
Trial summary
The aim of this randomized controlled parallel-designed study was to evaluate clinical healing and patient comfort after conventional and diode laser assisted frenectomy operations in case of high papillary frenulum attachment. Forty-eight patients with high papillary frenulum attachments were included in the study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Frenulum; Hypertrophy, Lip
- What is being tested?
- Gigaa Cheese 810 nm Diode Laser and Conventional Frenectomy Operation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2016to Oct 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Systemically healthy, nonsmoker, aged between 18 and 65, high papillary frenulum attachment diagnosed according to Mirko et al (Mirko et al, 1974), not received any periodontal treatment within the last 3 months, presence of at least central, lateral incisors and canines at the upper jaw, and consent to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- Any systemic disease that might interfere with the prognosis of periodontal disease (i.e., diabetes mellitus, HIV infection), smoking, antibiotics, anti-inflammatory drugs or any other medication taken within the last 6 months that might affect the outcome of the study, any physical limitations or restrictions that might preclude normal oral hygiene procedures.
About this study
The aim of this randomized controlled parallel-designed study was to evaluate clinical healing and patient comfort after conventional and diode laser assisted frenectomy operations in case of high papillary frenulum attachment. Forty-eight patients with high papillary frenulum attachments were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into three groups; conventional frenectomy operation (Group C), frenectomy operation using diode laser (Group L) and diode laser asissted frenectomy with horizontal incision on the periosteum (Group L+P). Postoperative pain, difficulty in speaking and eating scores were assessed postoperative 3 hours and 1, 7, 14, 21 and 45 days using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Evaluation of epithelialization of the wound surface was carried out via hydrogen peroxide to the surface using a dental injector at postoperative 7, 14, 21 and 45 days. Plaque index, gingival index, bleeding on probing and probing depth were assessed at baseline and postoperative 7, 14, 21 and 45 days. All data were compared between groups and within each group.
- Conditions
- Frenulum; Hypertrophy, Lip
- Being tested
- Gigaa Cheese 810 nm Diode Laser, Conventional Frenectomy Operation
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertrophy, Lymphoid Interstitial Pneumonia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gigaa Cheese 810 nm Diode LaserDevice
Diode Laser assisted frenectomy operation.
Conventional Frenectomy OperationProcedure or surgery
Frenectomy operation performed by surgical blades with suturing.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Frenectomy | Active comparator | For the conventional surgery, after application of local infiltration anesthesia of articaine HCL associated with epinephrine 1:100,000, the frenulum was grasped with a straight haemostat inserted into the depth of the vestibule; the tissue adjacent to the upper and lower surfaces of the haemostat was incised with a no.15 scalpel. After the diamond shaped resected portion of the frenulum was removed with the haemostat, muscle dilatations were excised on the submucosa of the lateral walls of the cavity. Horizontal incision was made on the periosteum with the help of a scalpel following the procedure. At the end of the operation, the wound was closed with absorbable sutures (4-0, Pegelak®, Doğsan Turkey). Receives: Procedure: Conventional Frenectomy Operation |
| Diode Laser Frenectomy | Experimental | For the laser frenectomy, a diode laser device (λ = 810 nm, W: 4, GIGA Cheese II, China) was used to perform the procedure. The procedure was performed under local infiltration anesthesia with articaine HCL associated with epinephrine 1:100,000. The frenlum was held by a haemostat inserted into the depth of the vestibule while laser energy was applied to the upper and lower parts of the frenulum adjacent to the haemostat via a fibre tip (400 µm diameter, plain-ended, optical fibre). The laser was carefully applied to the tissue and care was taken to avoid local necrosis of the periosteum or any bone structure.Following the bleeding control, the wound site was left to secondary healing. No sutures were necessary after procedure. Receives: Device: Gigaa Cheese 810 nm Diode Laser |
| Laser Frenectomy with Incision | Experimental | For the laser frenectomy, a diode laser device (λ = 810 nm, W: 4, GIGA Cheese II, China) was used to perform the procedure. The procedure was performed under local infiltration anesthesia with articaine HCL associated with epinephrine 1:100,000. The frenulum was held by a haemostat inserted into the depth of the vestibule while laser energy was applied to the upper and lower parts of the frenulum adjacent to the haemostat via a fibre tip (400 µm diameter, plain-ended, optical fibre). The laser was carefully applied to the tissue and care was taken to avoid local necrosis of the periosteum. Horizontal incision was made on the periosteum with the help of a scalpel, additionally. No sutures were necessary after procedure. Receives: Device: Gigaa Cheese 810 nm Diode Laser |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative Pain Change
Postoperative pain during eating and speaking will be evaluate via visual analog scale (VAS).Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain, discomfort during speaking and chewing. VAS consisted of a horizontal line with a range of numbers from '0' to '10' of which '0' means 'no pain' and '10' means unbearable pain.
Measured: Postoperative pain, difficulty during speaking and eating scores were assessed on postoperative 3 hours and 1, 7, 14, 21 and 45 days.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2018
- Study startSep 2016
- Primary completionOct 2017
- Study completionOct 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Frenulum; Hypertrophy, LipStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Marmara UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Marmara University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03552809
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Cetinkaya et al.
- Status last verified
- Jun 2018
- First submitted
- 31 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2018
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Evaluation of Postoperative Healing After Conventional And Laser Assisted Frenectomy Operations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03552809
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Cetinkaya et al.
- Conditions
- Frenulum; Hypertrophy, Lip
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Marmara UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this randomized controlled parallel-designed study was to evaluate clinical healing and patient comfort after conventional and diode laser assisted frenectomy operations in case of high papillary frenulum attachment. Forty-eight patients with high papillary frenulum attachments were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into three groups; conventional frenectomy operation (Group C), frenectomy operation using diode laser (Group L) and diode laser asissted frenectomy with horizontal incision on the periosteum (Group L+P). Postoperative pain, difficulty in speaking and eating scores were assessed postoperative 3 hours and 1, 7, 14, 21 and 45 days using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Evaluation of epithelialization of the wound surface was carried out via hydrogen peroxide to the surface using a dental injector at postoperative 7, 14, 21 and 45 days. Plaque index, gingival index, bleeding on probing and probing depth were assessed at baseline and postoperative 7, 14, 21 and 45 days. All data were compared between groups and within each group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Frenectomy | Active comparator | Procedure: Conventional Frenectomy OperationFor the conventional surgery, after application of local infiltration anesthesia of articaine HCL associated with epinephrine 1:100,000, the frenulum was grasped with a straight haemostat inserted into the depth of the vestibule; the tissue adjacent to the upper and lower surfaces of the haemostat was incised with a no.15 scalpel. After the diamond shaped resected portion of the frenulum was removed with the haemostat, muscle dilatations were excised on the submucosa of the lateral walls of the cavity. Horizontal incision was made on the periosteum with the help of a scalpel following the procedure. At the end of the operation, the wound was closed with absorbable sutures (4-0, Pegelak®, Doğsan Turkey). |
| Diode Laser Frenectomy | Experimental | Device: Gigaa Cheese 810 nm Diode LaserFor the laser frenectomy, a diode laser device (λ = 810 nm, W: 4, GIGA Cheese II, China) was used to perform the procedure. The procedure was performed under local infiltration anesthesia with articaine HCL associated with epinephrine 1:100,000. The frenlum was held by a haemostat inserted into the depth of the vestibule while laser energy was applied to the upper and lower parts of the frenulum adjacent to the haemostat via a fibre tip (400 µm diameter, plain-ended, optical fibre). The laser was carefully applied to the tissue and care was taken to avoid local necrosis of the periosteum or any bone structure.Following the bleeding control, the wound site was left to secondary healing. No sutures were necessary after procedure. |
| Laser Frenectomy with Incision | Experimental | Device: Gigaa Cheese 810 nm Diode LaserFor the laser frenectomy, a diode laser device (λ = 810 nm, W: 4, GIGA Cheese II, China) was used to perform the procedure. The procedure was performed under local infiltration anesthesia with articaine HCL associated with epinephrine 1:100,000. The frenulum was held by a haemostat inserted into the depth of the vestibule while laser energy was applied to the upper and lower parts of the frenulum adjacent to the haemostat via a fibre tip (400 µm diameter, plain-ended, optical fibre). The laser was carefully applied to the tissue and care was taken to avoid local necrosis of the periosteum. Horizontal incision was made on the periosteum with the help of a scalpel, additionally. No sutures were necessary after procedure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Systemically healthy, nonsmoker, aged between 18 and 65, high papillary frenulum attachment diagnosed according to Mirko et al (Mirko et al, 1974), not received any periodontal treatment within the last 3 months, presence of at least central, lateral incisors and canines at the upper jaw, and consent to participate in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Any systemic disease that might interfere with the prognosis of periodontal disease (i.e., diabetes mellitus, HIV infection), smoking, antibiotics, anti-inflammatory drugs or any other medication taken within the last 6 months that might affect the outcome of the study, any physical limitations or restrictions that might preclude normal oral hygiene procedures.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gigaa Cheese 810 nm Diode LaserDiode Laser assisted frenectomy operation. | Device | Diode Laser Frenectomy, Laser Frenectomy with Incision |
| Conventional Frenectomy OperationFrenectomy operation performed by surgical blades with suturing. | Procedure or surgery | Conventional Frenectomy |
Primary outcome
Postoperative Pain Change
Time frame: Postoperative pain, difficulty during speaking and eating scores were assessed on postoperative 3 hours and 1, 7, 14, 21 and 45 days.
Postoperative pain during eating and speaking will be evaluate via visual analog scale (VAS).Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain, discomfort during speaking and chewing. VAS consisted of a horizontal line with a range of numbers from '0' to '10' of which '0' means 'no pain' and '10' means unbearable pain.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2018.
Related trials for Frenulum; Hypertrophy, Lip
Not yet recruiting
970-nm Diode Laser Versus Liquid Nitrogen Cryotherapy in Maxillary Labial Frenectomy
Maxillary Labial Frenulum Abnormality, Hypertrophic Maxillary Labial Frenulum
Not yet recruiting
Diode Laser Versus Conventional Frenectomy in Children
Frenulum; Hypertrophy, Diode Laser
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Gigaa Cheese 810 nm Diode Laser and Conventional Frenectomy Operation in people with Frenulum; Hypertrophy, Lip, run by Marmara University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative Pain Change (time frame: Postoperative pain, difficulty during speaking and eating scores were assessed on postoperative 3 hours and 1, 7, 14, 21 and 45 days.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2018.