Orthodontic Tooth MovementGCFNCT03555747
Gingival Crevicular Fluid Cytokine Levels in Response to Orthodontic Forces
A study testing Canine distalization in people with Orthodontic Tooth Movement, run by Aydin Adnan Menderes University.
Trial summary
The aim of this randomized split-mouth study was to quantify simultaneously 30 analytes including cytokines, chemokines and growth factors in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) in response to different magnitudes of forces during maxillary canine distalization. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 11 to 16 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Orthodontic Tooth Movement
- What is being tested?
- Canine distalization
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 May 2015to 30 Sep 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 11 to 16 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Systemically healthy
- Non-smoker
- Orthodontic patients with class II division I malocclusion
Who cannot join
- Orthodontic treatment history
- Use of anti-inflammatory drugs within one month
- Use of antibiotics within last three months
About this study
Official title: Molecular Analysis of Gingival Crevicular Fluid in Response to the Magnitude of Orthodontic Force: a Longitudinal Randomized Split-mouth Study
The aim of this randomized split-mouth study was to quantify simultaneously 30 analytes including cytokines, chemokines and growth factors in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) in response to different magnitudes of forces during maxillary canine distalization. The upper right and left canines were distalized using a continuous force of 75 g or 150 g in 15 individuals who had Class II division I malocclusion requiring bilateral extraction of maxillary first premolars. GCF samples were obtained from the tension and the pressure side of each canine at appliance placement and after force application at 24 hours and 28 days. A multiplexed bead immunoassay was used to quantify 30 analytes simultaneously. The effect of force, side and time on the analyte levels were analyzed with Brunner-Langer method.
Read the detailed description
Patient selection:
Fifteen orthodontic patients with class II division I malocclusion, who required the extractions of maxillary first premolars bilaterally, distal canine movement, and maximum anchorage control as a part of fixed orthodontic treatment plan were invited to participate in the study. All subjects were in good general health with clinically and radiological healthy periodontal tissues (the probing depths ≤3 mm, full-mouth plaque and bleeding score ≤15%, and no bone loss radiographically). Patients were excluded if they were smokers, had had previous orthodontic treatment, had taken a course of anti-inflammatory drugs within 1 month and antimicrobial agents in the previous 3 months prior to the start of the study.
Experimental Design:
The first premolars were extracted at least 20 days prior to the distalization of the canines. Ten days prior to the application of orthodontic force all subjects underwent full-mouth scaling and oral hygiene instructions to ensure optimal plaque control and oral hygiene instruction was reinforced throughout the whole study period. In each patient, two mini-screw implants (1.5 mm in diameter and 8.0 mm in length) were placed bilaterally into the inter-radicular bone between the maxillary second premolar and first molar in the attached gingiva.The upper right and left canines of the same patient were randomly distalized using a continuous force of 75 or 150 g with nickel-titanium closed coil springs. Simple randomization by flipping a coin was used to determine the assignment of each site for two different forces.
GCF sampling:
GCF was sampled from the mesial (tension) and distal (pressure) sides of maxillary right and left canines immediately before appliance placement (baseline) and after force application at 24 hours and 28 days without any reactivation of the coil spring. Baseline measurements of maxillary canines served as a control.
Clinical Periodontal Measurements:
Periodontal clinical parameters including probing depth, clinical attachment loss, gingival index and plaque index were recorded at mesial and distal sites of distally moved canines at baseline and 24 hours and 28 days after force application. All clinical periodontal examinations were performed by a single calibrated periodontist who blinded to the groups using a manual periodontal probe.
Multiplex assay\& Quantification of inflammatory mediators:
A commercially available multiplex panel including thirty proteins was used to evaluate GCF content on the Luminex®200 platform.
Determination of the amount of tooth movement:
The distance of maxillary canine movement was measured from the cusp tip of a distally moved canine to the buccal groove of the first permanent molar by using a digital caliper with a sensitivity of ±0.01 mm.
Statistical Analysis:
The data was analysed using a statistical software package. The effect of force, side and time on the analyte levels were analyzed with Brunner-Langer method.
- Conditions
- Orthodontic Tooth Movement
- Being tested
- Canine distalization
- Keywords
- Canine distalization, Gingival crevicular fluid, Cytokines, Orthodontic force, Periodontium, Gingivitis
- Medical subject headings
- Gingivitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Canine distalizationOther
Also called Gingival crevicular fluid collection
GCF was sampled from the mesial (tension) and distal (pressure) sides of maxillary right and left canines immediately before appliance placement (baseline) and after force application (24 hours and 28 days)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Canine distalization by 75 g force | Other | Canine was distalized using a continuous force of 75 g with nickel-titanium closed coil springs. Receives: Other: Canine distalization |
| Canine distalization by 150 g force | Other | Canine was distalized using a continuous force of 150 g with nickel-titanium closed coil springs. Receives: Other: Canine distalization |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gingival crevicular fluid protein content change
pg/ml
Measured: Change from baseline to 24 hours and to 28 days after force application
Secondary outcomes (3)
Probing pocket depth change
mm
Measured: Change from baseline to 24 hours and to 28 days after force application
Clinical attachment level change
mm
Measured: Change from baseline to 24 hours and to 28 days after force application
The amount of tooth movement
mm
Measured: Change from baseline to 28 days after force application
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jun 2018
- Study start1 May 2015
- Primary completion29 May 2015
- Study completion30 Sep 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Orthodontic Tooth MovementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aydin Adnan Menderes University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ege University, Karolinska Institutet
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Beral Afacan, Aydin Adnan Menderes University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03555747
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- bafacan09
- Acronym
- GCF
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 19 May 2018
- Last updated
- 14 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Afacan B, Ozturk VO, Gecgelen Cesur M, Kose T, Bostanci N. Effect of orthodontic force magnitude on cytokine networks in gingival crevicular fluid: a longitudinal randomized split-mouth study. Eur J Orthod. 2019 Mar 29;41(2):214-222. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy068.
PubMed 30321318
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Molecular Analysis of Gingival Crevicular Fluid in Response to the Magnitude of Orthodontic Force: a Longitudinal Randomized Split-mouth Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03555747
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GCF / bafacan09
- Conditions
- Orthodontic Tooth Movement
- Keywords
- Canine distalization, Gingival crevicular fluid, Cytokines, Orthodontic force, Periodontium, Gingivitis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ege University, Karolinska Institutet
- Study start
- 1 May 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this randomized split-mouth study was to quantify simultaneously 30 analytes including cytokines, chemokines and growth factors in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) in response to different magnitudes of forces during maxillary canine distalization. The upper right and left canines were distalized using a continuous force of 75 g or 150 g in 15 individuals who had Class II division I malocclusion requiring bilateral extraction of maxillary first premolars. GCF samples were obtained from the tension and the pressure side of each canine at appliance placement and after force application at 24 hours and 28 days. A multiplexed bead immunoassay was used to quantify 30 analytes simultaneously. The effect of force, side and time on the analyte levels were analyzed with Brunner-Langer method.
Detailed description
Patient selection:
Fifteen orthodontic patients with class II division I malocclusion, who required the extractions of maxillary first premolars bilaterally, distal canine movement, and maximum anchorage control as a part of fixed orthodontic treatment plan were invited to participate in the study. All subjects were in good general health with clinically and radiological healthy periodontal tissues (the probing depths ≤3 mm, full-mouth plaque and bleeding score ≤15%, and no bone loss radiographically). Patients were excluded if they were smokers, had had previous orthodontic treatment, had taken a course of anti-inflammatory drugs within 1 month and antimicrobial agents in the previous 3 months prior to the start of the study.
Experimental Design:
The first premolars were extracted at least 20 days prior to the distalization of the canines. Ten days prior to the application of orthodontic force all subjects underwent full-mouth scaling and oral hygiene instructions to ensure optimal plaque control and oral hygiene instruction was reinforced throughout the whole study period. In each patient, two mini-screw implants (1.5 mm in diameter and 8.0 mm in length) were placed bilaterally into the inter-radicular bone between the maxillary second premolar and first molar in the attached gingiva.The upper right and left canines of the same patient were randomly distalized using a continuous force of 75 or 150 g with nickel-titanium closed coil springs. Simple randomization by flipping a coin was used to determine the assignment of each site for two different forces.
GCF sampling:
GCF was sampled from the mesial (tension) and distal (pressure) sides of maxillary right and left canines immediately before appliance placement (baseline) and after force application at 24 hours and 28 days without any reactivation of the coil spring. Baseline measurements of maxillary canines served as a control.
Clinical Periodontal Measurements:
Periodontal clinical parameters including probing depth, clinical attachment loss, gingival index and plaque index were recorded at mesial and distal sites of distally moved canines at baseline and 24 hours and 28 days after force application. All clinical periodontal examinations were performed by a single calibrated periodontist who blinded to the groups using a manual periodontal probe.
Multiplex assay\& Quantification of inflammatory mediators:
A commercially available multiplex panel including thirty proteins was used to evaluate GCF content on the Luminex®200 platform.
Determination of the amount of tooth movement:
The distance of maxillary canine movement was measured from the cusp tip of a distally moved canine to the buccal groove of the first permanent molar by using a digital caliper with a sensitivity of ±0.01 mm.
Statistical Analysis:
The data was analysed using a statistical software package. The effect of force, side and time on the analyte levels were analyzed with Brunner-Langer method.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Canine distalization by 75 g force | Other | Other: Canine distalizationCanine was distalized using a continuous force of 75 g with nickel-titanium closed coil springs. |
| Canine distalization by 150 g force | Other | Other: Canine distalizationCanine was distalized using a continuous force of 150 g with nickel-titanium closed coil springs. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 11 to 16 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Systemically healthy
- Non-smoker
- Orthodontic patients with class II division I malocclusion
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Orthodontic treatment history
- Use of anti-inflammatory drugs within one month
- Use of antibiotics within last three months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Canine distalizationAlso: Gingival crevicular fluid collectionGCF was sampled from the mesial (tension) and distal (pressure) sides of maxillary right and left canines immediately before appliance placement (baseline) and after force application (24 hours and 28 days) | Other | Canine distalization by 150 g force, Canine distalization by 75 g force |
Primary outcome
Gingival crevicular fluid protein content change
Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 hours and to 28 days after force application
pg/ml
3 secondary outcomes
Probing pocket depth change
Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 hours and to 28 days after force application
Clinical attachment level change
Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 hours and to 28 days after force application
The amount of tooth movement
Time frame: Change from baseline to 28 days after force application
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jan 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30321318Afacan B, Ozturk VO, Gecgelen Cesur M, Kose T, Bostanci N. Effect of orthodontic force magnitude on cytokine networks in gingival crevicular fluid: a longitudinal randomized split-mouth study. Eur J Orthod. 2019 Mar 29;41(2):214-222. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy068.
Related trials for Orthodontic Tooth Movement
Enrolling by invitation
Discision as Acceleration Method in Canine Retraction in Orthodontics With Aligner and Fixed Appliances in Young Adults a Split Mouth Study
Bimaxillary Protrusion, Class II Div 1 Malocclusion
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Various Acceleration Techniques on En-masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth
Accelerate Tooth Movement
Active, not recruiting
Treatment of the Mandibular Dental Crowding With and Without Corticotomy Surgery
Dental Research, Orthodontics
Recruiting
Assessment of the Locally Administrated Vitamin D3 and Corticision Efficacy on Orthodontic Canine Retraction
Malocclusions, Canine Retraction
Enrolling by invitation
Evaluation of Corticotomy-Assisted Canine Retraction Rate
Malocclusion, Corticotomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Canine distalization in people with Orthodontic Tooth Movement, run by Aydin Adnan Menderes University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gingival crevicular fluid protein content change (time frame: Change from baseline to 24 hours and to 28 days after force application). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03555747, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jan 2020.